World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Social Sciences and Humanities

D-Index
47
Citations
17252
World Ranking
3272
National Ranking
1578

Mark S. Mizruchi publication distribution in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Mark S. Mizruchi sits on this spectrum.

44–53 publications: 28 scientists 54–63 publications: 61 scientists 64–73 publications: 161 scientists 74–83 publications: 225 scientists 84–93 publications: 301 scientists 94–103 publications: 390 scientists 104–113 publications: 406 scientists 114–123 publications: 474 scientists 124–133 publications: 453 scientists 134–143 publications: 434 scientists 144–153 publications: 407 scientists 154–163 publications: 411 scientists 164–173 publications: 391 scientists 174–183 publications: 313 scientists 184–193 publications: 319 scientists 194–203 publications: 304 scientists 204–213 publications: 285 scientists 214–223 publications: 246 scientists 224–233 publications: 213 scientists 234–243 publications: 170 scientists 244–253 publications: 167 scientists 254–263 publications: 162 scientists 264–273 publications: 138 scientists 274–283 publications: 138 scientists 284–293 publications: 113 scientists 294–303 publications: 106 scientists 304–313 publications: 95 scientists 314–323 publications: 101 scientists 324–333 publications: 81 scientists 334–343 publications: 69 scientists 344–353 publications: 56 scientists 354–363 publications: 36 scientists 364–373 publications: 42 scientists 374–383 publications: 41 scientists 384–393 publications: 44 scientists 394–403 publications: 27 scientists 404–413 publications: 30 scientists 414–423 publications: 20 scientists 424–433 publications: 29 scientists 434–443 publications: 29 scientists 444–453 publications: 25 scientists 454–463 publications: 19 scientists 464–473 publications: 21 scientists 474–483 publications: 11 scientists 484–493 publications: 17 scientists 494–503 publications: 7 scientists 504–513 publications: 6 scientists 514–523 publications: 12 scientists 524–533 publications: 10 scientists 534–543 publications: 7 scientists 544–553 publications: 6 scientists 554–563 publications: 12 scientists 564–569 publications: 8 scientists 570+ publications: 100 scientists
44 publications 570+

This scientist: 140 publications — 36th percentile

36% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more.

Mark S. Mizruchi D-index placement in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Mark S. Mizruchi sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 177 scientists 31 D-Index: 210 scientists 32 D-Index: 222 scientists 33 D-Index: 188 scientists 34 D-Index: 181 scientists 35 D-Index: 243 scientists 36 D-Index: 261 scientists 37 D-Index: 272 scientists 38 D-Index: 278 scientists 39 D-Index: 300 scientists 40 D-Index: 297 scientists 41 D-Index: 308 scientists 42 D-Index: 313 scientists 43 D-Index: 300 scientists 44 D-Index: 269 scientists 45 D-Index: 260 scientists 46 D-Index: 228 scientists 47 D-Index: 251 scientists 48 D-Index: 203 scientists 49 D-Index: 186 scientists 50 D-Index: 187 scientists 51 D-Index: 166 scientists 52 D-Index: 138 scientists 53 D-Index: 141 scientists 54 D-Index: 131 scientists 55 D-Index: 137 scientists 56 D-Index: 109 scientists 57 D-Index: 129 scientists 58 D-Index: 95 scientists 59 D-Index: 105 scientists 60 D-Index: 106 scientists 61 D-Index: 86 scientists 62 D-Index: 94 scientists 63 D-Index: 77 scientists 64 D-Index: 79 scientists 65 D-Index: 59 scientists 66 D-Index: 68 scientists 67 D-Index: 51 scientists 68 D-Index: 49 scientists 69 D-Index: 40 scientists 70 D-Index: 43 scientists 71 D-Index: 40 scientists 72 D-Index: 50 scientists 73 D-Index: 46 scientists 74 D-Index: 43 scientists 75 D-Index: 45 scientists 76 D-Index: 45 scientists 77 D-Index: 30 scientists 78 D-Index: 25 scientists 79 D-Index: 31 scientists 80 D-Index: 29 scientists 81 D-Index: 18 scientists 82 D-Index: 21 scientists 83 D-Index: 26 scientists 84 D-Index: 15 scientists 85 D-Index: 15 scientists 86 D-Index: 19 scientists 87 D-Index: 19 scientists 88 D-Index: 12 scientists 89 D-Index: 7 scientists 90 D-Index: 19 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 13 scientists 93 D-Index: 9 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 8 scientists 96 D-Index: 7 scientists 97 D-Index: 6 scientists 98 D-Index: 6 scientists 99 D-Index: 6 scientists 100+ D-Index: 97 scientists
30 D-Index 100+

This scientist: 47 D-Index — 59th percentile

59% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2011 - Fellow of John Simon Guggenheim Memorial Foundation

Overview

Mark S. Mizruchi is affiliated with the University of Michigan-Ann Arbor in the United States. Their research spans primarily within the social sciences, with significant contributions related to business, management, and accounting. The scientist's work explores subfields including sociology and political science, political science and international relations, strategy and management, history and philosophy of science, and organizational behavior and human resource management.

The main research focus covers topics such as elite sociology and global capitalism, social and cultural dynamics, political influence and corporate strategies, social policy and reform studies, gender diversity and inequality, entrepreneurship studies and influences, and innovation and knowledge management.

Recent scholarly publications by Mark S. Mizruchi include:

  • Elite Fragmentation in the United States: Global or Domestic Phenomenon? (2025) in American Behavioral Scientist
  • The power of fragmented elites: the role of inadvertent robust action (2025) in Theory and Society
  • Social Class in Organizations: Entrance, Promotion, and Organizational and Societal Consequences of the Corporate Elite (2021) in Journal of Management Inquiry
  • The reconstitution of broken interfirm relations (2021) in Long Range Planning
  • Book Review Essay: Capitalism, Socialism, or Social Democracy? (2021) in Administrative Science Quarterly

Frequent coauthors collaborating with Mark S. Mizruchi include Jennifer J. Kish-Gephart, Donald Palmer, Michael Useem, Johan S. G. Chu, and Michelle K. Lee.

The scholar often publishes in venues such as:

  • Theory and Society
  • Administrative Science Quarterly
  • Academy of Management Proceedings
  • Journal of Management Inquiry
  • Long Range Planning

Mark S. Mizruchi was recognized as a Fellow of the John Simon Guggenheim Memorial Foundation in 2011.

Best Publications

  • What Do Interlocks Do? An Analysis, Critique, and Assessment of Research on Interlocking Directorates

    Mark S. Mizruchi

  • The Social Construction of Organizational Knowledge: A Study of the Uses of Coercive, Mimetic, and Normative Isomorphism:

    Mark S. Mizruchi;Lisa C. Fein

  • Who Controls Whom? An Examination of the Relation Between Management and Boards of Directors in Large American Corporations

    Mark S. Mizruchi

  • Fluctuating Fortunes: The Political Power of Business in America

    David Vogel

  • The Structure of Corporate Political Action: Interfirm Relations and Their Consequences

    Mark S. Mizruchi

  • A Longitudinal Study of the Formation of Interlocking Directorates

    Mark S. Mizruchi;Linda Brewster Stearns

  • The American Corporate Network 1904-1974

    Mark S. Mizruchi;G. William Domhoff

  • The Fracturing of the American Corporate Elite

    Mark S. Mizruchi

  • Getting deals done: The use of social networks in bank decision-making

    Mark S. Mizruchi;Linda Brewster Stearns

  • The Money Center Cannot Hold: Commercial Banks in the U.S. System of Corporate Governance

    Gerald F. Davis;Mark S. Mizruchi

  • Similarity of Political Behavior Among Large American Corporations

    Mark S. Mizruchi

  • Board Composition and Corporate Financing: The Impact of Financial Institution Representation on Borrowing

    Linda Brewster Stearns;Mark S. Mizruchi

  • Social network analysis: recent achievements and current controversies

    Mark S. Mizruchi

  • A Longitudinal Study of Borrowing by Large American Corporations

    Mark S. Mizruchi;Linda Brewster Stearns

  • Análise de redes sociais: avanços recentes e controvérsias atuais

    Mark S. Mizruchi

  • Networks of Interorganizational Relations

    Mark S. Mizruchi;Joseph Galaskiewicz

  • Osteocalcin in human serum: a circadian rhythm.

    Caren M. Gundberg;Morri E. Markowitz;Mark Mizruchi;John F. Rosen

  • Bankers on the board and the debt ratio of firms

    Daniel T. Byrd;Mark S. Mizruchi

  • Berle and Means revisited: The governance and power of large U.S. corporations

    Mark S. Mizruchi

  • Cohesion, equivalence, and similarity of behavior: a theoretical and empirical assessment

    Mark S. Mizruchi

  • Applied Network Analysis: A Methodological Introduction.@@@Social Structure and Network Analysis.

    Mark S. Mizruchi;Ronald S. Burt;Michael J. Minor;Peter V. Marsden

Frequent Co-Authors

Robert Plutchik
Robert Plutchik Albert Einstein College of Medicine
Gerald F. Davis
Gerald F. Davis University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
Richard B. Lipton
Richard B. Lipton Albert Einstein College of Medicine
Joseph C. Arezzo
Joseph C. Arezzo Albert Einstein College of Medicine
Joseph Galaskiewicz
Joseph Galaskiewicz University of Arizona
Stephen T. Chermack
Stephen T. Chermack University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
G. William Domhoff
G. William Domhoff University of California, Santa Cruz
Amy S.B. Bohnert
Amy S.B. Bohnert University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
Marcia Valenstein
Marcia Valenstein University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
David Knoke
David Knoke University of Minnesota

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Social Sciences and Humanities in the USA opens diverse opportunities, especially through online degrees. Many students are concerned about tuition fees, making programs with an affordable psychology degree cost highly attractive. Cost-effective options can make a significant difference in reducing student debt while pursuing a meaningful career.

For those interested in counseling or social work, accessibility matters. Selecting msw programs with high acceptance rate can help more applicants start their path to becoming licensed social workers. Flexible admissions and supportive online formats enable students from different backgrounds to access professional education.

Time-to-degree is another key issue. Some professionals value fast completion, especially for advanced credentials. The shortest online psyd programs enable qualified students to become psychologists sooner. Similarly, accelerated marriage and family therapy programs help graduates enter rewarding therapy roles efficiently.

Carefully researching online programs ensures that you find the right balance between affordability, accessibility, and program length—setting you on a successful and sustainable career path in the social sciences or humanities.

Best Scientists Citing Mark S. Mizruchi

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles