World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
William J. Muller

William J. Muller

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
107
Citations
42984
World Ranking
6243
National Ranking
246

William J. Muller publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where William J. Muller sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 610 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 381 publications — 34th percentile

34% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

William J. Muller D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where William J. Muller sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 399 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 107 D-Index — 70th percentile

70% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2011 - Fellow of the Royal Society of Canada Academy of Science
  • 2010 - Fellow of the American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS)
  • Member of the Association of American Physicians
  • Member of the Association of American Physicians
  • Member of the Association of American Physicians

Overview

William J. Muller is a researcher affiliated with McGill University in Canada, with a focus on biochemistry, genetics, molecular biology, and medicine. Their work spans several subfields, including molecular biology, oncology, immunology, cancer research, and genetics.

The scientist's research topics concentrate on the biological mechanisms and treatment approaches related to cancer. Major areas of study include:

  • Cancer Cells and Metastasis
  • HER2/EGFR in Cancer Research
  • RNA modifications and cancer
  • Immunotherapy and Immune Responses
  • Cancer Immunotherapy and Biomarkers
  • Genomics and Chromatin Dynamics
  • Cancer, Lipids, and Metabolism

Some of the recent notable papers authored by William J. Muller and collaborators consist of:

  • Insights from transgenic mouse models of PyMT-induced breast cancer: recapitulating human breast cancer progression in vivo (2020, Oncogene)
  • The tumor-derived cytokine Chi3l1 induces neutrophil extracellular traps that promote T cell exclusion in triple-negative breast cancer (2023, Immunity)
  • ESR1 mutant breast cancers show elevated basal cytokeratins and immune activation (2022, Nature Communications)
  • Targeting Axl favors an antitumorigenic microenvironment that enhances immunotherapy responses by decreasing Hif-1α levels (2021, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences)
  • Stimulation of Oncogene-Specific Tumor-Infiltrating T Cells through Combined Vaccine and αPD-1 Enable Sustained Antitumor Responses against Established HER2 Breast Cancer (2020, Clinical Cancer Research)

The primary publication venues where this scientist frequently publishes include:

  • Cancer Research
  • Oncogene
  • Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
  • Nature Communications
  • Cell Reports

Collaboration is a significant component of their work, as reflected by recurrent co-authors such as Virginie Sanguin-Gendreau, Morag Park, Sherif Samer Attalla, Dongmei Zuo, and Tarek Taifour.

William J. Muller has received recognition in the scientific community through awards such as:

  • Fellow of the Royal Society of Canada (2011, Academy of Science)
  • Fellow of the American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS) (2010)
  • Member of the Association of American Physicians

Best Publications

  • Induction of mammary tumors by expression of polyomavirus middle T oncogene: a transgenic mouse model for metastatic disease.

    Chantale T. Guy;Robert D. Cardiff;William J. Muller

  • Expression of the neu protooncogene in the mammary epithelium of transgenic mice induces metastatic disease

    Chantale T. Guy;Marc A. Webster;Michael Schaller;Thomas J. Parsons

  • Single-step induction of mammary adenocarcinoma in transgenic mice bearing the activated c-neu oncogene

    William J. Muller;Eric Sinn;Paul K. Pattengale;Racheal Wallace

  • Progression to Malignancy in the Polyoma Middle T Oncoprotein Mouse Breast Cancer Model Provides a Reliable Model for Human Diseases

    Elaine Y. Lin;Joan G. Jones;Ping Li;Liyin Zhu

  • Infectious Diseases Society of America Guidelines on the Treatment and Management of Patients with COVID-19.

    Adarsh Bhimraj;Rebecca L. Morgan;Amy Hirsch Shumaker;Valery Lavergne

  • Coexpression of MMTV/v-Ha-ras and MMTV/c-myc genes in transgenic mice: synergistic action of oncogenes in vivo.

    Eric Sinn;William Muller;Paul Pattengale;Isidore Tepler;Isidore Tepler

  • Hexokinase 2 Is Required for Tumor Initiation and Maintenance and Its Systemic Deletion Is Therapeutic in Mouse Models of Cancer

    Krushna C. Patra;Qi Wang;Prashanth T. Bhaskar;Luke Miller

  • ERK promotes tumorigenesis by inhibiting FOXO3a via MDM2-mediated degradation

    Jer Yen Yang;Cong S. Zong;Weiya Xia;Hirohito Yamaguchi

  • Suppression of tumor growth and metastasis in Mgat5-deficient mice.

    Maria Granovsky;Maria Granovsky;Jimmie Fata;Judy Pawling;William J. Muller

  • Elevated expression of activated forms of Neu/ErbB-2 and ErbB-3 are involved in the induction of mammary tumors in transgenic mice: implications for human breast cancer.

    Peter M. Siegel;Eamonn D. Ryan;Robert D. Cardiff;William J. Muller

  • Oncogenes and Tumor Suppressor Genes

    Eva Y.H.P. Lee;William J. Muller

  • β4 Integrin Amplifies ErbB2 Signaling to Promote Mammary Tumorigenesis

    Wenjun Guo;Yuliya Pylayeva;Yuliya Pylayeva;Angela Pepe;Toshiaki Yoshioka

  • Transforming growth factor β signaling impairs Neu-induced mammary tumorigenesis while promoting pulmonary metastasis

    Peter M. Siegel;Weiping Shu;Robert D. Cardiff;William J. Muller

  • Targeted disruption of β1-integrin in a transgenic mouse model of human breast cancer reveals an essential role in mammary tumor induction

    Donald E. White;Natasza A. Kurpios;Dongmei Zuo;John A. Hassell

  • Expression of Autotaxin and Lysophosphatidic Acid Receptors Increases Mammary Tumorigenesis, Invasion, and Metastases

    Shuying Liu;Makiko Umezu-Goto;Mandi Murph;Yiling Lu

  • Cyclin D1 is required for transformation by activated Neu and is induced through an E2F-dependent signaling pathway.

    Richard J. Lee;Chris Albanese;Maofu Fu;Mark D'Amico

  • Caveolin-1 Gene Disruption Promotes Mammary Tumorigenesis and Dramatically Enhances Lung Metastasis in Vivo ROLE OF CAV-1 IN CELL INVASIVENESS AND MATRIX METALLOPROTEINASE (MMP-2/9) SECRETION

    Terence M. Williams;Freddy Medina;Ines Badano;Rachel B. Hazan

  • The phosphatidyl inositol 3-kinase signaling network: implications for human breast cancer.

    R L Dillon;D E White;W J Muller

  • Protein tyrosine phosphatase 1B deficiency or inhibition delays ErbB2-induced mammary tumorigenesis and protects from lung metastasis.

    Sofi G Julien;Nadia Dubé;Nadia Dubé;Michelle Read;Janice Penney

  • Insights from transgenic mouse models of ERBB2-induced breast cancer

    Josie Ursini-Siegel;Babette Schade;Robert D. Cardiff;William J. Muller

Frequent Co-Authors

Robert D. Cardiff
Robert D. Cardiff University of California, Davis
Morag Park
Morag Park McGill University
Peter M. Siegel
Peter M. Siegel McGill University
Frank L. Graham
Frank L. Graham McMaster University
Senthil K. Muthuswamy
Senthil K. Muthuswamy Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center
Shoukat Dedhar
Shoukat Dedhar University of British Columbia
John A. Hassell
John A. Hassell McMaster University
Gordon B. Mills
Gordon B. Mills Oregon Health & Science University
Vincent Giguère
Vincent Giguère McGill University
Robert G. Oshima
Robert G. Oshima Sanford Burnham Prebys Medical Discovery Institute

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring medical careers in the USA doesn’t end with a traditional MD pathway. Students and professionals can find flexible, affordable options through online programs. For those seeking leadership roles in nursing, enrolling in the cheapest dnp program can open doors to advanced practice, policymaking, and education opportunities.

If you’re interested in pharmacy, accredited pharm d online programs provide rigorous education and clinical training, preparing you for roles as a licensed pharmacist. For tech-savvy learners, an online health information management degree merges healthcare and information systems, training professionals to manage critical patient data and health records.

Additionally, a medical coding certification offers a pathway into healthcare administration, focusing on coding systems and billing procedures vital to hospital operations. These online options allow you to launch or advance your career while balancing work and personal commitments.

Best Scientists Citing William J. Muller

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles