World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Peter M. Siegel

Peter M. Siegel

D-Index & Metrics

Biology and Biochemistry

D-Index
67
Citations
28206
World Ranking
8048
National Ranking
280

Peter M. Siegel publication distribution in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Biology and Biochemistry in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Peter M. Siegel sits on this spectrum.

47–56 publications: 8 scientists 57–66 publications: 35 scientists 67–76 publications: 106 scientists 77–86 publications: 231 scientists 87–96 publications: 413 scientists 97–106 publications: 546 scientists 107–116 publications: 704 scientists 117–126 publications: 848 scientists 127–136 publications: 980 scientists 137–146 publications: 942 scientists 147–156 publications: 969 scientists 157–166 publications: 949 scientists 167–176 publications: 951 scientists 177–186 publications: 915 scientists 187–196 publications: 787 scientists 197–206 publications: 840 scientists 207–216 publications: 733 scientists 217–226 publications: 708 scientists 227–236 publications: 651 scientists 237–246 publications: 605 scientists 247–256 publications: 510 scientists 257–266 publications: 524 scientists 267–276 publications: 434 scientists 277–286 publications: 417 scientists 287–296 publications: 350 scientists 297–306 publications: 363 scientists 307–316 publications: 315 scientists 317–326 publications: 296 scientists 327–336 publications: 261 scientists 337–346 publications: 240 scientists 347–356 publications: 219 scientists 357–366 publications: 196 scientists 367–376 publications: 154 scientists 377–386 publications: 161 scientists 387–396 publications: 155 scientists 397–406 publications: 145 scientists 407–416 publications: 124 scientists 417–426 publications: 112 scientists 427–436 publications: 132 scientists 437–446 publications: 116 scientists 447–456 publications: 99 scientists 457–466 publications: 81 scientists 467–476 publications: 91 scientists 477–486 publications: 80 scientists 487–496 publications: 80 scientists 497–506 publications: 59 scientists 507–516 publications: 36 scientists 517–526 publications: 46 scientists 527–536 publications: 54 scientists 537–546 publications: 44 scientists 547–556 publications: 43 scientists 557–566 publications: 43 scientists 567–576 publications: 42 scientists 577–586 publications: 25 scientists 587–596 publications: 34 scientists 597–606 publications: 23 scientists 607–616 publications: 33 scientists 617–626 publications: 31 scientists 627–636 publications: 27 scientists 637–646 publications: 25 scientists 647–656 publications: 28 scientists 657–666 publications: 34 scientists 667–676 publications: 18 scientists 677–686 publications: 16 scientists 687–696 publications: 10 scientists 697–706 publications: 12 scientists 707–716 publications: 21 scientists 717–726 publications: 12 scientists 727–736 publications: 12 scientists 737–746 publications: 10 scientists 747–756 publications: 7 scientists 757–766 publications: 13 scientists 767–776 publications: 15 scientists 777–786 publications: 13 scientists 787–796 publications: 9 scientists 797–806 publications: 9 scientists 807–816 publications: 7 scientists 817–826 publications: 4 scientists 827–836 publications: 9 scientists 837–846 publications: 7 scientists 847–856 publications: 3 scientists 857–866 publications: 5 scientists 867–876 publications: 5 scientists 877–886 publications: 11 scientists 887–896 publications: 3 scientists 897–906 publications: 4 scientists 907–916 publications: 7 scientists 917–926 publications: 5 scientists 927–936 publications: 6 scientists 937–946 publications: 6 scientists 947–956 publications: 3 scientists 957–966 publications: 7 scientists 967–976 publications: 2 scientists 977–986 publications: 2 scientists 987–996 publications: 1 scientists 997–1,006 publications: 5 scientists 1,007–1,016 publications: 2 scientists 1,017–1,026 publications: 2 scientists 1,027 publications: 1 scientists 1,028+ publications: 100 scientists
47 publications 1,028+

This scientist: 198 publications — 49th percentile

49% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,028 publications or more.

Peter M. Siegel D-index placement in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Biology and Biochemistry scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Peter M. Siegel sits on this spectrum.

40–41 D-Index: 80 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 183 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 316 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 504 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 718 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 899 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 1,025 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 1,149 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 1,235 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 1,253 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 1,162 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 1,130 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 1,031 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 897 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 814 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 714 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 709 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 596 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 512 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 473 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 412 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 373 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 358 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 285 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 273 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 227 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 208 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 193 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 153 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 157 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 148 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 120 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 113 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 100 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 86 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 67 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 71 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 73 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 64 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 53 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 60 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 54 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 43 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 38 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 49 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 26 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 18 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 23 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 32 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 32 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 27 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 19 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 22 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 12 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 16 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 14 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 10 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 13 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 10 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 7 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 9 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 13 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 4 scientists 166 D-Index: 4 scientists 167+ D-Index: 98 scientists
40 D-Index 167+

This scientist: 67 D-Index — 59th percentile

59% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 167 D-Index or more.

Overview

Peter M. Siegel is affiliated with McGill University in Canada. Their research spans multiple areas within the life sciences, focusing heavily on molecular biology, oncology, and immunology. The scientist's work is primarily situated within the broader fields of biochemistry, genetics, and molecular biology, as well as medicine.

The specific subfields of study Peter M. Siegel engages in include molecular biology, pulmonary and respiratory medicine, cancer research, oncology, and immunology. These areas reflect a multidisciplinary approach to understanding cancer biology and immune mechanisms at the cellular and molecular levels.

The research topics covered by their publications highlight significant interest in multiple aspects of cancer biology and treatment:

  • Brain Metastases and Treatment
  • Cancer, Hypoxia, and Metabolism
  • Ferroptosis and cancer prognosis
  • Immune cells in cancer
  • Metabolism, Diabetes, and Cancer
  • Cancer Cells and Metastasis
  • Cancer Genomics and Diagnostics

Peter M. Siegel has contributed to research published in numerous scientific journals, with a notable presence in:

  • Cancer Research
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • Neuro-Oncology
  • Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
  • Neuro-Oncology Advances

Frequent co-authors working with Peter M. Siegel include:

  • Matthew G. Annis
  • Matthew Dankner
  • Morag Park
  • Kevin Petrecca
  • Sarah M. Maritan

Among their recent publications, several papers stand out for their contributions to our understanding of cancer and immune microenvironments:

  • Single-cell spatial landscapes of the lung tumour immune microenvironment, 2023, Nature
  • Single-cell spatial immune landscapes of primary and metastatic brain tumours, 2023, Nature
  • AMPK-dependent phosphorylation is required for transcriptional activation of TFEB and TFE3, 2021, Autophagy
  • The tumor-derived cytokine Chi3l1 induces neutrophil extracellular traps that promote T cell exclusion in triple-negative breast cancer, 2023, Immunity
  • Creatine-mediated crosstalk between adipocytes and cancer cells regulates obesity-driven breast cancer, 2021, Cell Metabolism

Best Publications

  • Genes that mediate breast cancer metastasis to lung

    Andy J. Minn;Gaorav P. Gupta;Peter M. Siegel;Peter M. Siegel;Paula D. Bos

  • A multigenic program mediating breast cancer metastasis to bone.

    Yibin Kang;Peter M. Siegel;Weiping Shu;Maria Drobnjak

  • Driver mutations in histone H3.3 and chromatin remodelling genes in paediatric glioblastoma

    Jeremy Schwartzentruber;Andrey Korshunov;Xiao Yang Liu;David T.W. Jones

  • Cytostatic and apoptotic actions of TGF-beta in homeostasis and cancer.

    Peter M. Siegel;Joan Massagué

  • AMPK Is a Negative Regulator of the Warburg Effect and Suppresses Tumor Growth In Vivo

    Brandon Faubert;Gino Boily;Said Izreig;Takla Griss

  • E2F4/5 and p107 as Smad Cofactors Linking the TGFβ Receptor to c-myc Repression

    Chang Rung Chen;Yibin Kang;Peter M. Siegel;Joan Massagué

  • Elevated expression of activated forms of Neu/ErbB-2 and ErbB-3 are involved in the induction of mammary tumors in transgenic mice: implications for human breast cancer.

    Peter M. Siegel;Eamonn D. Ryan;Robert D. Cardiff;William J. Muller

  • Transforming growth factor β signaling impairs Neu-induced mammary tumorigenesis while promoting pulmonary metastasis

    Peter M. Siegel;Weiping Shu;Robert D. Cardiff;William J. Muller

  • PDK1-Dependent Metabolic Reprogramming Dictates Metastatic Potential in Breast Cancer

    Fanny Dupuy;Sébastien Tabariès;Sylvia Andrzejewski;Zhifeng Dong

  • Frequent ATRX mutations and loss of expression in adult diffuse astrocytic tumors carrying IDH1/IDH2 and TP53 mutations.

    Xiao-Yang Liu;Noha Gerges;Andrey Korshunov;Nesrin Sabha

  • Recurrent somatic mutations in ACVR1 in pediatric midline high-grade astrocytoma

    Adam M. Fontebasso;Simon Papillon-Cavanagh;Jeremy Schwartzentruber;Hamid Nikbakht

  • Classifying BRAF alterations in cancer: new rational therapeutic strategies for actionable mutations.

    Matthew Dankner;April A N Rose;Shivshankari Rajkumar;Peter M Siegel

  • Cyclin D1 is required for transformation by activated Neu and is induced through an E2F-dependent signaling pathway.

    Richard J. Lee;Chris Albanese;Maofu Fu;Mark D'Amico

  • Amplification of the neu/erbB-2 oncogene in a mouse model of mammary tumorigenesis.

    Eran R. Andrechek;William R. Hardy;Peter M. Siegel;Michael A. Rudnicki

  • Mammary tumors expressing the neu proto-oncogene possess elevated c-Src tyrosine kinase activity.

    S K Muthuswamy;P M Siegel;D L Dankort;M A Webster

  • Metabolic Plasticity as a Determinant of Tumor Growth and Metastasis.

    Camille Lehuédé;Fanny Dupuy;Rebecca Rabinovitch;Russell G. Jones

  • Novel activating mutations in the neu proto-oncogene involved in induction of mammary tumors.

    P M Siegel;D L Dankort;W R Hardy;W J Muller

  • Reciprocal Regulation of Neu Tyrosine Kinase Activity and Caveolin-1 Protein Expression in Vitro and in Vivo IMPLICATIONS FOR HUMAN BREAST CANCER

    Jeffrey A. Engelman;Richard J. Lee;Anthony Karnezis;David J. Bearss

  • ADAM10 releases a soluble form of the GPNMB/Osteoactivin extracellular domain with angiogenic properties.

    April A. N. Rose;Matthew G. Annis;Zhifeng Dong;Francois Pepin

  • Osteoactivin promotes breast cancer metastasis to bone.

    April A.N. Rose;François Pepin;Caterina Russo;Jad E. Abou Khalil

Frequent Co-Authors

William J. Muller
William J. Muller McGill University
Morag Park
Morag Park McGill University
Russell G. Jones
Russell G. Jones McGill University
Julie St-Pierre
Julie St-Pierre McGill University
Joan Massagué
Joan Massagué Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center
Stefan M. Pfister
Stefan M. Pfister German Cancer Research Center
Wilson H. Miller
Wilson H. Miller McGill University
David T. W. Jones
David T. W. Jones German Cancer Research Center
Nada Jabado
Nada Jabado McGill University
Jeremy Schwartzentruber
Jeremy Schwartzentruber Wellcome Sanger Institute

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing Biology or Biochemistry opens the door to a variety of online degrees and diverse career opportunities in the healthcare industry. Many graduates choose to complement their life sciences background by obtaining an affordable online MBA healthcare management degree, which can strengthen leadership and management skills essential for roles in healthcare administration.

For those interested in the technical and operational side of healthcare, obtaining a medical coding certification is a popular choice. These certifications, such as CPC and CCS, are gateways to new career avenues and often come with competitive salaries. If you’re curious about earning potential, exploring what is medical coding salary can provide helpful insights into typical compensation ranges across the field.

Considering career flexibility and job stability is essential. Many wonder, is medical billing and coding a good career? These roles often offer remote work options and strong job demand, making them attractive for graduates with a science focus looking for rewarding non-laboratory roles.

Best Scientists Citing Peter M. Siegel

Trending Scientists