World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Ecology and Evolution

D-Index
49
Citations
12172
World Ranking
3973
National Ranking
439

Matthew J. G. Gage publication distribution in Ecology and Evolution in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Ecology and Evolution in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Matthew J. G. Gage sits on this spectrum.

37–41 publications: 2 scientists 42–46 publications: 9 scientists 47–51 publications: 10 scientists 52–56 publications: 31 scientists 57–61 publications: 56 scientists 62–66 publications: 91 scientists 67–71 publications: 92 scientists 72–76 publications: 127 scientists 77–81 publications: 173 scientists 82–86 publications: 236 scientists 87–91 publications: 227 scientists 92–96 publications: 240 scientists 97–101 publications: 333 scientists 102–106 publications: 280 scientists 107–111 publications: 300 scientists 112–116 publications: 285 scientists 117–121 publications: 305 scientists 122–126 publications: 287 scientists 127–131 publications: 278 scientists 132–136 publications: 289 scientists 137–141 publications: 273 scientists 142–146 publications: 262 scientists 147–151 publications: 246 scientists 152–156 publications: 235 scientists 157–161 publications: 205 scientists 162–166 publications: 199 scientists 167–171 publications: 174 scientists 172–176 publications: 164 scientists 177–181 publications: 173 scientists 182–186 publications: 189 scientists 187–191 publications: 170 scientists 192–196 publications: 139 scientists 197–201 publications: 128 scientists 202–206 publications: 117 scientists 207–211 publications: 115 scientists 212–216 publications: 107 scientists 217–221 publications: 124 scientists 222–226 publications: 81 scientists 227–231 publications: 82 scientists 232–236 publications: 85 scientists 237–241 publications: 75 scientists 242–246 publications: 66 scientists 247–251 publications: 81 scientists 252–256 publications: 69 scientists 257–261 publications: 70 scientists 262–266 publications: 55 scientists 267–271 publications: 64 scientists 272–276 publications: 49 scientists 277–281 publications: 48 scientists 282–286 publications: 44 scientists 287–291 publications: 45 scientists 292–296 publications: 36 scientists 297–301 publications: 39 scientists 302–306 publications: 38 scientists 307–311 publications: 30 scientists 312–316 publications: 34 scientists 317–321 publications: 25 scientists 322–326 publications: 22 scientists 327–331 publications: 28 scientists 332–336 publications: 30 scientists 337–341 publications: 22 scientists 342–346 publications: 30 scientists 347–351 publications: 26 scientists 352–356 publications: 22 scientists 357–361 publications: 29 scientists 362–366 publications: 21 scientists 367–371 publications: 12 scientists 372–376 publications: 18 scientists 377–381 publications: 17 scientists 382–386 publications: 13 scientists 387–391 publications: 21 scientists 392–396 publications: 13 scientists 397–401 publications: 10 scientists 402–406 publications: 15 scientists 407–411 publications: 8 scientists 412–416 publications: 9 scientists 417–421 publications: 8 scientists 422–426 publications: 4 scientists 427–431 publications: 10 scientists 432–436 publications: 10 scientists 437–441 publications: 5 scientists 442–446 publications: 4 scientists 447–451 publications: 10 scientists 452–456 publications: 2 scientists 457–461 publications: 4 scientists 462–466 publications: 7 scientists 467–471 publications: 7 scientists 472–476 publications: 6 scientists 477–481 publications: 6 scientists 482–486 publications: 3 scientists 487–491 publications: 3 scientists 492–496 publications: 4 scientists 497–501 publications: 4 scientists 502–506 publications: 8 scientists 507–511 publications: 5 scientists 512–516 publications: 4 scientists 517–521 publications: 5 scientists 522–526 publications: 4 scientists 527–530 publications: 5 scientists 531+ publications: 100 scientists
37 publications 531+

This scientist: 103 publications — 21st percentile

21% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 531 publications or more.

Matthew J. G. Gage D-index placement in Ecology and Evolution in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Ecology and Evolution scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Matthew J. G. Gage sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 95 scientists 31 D-Index: 123 scientists 32 D-Index: 191 scientists 33 D-Index: 245 scientists 34 D-Index: 252 scientists 35 D-Index: 244 scientists 36 D-Index: 249 scientists 37 D-Index: 244 scientists 38 D-Index: 254 scientists 39 D-Index: 254 scientists 40 D-Index: 280 scientists 41 D-Index: 274 scientists 42 D-Index: 266 scientists 43 D-Index: 233 scientists 44 D-Index: 248 scientists 45 D-Index: 208 scientists 46 D-Index: 201 scientists 47 D-Index: 213 scientists 48 D-Index: 207 scientists 49 D-Index: 172 scientists 50 D-Index: 209 scientists 51 D-Index: 199 scientists 52 D-Index: 153 scientists 53 D-Index: 169 scientists 54 D-Index: 163 scientists 55 D-Index: 148 scientists 56 D-Index: 120 scientists 57 D-Index: 146 scientists 58 D-Index: 137 scientists 59 D-Index: 140 scientists 60 D-Index: 104 scientists 61 D-Index: 119 scientists 62 D-Index: 118 scientists 63 D-Index: 99 scientists 64 D-Index: 77 scientists 65 D-Index: 100 scientists 66 D-Index: 86 scientists 67 D-Index: 83 scientists 68 D-Index: 75 scientists 69 D-Index: 94 scientists 70 D-Index: 57 scientists 71 D-Index: 68 scientists 72 D-Index: 59 scientists 73 D-Index: 63 scientists 74 D-Index: 66 scientists 75 D-Index: 60 scientists 76 D-Index: 42 scientists 77 D-Index: 49 scientists 78 D-Index: 39 scientists 79 D-Index: 37 scientists 80 D-Index: 43 scientists 81 D-Index: 41 scientists 82 D-Index: 45 scientists 83 D-Index: 34 scientists 84 D-Index: 40 scientists 85 D-Index: 35 scientists 86 D-Index: 55 scientists 87 D-Index: 24 scientists 88 D-Index: 24 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 23 scientists 91 D-Index: 25 scientists 92 D-Index: 27 scientists 93 D-Index: 27 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 23 scientists 96 D-Index: 12 scientists 97 D-Index: 14 scientists 98 D-Index: 19 scientists 99 D-Index: 16 scientists 100 D-Index: 14 scientists 101 D-Index: 5 scientists 102 D-Index: 21 scientists 103 D-Index: 16 scientists 104 D-Index: 10 scientists 105 D-Index: 7 scientists 106 D-Index: 7 scientists 107 D-Index: 7 scientists 108 D-Index: 6 scientists 109 D-Index: 9 scientists 110 D-Index: 11 scientists 111 D-Index: 12 scientists 112 D-Index: 9 scientists 113 D-Index: 7 scientists 114 D-Index: 3 scientists 115 D-Index: 8 scientists 116 D-Index: 5 scientists 117 D-Index: 11 scientists 118 D-Index: 4 scientists 119 D-Index: 2 scientists 120 D-Index: 5 scientists 121+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 121+

This scientist: 49 D-Index — 53rd percentile

53% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 121 D-Index or more.

Overview

Matthew J. G. Gage is affiliated with the University of East Anglia in the United Kingdom. Their research spans multiple areas within biological and environmental sciences, with a particular focus on insect ecology, evolutionary biology, genetics, and physiological adaptations.

Their recent papers include:

  • Scientists' warning on climate change and insects (2022), published in Ecological Monographs
  • Fertility and mortality impacts of thermal stress from experimental heatwaves on different life stages and their recovery in a model insect (2021), published in Royal Society Open Science
  • Tribolium beetles as a model system in evolution and ecology (2021), published in Heredity
  • Mating patterns influence vulnerability to the extinction vortex (2020), published in Global Change Biology
  • Polyandry provides reproductive and genetic benefits in colonising populations (2020), published in Ecology and Evolution

Frequent co-authors collaborating with Matthew J. G. Gage include:

  • Ramakrishnan Vasudeva
  • Michael D. Pointer
  • Kris Sales
  • Lewis G. Spurgin
  • Marco Graziano

The scientist regularly publishes in established venues such as:

  • Royal Society Open Science
  • Journal of Evolutionary Biology
  • Endocrine Abstracts
  • Heredity
  • Ecology and Evolution

The main fields of study pursued include Agricultural and Biological Sciences, Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology, and Environmental Science.

Within these fields, Matthew J. G. Gage focuses on subfields such as Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics; Genetics; Ecology; Insect Science; and Molecular Biology.

The principal research topics addressed in their work cover:

  • Animal Behavior and Reproduction
  • Insect and Arachnid Ecology and Behavior
  • Plant and animal studies
  • Insect-Plant Interactions and Control
  • Physiological and biochemical adaptations
  • Reproductive biology and impacts on aquatic species
  • Forest Insect Ecology and Management

Best Publications

  • Sperm competition, male prudence and sperm-limited females

    Nina Wedell;Matthew J.G. Gage;Geoffrey A. Parker

  • Sperm competition in fishes: the evolution of testis size and ejaculate characteristics.

    P. Stockley;M. J. G. Gage;G. A. Parker;A. P. Møller

  • Spermatozoal traits and sperm competition in Atlantic salmon: relative sperm velocity is the primary determinant of fertilization success.

    Matthew J.G. Gage;Christopher P. Macfarlane;Sarah Yeates;Richard G. Ward

  • Scientists' warning on climate change and insects

    Unknown

  • Associations between Body Size, Mating Pattern, Testis Size and Sperm Lengths across Butterflies

    Matthew J. G. Gage

  • Sperm competition games: a prospective analysis of risk assessment

    G. A. Parker;M. A. Ball;P. Stockley;M. J. G. Gage

  • Sperm Competition Games: Individual Assessment of Sperm Competition Intensity by Group Spawners

    Geoffrey Alan Parker;M. A. Ball;Paula Stockley;Matthew J. G. Gage

  • Effects of alternative male mating strategies on characteristics of sperm production in the Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar): theoretical and empirical investigations

    Matthew J. G. Gage;Paula Stockley;Geoffrey Alan Parker

  • Continuous variation in reproductive strategy as an adaptive response to population density in the moth Plodia interpunctella

    Matthew J. G. Gage

  • Risk of sperm competition directly affects ejaculate size in the Mediterranean fruit fly

    Matthew J.G. Gage

  • Experimental heatwaves compromise sperm function and cause transgenerational damage in a model insect.

    Kris Sales;Ramakrishnan Vasudeva;Matthew E. Dickinson;Joanne L. Godwin

  • Sperm Size or Numbers? Effects of Nutritional Stress Upon Eupyrene and Apyrene Sperm Production Strategies in the Moth Plodia interpunctella (Lepidoptera: Pyralidea)

    M. J. G. Gage;P. A. Cook

  • Experimental evidence for the evolution of numerous, tiny sperm via sperm competition.

    Matthew J.G Gage;Edward H Morrow

  • Relative testis size and sperm morphometry across mammals: no evidence for an association between sperm competition and sperm length.

    Matthew J. G. Gage;Robert P. Freckleton

  • Quick-change artists: male plastic behavioural responses to rivals.

    Amanda Bretman;Matthew J.G. Gage;Tracey Chapman

  • Sexual selection protects against extinction

    Alyson J. Lumley;Łukasz Michalczyk;James J. N. Kitson;Lewis G. Spurgin

  • Ejaculate size varies with socio‐sexual situation in an insect

    Matthew J. G. Gage;R. Robin Baker

  • Mammalian sperm morphometry

    M. J. G. Gage

  • Effects of risks of sperm competition on the numbers of eupyrene and apyrene sperm ejaculated by the moth Plodia interpunctella (Lepidoptera: Pyralidae)

    Penny A. Cook;Matthew J. G. Gage

  • The evolution of sperm length in moths.

    Edward H. Morrow;Matthew J.G. Gage

  • Consistent significant variation between individual males in spermatozoal morphometry

    Edward H. Morrow;Matthew J. G. Gage

Frequent Co-Authors

Łukasz Michalczyk
Łukasz Michalczyk Jagiellonian University
Brent C. Emerson
Brent C. Emerson Spanish National Research Council
Tracey Chapman
Tracey Chapman University of East Anglia
Isabelle M. Côté
Isabelle M. Côté Simon Fraser University
John D. Reynolds
John D. Reynolds Simon Fraser University
Amanda Bretman
Amanda Bretman University of Leeds
Eric Haubruge
Eric Haubruge University of Liège
Paula Stockley
Paula Stockley University of Liverpool
Geoff A. Parker
Geoff A. Parker University of Liverpool
Sigurd Einum
Sigurd Einum Norwegian University of Science and Technology

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Ecology and Evolution opens doors to a range of interdisciplinary fields. Many students discover overlapping interests in allied health and science careers, where online degrees offer flexible, accelerated options. For example, those from non-science backgrounds can pursue an slp bridge program online and transition into speech-language pathology to support communication health across diverse communities.

Other career changers often seek programs geared toward healthcare. The accelerated nursing programs for non nurses online make it possible to earn a BSN at an affordable rate and in less time, allowing for a quicker entry into this high-demand profession.

If you’re considering advanced practice roles, it’s important to understand earning potential and educational timelines. Comparing a pmhnp salary by state can help inform your decision about where to work, as pay rates for psychiatric nurse practitioners vary widely.

Curious about your pathway timeline? Learn how many years to become a nurse practitioner and plan your educational goals accordingly. Whatever your focus, online degrees provide accessible routes to dynamic, science-based careers.

Best Scientists Citing Matthew J. G. Gage

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles