World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 68 2490 2278 1442 1290 209 16308

Marcia Valenstein publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Marcia Valenstein between 1997 and 2021, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Marcia Valenstein published across 25 years, from 1997 to 2021, averaging 8.5 papers a year. Output peaked at 25 publications in 2011. 5 of the 213 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15 20 25
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1997 to 2021. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 25. Peak 25 publications in 2011. 1997: 1 publication 1998: 2 publications 1999: 0 publications 2000: 0 publications 2001: 0 publications 2002: 8 publications 2003: 2 publications 2004: 5 publications 2005: 1 publication 2006: 14 publications 2007: 14 publications 2008: 11 publications 2009: 19 publications 2010: 18 publications 2011: 25 publications 2012: 24 publications 2013: 10 publications 2014: 12 publications 2015: 10 publications 2016: 14 publications 2017: 5 publications 2018: 8 publications 2019: 5 publications 2020: 3 publications 2021: 2 publications
1997 2021

213 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Marcia Valenstein: publications per year, 1997 to 2021
Year Publications
1997 1
1998 2
1999 0
2000 0
2001 0
2002 8
2003 2
2004 5
2005 1
2006 14
2007 14
2008 11
2009 19
2010 18
2011 25
2012 24
2013 10
2014 12
2015 10
2016 14
2017 5
2018 8
2019 5
2020 3
2021 2
Total 213
Download as CSV

Marcia Valenstein publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Marcia Valenstein sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 201–210 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 209 publications — 71st percentile

71% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605
91–100 713
101–110 736
111–120 686
121–130 670
131–140 644
141–150 597
151–160 576
161–170 477
171–180 450
181–190 397
191–200 343
201–210 328 209
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

Marcia Valenstein D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Marcia Valenstein sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 68–69 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 68 D-Index — 79th percentile

79% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671
36–37 659
38–39 641
40–41 671
42–43 617
44–45 558
46–47 495
48–49 487
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219 68
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Marcia Valenstein is affiliated with the University of Michigan-Ann Arbor in the United States. Their research spans multiple subfields within psychology, including applied psychology, social psychology, clinical psychology, experimental and cognitive psychology, and health. The main field of study is psychology, supported by seven publications.

Their work concentrates particularly on topics related to digital mental health interventions, mental health treatment and access, general mental health research topics, posttraumatic stress disorder research, health disparities and outcomes, suicide and self-harm studies, and telemedicine and telehealth implementation.

Valenstein has published in various venues, including:

  • Psychiatric Services
  • Journal of American College Health
  • Telemedicine Journal and e-Health

Recent papers authored or co-authored by Valenstein include:

  • "Effectiveness of Peer-Supported Computer-Based CBT for Depression Among Veterans in Primary Care," 2020, Psychiatric Services
  • "A nationally representative sample of veteran and matched non-veteran college students: Mental health symptoms, suicidal ideation, and mental health treatment," 2020, Journal of American College Health
  • "Technology-Facilitated Depression Self-Management Linked with Lay Supporters and Primary Care Clinics: Randomized Controlled Trial in a Low-Income Sample," 2021, Telemedicine Journal and e-Health

Frequent co-authors in Valenstein's publications include:

  • P. Pfeiffer
  • Kara Zivin
  • Dara Ganoczy
  • Hyungjin Myra Kim
  • Heather Walters

Best Publications

  • Association between opioid prescribing patterns and opioid overdose-related deaths.

    Amy S. B. Bohnert;Marcia Valenstein;Marcia Valenstein;Matthew J. Bair;Matthew J. Bair;Dara Ganoczy;Dara Ganoczy

  • The expert consensus guideline series: adherence problems in patients with serious and persistent mental illness.

    Alan S. Bellack;Charles L. Bowden;Christopher R. Bowie;Matthew J. Byerly

  • Efficacy of peer support interventions for depression: a meta-analysis

    Paul N. Pfeiffer;Michele Heisler;Michele Heisler;John D. Piette;John D. Piette;Mary A.M. Rogers

  • Social relationships and depression: ten-year follow-up from a nationally representative study.

    Alan R. Teo;HwaJung J. Choi;Marcia Valenstein

  • Pharmacy data identify poorly adherent patients with schizophrenia at increased risk for admission.

    Marcia Valenstein;Laurel A Copeland;Frederic C Blow;Frederic C Blow;John F McCarthy

  • Risk of Mortality Among Individual Antipsychotics in Patients With Dementia

    Helen C. Kales;Hyungjin Myra Kim;Hyungjin Myra Kim;Kara Zivin;Kara Zivin;Marcia Valenstein;Marcia Valenstein

  • Poor Antipsychotic Adherence Among Patients With Schizophrenia: Medication and Patient Factors

    Marcia Valenstein;Frederic C. Blow;Laurel A. Copeland;John F. McCarthy

  • Psychiatric Diagnoses and Risk of Suicide in Veterans

    Mark A. Ilgen;Amy S. B. Bohnert;Rosalinda V. Ignacio;John F. McCarthy

  • Antipsychotic adherence over time among patients receiving treatment for schizophrenia: a retrospective review.

    Marcia Valenstein;Dara Ganoczy;John F. McCarthy;Hyungjin Myra Kim

  • Mortality risk in patients with dementia treated with antipsychotics versus other psychiatric medications.

    Helen C. Kales;Marcia Valenstein;H. Myra Kim;John F. McCarthy

  • Treatment adherence with antipsychotic medications in bipolar disorder

    Martha X Sajatovic;Marcia Valenstein;Marcia Valenstein;Frederic C. Blow;Frederic C. Blow;Dara Ganoczy;Dara Ganoczy

  • Suicide Mortality Among Individuals Receiving Treatment for Depression in the Veterans Affairs Health System: Associations with Patient and Treatment Setting Characteristics

    Kara Zivin;H. Myra Kim;John F. McCarthy;Karen L. Austin

  • Suicide Mortality Among Patients Receiving Care in the Veterans Health Administration Health System

    John F. McCarthy;Marcia Valenstein;H. Myra Kim;Mark Ilgen

  • A Tailored Smoking, Alcohol, and Depression Intervention for Head and Neck Cancer Patients

    Sonia A. Duffy;Sonia A. Duffy;David L. Ronis;David L. Ronis;Marcia Valenstein;Marcia Valenstein;Michael T. Lambert;Michael T. Lambert

  • Effect of smoking, alcohol, and depression on the quality of life of head and neck cancer patients.

    Sonia A Duffy;Jeffrey E Terrell;Marcia Valenstein;David L Ronis

  • Noncancer pain conditions and risk of suicide

    Mark A. Ilgen;Mark A. Ilgen;Felicia Kleinberg;Felicia Kleinberg;Rosalinda V. Ignacio;Rosalinda V. Ignacio;Amy S. B. Bohnert;Amy S. B. Bohnert

  • Buddy‐to‐Buddy, a citizen soldier peer support program to counteract stigma, PTSD, depression, and suicide

    John F. Greden;Marcia Valenstein;Jane Spinner;Adrian Blow

  • A randomized trial of telephonic counseling plus walking for depressed diabetes patients.

    John D. Piette;Caroline Richardson;Joseph Himle;Sonia Duffy

  • Measurement of psychiatric treatment adherence

    Martha X Sajatovic;Dawn I. Velligan;Peter J. Weiden;Marcia A. Valenstein

  • Pain and suicidal thoughts, plans and attempts in the United States.

    Mark A. Ilgen;Kara Zivin;Ryan J. McCammon;Marcia Valenstein

  • Treatment Adherence With Lithium and Anticonvulsant Medications Among Patients With Bipolar Disorder

    Martha X Sajatovic;Marcia Valenstein;Frederick Blow;Dara Ganoczy

  • The expert consensus guideline series

    Alan S. Bellack;Charles L. Bowden;Christopher R. Bowie;Matthew J. Byerly

Frequent Co-Authors

Frederic C. Blow
Frederic C. Blow University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
John F. McCarthy
John F. McCarthy University of Michigan Medical School
Rosalinda V. Ignacio
Rosalinda V. Ignacio University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
John D. Piette
John D. Piette University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
Amy M. Kilbourne
Amy M. Kilbourne University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
Lisa B. Dixon
Lisa B. Dixon Columbia University
Amy S.B. Bohnert
Amy S.B. Bohnert University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
Daniel Eisenberg
Daniel Eisenberg University of California, Los Angeles
Susan V. Eisen
Susan V. Eisen Boston University
Dawn I. Velligan
Dawn I. Velligan The University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring social sciences and humanities in the USA opens doors to a diverse range of online degrees and career opportunities. Students seeking flexibility can find programs suited to various professional interests, including psychology, social work, therapy, and research.

If affordability is a priority, consider an affordable online psychology degree, which offers a path into numerous mental health and research roles. Those interested in a career helping communities might look for msw schools that are accessible and designed to prepare graduates for social work licensure across the country.

For advanced study in clinical psychology, you can compare psyd psychology programs to gain hands-on training and leadership skills for therapy or academic settings. In the fast-growing field of marriage and family therapy, mft programs offer accelerated tracks to quickly launch your career working with families and couples.

Best Scientists Citing Marcia Valenstein

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles