World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Social Sciences and Humanities 35 6763 6287 3285 2997 58 4755

Rosalinda V. Ignacio publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Rosalinda V. Ignacio between 2004 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Rosalinda V. Ignacio published across 22 years, from 2004 to 2025, averaging 3 papers a year. Output peaked at 7 publications in 2006. 4 of the 67 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
2 4 6
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 2004 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 7. Peak 7 publications in 2006. 2004: 1 publication 2005: 3 publications 2006: 7 publications 2007: 4 publications 2008: 3 publications 2009: 5 publications 2010: 3 publications 2011: 4 publications 2012: 7 publications 2013: 4 publications 2014: 2 publications 2015: 1 publication 2016: 1 publication 2017: 1 publication 2018: 3 publications 2019: 3 publications 2020: 1 publication 2021: 5 publications 2022: 2 publications 2023: 3 publications 2024: 3 publications 2025: 1 publication
2004 2025

67 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Rosalinda V. Ignacio: publications per year, 2004 to 2025
Year Publications
2004 1
2005 3
2006 7
2007 4
2008 3
2009 5
2010 3
2011 4
2012 7
2013 4
2014 2
2015 1
2016 1
2017 1
2018 3
2019 3
2020 1
2021 5
2022 2
2023 3
2024 3
2025 1
Total 67
Download as CSV

Rosalinda V. Ignacio publication distribution in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Rosalinda V. Ignacio sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300 400
Bar chart with 54 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 44–53 to 570+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 474. Most scientists, 474, have 114–123 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 54–63 publications, is where this scientist sits. 44–53 publications: 28 scientists 54–63 publications: 61 scientists 64–73 publications: 161 scientists 74–83 publications: 225 scientists 84–93 publications: 301 scientists 94–103 publications: 390 scientists 104–113 publications: 406 scientists 114–123 publications: 474 scientists 124–133 publications: 453 scientists 134–143 publications: 434 scientists 144–153 publications: 407 scientists 154–163 publications: 411 scientists 164–173 publications: 391 scientists 174–183 publications: 313 scientists 184–193 publications: 319 scientists 194–203 publications: 304 scientists 204–213 publications: 285 scientists 214–223 publications: 246 scientists 224–233 publications: 213 scientists 234–243 publications: 170 scientists 244–253 publications: 167 scientists 254–263 publications: 162 scientists 264–273 publications: 138 scientists 274–283 publications: 138 scientists 284–293 publications: 113 scientists 294–303 publications: 106 scientists 304–313 publications: 95 scientists 314–323 publications: 101 scientists 324–333 publications: 81 scientists 334–343 publications: 69 scientists 344–353 publications: 56 scientists 354–363 publications: 36 scientists 364–373 publications: 42 scientists 374–383 publications: 41 scientists 384–393 publications: 44 scientists 394–403 publications: 27 scientists 404–413 publications: 30 scientists 414–423 publications: 20 scientists 424–433 publications: 29 scientists 434–443 publications: 29 scientists 444–453 publications: 25 scientists 454–463 publications: 19 scientists 464–473 publications: 21 scientists 474–483 publications: 11 scientists 484–493 publications: 17 scientists 494–503 publications: 7 scientists 504–513 publications: 6 scientists 514–523 publications: 12 scientists 524–533 publications: 10 scientists 534–543 publications: 7 scientists 544–553 publications: 6 scientists 554–563 publications: 12 scientists 564–569 publications: 8 scientists 570+ publications: 100 scientists
44–53 publications 570+

This scientist: 58 publications — 1st percentile

1% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 7,777 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
44–53 28
54–63 61 58
64–73 161
74–83 225
84–93 301
94–103 390
104–113 406
114–123 474
124–133 453
134–143 434
144–153 407
154–163 411
164–173 391
174–183 313
184–193 319
194–203 304
204–213 285
214–223 246
224–233 213
234–243 170
244–253 167
254–263 162
264–273 138
274–283 138
284–293 113
294–303 106
304–313 95
314–323 101
324–333 81
334–343 69
344–353 56
354–363 36
364–373 42
374–383 41
384–393 44
394–403 27
404–413 30
414–423 20
424–433 29
434–443 29
444–453 25
454–463 19
464–473 21
474–483 11
484–493 17
494–503 7
504–513 6
514–523 12
524–533 10
534–543 7
544–553 6
554–563 12
564–569 8
570+ 100
Download as CSV

Rosalinda V. Ignacio D-index placement in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Rosalinda V. Ignacio sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300
Bar chart with 71 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30 to 100+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 313. Most scientists, 313, have 42 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 35 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30 D-Index: 177 scientists 31 D-Index: 210 scientists 32 D-Index: 222 scientists 33 D-Index: 188 scientists 34 D-Index: 181 scientists 35 D-Index: 243 scientists 36 D-Index: 261 scientists 37 D-Index: 272 scientists 38 D-Index: 278 scientists 39 D-Index: 300 scientists 40 D-Index: 297 scientists 41 D-Index: 308 scientists 42 D-Index: 313 scientists 43 D-Index: 300 scientists 44 D-Index: 269 scientists 45 D-Index: 260 scientists 46 D-Index: 228 scientists 47 D-Index: 251 scientists 48 D-Index: 203 scientists 49 D-Index: 186 scientists 50 D-Index: 187 scientists 51 D-Index: 166 scientists 52 D-Index: 138 scientists 53 D-Index: 141 scientists 54 D-Index: 131 scientists 55 D-Index: 137 scientists 56 D-Index: 109 scientists 57 D-Index: 129 scientists 58 D-Index: 95 scientists 59 D-Index: 105 scientists 60 D-Index: 106 scientists 61 D-Index: 86 scientists 62 D-Index: 94 scientists 63 D-Index: 77 scientists 64 D-Index: 79 scientists 65 D-Index: 59 scientists 66 D-Index: 68 scientists 67 D-Index: 51 scientists 68 D-Index: 49 scientists 69 D-Index: 40 scientists 70 D-Index: 43 scientists 71 D-Index: 40 scientists 72 D-Index: 50 scientists 73 D-Index: 46 scientists 74 D-Index: 43 scientists 75 D-Index: 45 scientists 76 D-Index: 45 scientists 77 D-Index: 30 scientists 78 D-Index: 25 scientists 79 D-Index: 31 scientists 80 D-Index: 29 scientists 81 D-Index: 18 scientists 82 D-Index: 21 scientists 83 D-Index: 26 scientists 84 D-Index: 15 scientists 85 D-Index: 15 scientists 86 D-Index: 19 scientists 87 D-Index: 19 scientists 88 D-Index: 12 scientists 89 D-Index: 7 scientists 90 D-Index: 19 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 13 scientists 93 D-Index: 9 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 8 scientists 96 D-Index: 7 scientists 97 D-Index: 6 scientists 98 D-Index: 6 scientists 99 D-Index: 6 scientists 100+ D-Index: 97 scientists
30 D-Index 100+

This scientist: 35 D-Index — 16th percentile

16% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 7,777 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30 177
31 210
32 222
33 188
34 181
35 243 35
36 261
37 272
38 278
39 300
40 297
41 308
42 313
43 300
44 269
45 260
46 228
47 251
48 203
49 186
50 187
51 166
52 138
53 141
54 131
55 137
56 109
57 129
58 95
59 105
60 106
61 86
62 94
63 77
64 79
65 59
66 68
67 51
68 49
69 40
70 43
71 40
72 50
73 46
74 43
75 45
76 45
77 30
78 25
79 31
80 29
81 18
82 21
83 26
84 15
85 15
86 19
87 19
88 12
89 7
90 19
91 20
92 13
93 9
94 13
95 8
96 7
97 6
98 6
99 6
100+ 97
Download as CSV

Overview

Rosalinda V. Ignacio is a researcher primarily affiliated with the University of Michigan-Ann Arbor in the United States. Their research spans various areas within medicine, focusing notably on pulmonary and respiratory medicine as well as epidemiology and geriatrics and gerontology.

Their recent publications reflect a diverse range of interests and contributions to medical science. Notable works include:

  • Polysubstance use and association with opioid use disorder treatment in the US Veterans Health Administration, 2020, Addiction
  • Impact of long-term administration of maralixibat on children with cholestasis secondary to Alagille syndrome, 2022, Hepatology Communications
  • Undergraduate nursing students' pharmacology knowledge and risk of error estimate, 2020, Nurse Education Today
  • Use of Benzodiazepines and Risk of Incident Dementia: A Retrospective Cohort Study, 2021, The Journals of Gerontology Series A
  • Benzodiazepine Use among Medicare, Commercially Insured, and Veteran Older Adults, 2013-2017, 2020, Journal of the American Geriatrics Society

Ignacio has collaborated frequently with several coauthors including Frederic C. Blow, Kevin R. Flaherty, H. Myra Kim, Mark A. Ilgen, and Benjamin L. Shneider. These collaborations reflect interdisciplinary work across topics in medicine and related fields.

The main fields covered in Ignacio's research include:

  • Medicine

Within medicine, their subfields of study include:

  • Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine
  • Epidemiology
  • Geriatrics and Gerontology
  • Physiology
  • General Health Professions

The topics frequently addressed by Ignacio in their research are:

  • Interstitial Lung Diseases and Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis
  • Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes
  • Pharmaceutical Practices and Patient Outcomes
  • Pediatric Hepatobiliary Diseases and Treatments
  • Drug Transport and Resistance Mechanisms
  • Sleep and related disorders
  • Sarcoidosis and Beryllium Toxicity Research

Their research work appears in several recurring publication venues, mainly:

  • Addiction
  • Hepatology Communications
  • American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine
  • Nurse Education Today
  • The Journals of Gerontology Series A

Best Publications

  • Psychiatric Diagnoses and Risk of Suicide in Veterans

    Mark A. Ilgen;Amy S. B. Bohnert;Rosalinda V. Ignacio;John F. McCarthy

  • Treatment adherence with antipsychotic medications in bipolar disorder

    Martha X Sajatovic;Marcia Valenstein;Marcia Valenstein;Frederic C. Blow;Frederic C. Blow;Dara Ganoczy;Dara Ganoczy

  • Noncancer pain conditions and risk of suicide

    Mark A. Ilgen;Mark A. Ilgen;Felicia Kleinberg;Felicia Kleinberg;Rosalinda V. Ignacio;Rosalinda V. Ignacio;Amy S. B. Bohnert;Amy S. B. Bohnert

  • Suicide and traumatic brain injury among individuals seeking Veterans Health Administration services.

    Lisa Anne Brenner;Rosalinda V. Ignacio;Frederic C. Blow

  • Treatment Adherence With Lithium and Anticonvulsant Medications Among Patients With Bipolar Disorder

    Martha X Sajatovic;Marcia Valenstein;Frederick Blow;Dara Ganoczy

  • Trends in antipsychotic use in dementia 1999-2007.

    Helen C. Kales;Kara Zivin;Kara Zivin;Hyungjin Myra Kim;Hyungjin Myra Kim;Marcia Valenstein;Marcia Valenstein

  • Military Sexual Trauma and Suicide Mortality

    Rachel Kimerling;Rachel Kimerling;Kerry Makin-Byrd;Kerry Makin-Byrd;Samantha Louzon;Rosalinda V. Ignacio

  • Predictors of nonadherence among individuals with bipolar disorder receiving treatment in a community mental health clinic.

    Martha Sajatovic;Rosalinda V. Ignacio;Jane A. West;Kristin A. Cassidy

  • Suicide Among Patients in the Veterans Affairs Health System: Rural–Urban Differences in Rates, Risks, and Methods

    John F. McCarthy;Frederic C. Blow;Rosalinda V. Ignacio;Mark A. Ilgen

  • Risk of Death From Accidental Overdose Associated With Psychiatric and Substance Use Disorders

    Amy S.B. Bohnert;Mark A. Ilgen;Rosalinda V. Ignacio;John F. McCarthy

  • Predictors of suicide in patients with dementia

    Lisa S. Seyfried;Helen C. Kales;Helen C. Kales;Rosalinda V. Ignacio;Rosalinda V. Ignacio;Yeates Conwell

  • The efficacy of two brief intervention strategies among injured, at-risk drinkers in the emergency department: impact of tailored messaging and brief advice

    Frederic C. Blow;Kristen L. Barry;Maureen A. Walton;Ronald F. Maio

  • Does Adherence to Medications for Type 2 Diabetes Differ Between Individuals With Vs Without Schizophrenia

    Julie Kreyenbuhl;Lisa B. Dixon;Lisa B. Dixon;John F. McCarthy;Soheil Soliman

  • Veterans Affairs Health System and mental health treatment retention among patients with serious mental illness: evaluating accessibility and availability barriers.

    John F. McCarthy;Frederic C. Blow;Frederic C. Blow;Marcia Valenstein;Marcia Valenstein;Ellen P. Fischer;Ellen P. Fischer

  • Patterns and trends in antipsychotic prescribing for Parkinson disease psychosis.

    Daniel Weintraub;Peijun Chen;Peijun Chen;Rosalinda V. Ignacio;Eugenia Mamikonyan

  • Suicide Mortality Among Patients Treated by the Veterans Health Administration From 2000 to 2007

    Frederic C. Blow;Amy S. B. Bohnert;Mark A. Ilgen;Rosalinda Ignacio

  • Psychopathology, Iraq and Afghanistan service, and suicide among Veterans Health Administration patients.

    Mark A. Ilgen;John F. McCarthy;Rosalinda V. Ignacio;Amy S. B. Bohnert

  • Polysubstance use and association with opioid use disorder treatment in the US Veterans Health Administration.

    Lewei Allison Lin;Amy S. B. Bohnert;Frederic C. Blow;Adam J. Gordon

  • Psychiatric comorbidity in older adults with bipolar disorder

    Martha Sajatovic;Frederic C. Blow;Rosalinda V. Ignacio

  • Misclassification of suicide deaths: examining the psychiatric history of overdose decedents.

    Amy S B Bohnert;John F McCarthy;Rosalinda V Ignacio;Mark A Ilgen

Frequent Co-Authors

Frederic C. Blow
Frederic C. Blow University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
John F. McCarthy
John F. McCarthy University of Michigan Medical School
Marcia Valenstein
Marcia Valenstein University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
Amy S.B. Bohnert
Amy S.B. Bohnert University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
Maureen A. Walton
Maureen A. Walton University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
Stephen T. Chermack
Stephen T. Chermack University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
Amy M. Kilbourne
Amy M. Kilbourne University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
Rebecca M. Cunningham
Rebecca M. Cunningham University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
Daniel Weintraub
Daniel Weintraub University of Pennsylvania
Lisa B. Dixon
Lisa B. Dixon Columbia University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring social sciences and humanities offers a broad range of online degree options for students interested in careers that make a difference in society. Whether you’re just starting out or considering advanced graduate study, flexible online programs exist for every stage of your educational journey.

Many students begin with a bachelor of science in psychology, which provides foundational knowledge in behavior, cognition, and interpersonal relationships. From there, some pursue clinical or counseling careers by exploring advanced degrees. For example, you can look into the msw online options to prepare for licensure as a social worker if you are passionate about social advocacy.

If your career goals include practicing as a psychologist, there are several psy d programs to help students gain clinical skills for careers in therapy, assessment, and mental health services. Additionally, those interested in supporting couples and families can choose from accredited mft programs and earn licensure as a Marriage and Family Therapist.

Each program has unique admission criteria, timelines, and specializations, so it is important to select the degree pathway that aligns with your career aspirations and current experience.

Best Scientists Citing Rosalinda V. Ignacio

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles