World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Robert J. Vandenberg

Robert J. Vandenberg

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
58
Citations
29813
World Ranking
3770
National Ranking
2110

Robert J. Vandenberg publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Robert J. Vandenberg sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 108 publications — 25th percentile

25% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Robert J. Vandenberg D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Robert J. Vandenberg sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 58 D-Index — 67th percentile

67% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

Robert J. Vandenberg is affiliated with the University of Georgia in the United States and contributes primarily to research in Computer Science. Their work spans several subfields, including General Health Professions, Information Systems, Social Psychology, Sociology and Political Science, and Development.

The research topics most frequently associated with Vandenberg include Workplace Health and Well-being, Stress and Burnout Research, Healthcare professionals' stress and burnout, Health and Lifestyle Studies, Software Engineering Techniques and Practices, Expert finding and Q&A systems, and Software Engineering Research.

Scientific publications by Robert J. Vandenberg include the following recent papers:

  • Translating CDSMP to the Workplace: Results of the Live Healthy Work Healthy Program, 2020, American Journal of Health Promotion
  • Evaluating the impact of the live healthy, work healthy program on organizational outcomes: A randomized field experiment, 2021, Journal of Applied Psychology
  • ORM-CARMA Virtual Feature Topics for Advanced Reviewer Development, 2021, Organizational Research Methods
  • The Challenges of Scale Development, 2022, Academy of Management Proceedings
  • Emerging Topics and Future Directions in Measurement, 2022, Academy of Management Proceedings

Throughout their career, Vandenberg has published frequently in these venues:

  • Academy of Management Proceedings (3 publications)
  • Journal of Applied Psychology (1 publication)
  • American Journal of Health Promotion (1 publication)
  • Organizational Research Methods (1 publication)
  • Harvard Dataverse (1 publication)

Frequent collaborators in their research include the following coauthors:

  • Lisa Schurer Lambert (4 publications)
  • Anna Maria Zabinski (4 publications)
  • Larry J. Williams (3 publications)
  • Nicholas J. Haynes (2 publications)
  • Mark G. Wilson (2 publications)

Robert J. Vandenberg's work integrates interdisciplinary perspectives that bridge health, social sciences, and computing. The combination of topics covered reflects a focus on improving workplace health and addressing stress and burnout within professional environments, alongside contributions to software engineering research.

Best Publications

  • A Review and Synthesis of the Measurement Invariance Literature: Suggestions, Practices, and Recommendations for Organizational Research

    Robert J. Vandenberg;Charles E. Lance

  • Longitudinal Research: The Theory, Design, and Analysis of Change:

    Robert E. Ployhart;Robert J. Vandenberg

  • Exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis: guidelines, issues, and alternatives

    Amy E. Hurley;Terri A. Scandura;Chester A. Schriesheim;Michael T. Brannick

  • Examining the Causal Order of Job Satisfaction and Organizational Commitment

    Robert J. Vandenberg;Charles E. Lance

  • Understanding fit and appropriation effects in group support systems via meta-analysis

    Alan R. Dennis;Barbara H. Wixom;Robert J. Vandenberg

  • 12 Structural Equation Modeling in Management Research: A Guide for Improved Analysis

    Larry J. Williams;Robert J. Vandenberg;Jeffrey R. Edwards

  • The role of change in the relationship between commitment and turnover: A latent growth modeling approach

    Kathleen Bentein;Christian Vandenberghe;Robert Vandenberg;Florence Stinglhamber

  • Work characteristics and employee health and well-being: Test of a model of healthy work organization.

    Mark G. Wilson;David M. Dejoy;Robert J. Vandenberg;Hettie A. Richardson

  • The Impact of High Involvement Work Processes on Organizational Effectiveness A Second-Order Latent Variable Approach

    Robert J. Vandenberg;Hettie A. Richardson;Lorrina J. Eastman

  • Creating safer workplaces: assessing the determinants and role of safety climate.

    David M. DeJoy;Bryan S. Schaffer;Murray G. A. Wilson;Robert J. Vandenberg

  • Recent Advances in Causal Modeling Methods for Organizational and Management Research

    Larry J. Williams;Jeffrey R. Edwards;Robert J. Vandenberg

  • Toward a Further Understanding of and Improvement in Measurement Invariance Methods and Procedures

    Robert J. Vandenberg

  • Disaggregating the Motives Underlying Turnover Intentions: When Do Intentions Predict Turnover Behavior?

    Robert J. Vandenberg;Jodi Barnes Nelson

  • A Central Question in Cross-Cultural Research: Do Employees of Different Cultures Interpret Work-related Measures in an Equivalent Manner?:

    Christine M. Riordan;Robert J. Vandenberg

  • A longitudinal assessment of the determinant relationship between employee commitments to the occupation and the organization.

    Robert J. Vandenberg;Vida Scarpello

  • Statistical and methodological myths and urban legends : doctrine, verity, and fable in the organizational and social sciences

    Charles E. Lance;Robert J Vandenberg

  • Employee involvement climate and organizational effectiveness

    Christine M. Riordan;Robert J. Vandenberg;Hettie A. Richardson

  • Assessing newcomers' changing commitments to the organization during the first 6 months of work

    Robert J. Vandenberg;Robin M. Self

  • The Critical Psychological States: An Underrepresented Component in Job Characteristics Model Research

    Robert W. Renn;Robert J. Vandenberg

  • A person-centered approach to the study of commitment

    John P. Meyer;Laura J. Stanley;Robert J. Vandenberg

  • Integrating managerial perceptions and transformational leadership into a work‐unit level model of employee involvement

    Hettie A. Richardson;Robert J. Vandenberg

Frequent Co-Authors

David M. DeJoy
David M. DeJoy University of Georgia
Charles E. Lance
Charles E. Lance University of the Western Cape
Larry J. Williams
Larry J. Williams Texas Tech University
Rod K. Dishman
Rod K. Dishman University of Georgia
Mo Wang
Mo Wang University of Florida
Kate Lorig
Kate Lorig Stanford University
Lois E. Tetrick
Lois E. Tetrick George Mason University
David Chan
David Chan Singapore Management University
Jeffrey R. Edwards
Jeffrey R. Edwards University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing a degree in psychology can open doors to various rewarding career pathways, including becoming a Board Certified Behavior Analyst (BCBA). Many students choose online programs for greater flexibility, often balancing education with work or family commitments.

If you’re aiming for a BCBA role, it’s important to understand location-specific requirements. For example, Philadelphia bcba requirements emphasize approved graduate-level coursework and supervised experience. Similarly, Phoenix bcba requirements include specific educational credentials and certification steps.

Requirements can also vary in other cities. Pittsburgh bcba requirements focus on regionally accredited programs and a clear certification process, while Plano bcba education requirements detail specific instructional hours and practicum expectations.

Exploring these regional differences will help you choose the right online degree and career pathway, ensuring you meet all the steps necessary for professional success in psychology or behavioral analysis.

Best Scientists Citing Robert J. Vandenberg

Trending Scientists