World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Theo A. Klimstra

Theo A. Klimstra

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 46 6455 6010 3495 3174 134 7935

Theo A. Klimstra publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Theo A. Klimstra between 2009 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Theo A. Klimstra published across 17 years, from 2009 to 2025, averaging 8.5 papers a year. Output peaked at 20 publications in 2013. 8 of the 145 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15 20
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 2009 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 20. Peak 20 publications in 2013. 2009: 3 publications 2010: 8 publications 2011: 12 publications 2012: 16 publications 2013: 20 publications 2014: 13 publications 2015: 6 publications 2016: 4 publications 2017: 9 publications 2018: 6 publications 2019: 10 publications 2020: 8 publications 2021: 14 publications 2022: 3 publications 2023: 5 publications 2024: 6 publications 2025: 2 publications
2009 2025

145 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Theo A. Klimstra: publications per year, 2009 to 2025
Year Publications
2009 3
2010 8
2011 12
2012 16
2013 20
2014 13
2015 6
2016 4
2017 9
2018 6
2019 10
2020 8
2021 14
2022 3
2023 5
2024 6
2025 2
Total 145
Download as CSV

Theo A. Klimstra publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Theo A. Klimstra sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 131–140 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 134 publications — 40th percentile

40% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605
91–100 713
101–110 736
111–120 686
121–130 670
131–140 644 134
141–150 597
151–160 576
161–170 477
171–180 450
181–190 397
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

Theo A. Klimstra D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Theo A. Klimstra sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 46–47 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 46 D-Index — 45th percentile

45% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671
36–37 659
38–39 641
40–41 671
42–43 617
44–45 558
46–47 495 46
48–49 487
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Theo A. Klimstra is affiliated with Tufts University in the United States and has contributed extensively to research in psychology and social sciences. Their work spans multiple subfields including sociology and political science, developmental and educational psychology, clinical psychology, experimental and cognitive psychology, and demography.

Their research primarily focuses on topics such as identity, memory, and therapy; family support in illness; youth education and societal dynamics; personality disorders and psychopathology; personality traits and psychology; child and adolescent psychosocial and emotional development; and aging and gerontology research.

Recent significant publications by Theo A. Klimstra include the following papers:

  • "The unfolding dark side: Age trends in dark personality features," 2020, Journal of Research in Personality
  • "Time and Identity: An Evaluation of Existing Empirical Research, Conceptual Challenges, and Methodological Opportunities," 2021, Identity

Other papers from related research include:

  • "How Does Financial Life Shape Emerging Adulthood? Short-Term Longitudinal Associations Between Perceived Features of Emerging Adulthood, Financial Behaviors, and Financial Well-Being," 2020, Emerging Adulthood
  • "Associations between the identity domains of future plans and education, and the role of a major curricular internship on identity formation processes," 2021, Journal of Adolescence
  • "The development of narrative identity and the emergence of personality disorders in adolescence," 2020, Current Opinion in Psychology

Theo A. Klimstra has collaborated frequently with several coauthors, reflecting interdisciplinary cooperation and collaboration in their research. Frequent coauthors include:

  • Jaap J. A. Denissen
  • Amy Y. See
  • Sara K. Johnson
  • Elisabeth L. de Moor
  • Jelle J. Sijtsema

Their research is regularly published in specific academic journals, with the most frequent venues being:

  • Identity
  • Journal of Research in Personality
  • Psychological Assessment
  • Emerging Adulthood
  • Current Opinion in Psychology

Theo A. Klimstra's scientific contributions are deeply rooted in the extensive study of identity and personality development through adolescence into adulthood, as well as examinations of psychological processes related to family dynamics and aging. Their ongoing work continues to impact these interconnected areas of psychology and social sciences.

Best Publications

  • Identity Formation in Adolescence: Change or Stability?

    Theo A. Klimstra;William W. Hale;Quinten A. W. Raaijmakers;Susan J. T. Branje

  • Personality Maturation Around the World A Cross-Cultural Examination of Social-Investment Theory

    Wiebke Bleidorn;Theo A. Klimstra;Jaap J. A. Denissen;Peter J. Rentfrow

  • Maturation of personality in adolescence

    Theo A. Klimstra;William W. Hale Iii;Quinten A. W. Raaijmakers;Susan J. T. Branje

  • Anxiety trajectories and identity development in adolescence: a five-wave longitudinal study.

    Elisabetta Crocetti;Theo Klimstra;Loes Keijsers;William W. Hale

  • Loneliness and Facebook motives in adolescence: a longitudinal inquiry into directionality of effect.

    Eveline Teppers;Koen Luyckx;Theo A. Klimstra;Luc Goossens

  • The Interplay of Loneliness and Depressive Symptoms Across Adolescence: Exploring the Role of Personality Traits

    Janne Vanhalst;Theo A. Klimstra;Koen Luyckx;Ron H. J. Scholte

  • Daily Dynamics of Personal Identity and Self–Concept Clarity:

    Seth J. Schwartz;Theo A. Klimstra;Koen Luyckx;William W. Hale

  • Personal identity processes from adolescence through the late 20s : age trends, functionality, and depressive symptoms

    Koen Luyckx;Theo A. Klimstra;Bart Duriez;Stijn Van Petegem

  • Longitudinal Associations Between Parental Bonding, Parenting Stress, and Executive Functioning in Toddlerhood

    Evi S. A. de Cock;Jens Henrichs;Jens Henrichs;Theo A. Klimstra;A. Janneke B. M. Maas

  • Personality Types in Adolescence: Change and Stability and Links with Adjustment and Relationships--A Five-Wave Longitudinal Study.

    Wim Meeus;Rens Van de Schoot;Theo Klimstra;Susan Branje

  • Identity Statuses in Young Adult Employees: Prospective Relations with Work Engagement and Burnout.

    Koen Luyckx;Bart Duriez;Theo A. Klimstra;Hans De Witte

  • Short-term fluctuations in identity: introducing a micro-level approach to identity formation.

    Theo A. Klimstra;Koen Luyckx;William A. Hale Iii;Tom Frijns

  • Personality Assessment and Maturation

    Theo A. Klimstra;William W. Hale;Quinten A. W. Raaijmakers;Susan J. T. Branje

  • Impact of Early Adolescent Externalizing Problem Behaviors on Identity Development in Middle to Late Adolescence: A Prospective 7-Year Longitudinal Study

    Elisabetta Crocetti;Theo A. Klimstra;Theo A. Klimstra;William W. Hale;Hans M. Koot

  • A theoretical framework for the associations between identity and psychopathology.

    Theo A. Klimstra;Jaap J. A. Denissen

  • Personality traits, loneliness, and attitudes toward aloneness in adolescence

    Eveline Teppers;Theo A. Klimstra;Carolien Van Damme;Koen Luyckx

  • A cross-national study of identity status in Dutch and Italian adolescents: Status distributions and correlates

    Elisabetta Crocetti;Seth J. Schwartz;Alessandra Fermani;Theo Klimstra

  • Characterizing the Self-System over Time in Adolescence: Internal Structure and Associations with Internalizing Symptoms

    Seth J. Schwartz;Theo A. Klimstra;Koen Luyckx;William W. Hale

  • Come rain or come shine: Individual differences in how weather affects mood.

    Theo A. Klimstra;Tom Frijns;Loes Keijsers;Jaap J. A. Denissen

  • Longitudinal associations between personality traits and problem behavior symptoms in adolescence

    Theo A. Klimstra;Joyce Akse;William W. Hale;Quinten A.W. Raaijmakers

Frequent Co-Authors

Wim Meeus
Wim Meeus Utrecht University
Koen Luyckx
Koen Luyckx KU Leuven
Luc Goossens
Luc Goossens KU Leuven
William W. Hale
William W. Hale Utrecht University
Jaap J. A. Denissen
Jaap J. A. Denissen Utrecht University
Susan Branje
Susan Branje Utrecht University
Bart Duriez
Bart Duriez KU Leuven
Elisabetta Crocetti
Elisabetta Crocetti University of Bologna
Quinten A. W. Raaijmakers
Quinten A. W. Raaijmakers Utrecht University
Seth J. Schwartz
Seth J. Schwartz The University of Texas at Austin

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring a career in psychology opens many doors, especially as mental health awareness grows. One rewarding career path is becoming a substance abuse counselor. The journey may vary by location, so understanding local requirements is essential. For example, if you want to know how to become a substance abuse counselor in Chandler, you’ll notice steps could differ from other cities.

Education is the foundation. Many areas, such as Charlotte substance abuse counselors education requirements, focus on earning at least a bachelor’s degree, with a preference for advanced degrees for some positions. In other locations, like Chesapeake, you’ll find detailed substance abuse counselor requirements in Chesapeake that include supervised clinical experience and state licensure.

If you plan on becoming a substance abuse counselor in Chicago, keep in mind that online psychology programs can help you meet essential coursework and training needs. By comparing programs and city-specific requirements, you can take the next step toward a meaningful and impactful career in psychology or counseling—no matter where you live.

Best Scientists Citing Theo A. Klimstra

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles