World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
107
Citations
51491
World Ranking
6159
National Ranking
597

Paula R Williamson publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Paula R Williamson sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 610 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 568 publications — 68th percentile

68% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

Paula R Williamson D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Paula R Williamson sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 399 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 107 D-Index — 70th percentile

70% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Overview

Paula R Williamson is affiliated with the University of Liverpool in the United Kingdom. Their research primarily spans the fields of Medicine and Social Sciences, with significant contributions to subfields such as Sociology and Political Science, Economics and Econometrics, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Surgery, and General Health Professions.

The scientist's core research topics include the Delphi Technique in Research, Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life, Clinical Practice Guidelines Implementation, Meta-Analysis and Systematic Reviews, Hip and Femur Fractures, Long-Term Effects of COVID-19, and Intensive Care Unit Cognitive Disorders.

Recent notable publications include:

  • A minimal common outcome measure set for COVID-19 clinical research (2020) in The Lancet Infectious Diseases
  • Guidelines for Reporting Outcomes in Trial Reports (2022) in JAMA
  • Guidelines for Reporting Outcomes in Trial Protocols (2022) in JAMA
  • A core outcome set for post-COVID-19 condition in adults for use in clinical practice and research: an international Delphi consensus study (2022) in The Lancet Respiratory Medicine
  • Lung cancer mortality reduction by LDCT screening: UKLS randomised trial results and international meta-analysis (2021) in The Lancet Regional Health - Europe

Frequent co-authors collaborating with Paula R Williamson include:

  • Susanna Dodd
  • Sarah L. Gorst
  • Anthony G Marson
  • Mike Clarke
  • Jamie J Kirkham

Their work has been published repeatedly in several key venues, reflecting a pattern of ongoing scholarly engagement. These publication venues include:

  • Journal of Clinical Epidemiology
  • BMJ Open
  • Trials
  • F1000Research
  • HRB Open Research

Best Publications

  • Design and analysis of pilot studies: recommendations for good practice

    Gillian A. Lancaster;Susanna Dodd;Paula R. Williamson

  • The COMET Handbook: Version 1.0

    Paula R. Williamson;Douglas G. Altman;Heather Bagley;Karen L. Barnes

  • Systematic Review of the Empirical Evidence of Study Publication Bias and Outcome Reporting Bias

    Kerry Dwan;Douglas G. Altman;Juan A. Arnaiz;Jill Bloom

  • A minimal common outcome measure set for COVID-19 clinical research

    John C. Marshall;Srinivas Murthy;Janet Diaz;Neil Adhikari

  • Developing core outcome sets for clinical trials: issues to consider.

    Paula R Williamson;Douglas G Altman;Jane M Blazeby;Mike Clarke

  • The SANAD study of effectiveness of valproate, lamotrigine, or topiramate for generalised and unclassifiable epilepsy: an unblinded randomised controlled trial.

    Anthony G Marson;Asya M Al-Kharusi;Muna Alwaidh;Richard Appleton

  • The SANAD study of effectiveness of carbamazepine, gabapentin, lamotrigine, oxcarbazepine, or topiramate for treatment of partial epilepsy: an unblinded randomised controlled trial

    Anthony G Marson;Asya M Al-Kharusi;Muna Alwaidh;Richard Appleton

  • Systematic Review of the Empirical Evidence of Study Publication Bias and Outcome Reporting Bias — An Updated Review

    Kerry Dwan;Carrol Gamble;Paula R. Williamson;Jamie J. Kirkham

  • The impact of outcome reporting bias in randomised controlled trials on a cohort of systematic reviews.

    Jamie J Kirkham;Kerry M Dwan;Douglas G Altman;Carrol Gamble

  • A Randomized Trial of Genotype-Guided Dosing of Warfarin

    Munir Pirmohamed;Girvan Burnside;Niclas Eriksson;Andrea L. Jorgensen

  • Adverse Drug Reactions in Hospital In-Patients: A Prospective Analysis of 3695 Patient-Episodes

    Emma C. Davies;Christopher F. Green;Stephen Taylor;Paula R. Williamson

  • Using the Delphi technique to determine which outcomes to measure in clinical trials: recommendations for the future based on a systematic review of existing studies.

    Ian P. Sinha;Rosalind L. Smyth;Paula R. Williamson

  • How to select outcome measurement instruments for outcomes included in a “Core Outcome Set” – a practical guideline

    Cecilia A. C. Prinsen;Sunita Vohra;Michael R. Rose;Maarten Boers

  • Core Outcome Set-STAndards for Development: The COS-STAD recommendations

    Jamie J Kirkham;Katherine Davis;Douglas G Altman;Jane M Blazeby

  • Risk factors for complication following ERCP; results of a large-scale, prospective multicenter study.

    E. J. Williams;S. Taylor;P. Fairclough;A. Hamlyn

  • Aggregate data meta-analysis with time-to-event outcomes

    Paula R. Williamson;Catrin Tudur Smith;Jane L. Hutton;Anthony G. Marson

  • Cervical cerclage for prevention of preterm delivery in woman with short cervix:randomised controlled trial

    Meekai S. To;Zarko Alfirevic;Victoria C. F. Heath;Simona Cicero

  • Core Outcome Set-STAndards for Reporting: The COS-STAR Statement.

    Jamie J. Kirkham;Sarah Gorst;Douglas G. Altman;Jane M. Blazeby

  • A taxonomy has been developed for outcomes in medical research to help improve knowledge discovery.

    Susanna Dodd;Mike Clarke;Lorne Becker;Chris Mavergames

  • Guidelines for the Content of Statistical Analysis Plans in Clinical Trials.

    Carrol Gamble;Ashma Krishan;Deborah Stocken;Deborah Stocken;Steff Lewis

Frequent Co-Authors

Mike Clarke
Mike Clarke Queen's University Belfast
Jane M Blazeby
Jane M Blazeby University of Bristol
Anthony G Marson
Anthony G Marson University of Liverpool
Bridget Young
Bridget Young University of Liverpool
Douglas G. Altman
Douglas G. Altman University of Oxford
Munir Pirmohamed
Munir Pirmohamed University of Liverpool
Zarko Alfirevic
Zarko Alfirevic University of Liverpool
David Chadwick
David Chadwick University of Liverpool
Keith M. Kerr
Keith M. Kerr Aberdeen Royal Infirmary
Stephen W. Duffy
Stephen W. Duffy Queen Mary University of London

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

If you’re considering studying Medicine in the USA, you may also be interested in related online degrees that expand your career options in healthcare. Advancements in technology have made it easier for students and professionals to further their education with flexible online programs.

Administration is a popular pathway for medical professionals looking to move into leadership roles. There are cahme accredited online mha programs designed for those who want to manage healthcare facilities or organizations. These accredited degrees provide specialized knowledge in healthcare systems, policy, and management.

Registered nurses looking to advance their qualifications can explore rn to bsn no clinical hours options, which allow you to earn your BSN degree online without in-person clinical requirements.

For those seeking advanced clinical leadership roles, options such as the shortest post master's dnp program help nurses complete their Doctor of Nursing Practice efficiently. If you’re searching for more accessible pathways, you can also look into dnp programs that offer flexible admission and curriculum requirements.

These online degrees create new opportunities and career flexibility, making it easier to grow within the ever-changing field of medicine and healthcare.

Best Scientists Citing Paula R Williamson

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles