2023 - Research.com Medicine in United Kingdom Leader Award
2022 - Research.com Medicine in United Kingdom Leader Award
1997 - Bradford Hill Medal, Royal Statistical Society (UK)
Fellow of The Academy of Medical Sciences, United Kingdom
Lifetime achievement award, British Medical Journal (BMJ)
Douglas G. Altman mostly deals with MEDLINE, Research design, Clinical trial, Systematic review and Checklist. The MEDLINE study combines topics in areas such as Guideline, Randomized controlled trial, Statement, Family medicine and Intensive care medicine. His research in Research design intersects with topics in Medical physics, Medical research and Set.
His Systematic review research is multidisciplinary, relying on both Meta-analysis, Publication bias, Health care and Evidence-based medicine. His Checklist research includes elements of Observational study, Applied psychology, Medical education, Clinical study design and Critical appraisal. In his research on the topic of Alternative medicine, Statistics is strongly related with Data mining.
The scientist’s investigation covers issues in MEDLINE, Randomized controlled trial, Clinical trial, Research design and Family medicine. His research in MEDLINE is mostly concerned with Systematic review. The various areas that Douglas G. Altman examines in his Systematic review study include Meta-analysis, Health care and Evidence-based medicine.
His Randomized controlled trial research incorporates elements of Physical therapy, Sample size determination and Data mining. He has included themes like Medical physics, Pediatrics and Intensive care medicine in his Clinical trial study. His Checklist study integrates concerns from other disciplines, such as Clinical study design, Quality and Medical education.
His primary scientific interests are in MEDLINE, Checklist, Clinical trial, Randomized controlled trial and Family medicine. Particularly relevant to Systematic review is his body of work in MEDLINE. His research investigates the connection between Systematic review and topics such as Psychological intervention that intersect with issues in Health care.
Douglas G. Altman usually deals with Checklist and limits it to topics linked to Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials and Transparency. His study focuses on the intersection of Clinical trial and fields such as Alternative medicine with connections in the field of Intensive care medicine. His studies in Randomized controlled trial integrate themes in fields like Physical therapy, Data mining and Epidemiology.
Douglas G. Altman mainly investigates MEDLINE, Checklist, Research design, Systematic review and Clinical trial. His MEDLINE study combines topics from a wide range of disciplines, such as Observational study, Delphi method, Data mining, Randomized controlled trial and Evidence-based practice. His studies deal with areas such as Statistics and N of 1 trial as well as Data mining.
His Checklist research is multidisciplinary, relying on both Alternative medicine, Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials, Health care and Medical education. In his study, Evidence-based medicine is inextricably linked to Family medicine, which falls within the broad field of Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials. His biological study spans a wide range of topics, including Psychological intervention, Meta-analysis and Confounding.
This overview was generated by a machine learning system which analysed the scientist’s body of work. If you have any feedback, you can contact us here.
Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement
David Moher;David Moher;Alessandro Liberati;Jennifer Tetzlaff;Douglas G. Altman.
PLOS Medicine (2009)
Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement.
J M Bland;J M Bland;D G Altman;D G Altman.
The Lancet (1986)
Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses
Julian P T Higgins;Simon G Thompson;Jonathan J Deeks;Douglas G Altman.
BMJ (2003)
The PRISMA Statement for Reporting Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Studies That Evaluate Health Care Interventions: Explanation and Elaboration
Alessandro Liberati;Douglas G. Altman;Jennifer Tetzlaff;Cynthia Mulrow.
PLOS Medicine (2009)
Assessing Risk of Bias in Included Studies
Julian Pt Higgins;Douglas G Altman.
(2008)
The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies
E von Elm;D G Altman;M Egger;M Egger;S J Pocock.
Bulletin of The World Health Organization (2007)
Practical statistics for medical research
Douglas G. Altman.
(2006)
The Cochrane Collaboration’s tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials
Julian P T Higgins;Douglas G Altman;Peter C Gøtzsche;Peter Jüni.
BMJ (2011)
The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate healthcare interventions: explanation and elaboration
Alessandro Liberati;Douglas G Altman;Jennifer Tetzlaff;Cynthia Mulrow.
BMJ (2009)
Practical Statistics for Medical Research.
S. D. Walter;D. G. Altman.
Biometrics (1992)
If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.
We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:
Ottawa Hospital
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
University of Bern
Cochrane
Queen's University Belfast
Utrecht University
Université Paris Cité
University of Birmingham
University of Liverpool
University College London
University of Utah
The Ohio State University
University of Minnesota
Columbia University
University of Bristol
Oregon State University
California Academy of Sciences
University of Connecticut
Zhejiang University
University of Oxford
University of Pittsburgh
Statistics Canada
Pennsylvania State University
Kyoto University
Fermilab
Virginia Tech