World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
129
Citations
72642
World Ranking
2559
National Ranking
33

Christian Gluud publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Christian Gluud sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 611 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 850 publications — 89th percentile

89% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

Christian Gluud D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Christian Gluud sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 400 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 129 D-Index — 88th percentile

88% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Overview

Christian Gluud is affiliated with the University of Southern Denmark in Denmark. Their research primarily spans the broad field of medicine with a particular focus on several subfields including cardiology and cardiovascular medicine, epidemiology, clinical psychology, neurology, and surgery.

Their main research topics reflect a focus on systematic approaches and clinical conditions, including:

  • Meta-analysis and systematic reviews
  • COVID-19 clinical research studies
  • Health systems, economic evaluations, and quality of life
  • Sepsis diagnosis and treatment
  • Hemodynamic monitoring and therapy
  • Child and adolescent psychosocial and emotional development
  • Attention deficit hyperactivity disorder

Christian Gluud has contributed extensively to scientific literature. Their recent notable papers include:

  • "Blinding in randomised clinical trials of psychological interventions: a retrospective study of published trial reports" (2020) published in BMJ Evidence-Based Medicine
  • "Dexamethasone 12 mg versus 6 mg for patients with COVID-19 and severe hypoxaemia: a pre-planned, secondary Bayesian analysis of the COVID STEROID 2 trial" (2021) published in Intensive Care Medicine
  • "Maternal Sildenafil vs Placebo in Pregnant Women With Severe Early-Onset Fetal Growth Restriction" (2020) published in JAMA Network Open
  • "Vaccines to prevent COVID-19: A living systematic review with Trial Sequential Analysis and network meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials" (2022) published in PLoS ONE
  • "Interventions for treatment of COVID-19: A living systematic review with meta-analyses and trial sequential analyses (The LIVING Project)" (2020) published in PLoS Medicine

The frequent coauthors who have collaborated with Christian Gluud include:

  • Janus Christian Jakobsen
  • Jane Lindschou
  • Markus Harboe Olsen
  • Sophie Juul
  • Caroline Barkholt Kamp

Their research findings have been published across various scientific venues, with high frequencies in the following journals and databases:

  • Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews
  • BMJ Open
  • Systematic Reviews
  • Trials
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)

Best Publications

  • Mortality in randomized trials of antioxidant supplements for primary and secondary prevention: Systematic review and meta-analysis

    Goran Bjelakovic;Dimitrinka Nikolova;Lise Lotte Gluud;Rosa G. Simonetti

  • Empirical evidence of bias in treatment effect estimates in controlled trials with different interventions and outcomes: meta-epidemiological study.

    Lesley Wood;Matthias Egger;Lise Lotte Gluud;Kenneth F Schulz

  • Reported Methodologic Quality and Discrepancies between Large and Small Randomized Trials in Meta-Analyses

    Lise L. Kjaergard;John Villumsen;Christian Gluud

  • When and how should multiple imputation be used for handling missing data in randomised clinical trials – a practical guide with flowcharts

    Janus Christian Jakobsen;Christian Gluud;Jørn Wetterslev;Per Winkel

  • Trial sequential analysis may establish when firm evidence is reached in cumulative meta-analysis.

    Jørn Wetterslev;Kristian Thorlund;Jesper Brok;Christian Gluud

  • Antioxidant supplements for prevention of mortality in healthy participants and patients with various diseases

    Goran Bjelakovic;Dimitrinka Nikolova;Lise Lotte Gluud;Rosa G. Simonetti

  • Influence of reported study design characteristics on intervention effect estimates from randomized, controlled trials.

    Jelena Savović;Hayley E Jones;Douglas G Altman;Ross J Harris

  • Influence of reported study design characteristics on intervention effect estimates from randomised controlled trials: combined analysis of meta-epidemiological studies

    J Savović;HE Jones;DG Altman;RJ Harris

  • Vitamin D supplementation for prevention of mortality in adults

    Goran Bjelakovic;Lise Lotte Gluud;Dimitrinka Nikolova;Kate Whitfield

  • Trial sequential analysis reveals insufficient information size and potentially false positive results in many meta-analyses

    Jesper Brok;Kristian Thorlund;Christian Gluud;Jørn Wetterslev

  • Association of funding and conclusions in randomized drug trials: a reflection of treatment effect or adverse events?

    Bodil Als-Nielsen;Wendong Chen;Christian Gluud;Lise L. Kjaergard

  • Trial Sequential Analysis in systematic reviews with meta-analysis

    Jørn Wetterslev;Janus Christian Jakobsen;Christian Gluud

  • Estimating required information size by quantifying diversity in random-effects model meta-analyses

    Jørn Wetterslev;Kristian Thorlund;Jesper Brok;Christian Gluud

  • Antioxidant supplements for prevention of gastrointestinal cancers: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

    Goran Bjelakovic;Dimitrinka Nikolova;Rosa G Simonetti;Christian Gluud;Christian Gluud

  • Antenatal magnesium sulphate may prevent cerebral palsy in preterm infants--but are we convinced? Evaluation of an apparently conclusive meta-analysis with trial sequential analysis.

    LD Huusom;NJ Secher;O Pryds;K Whitfield

  • Can trial sequential monitoring boundaries reduce spurious inferences from meta-analyses?

    Kristian Thorlund;P. J. Devereaux;Jørn Wetterslev;Gordon Guyatt

  • Apparently conclusive meta-analyses may be inconclusive—Trial sequential analysis adjustment of random error risk due to repetitive testing of accumulating data in apparently conclusive neonatal meta-analyses

    Jesper Brok;Kristian Thorlund;Jørn Wetterslev;Christian Gluud

  • Early versus delayed laparoscopic cholecystectomy for people with acute cholecystitis

    Kurinchi Selvan Gurusamy;Christopher Davidson;Christian Gluud;Brian R Davidson

  • Thresholds for statistical and clinical significance in systematic reviews with meta-analytic methods

    Janus Christian Jakobsen;Jørn Wetterslev;Per Winkel;Theis Lange

  • Reported methodologic quality and discrepancies between large and small randomized trials in meta-analyses (Annals of Internal Medicine (2008) 149, (219))

    Lise L. Gluud;Kristian Thorlund;Christian Gluud;Lesley Woods

Frequent Co-Authors

Jørn Wetterslev
Jørn Wetterslev Copenhagen University Hospital
Lise Lotte Gluud
Lise Lotte Gluud University of Copenhagen
Erik Simonsen
Erik Simonsen University of Copenhagen
Merete Nordentoft
Merete Nordentoft University of Copenhagen
Gorm B. Jensen
Gorm B. Jensen Copenhagen University Hospital
Gorm Greisen
Gorm Greisen Copenhagen University Hospital
Kurinchi Selvan Gurusamy
Kurinchi Selvan Gurusamy University College London
Johan Ärnlöv
Johan Ärnlöv Karolinska Institute
Lehana Thabane
Lehana Thabane McMaster University
Allan Vaag
Allan Vaag Steno Diabetes Center

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing a career in medicine isn’t limited to becoming a physician. Many students explore online pathways in nursing and allied health to enter the healthcare field. Today, accredited programs make it possible to earn a reputable degree without relocating or pausing your career. For example, the cheapest online nurse practitioner programs offer a flexible, affordable route to advanced clinical roles.

For those just starting out, nursing school online provides a convenient entry point with courses that fit your schedule. Many registered nurses are also seeking advancement with the cheapest rn to bsn programs, which build upon existing credentials.

If advancing to leadership or academic positions is your goal, a Doctor of Nursing Practice can be pursued through the cheapest dnp online program options. These online degrees allow you to progress your career with less financial burden and greater flexibility—making healthcare education more accessible than ever before.

Best Scientists Citing Christian Gluud

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles