World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
40
Citations
8890
World Ranking
8126
National Ranking
4359

Simon H. Budman publications per year

1972: 1 publications 1973: 1 publications 1974: 0 publications 1975: 1 publications 1976: 0 publications 1977: 0 publications 1978: 1 publications 1979: 5 publications 1980: 2 publications 1981: 5 publications 1982: 4 publications 1983: 3 publications 1984: 5 publications 1985: 1 publications 1986: 0 publications 1987: 6 publications 1988: 2 publications 1989: 2 publications 1990: 2 publications 1991: 2 publications 1992: 4 publications 1993: 7 publications 1994: 0 publications 1995: 4 publications 1996: 7 publications 1997: 2 publications 1998: 3 publications 1999: 1 publications 2000: 1 publications 2001: 2 publications 2002: 0 publications 2003: 4 publications 2004: 5 publications 2005: 7 publications 2006: 7 publications 2007: 9 publications 2008: 7 publications 2009: 9 publications 2010: 5 publications 2011: 9 publications 2012: 3 publications 2013: 4 publications 2014: 3 publications 2015: 6 publications 2016: 3 publications 2017: 4 publications 2018: 2 publications
1972 2018

161 publications in total across all disciplines

Simon H. Budman publication distribution in Psychology in 2027

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2027. The highlighted bar marks where Simon H. Budman sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 132 publications — 39th percentile

39% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Simon H. Budman D-index placement in Psychology in 2027

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2027. The highlighted bar marks where Simon H. Budman sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 40 D-Index — 30th percentile

30% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2000 - APA Award for Distinguished Professional Contributions to Applied Research

Overview

Simon H. Budman is affiliated with Harvard University in the United States. Their academic career includes recognition through awards such as the APA Award for Distinguished Professional Contributions to Applied Research received in 2000.

While specific details about their research papers, frequent co-authors, publication venues, and fields of study are not documented here, the award highlights a focus on applied research within the professional psychological community.

Budman's work has been situated within an applied research context, which often involves bridging theoretical insights with practical applications. This suggests involvement in studies or projects that seek to directly impact professional practices or societal issues.

Due to the absence of listed recent papers, publications, or distinct research topics, it is not possible to outline specific contributions or thematic focuses. Likewise, information on subfields, co-authorship networks, or book publications is not available for further elaboration.

Their affiliation with Harvard University situates them within a major academic institution known for a broad spectrum of research activities, indicating access to a dynamic scholarly environment.

Best Publications

  • Development and validation of the Current Opioid Misuse Measure.

    Stephen F. Butler;Simon H. Budman;Kathrine C. Fernandez;Brian Houle

  • Validation of the Revised Screener and Opioid Assessment for Patients with Pain (SOAPP-R)

    Stephen F. Butler;Kathrine Fernandez;Christine Benoit;Simon H. Budman

  • Performance of screening and diagnostic tests. Application of receiver operating characteristic analysis.

    Jane M. Murphy;Donald M. Berwick;Milton C. Weinstein;Jonathan F. Borus

  • Validation of a screener and opioid assessment measure for patients with chronic pain.

    Stephen F. Butler;Simon H. Budman;Kathrine Fernandez;Robert N. Jamison

  • Psychiatric history and psychologic adjustment as risk factors for aberrant drug-related behavior among patients with chronic pain.

    Ajay D. Wasan;Stephen F. Butler;Simon H. Budman;Christine Benoit

  • Representation of personality disorders in circumplex and five-factor space: explorations with a clinical sample

    Stephen Soldz;Simon Budman;Annette Demby;Jocelyn Merry

  • Theory and Practice of Brief Therapy

    Simon H. Budman;Alan S. Gurman

  • Cohesion, Alliance and Outcome in Group Psychotherapy

    Simon H. Budman;Stephen Soldz;Annette Demby;Michael Feldstein

  • A Short Form of the Inventory of Interpersonal Problems Circumples Scales

    Stephen Soldz;Simon Budman;Annette Demby;Jocelyn Merry

  • Validation and Clinical Application of the Screener and Opioid Assessment for Patients with Pain (SOAPP)

    Hammam Akbik;Stephen F. Butler;Simon H. Budman;Katherine Fernandez

  • Abuse Rates and Routes of Administration of Reformulated Extended-Release Oxycodone: Initial Findings From a Sentinel Surveillance Sample of Individuals Assessed for Substance Abuse Treatment

    Stephen F. Butler;Theresa A. Cassidy;Howard Chilcoat;Ryan A. Black

  • Cross validation of the current opioid misuse measure to monitor chronic pain patients on opioid therapy.

    Stephen F. Butler;Simon H. Budman;Gilbert J. Fanciullo;Robert N. Jamison

  • Abuse risks and routes of administration of different prescription opioid compounds and formulations

    Stephen F Butler;Ryan A Black;Theresa A Cassidy;Taryn M Dailey

  • Cross-Validation of a Screener to Predict Opioid Misuse in Chronic Pain Patients (SOAPP-R)

    Stephen F. Butler;Simon H. Budman;Kathrine C. Fernandez;Gilbert J. Fanciullo

  • Efficacy of a brief psychosocial intervention for symptoms of stress and distress among patients in primary care.

    Gerald L. Klerman;Simon Budman;Donald Berwick;Myrna M. Weissman

  • Connecting to young adults: an online social network survey of beliefs and attitudes associated with prescription opioid misuse among college students.

    Sarah Lord;Julie Brevard;Simon Budman

  • What is Cohesiveness? An Empirical Examination

    Simon H. Budman;Stephen Soldz;Annette Demby;Michael Davis

  • Foundations of opioid risk management.

    Nathaniel P. Katz;Edgar H. Adams;James C. Benneyan;Howard G. Birnbaum

  • Gender differences in risk factors for aberrant prescription opioid use.

    Robert N. Jamison;Stephen F. Butler;Simon H. Budman;Robert R. Edwards

  • Women who abuse prescription opioids: findings from the Addiction Severity Index-Multimedia Version Connect prescription opioid database.

    Traci C. Green;Jill M. Grimes Serrano;Andrea Licari;Simon H. Budman

Frequent Co-Authors

Stephen F. Butler
Stephen F. Butler Vanderbilt University
Robert N. Jamison
Robert N. Jamison Brigham and Women's Hospital
Traci C. Green
Traci C. Green Brown University
Donald M. Berwick
Donald M. Berwick Harvard University
Gerald L. Klerman
Gerald L. Klerman Cornell University
Leslie C. Morey
Leslie C. Morey Texas A&M University
Robert R. Edwards
Robert R. Edwards Brigham and Women's Hospital
Michael Davis
Michael Davis Georgia Institute of Technology
Michael J. Lambert
Michael J. Lambert Brigham Young University
Myrna M. Weissman
Myrna M. Weissman Columbia University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring online psychology degrees opens the door to a wide range of specialized career opportunities. One of the increasingly popular paths is becoming a Board Certified Behavior Analyst (BCBA). This career not only emphasizes psychological principles but also positively impacts individuals with behavioral challenges. To become a BCBA, students must complete graduate-level coursework, supervised fieldwork, and pass a rigorous national exam.

Each state may have unique requirements, so it is important to understand the local processes. For example, those interested can review the Oklahoma City bcba requirements and compare them with what is necessary for how to become a bcba in Omaha. Additionally, some states offer specific guidance, such as the bcba certification requirements in Orlando or insights into how to become a bcba in Philadelphia.

Online degree programs offer flexibility for working professionals or those needing distance education. As you plan your future in psychology, carefully research degree options and local licensure pathways to maximize your career potential.

Best Scientists Citing Simon H. Budman

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles