World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 73 1963 1776 1147 1014 249 19958

Eric L. Garland publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Eric L. Garland between 2007 and 2026, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Eric L. Garland published across 20 years, from 2007 to 2026, averaging 15.2 papers a year. Output peaked at 31 publications in 2023. 18 of the 303 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
10 20 30
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 2007 to 2026. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 31. Peak 31 publications in 2023. 2007: 1 publication 2008: 1 publication 2009: 6 publications 2010: 6 publications 2011: 13 publications 2012: 15 publications 2013: 11 publications 2014: 21 publications 2015: 20 publications 2016: 10 publications 2017: 27 publications 2018: 16 publications 2019: 22 publications 2020: 20 publications 2021: 20 publications 2022: 24 publications 2023: 31 publications 2024: 21 publications 2025: 17 publications 2026: 1 publication
2007 2026

303 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Eric L. Garland: publications per year, 2007 to 2026
Year Publications
2007 1
2008 1
2009 6
2010 6
2011 13
2012 15
2013 11
2014 21
2015 20
2016 10
2017 27
2018 16
2019 22
2020 20
2021 20
2022 24
2023 31
2024 21
2025 17
2026 1
Total 303
Download as CSV

Eric L. Garland publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Eric L. Garland sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 241–250 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 249 publications — 80th percentile

80% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605
91–100 713
101–110 736
111–120 686
121–130 670
131–140 644
141–150 597
151–160 576
161–170 477
171–180 450
181–190 397
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196 249
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

Eric L. Garland D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Eric L. Garland sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 72–73 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 73 D-Index — 83rd percentile

83% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671
36–37 659
38–39 641
40–41 671
42–43 617
44–45 558
46–47 495
48–49 487
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183 73
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Eric L. Garland is affiliated with the University of Utah in the United States. Their research spans a range of topics primarily within the fields of psychology and medicine, with a focus on clinical psychology, experimental and cognitive psychology, pharmacology, cognitive neuroscience, and public health. The scholar has made significant contributions related to mindfulness and compassion interventions, anxiety, depression, psychometrics, treatment, cognitive processes, musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation, opioid use disorder treatment, pain management and placebo effect, COVID-19 and mental health, and heart rate variability and autonomic control.

Their recent publications include the following works:

  • Integrative Medicine for Pain Management in Oncology: Society for Integrative Oncology-ASCO Guideline (2022), Journal of Clinical Oncology
  • Mindfulness-Oriented Recovery Enhancement vs Supportive Group Therapy for Co-occurring Opioid Misuse and Chronic Pain in Primary Care (2022), JAMA Internal Medicine
  • Assessment of Anhedonia in Adults With and Without Mental Illness (2020), JAMA Network Open
  • Neurophysiological Mechanisms Supporting Mindfulness Meditation-Based Pain Relief: an Updated Review (2020), Current Pain and Headache Reports
  • Mindful positive emotion regulation as a treatment for addiction: from hedonic pleasure to self-transcendent meaning (2021), Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences

Eric L. Garland has frequently collaborated with several co-authors including:

  • Adam W. Hanley
  • Brett Froeliger
  • Yoshio Nakamura
  • Matthew O. Howard
  • Justin Hudak

The primary publication venues for their work include:

  • UNC Libraries
  • Mindfulness
  • Journal of Pain
  • Drug and Alcohol Dependence
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)

Eric L. Garland has contributed predominantly to the study of mindfulness and compassion interventions, with many publications dedicated to understanding anxiety, depression, cognitive processes, and treatment approaches within both psychological and medical frameworks.

Best Publications

  • Upward Spirals of Positive Emotions Counter Downward Spirals of Negativity: Insights from the Broaden-and-Build Theory and Affective Neuroscience on The Treatment of Emotion Dysfunctions and Deficits in Psychopathology

    Eric L. Garland;Barbara Fredrickson;Ann M. Kring;David P. Johnson

  • From a state to a trait: Trajectories of state mindfulness in meditation during intervention predict changes in trait mindfulness☆☆☆

    Laura G. Kiken;Eric L. Garland;Karen Bluth;Olafur S. Palsson

  • Positive Reappraisal Mediates the Stress-Reductive Effects of Mindfulness: An Upward Spiral Process

    Eric L. Garland;Susan A. Gaylord;Barbara L. Fredrickson

  • Mindfulness Broadens Awareness and Builds Eudaimonic Meaning: A Process Model of Mindful Positive Emotion Regulation

    Eric L. Garland;Norman A. Farb;Philippe R. Goldin;Barbara L. Fredrickson

  • The role of mindfulness in positive reappraisal.

    Eric Garland;Susan Gaylord;Jongbae Park

  • Pain Processing in the Human Nervous System: A Selective Review of Nociceptive and Biobehavioral Pathways

    Eric L. Garland

  • Mindfulness training modifies cognitive, affective, and physiological mechanisms implicated in alcohol dependence: results of a randomized controlled pilot trial.

    Eric L. Garland;Susan A. Gaylord;Charlotte A. Boettiger;Matthew O. Howard

  • Mindfulness-Oriented Recovery Enhancement for Chronic Pain and Prescription Opioid Misuse: Results from an Early Stage Randomized Controlled Trial

    Eric L. Garland;Eron G. Manusov;Brett Froeliger;Amber Kelly

  • Mindfulness Training Reduces the Severity of Irritable Bowel Syndrome in Women: Results of a Randomized Controlled Trial

    Susan A Gaylord;Olafur S Palsson;Eric L Garland;Keturah R Faurot

  • Mindfulness treatment for substance misuse: A systematic review and meta-analysis

    Wen Li;Matthew O. Howard;Eric L. Garland;Patricia McGovern

  • Family factors in Internet addiction among Chinese youth: A review of English- and Chinese-language studies

    Wen Li;Eric L. Garland;Matthew O. Howard

  • The role of positive affect in pain and its treatment.

    Patrick H. Finan;Eric L. Garland

  • The downward spiral of chronic pain, prescription opioid misuse, and addiction: cognitive, affective, and neuropsychopharmacologic pathways.

    Eric L. Garland;Brett Froeliger;Fadel Zeidan;Kaitlyn Partin

  • Mindfulness Training Targets Neurocognitive Mechanisms of Addiction at the Attention-Appraisal-Emotion Interface

    Eric L. Garland;Brett Froeliger;Matthew O. Howard

  • Therapeutic mechanisms of a mindfulness-based treatment for IBS: effects on visceral sensitivity, catastrophizing, and affective processing of pain sensations

    Eric L. Garland;Susan A. Gaylord;Olafur Palsson;Keturah Faurot

  • Mindfulness-based treatment of addiction: current state of the field and envisioning the next wave of research.

    Eric L. Garland;Matthew O. Howard

  • The Mindfulness-to-Meaning Theory: Extensions, Applications, and Challenges at the Attention–Appraisal–Emotion Interface

    Eric L. Garland;Norman A. Farb;Philippe R. Goldin;Barbara L. Fredrickson

  • Mindfulness training promotes upward spirals of positive affect and cognition: multilevel and autoregressive latent trajectory modeling analyses

    Eric L. Garland;Nicole Geschwind;Frenk Peeters;Marieke Wichers

  • Cue-elicited heart rate variability and attentional bias predict alcohol relapse following treatment

    Eric L. Garland;Ingmar H. A. Franken;Matthew O. Howard

  • Effects of Mindfulness-Oriented Recovery Enhancement on reward responsiveness and opioid cue-reactivity

    Eric L. Garland;Brett Froeliger;Matthew O. Howard

  • Mindfulness-to-Meaning Theory - Mindfulness Broadens Awareness and Builds Eudaimonic Meaning: A Process Model of Mindful Positive Emotion Regulation

    Eric Garland;Norman Farb;Philippe R. Goldin;Barbara Fredrickson

Frequent Co-Authors

Matthew O. Howard
Matthew O. Howard University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
Adam W. Hanley
Adam W. Hanley Florida State University
Elizabeth A. Thomas
Elizabeth A. Thomas University of California, Irvine
Craig J. Bryan
Craig J. Bryan The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center
F. Joseph McClernon
F. Joseph McClernon Duke University
Barbara L. Fredrickson
Barbara L. Fredrickson University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
Norman A. S. Farb
Norman A. S. Farb University of Toronto
Brian E. Perron
Brian E. Perron University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
William E. Whitehead
William E. Whitehead University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
Michael G. Vaughn
Michael G. Vaughn Saint Louis University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring psychology in the USA opens doors to a wide variety of online degrees and dynamic career pathways. One popular option is counseling, which is increasingly accessible through flexible online programs designed for busy students and career changers.

If you are interested in pursuing a counseling career quickly, there are region-specific pathways to consider. For example, you can discover the shortest path to becoming a counselor in Texas, which highlights state requirements and accelerated options. Similarly, explore the Utah fastest counseling programs for students seeking speedy licensure in Utah.

Each state may have different pathways and timelines, so it’s important to research your destination. Check out the quickest path to becoming a counselor in Vermont if you are planning to practice in the Northeast. Additionally, the Virginia accelerated counseling programs offer another route for those targeting careers in the Mid-Atlantic.

From online psychology degrees to fast-track licensure programs, the USA offers flexible options tailored to various career aspirations and locations. Researching each state’s requirements and opportunities will help you find the most efficient route to your chosen profession.

Best Scientists Citing Eric L. Garland

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles