World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Nicholas T. Van Dam

Nicholas T. Van Dam

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
34
Citations
8405
World Ranking
10038
National Ranking
576

Nicholas T. Van Dam publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Nicholas T. Van Dam sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 90 publications — 14th percentile

14% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Nicholas T. Van Dam D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Nicholas T. Van Dam sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 34 D-Index — 13th percentile

13% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

Nicholas T. Van Dam is a researcher affiliated with the University of Melbourne in Australia. Their work primarily focuses on the field of psychology, contributing notably within clinical psychology, experimental and cognitive psychology, cognitive neuroscience, applied psychology, and general health professions.

Their research topics span multiple areas, including:

  • Mindfulness and Compassion Interventions
  • Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
  • Mind wandering and attention
  • COVID-19 and Mental Health
  • Music Therapy and Health
  • Child Therapy and Development
  • Digital Mental Health Interventions

Van Dam has produced scholarly work published across a variety of journals. Frequent publication venues include:

  • Mindfulness
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • Journal of Medical Internet Research
  • Scientific Reports
  • Cognitive Affective & Behavioral Neuroscience

Among recent papers where Van Dam is either primary or co-author, key publications include:

  • "Dose-response Relationship of Reported Lifetime Meditation Practice with Mental Health and Wellbeing: a Cross-sectional Study" (2022, Mindfulness)
  • "Prevalence and 20-year trends in meditation, yoga, guided imagery and progressive relaxation use among US adults from 2002 to 2022" (2024, Scientific Reports)
  • "Mindfulness meditation alters neural activity underpinning working memory during tactile distraction" (2020, Cognitive Affective & Behavioral Neuroscience)
  • "Underestimating harm in mindfulness-based stress reduction" (2020, Psychological Medicine)
  • "Subjective Experiences of Committed Meditators Across Practices Aiming for Contentless States" (2023, Mindfulness)

Van Dam frequently collaborates with several co-authors, notably:

  • Jonathan N. Davies
  • Julieta Galante
  • Saampras Ganesan
  • Bradford A. Moffat
  • Valentina Lorenzetti

Their body of work largely addresses mental health and wellbeing through mindfulness and related cognitive interventions. The cross-disciplinary nature of their research encompasses clinical approaches, neurocognitive mechanisms, and digital mental health tools, which reflect a broad engagement with evolving psychological sciences and public health concerns. Van Dam's contributions include both empirical investigations and conceptual discussions on mindfulness practices and their potential benefits and harms.

Best Publications

  • Mind the Hype: A Critical Evaluation and Prescriptive Agenda for Research on Mindfulness and Meditation:

    Nicholas T Van Dam;Marieke K van Vugt;David R Vago;Laura Schmalzl

  • Self-compassion is a better predictor than mindfulness of symptom severity and quality of life in mixed anxiety and depression.

    Nicholas T. Van Dam;Sean C. Sheppard;John P. Forsyth;Mitch Earleywine

  • Validation of the Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale--Revised (CESD-R): pragmatic depression assessment in the general population.

    Nicholas T. Van Dam;Mitch Earleywine

  • Mindfulness, by any other name…: trials and tribulations of sati in western psychology and science

    Paul Grossman;Nicholas T. Van Dam

  • Measuring mindfulness? An Item Response Theory analysis of the Mindful Attention Awareness Scale.

    Nicholas T. Van Dam;Mitch Earleywine;Ashley Borders

  • Differential item function across meditators and non-meditators on the Five Facet Mindfulness Questionnaire

    Nicholas T. Van Dam;Mitch Earleywine;Sharon Danoff-Burg

  • Cognition–Emotion Integration in the Anterior Insular Cortex

    Xiaosi Gu;Xun Liu;Nicholas T. Van Dam;Patrick R. Hof

  • Cognitive control and attentional functions

    Melissa-Ann Mackie;Nicholas T. Van Dam;Nicholas T. Van Dam;Jin Fan;Jin Fan

  • Anxious brain networks: A coordinate-based activation likelihood estimation meta-analysis of resting-state functional connectivity studies in anxiety

    Jie Xu;Nicholas T. Van Dam;Nicholas T. Van Dam;Chunliang Feng;Chunliang Feng;Yuejia Luo

  • Different topological organization of human brain functional networks with eyes open versus eyes closed

    Pengfei Xu;Ruiwang Huang;Ruiwang Huang;Jinhui Wang;Nicholas T. Van Dam

  • Childhood Maltreatment, Altered Limbic Neurobiology, and Substance Use Relapse Severity via Trauma-Specific Reductions in Limbic Gray Matter Volume

    Nicholas T Van Dam;Kenneth Rando;Marc N Potenza;Ken I Tuit

  • Spontaneous Brain Activity Relates to Autonomic Arousal

    Jin Fan;Pengfei Xu;Nicholas T Van Dam;Tehila Eilam-Stock;Tehila Eilam-Stock

  • Establishing a trait anxiety threshold that signals likelihood of anxiety disorders

    Nicholas T Van Dam;Daniel F Gros;Mitch Earleywine;Martin M Antony

  • Functional deficits of the attentional networks in autism

    Jin Fan;Silvia Bernardi;Nicholas T Van Dam;Nicholas T Van Dam;Evdokia Anagnostou

  • Neural basis of emotional decision making in trait anxiety

    Pengfei Xu;Ruolei Gu;Lucas S Broster;Runguo Wu

  • Mind Your Words Positive and Negative Items Create Method Effects on the Five Facet Mindfulness Questionnaire

    Nicholas T. Van Dam;Andréa L. Hobkirk;Sharon Danoff-Burg;Mitch Earleywine

  • Data-Driven Phenotypic Categorization for Neurobiological Analyses: Beyond DSM-5 Labels

    Nicholas T. Van Dam;Nicholas T. Van Dam;Nicholas T. Van Dam;David O’Connor;David O’Connor;Enitan T. Marcelle;Enitan T. Marcelle;Erica J. Ho

  • Gender inequality in awarded research grants

    Gillinder Bedi;Nicholas T. Van Dam;Nicholas T. Van Dam;Marcus R Munafo

  • Abnormal autonomic and associated brain activities during rest in autism spectrum disorder

    Tehila Eilam-Stock;Tehila Eilam-Stock;Tehila Eilam-Stock;Pengfei Xu;Miao Cao;Xiaosi Gu;Xiaosi Gu

  • Pulmonary function in cannabis users: Support for a clinical trial of the vaporizer.

    Nicholas T. Van Dam;Mitch Earleywine

Frequent Co-Authors

Mitch Earleywine
Mitch Earleywine University at Albany, State University of New York
Jin Fan
Jin Fan City University of New York
James W. Murrough
James W. Murrough Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai
Paul B. Fitzgerald
Paul B. Fitzgerald Australian National University
Michael P. Milham
Michael P. Milham Child Mind Institute
Xiaosi Gu
Xiaosi Gu Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai
Yuejia Luo
Yuejia Luo Shenzhen University
Patrick R. Hof
Patrick R. Hof Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai
R. Cameron Craddock
R. Cameron Craddock Facebook (United States)
Dan V. Iosifescu
Dan V. Iosifescu New York University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For students interested in Psychology, online degrees offer flexible pathways into diverse mental health careers. One growing field is counseling, where different states have unique education and certification requirements. For example, Arlington mental health counselor education requirements emphasize accredited degrees and state-specific licensure. Meanwhile, if you plan to become a mental health counselor in Atlanta, you’ll need to understand local program prerequisites and supervised clinical hours.

Similarly, learning how to how to become a mental health counselor in Aurora involves researching Colorado’s guidelines for graduate education and exam processes. Austin mental health counselor certification requirements highlight the importance of Texas’s specific coursework and practical training. Each city and state may present different expectations for practicum experience, licensure exams, and continuing education. Choosing an online degree aligned with your target location will help ensure you meet all licensure demands and open more career doors within counseling and mental health services.

Best Scientists Citing Nicholas T. Van Dam

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles