World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Ausiàs Cebolla

Ausiàs Cebolla

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 41 7978 7446 94 93 150 5961

Ausiàs Cebolla publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Ausiàs Cebolla between 2009 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Ausiàs Cebolla published across 17 years, from 2009 to 2025, averaging 10.1 papers a year. Output peaked at 18 publications in 2021. 17 of the 172 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 2009 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 18. Peak 18 publications in 2021. 2009: 1 publication 2010: 2 publications 2011: 8 publications 2012: 10 publications 2013: 9 publications 2014: 11 publications 2015: 13 publications 2016: 17 publications 2017: 14 publications 2018: 15 publications 2019: 9 publications 2020: 15 publications 2021: 18 publications 2022: 10 publications 2023: 3 publications 2024: 6 publications 2025: 11 publications
2009 2025

172 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Ausiàs Cebolla: publications per year, 2009 to 2025
Year Publications
2009 1
2010 2
2011 8
2012 10
2013 9
2014 11
2015 13
2016 17
2017 14
2018 15
2019 9
2020 15
2021 18
2022 10
2023 3
2024 6
2025 11
Total 172
Download as CSV

Ausiàs Cebolla publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Ausiàs Cebolla sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 141–150 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 150 publications — 49th percentile

49% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605
91–100 713
101–110 736
111–120 686
121–130 670
131–140 644
141–150 597 150
151–160 576
161–170 477
171–180 450
181–190 397
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

Ausiàs Cebolla D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Ausiàs Cebolla sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 40–41 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 41 D-Index — 33rd percentile

33% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671
36–37 659
38–39 641
40–41 671 41
42–43 617
44–45 558
46–47 495
48–49 487
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Ausiàs Cebolla is affiliated with the University of Valencia in Spain and has contributed extensively to research in psychology, with a primary focus on clinical psychology. Their work includes over a hundred publications, notably covering subfields such as clinical psychology, social psychology, experimental and cognitive psychology, psychiatry and mental health, and applied psychology.

Their research spans several main topics, including mindfulness and compassion interventions, COVID-19 and mental health, anxiety, depression, psychometrics, treatment, cognitive processes, psychotherapy techniques and applications, virtual reality applications and impacts, empathy and medical education, as well as behavioral health and interventions.

Frequent collaborators in their research include Rosa Baños, Jaime Navarrete, Joaquim Soler, Rocío Herrero, and Catherine I. Andreu. These coauthors have contributed to numerous publications together, indicating ongoing collaborative relationships within the field.

Ausiàs Cebolla's publication history covers a range of journals and venues, with notable numbers of articles published in the following outlets:

  • Mindfulness
  • PsycTESTS Dataset
  • Frontiers in Psychology
  • International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
  • The Spanish Journal of Psychology

Some recent papers authored include:

  • Virtual Reality as a Medium to Elicit Empathy: A Meta-Analysis, 2020, Cyberpsychology Behavior and Social Networking
  • The effect of a mindfulness-based therapy on different biomarkers among patients with inflammatory bowel disease: a randomised controlled trial, 2020, Scientific Reports
  • Impact of a Web-Based Exercise and Nutritional Education Intervention in Patients Who Are Obese With Hypertension: Randomized Wait-List Controlled Trial, 2020, Journal of Medical Internet Research
  • Brief mindfulness session improves mood and increases salivary oxytocin in psychology students, 2020, Stress and Health
  • Can Avatar Appearance Influence Physical Activity? User-Avatar Similarity and Proteus Effects on Cardiac Frequency and Step Counts, 2020, Health Communication

Best Publications

  • Psychometric properties of the Spanish validation of the Five Facets of Mindfulness Questionnaire (FFMQ)

    A. Cebolla;A. Cebolla;A. García-Palacios;A. García-Palacios;J. Soler;V. Guillen

  • Emotional eating and food intake after sadness and joy

    T. van Strien;A. Cebolla;E. Etchemendy;J. Gutierrez-Maldonado

  • Unwanted effects: Is there a negative side of meditation? A multicentre survey.

    Ausiàs Cebolla;Marcelo Demarzo;Patricia Martins;Joaquim Soler

  • Meditation and happiness: Mindfulness and self-compassion may mediate the meditation–happiness relationship

    Daniel Campos;Ausiàs Cebolla;Soledad Quero;Juana Bretón-López

  • Mindfulness, perceived stress, and subjective well-being: a correlational study in primary care health professionals

    Ana C. M. Atanes;Solange Andreoni;Marcio S. Hirayama;Jesús Montero-Marin

  • Validation of the Dutch Eating Behavior Questionnaire (DEBQ) in a sample of Spanish women

    A. Cebolla;A. Cebolla;J.R. Barrada;T. van Strien;E. Oliver

  • Relationship between meditative practice and self-reported mindfulness: the MINDSENS composite index

    Joaquim Soler;Ausias Cebolla;Albert Feliu-Soler;Marcelo Marcos Piva Demarzo

  • Fostering Self-Compassion and Loving-Kindness in Patients With Borderline Personality Disorder: A Randomized Pilot Study.

    Albert Feliu-Soler;Juan Carlos Pascual;Matilde Elices;Ana Martín-Blanco

  • Bifactor analysis and construct validity of the five facet mindfulness questionnaire (FFMQ) in non-clinical Spanish samples.

    Jaume Aguado;Juan V. Luciano;Ausias Cebolla;Antoni Serrano-Blanco

  • Intervenciones psicológicas basadas en mindfulness y sus beneficios: estado actual de la cuestión

    Gonzalo Hervás;Ausiàs Cebolla;Joaquim Soler;Joaquim Soler

  • Virtual Reality as a Medium to Elicit Empathy: A Meta-Analysis

    Sara Ventura;Laura Badenes-Ribera;Rocio Herrero;Ausias Cebolla

  • Psychometric proprieties of Spanish version of Mindful Attention Awareness Scale (MAAS)

    Soler J;Tejedor R;Feliu-Soler A;Pascual Jc

  • Smell–taste dysfunctions in extreme weight/eating conditions: analysis of hormonal and psychological interactions

    Fernando Fernández-Aranda;Zaida Agüera;Jose C. Fernández-García;Lourdes Garrido-Sanchez

  • The Serenity of the Meditating Mind: A Cross-Cultural Psychometric Study on a Two-Factor Higher Order Structure of Mindfulness, Its Effects, and Mechanisms Related to Mental Health among Experienced Meditators

    Ulrich S. Tran;Ausiàs Cebolla;Tobias M. Glück;Joaquim Soler

  • The implementation of mindfulness in healthcare systems: a theoretical analysis.

    M.M.P. Demarzo;A. Cebolla;J. Garcia-Campayo

  • Assessing Decentering: Validation, Psychometric Properties, and Clinical Usefulness of the Experiences Questionnaire in a Spanish Sample

    Joaquim Soler;Alba Franquesa;Albert Feliu-Soler;Ausias Cebolla

  • Efficacy and acceptability of an Internet platform to improve the learning of nutritional knowledge in children: the ETIOBE mates

    R M Baños;A Cebolla;E Oliver;M Alcañiz

  • Validation of the Dutch eating behavior questionnaire for children (DEBQ-C) for use with Spanish children

    R M Baños;A Cebolla;E Etchemendy;S Felipe

  • Implicit or Explicit Compassion? Effects of Compassion Cultivation Training and Comparison with Mindfulness-based Stress Reduction

    Gonzalo Brito-Pons;Daniel Campos;Ausiàs Cebolla

  • Cognitively-Based Compassion Training (CBCT ®) in Breast Cancer Survivors: A Randomized Clinical Trial Study

    Edgar Gonzalez-Hernandez;Rocio Romero;Daniel Campos;Diana Burychka

  • Intuitive eating: A novel eating style? Evidence from a Spanish sample.

    Juan Ramón Barrada;Blanca Cativiela;Tatjana van Strien;Tatjana van Strien;Ausiàs Cebolla;Ausiàs Cebolla

Frequent Co-Authors

Rosa M. Baños
Rosa M. Baños University of Valencia
Cristina Botella
Cristina Botella Jaume I University
Joaquim Soler
Joaquim Soler Autonomous University of Barcelona
Javier García-Campayo
Javier García-Campayo University of Zaragoza
Albert Feliu-Soler
Albert Feliu-Soler Autonomous University of Barcelona
Juan C. Pascual
Juan C. Pascual King's College London
Tatjana van Strien
Tatjana van Strien Radboud University
Mariano Alcañiz
Mariano Alcañiz Universitat Politècnica de València
Jesús Montero-Marín
Jesús Montero-Marín University of Oxford
Juan V. Luciano
Juan V. Luciano Autonomous University of Barcelona

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring online psychology degrees offers flexibility and various pathways tailored to your goals. For students seeking programs that balance ease and quality, there are several options nationwide. For example, if you’re interested in the easiest psychology degrees online in the South, you’ll find institutions focused on student support and accessible coursework.

In Texas, the easiest online psychology programs in Texas attract learners who want to complete their studies at their own pace, often with generous transfer-credit policies. Similarly, those considering the Midwest can explore the easiest online psychology programs in Wisconsin, which also prioritize flexibility and accessible admission requirements.

For students aiming to fast-track their careers, the accelerated online psychology programs in Arizona are designed to be completed in a shorter time frame, allowing graduates to pursue employment or advanced study sooner.

Each pathway can open doors to careers in counseling, human resources, education, social services, and more. Choosing a program that aligns with your lifestyle, goals, and timeline is key to starting a rewarding journey in psychology.

Best Scientists Citing Ausiàs Cebolla

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles