World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Neuroscience 53 5008 4600 2242 2023 123 20149
Computer Science 48 6023 5850 2710 2612 103 17042

R. Cameron Craddock publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by R. Cameron Craddock between 2006 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. R. Cameron Craddock published across 20 years, from 2006 to 2025, averaging 6.7 papers a year. Output peaked at 20 publications in 2016. 3 of the 134 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15 20
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 2006 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 20. Peak 20 publications in 2016. 2006: 4 publications 2007: 0 publications 2008: 1 publication 2009: 2 publications 2010: 0 publications 2011: 0 publications 2012: 3 publications 2013: 12 publications 2014: 10 publications 2015: 11 publications 2016: 20 publications 2017: 20 publications 2018: 7 publications 2019: 3 publications 2020: 16 publications 2021: 15 publications 2022: 3 publications 2023: 4 publications 2024: 1 publication 2025: 2 publications
2006 2025

134 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
R. Cameron Craddock: publications per year, 2006 to 2025
Year Publications
2006 4
2007 0
2008 1
2009 2
2010 0
2011 0
2012 3
2013 12
2014 10
2015 11
2016 20
2017 20
2018 7
2019 3
2020 16
2021 15
2022 3
2023 4
2024 1
2025 2
Total 134
Download as CSV

R. Cameron Craddock publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where R. Cameron Craddock sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300 400 500
Bar chart with 86 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 38–47 to 887+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 539. Most scientists, 539, have 98–107 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 118–127 publications, is where this scientist sits. 38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientist 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38–47 publications 887+

This scientist: 123 publications — 29th percentile

29% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Neuroscience scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,597 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
38–47 18
48–57 79
58–67 193
68–77 323
78–87 406
88–97 452
98–107 539
108–117 505
118–127 522 123
128–137 469
138–147 456
148–157 459
158–167 397
168–177 383
178–187 350
188–197 302
198–207 306
208–217 262
218–227 242
228–237 220
238–247 203
248–257 174
258–267 176
268–277 175
278–287 125
288–297 116
298–307 127
308–317 128
318–327 99
328–337 89
338–347 78
348–357 96
358–367 66
368–377 59
378–387 65
388–397 54
398–407 48
408–417 49
418–427 34
428–437 31
438–447 30
448–457 31
458–467 36
468–477 40
478–487 35
488–497 30
498–507 23
508–517 26
518–527 20
528–537 23
538–547 20
548–557 20
558–567 17
568–577 14
578–587 20
588–597 20
598–607 19
608–617 18
618–627 17
628–637 11
638–647 11
648–657 11
658–667 8
668–677 7
678–687 11
688–697 10
698–707 4
708–717 6
718–727 5
728–737 5
738–747 9
748–757 9
758–767 3
768–777 7
778–787 7
788–797 6
798–807 2
808–817 2
818–827 7
828–837 0
838–847 9
848–857 3
858–867 1
868–877 3
878–886 6
887+ 100
Download as CSV

R. Cameron Craddock D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where R. Cameron Craddock sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300 400 500
Bar chart with 68 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 163+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 512. Most scientists, 512, have 46–47 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 52–53 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30–31 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 53 D-Index — 48th percentile

48% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Neuroscience scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,597 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 42
32–33 172
34–35 296
36–37 435
38–39 459
40–41 456
42–43 467
44–45 478
46–47 512
48–49 435
50–51 425
52–53 418 53
54–55 392
56–57 357
58–59 334
60–61 328
62–63 260
64–65 278
66–67 239
68–69 250
70–71 210
72–73 200
74–75 189
76–77 170
78–79 146
80–81 113
82–83 126
84–85 100
86–87 84
88–89 99
90–91 84
92–93 85
94–95 72
96–97 76
98–99 45
100–101 49
102–103 43
104–105 32
106–107 45
108–109 50
110–111 32
112–113 39
114–115 32
116–117 29
118–119 27
120–121 19
122–123 23
124–125 27
126–127 16
128–129 24
130–131 13
132–133 21
134–135 17
136–137 14
138–139 15
140–141 10
142–143 10
144–145 13
146–147 9
148–149 8
150–151 6
152–153 6
154–155 7
156–157 7
158–159 10
160–161 4
162 8
163+ 100
Download as CSV

Overview

R. Cameron Craddock is affiliated with Facebook in the United States and has a research focus primarily in the fields of Medicine and Neuroscience. Their work spans several subfields including Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, Cognitive Neuroscience, Epidemiology, Rehabilitation, and Applied Psychology.

Their research interests are reflected in numerous studies concerning brain connectivity and neuroimaging, with significant attention to stroke rehabilitation and recovery. Key topics in their work include Functional Brain Connectivity Studies, Advanced Neuroimaging Techniques and Applications, Advanced MRI Techniques and Applications, Stroke Rehabilitation and Recovery, Acute Ischemic Stroke Management, Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research, and Health Disparities and Outcomes.

Craddock has contributed frequently to notable academic venues, including bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory), NeuroImage, Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research), arXiv (Cornell University), and Nature Methods.

Selected recent publications include:

  • The ENIGMA Stroke Recovery Working Group: Big data neuroimaging to study brain-behavior relationships after stroke, 2020, Human Brain Mapping
  • U-net model for brain extraction: Trained on humans for transfer to non-human primates, 2021, NeuroImage
  • Moving Beyond Processing and Analysis-Related Variation in Neuroscience, 2021, bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • brainlife.io: a decentralized and open-source cloud platform to support neuroscience research, 2024, Nature Methods
  • Brainhack: Developing a culture of open, inclusive, community-driven neuroscience, 2021, Neuron

Their frequent coauthors include Michael P. Milham, Anibal Sólon Heinsfeld, David M. Schnyer, Sook-Lei Liew, and Michael R. Borich, indicating ongoing collaborations within neuroscience and medical imaging research communities.

Best Publications

  • A whole brain fMRI atlas generated via spatially constrained spectral clustering

    R. Cameron Craddock;G.Andrew James;Paul E. Holtzheimer;Xiaoping P. Hu

  • The brain imaging data structure, a format for organizing and describing outputs of neuroimaging experiments.

    Krzysztof J. Gorgolewski;Tibor Auer;Vince D. Calhoun;R. Cameron Craddock

  • A Comprehensive Assessment of Regional Variation in the Impact of Head Micromovements on Functional Connectomics

    Chao-Gan Yan;Brian Cheung;Clare Kelly;Stanley J. Colcombe

  • Subcallosal cingulate gyrus deep brain stimulation for treatment-resistant depression.

    Andres M. Lozano;Helen S. Mayberg;Helen S. Mayberg;Peter Giacobbe;Clement Hamani

  • Identification of autism spectrum disorder using deep learning and the ABIDE dataset.

    Anibal Sólon Heinsfeld;Alexandre Rosa Franco;R. Cameron Craddock;Augusto Buchweitz

  • Deriving reproducible biomarkers from multi-site resting-state data: An Autism-based example

    Alexandre Abraham;Michael P. Milham;Adriana Di Martino;R. Cameron Craddock

  • Enhancing studies of the connectome in autism using the autism brain imaging data exchange II

    Adriana Di Martino;David O'Connor;David O'Connor;Bosi Chen;Kaat Alaerts

  • An open resource for transdiagnostic research in pediatric mental health and learning disorders

    Lindsay M. Alexander;Jasmine Escalera;Lei Ai;Charissa Andreotti

  • Neuroimaging after mild traumatic brain injury: Review and meta-analysis

    Cyrus Eierud;R. Cameron Craddock;Sean Fletcher;Manek Aulakh

  • Predicting brain-age from multimodal imaging data captures cognitive impairment

    Franziskus Liem;Gaël Varoquaux;Gaël Varoquaux;Jana Kynast;Frauke Beyer;Frauke Beyer

  • Toward a Neuroimaging Treatment Selection Biomarker for Major Depressive Disorder

    Callie L. McGrath;Mary E. Kelley;Paul E. Holtzheimer;Boadie W. Dunlop

  • Imaging human connectomes at the macroscale

    R Cameron Craddock;Saad Jbabdi;Chao-Gan Yan;Chao-Gan Yan;Chao-Gan Yan;Joshua T Vogelstein

  • Disease state prediction from resting state functional connectivity

    R. Cameron Craddock;R. Cameron Craddock;Paul E. Holtzheimer;Xiaoping P. Hu;Helen S. Mayberg

  • An open science resource for establishing reliability and reproducibility in functional connectomics

    Xi Nian Zuo;Jeffrey S. Anderson;Pierre Bellec;Rasmus M. Birn

  • Standardizing the intrinsic brain: Towards robust measurement of inter-individual variation in 1000 functional connectomes

    Chao Gan Yan;R. Cameron Craddock;R. Cameron Craddock;Xi Nian Zuo;Yu Feng Zang

  • Quantitative assessment of structural image quality.

    Adon F.G. Rosen;David R. Roalf;Kosha Ruparel;Jason Blake

  • Unraveling the Miswired Connectome: A Developmental Perspective

    Adriana Di Martino;Damien A. Fair;Clare Kelly;Theodore D. Satterthwaite

  • Clinical applications of the functional connectome

    F. Xavier Castellanos;Adriana Di Martino;R. Cameron Craddock;R. Cameron Craddock;Ashesh D. Mehta

  • The Neuro Bureau ADHD-200 Preprocessed repository.

    Pierre Bellec;Carlton Chu;François Chouinard-Decorte;Yassine Benhajali

  • BIDS apps: Improving ease of use, accessibility, and reproducibility of neuroimaging data analysis methods

    Krzysztof J. Gorgolewski;Fidel Alfaro-Almagro;Tibor Auer;Pierre Bellec

  • An open science resource for establishing reliability and reproducibility in functional

    Randy L. Buckner;Vince D. Calhoun;F. Xavier Castellanos;Antao Chen

Frequent Co-Authors

Michael P. Milham
Michael P. Milham Child Mind Institute
F. Xavier Castellanos
F. Xavier Castellanos New York University
Ting Xu
Ting Xu University of California, Davis
Daniel S. Margulies
Daniel S. Margulies Centre national de la recherche scientifique, CNRS
Gaël Varoquaux
Gaël Varoquaux French Institute for Research in Computer Science and Automation - INRIA
Xi-Nian Zuo
Xi-Nian Zuo Beijing Normal University
Chao-Gan Yan
Chao-Gan Yan Tsinghua University
Krzysztof J. Gorgolewski
Krzysztof J. Gorgolewski Stanford University
Pierre Bellec
Pierre Bellec University of Montreal

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Best Scientists Citing R. Cameron Craddock

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles