World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Neuroscience

D-Index
88
Citations
39133
World Ranking
1178
National Ranking
36

Daniel S. Margulies publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Daniel S. Margulies sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientists 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 887+

This scientist: 351 publications — 88th percentile

88% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

Daniel S. Margulies D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Daniel S. Margulies sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 88 D-Index — 88th percentile

88% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

Overview

Daniel S. Margulies is affiliated with the Centre national de la recherche scientifique (CNRS) in France, where they conduct research primarily in the fields of neuroscience and medicine. Their work concentrates strongly on cognitive neuroscience, supported by extensive publications in experimental and cognitive psychology, radiology, nuclear medicine and imaging, psychiatry, and social psychology.

Margulies's research topics cover a range of subjects related to brain function and connectivity, including:

  • Functional Brain Connectivity Studies
  • Neural dynamics and brain function
  • Advanced Neuroimaging Techniques and Applications
  • Mind wandering and attention
  • EEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces
  • Advanced MRI Techniques and Applications
  • Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies

Some recent papers authored or co-authored by Margulies include:

  • The default mode network in cognition: a topographical perspective (2021), published in Nature reviews. Neuroscience
  • Topographic organization of the human subcortex unveiled with functional connectivity gradients (2020), published in Nature Neuroscience
  • BrainSpace: a toolbox for the analysis of macroscale gradients in neuroimaging and connectomics datasets (2020), published in Communications Biology
  • Toward a hierarchical model of social cognition: A neuroimaging meta-analysis and integrative review of empathy and theory of mind (2020), published in Psychological Bulletin
  • Cross-species functional alignment reveals evolutionary hierarchy within the connectome (2020), published in NeuroImage

Frequent co-authors who have collaborated with Margulies include:

  • Jonathan Smallwood
  • Boris C. Bernhardt
  • Elizabeth Jefferies
  • Robert Leech
  • Reinder Vos de Wael

Margulies has published extensively in several academic venues, with the highest number of publications in:

  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • NeuroImage
  • Communications Biology
  • Scientific Reports
  • Nature Neuroscience

Their main subfields of study highlight a focus on cognitive and neural processes, emphasizing cognitive neuroscience with a strong connection to neuroimaging and brain mapping techniques. The research reflects an interdisciplinary approach that integrates psychology, psychiatry, and advanced imaging technologies.

Best Publications

  • Toward discovery science of human brain function

    Bharat B. Biswal;Maarten Mennes;Xi Nian Zuo;Suril Gohel

  • Situating the default-mode network along a principal gradient of macroscale cortical organization

    Daniel S. Margulies;Satrajit S. Ghosh;Satrajit S. Ghosh;Alexandros Goulas;Marcel Falkiewicz

  • Functional Connectivity of Human Striatum: A Resting State fMRI Study

    A. Di Martino;A.P.J. Scheres;D.S. Margulies;A.M.C. Kelly

  • Precuneus shares intrinsic functional architecture in humans and monkeys

    Daniel S. Margulies;Daniel S. Margulies;Justin L. Vincent;Clare Kelly;Gabriele Lohmann

  • The Resting Brain: Unconstrained yet Reliable

    Zarrar E. Shehzad;A. M. Clare Kelly;Philipp T. Reiss;Philipp T. Reiss;Dylan G. Gee

  • Cingulate-Precuneus Interactions : A New Locus of Dysfunction in Adult Attention-Deficit/ Hyperactivity Disorder

    F. Xavier Castellanos;F. Xavier Castellanos;Daniel S. Margulies;Clare Kelly;Lucina Q. Uddin

  • Large-Scale Gradients in Human Cortical Organization

    Julia M. Huntenburg;Julia M. Huntenburg;Pierre-Louis Bazin;Pierre-Louis Bazin;Daniel S. Margulies

  • Mapping the functional connectivity of anterior cingulate cortex.

    Daniel S. Margulies;A.M. Clare Kelly;Lucina Q. Uddin;Bharat B. Biswal

  • Functional Connectivity of the Human Amygdala using Resting State fMRI

    Amy Krain Roy;Zarrar E. Shehzad;Daniel S. Margulies;A. M. Clare Kelly

  • The default mode network in cognition: a topographical perspective.

    Jonathan Smallwood;Boris C Bernhardt;Robert Leech;Danilo Bzdok

  • Growing Together and Growing Apart: Regional and Sex Differences in the Lifespan Developmental Trajectories of Functional Homotopy

    Xi-Nian Zuo;Xi-Nian Zuo;Clare Kelly;Adriana Di Martino;Adriana Di Martino;Maarten Mennes

  • Sex beyond the genitalia: The human brain mosaic

    Daphna Joel;Zohar Berman;Ido Tavor;Nadav Wexler

  • Topographic organization of the human subcortex unveiled with functional connectivity gradients

    Ye Tian;Daniel S Margulies;Michael Breakspear;Andrew Zalesky

  • BrainSpace: a toolbox for the analysis of macroscale gradients in neuroimaging and connectomics datasets

    Reinder Vos de Wael;Oualid Benkarim;Casey Paquola;Sara Lariviere

  • Development of Anterior Cingulate Functional Connectivity from Late Childhood to Early Adulthood

    A.M. Clare Kelly;Adriana Di Martino;Lucina Q. Uddin;Zarrar Shehzad

  • Prioritizing spatial accuracy in high-resolution fMRI data using multivariate feature weight mapping

    Johannes Stelzer;Johannes Stelzer;Tilo Buschmann;Tilo Buschmann;Gabriele Lohmann;Daniel S. Margulies

  • NeuroVault.org: a web-based repository for collecting and sharing unthresholded statistical maps of the human brain

    Krzysztof J. Gorgolewski;Krzysztof J. Gorgolewski;Gael Varoquaux;Gabriel Rivera;Yannick Schwarz

  • Microstructural and functional gradients are increasingly dissociated in transmodal cortices

    Casey Paquola;Reinder Vos De Wael;Konrad Wagstyl;Richard A. I. Bethlehem

  • Eigenvector centrality mapping for analyzing connectivity patterns in fMRI data of the human brain.

    Gabriele Lohmann;Daniel S. Margulies;Annette Horstmann;Burkhard Pleger

  • Toward a hierarchical model of social cognition: A neuroimaging meta-analysis and integrative review of empathy and theory of mind.

    Matthias Schurz;Joaquim Radua;Matthias G. Tholen;Lara Maliske

  • Network homogeneity reveals decreased integrity of default-mode network in ADHD

    Lucina Q. Uddin;A. M.Clare Kelly;Bharat B. Biswal;Daniel S. Margulies

  • Effects of Resveratrol on Memory Performance, Hippocampal Functional Connectivity, and Glucose Metabolism in Healthy Older Adults

    A. Veronica Witte;A. Veronica Witte;Lucia Kerti;Daniel S. Margulies;Agnes Flöel

Frequent Co-Authors

Arno Villringer
Arno Villringer Max Planck Institute for Human Cognitive and Brain Sciences
Jonathan Smallwood
Jonathan Smallwood Queen's University
Michael P. Milham
Michael P. Milham Child Mind Institute
Elizabeth Jefferies
Elizabeth Jefferies University of York
Boris C. Bernhardt
Boris C. Bernhardt Montreal Neurological Institute and Hospital
Krzysztof J. Gorgolewski
Krzysztof J. Gorgolewski Stanford University
F. Xavier Castellanos
F. Xavier Castellanos New York University
Ting Xu
Ting Xu University of California, Davis
R. Cameron Craddock
R. Cameron Craddock Facebook (United States)
Annette Horstmann
Annette Horstmann University of Helsinki

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Best Scientists Citing Daniel S. Margulies

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles