World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Ecology and Evolution

D-Index
63
Citations
11108
World Ranking
1998
National Ranking
726

John A. Byers publication distribution in Ecology and Evolution in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Ecology and Evolution in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where John A. Byers sits on this spectrum.

37–41 publications: 2 scientists 42–46 publications: 9 scientists 47–51 publications: 10 scientists 52–56 publications: 31 scientists 57–61 publications: 56 scientists 62–66 publications: 91 scientists 67–71 publications: 92 scientists 72–76 publications: 127 scientists 77–81 publications: 173 scientists 82–86 publications: 236 scientists 87–91 publications: 227 scientists 92–96 publications: 240 scientists 97–101 publications: 333 scientists 102–106 publications: 280 scientists 107–111 publications: 300 scientists 112–116 publications: 285 scientists 117–121 publications: 305 scientists 122–126 publications: 287 scientists 127–131 publications: 278 scientists 132–136 publications: 289 scientists 137–141 publications: 273 scientists 142–146 publications: 262 scientists 147–151 publications: 246 scientists 152–156 publications: 235 scientists 157–161 publications: 205 scientists 162–166 publications: 199 scientists 167–171 publications: 174 scientists 172–176 publications: 164 scientists 177–181 publications: 173 scientists 182–186 publications: 189 scientists 187–191 publications: 170 scientists 192–196 publications: 139 scientists 197–201 publications: 128 scientists 202–206 publications: 117 scientists 207–211 publications: 115 scientists 212–216 publications: 107 scientists 217–221 publications: 124 scientists 222–226 publications: 81 scientists 227–231 publications: 82 scientists 232–236 publications: 85 scientists 237–241 publications: 75 scientists 242–246 publications: 66 scientists 247–251 publications: 81 scientists 252–256 publications: 69 scientists 257–261 publications: 70 scientists 262–266 publications: 55 scientists 267–271 publications: 64 scientists 272–276 publications: 49 scientists 277–281 publications: 48 scientists 282–286 publications: 44 scientists 287–291 publications: 45 scientists 292–296 publications: 36 scientists 297–301 publications: 39 scientists 302–306 publications: 38 scientists 307–311 publications: 30 scientists 312–316 publications: 34 scientists 317–321 publications: 25 scientists 322–326 publications: 22 scientists 327–331 publications: 28 scientists 332–336 publications: 30 scientists 337–341 publications: 22 scientists 342–346 publications: 30 scientists 347–351 publications: 26 scientists 352–356 publications: 22 scientists 357–361 publications: 29 scientists 362–366 publications: 21 scientists 367–371 publications: 12 scientists 372–376 publications: 18 scientists 377–381 publications: 17 scientists 382–386 publications: 13 scientists 387–391 publications: 21 scientists 392–396 publications: 13 scientists 397–401 publications: 10 scientists 402–406 publications: 15 scientists 407–411 publications: 8 scientists 412–416 publications: 9 scientists 417–421 publications: 8 scientists 422–426 publications: 4 scientists 427–431 publications: 10 scientists 432–436 publications: 10 scientists 437–441 publications: 5 scientists 442–446 publications: 4 scientists 447–451 publications: 10 scientists 452–456 publications: 2 scientists 457–461 publications: 4 scientists 462–466 publications: 7 scientists 467–471 publications: 7 scientists 472–476 publications: 6 scientists 477–481 publications: 6 scientists 482–486 publications: 3 scientists 487–491 publications: 3 scientists 492–496 publications: 4 scientists 497–501 publications: 4 scientists 502–506 publications: 8 scientists 507–511 publications: 5 scientists 512–516 publications: 4 scientists 517–521 publications: 5 scientists 522–526 publications: 4 scientists 527–530 publications: 5 scientists 531+ publications: 100 scientists
37 publications 531+

This scientist: 163 publications — 59th percentile

59% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 531 publications or more.

John A. Byers D-index placement in Ecology and Evolution in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Ecology and Evolution scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where John A. Byers sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 95 scientists 31 D-Index: 123 scientists 32 D-Index: 191 scientists 33 D-Index: 245 scientists 34 D-Index: 252 scientists 35 D-Index: 244 scientists 36 D-Index: 249 scientists 37 D-Index: 244 scientists 38 D-Index: 254 scientists 39 D-Index: 254 scientists 40 D-Index: 280 scientists 41 D-Index: 274 scientists 42 D-Index: 266 scientists 43 D-Index: 233 scientists 44 D-Index: 248 scientists 45 D-Index: 208 scientists 46 D-Index: 201 scientists 47 D-Index: 213 scientists 48 D-Index: 207 scientists 49 D-Index: 172 scientists 50 D-Index: 209 scientists 51 D-Index: 199 scientists 52 D-Index: 153 scientists 53 D-Index: 169 scientists 54 D-Index: 163 scientists 55 D-Index: 148 scientists 56 D-Index: 120 scientists 57 D-Index: 146 scientists 58 D-Index: 137 scientists 59 D-Index: 140 scientists 60 D-Index: 104 scientists 61 D-Index: 119 scientists 62 D-Index: 118 scientists 63 D-Index: 99 scientists 64 D-Index: 77 scientists 65 D-Index: 100 scientists 66 D-Index: 86 scientists 67 D-Index: 83 scientists 68 D-Index: 75 scientists 69 D-Index: 94 scientists 70 D-Index: 57 scientists 71 D-Index: 68 scientists 72 D-Index: 59 scientists 73 D-Index: 63 scientists 74 D-Index: 66 scientists 75 D-Index: 60 scientists 76 D-Index: 42 scientists 77 D-Index: 49 scientists 78 D-Index: 39 scientists 79 D-Index: 37 scientists 80 D-Index: 43 scientists 81 D-Index: 41 scientists 82 D-Index: 45 scientists 83 D-Index: 34 scientists 84 D-Index: 40 scientists 85 D-Index: 35 scientists 86 D-Index: 55 scientists 87 D-Index: 24 scientists 88 D-Index: 24 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 23 scientists 91 D-Index: 25 scientists 92 D-Index: 27 scientists 93 D-Index: 27 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 23 scientists 96 D-Index: 12 scientists 97 D-Index: 14 scientists 98 D-Index: 19 scientists 99 D-Index: 16 scientists 100 D-Index: 14 scientists 101 D-Index: 5 scientists 102 D-Index: 21 scientists 103 D-Index: 16 scientists 104 D-Index: 10 scientists 105 D-Index: 7 scientists 106 D-Index: 7 scientists 107 D-Index: 7 scientists 108 D-Index: 6 scientists 109 D-Index: 9 scientists 110 D-Index: 11 scientists 111 D-Index: 12 scientists 112 D-Index: 9 scientists 113 D-Index: 7 scientists 114 D-Index: 3 scientists 115 D-Index: 8 scientists 116 D-Index: 5 scientists 117 D-Index: 11 scientists 118 D-Index: 4 scientists 119 D-Index: 2 scientists 120 D-Index: 5 scientists 121+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 121+

This scientist: 63 D-Index — 77th percentile

77% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 121 D-Index or more.

Overview

John A. Byers is affiliated with the University of Idaho in the United States and conducts research primarily in the fields of Agricultural and Biological Sciences, Environmental Science, and Engineering.

Their work spans several subfields, including Insect Science, Ecology, Plant Science, Mechanical Engineering, and Genetics. Key topics addressed in their research involve Forest Insect Ecology and Management, Insect and Pesticide Research, Insect-Plant Interactions and Control, Insect Pest Control Strategies, Insect and Arachnid Ecology and Behavior, Additive Manufacturing Materials and Processes, and Insect behavior and control techniques.

The scientist's recent publications include the following:

  • Circadian rhythms of insect pheromone titer, calling, emission, and response: a review (2021) in Die Naturwissenschaften
  • Protecting avocado trees from ambrosia beetles by repellents and mass trapping (push-pull): experiments and simulations (2021) in Journal of Pest Science
  • Semiochemicals Affecting Attraction of Ambrosia Beetle Euwallacea fornicatus (Coleoptera: Curculionidae: Scolytinae) to Quercivorol: Developing Push-Pull Control (2020) in Journal of Economic Entomology

Frequent coauthors collaborating with them include Anat Levi−Zada, Daniela Fefer, Yonatan Maoz, Jennifer Bennett, and Samantha Webster.

Their research is regularly published in venues such as the Journal of Chemical Ecology, Die Naturwissenschaften, Methods in Ecology and Evolution, Journal of Pest Science, and Journal of Economic Entomology.

Best Publications

  • Animal play : evolutionary, comparative, and ecological perspectives

    Marc Bekoff;John Alexander Byers

  • Potential of Mass Trapping for Long-Term Pest Management and Eradication of Invasive Species

    A. M. El-Sayed;D. M. Suckling;C. H. Wearing;J. A. Byers

  • Female mate choice based upon male motor performance

    John Byers;Eileen Hebets;Jeffrey Podos

  • American Pronghorn: Social Adaptations and the Ghosts of Predators Past

    John A. Byers

  • Chemical ecology of bark beetles

    J. A. Byers

  • Refining the Motor Training Hypothesis for the Evolution of Play

    John A. Byers;Curt Walker

  • Host-Tree Chemistry Affecting Colonization in Bark Beetles

    John A. Byers

  • Attraction of bark beetles, Tomicus piniperda, Hylurgops palliatus, and Trypodendron domesticum and other insects to short-chain alcohols and monoterpenes.

    John A. Byers

  • Effective attraction radius : A method for comparing species attractants and determining densities of flying insects.

    John A. Byers;Olle Anderbrant;Jan Löqvist

  • CORRELATED RANDOM WALK EQUATIONS OF ANIMAL DISPERSAL RESOLVED BY SIMULATION

    John A. Byers

  • Sex-specific maternal investment in pronghorn, and the question of a limit on differential provisioning in ungulates

    John A. Byers;James D. Moodie

  • Attractive and inhibitory pheromones produced in the bark beetle,Dendroctonus brevicomis, during host colonization: Regulation of inter- and intraspecific competition.

    John A. Byers;David L. Wood;John Craig;Larry B. Hendry

  • Good genes sexual selection in nature

    John A. Byers;Lisette Waits

  • A large cost of female mate sampling in pronghorn.

    John A. Byers;Patryce A. Wiseman;Lee Jones;Thomas J. Roffe

  • Field response of spruce bark beetle,Ips typographus, to aggregation pheromone candidates.

    Fredrik Schlyter;Göran Birgersson;John A. Byers;Jan Löfqvist

  • Chemical Ecology of Bark Beetles in a Complex Olfactory Landscape

    J.A. Byers

  • Volatiles from Nonhost Birch Trees Inhibit Pheromone Response in Spruce Bark Beetles

    John A. Byers;Qing-He Zhang;Fredrik Schlyter;Göran Birgersson

  • Pronghorn females choose vigorous mates

    John A. Byers;James D. Moodie;Nicho Hall

  • Attraction to pheromone sources of different quantity, quality, and spacing: Density-regulation mechanisms in bark beetleIps typographus.

    Fredrik Schlyter;John A. Byers;Jan Löfqvist

  • Do pronghorn mothers reveal the locations of their hidden fawns

    John A. Byers;Karen Z. Byers

  • Social, Spacing, and Cooperative Behavior of the Collared Peccary, Tayassu tajacu

    John A. Byers;John A. Byers;Marc Bekoff;Marc Bekoff

  • Age-related changes in reproductive effort of male bison

    Christine R. Maher;John A. Byers

  • Kin recognition in vertebrates: what do we really know about adaptive value?

    Andrew R. Blaustein;Marc Bekoff;John A. Byers;Thomas J. Daniels

  • Effect of trap color and height on captures of blunt-nosed and sharp-nosed leafhoppers (Hemiptera: Cicadellidae) and non-target arthropods in cranberry bogs

    Cesar R. Rodriguez-Saona;John A. Byers;Daniel Schiffhauer

  • Mating system shift in a pronghorn population

    John A. Byers;David W. Kitchen

  • Evaluation of color traps for monitoring Lygus spp.: Design, placement, height, time of day, and non-target effects

    Jacquelyn L. Blackmer;John A. Byers;Cesar Rodriguez-Saona

  • Energetic cost of locomotor play in pronghorn fawns

    Michellen N. Miller;John A. Byers

  • Environmental effects on prenatal growth rate in pronghorn and bighorn: further evidence for energy constraint on sex-biased maternal expenditure

    John A. Byers;John T. Hogg

  • MICROSATELLITE ANALYSIS REVEALS MULTIPLE PATERNITY IN A POPULATION OF WILD PRONGHORN ANTELOPES (ANTILOCAPRA AMERICANA)

    Matthew D. Carling;Patryce Avsharian Wiseman;John A. Byers

  • Animal Behavior and Wildlife Conservation

    John A. Byers

Frequent Co-Authors

Lisette P. Waits
Lisette P. Waits University of Idaho
Marc Bekoff
Marc Bekoff University of Colorado Boulder
Eileen A. Hebets
Eileen A. Hebets University of Nebraska–Lincoln
Douglas W. Smith
Douglas W. Smith National Park Service
Niko Balkenhol
Niko Balkenhol University of Göttingen
Jeffrey Podos
Jeffrey Podos University of Massachusetts Amherst
Andrew R. Blaustein
Andrew R. Blaustein Oregon State University
Fanie Pelletier
Fanie Pelletier Université de Sherbrooke

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring the world of Ecology and Evolution opens doors to a wide spectrum of academic and professional possibilities. Many students consider related roles—such as working in research, libraries, healthcare, or education—that also require advanced degrees or professional certifications.

For those interested in information science or resource management, understanding how much does it cost to become a librarian is essential when weighing career options and planning for graduate studies.

Students drawn to health sciences might consider speech-language pathology. Fully accredited, flexible asha certified slp programs are available online and can lead to rewarding roles in clinical or educational settings. If your background is in another field, entry to this pathway is made possible by specialized slp bridge program options designed for non-SLP majors.

Additionally, for those wishing to transition into nursing from non-nursing backgrounds, there are accessible non nursing degree to bsn online options to accelerate your entry into healthcare professions.

Whichever path you choose, online degrees can provide the flexibility to align your studies with a wide array of careers linked to ecology, evolution, and related disciplines.

Best Scientists Citing John A. Byers

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles