World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Medicine 91 11567 10876 5937 5493 546 41910

Jeffrey S. Borer publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Jeffrey S. Borer between 1968 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Jeffrey S. Borer published across 58 years, from 1968 to 2025, averaging 9.7 papers a year. Output peaked at 36 publications in 2013. 1 of the 564 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
10 20 30
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1968 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 36. Peak 36 publications in 2013. 1968: 1 publication 1969: 0 publications 1970: 0 publications 1971: 0 publications 1972: 1 publication 1973: 0 publications 1974: 4 publications 1975: 5 publications 1976: 2 publications 1977: 4 publications 1978: 14 publications 1979: 13 publications 1980: 11 publications 1981: 8 publications 1982: 9 publications 1983: 13 publications 1984: 8 publications 1985: 11 publications 1986: 17 publications 1987: 16 publications 1988: 7 publications 1989: 2 publications 1990: 6 publications 1991: 9 publications 1992: 9 publications 1993: 7 publications 1994: 11 publications 1995: 17 publications 1996: 8 publications 1997: 11 publications 1998: 6 publications 1999: 8 publications 2000: 3 publications 2001: 4 publications 2002: 17 publications 2003: 11 publications 2004: 17 publications 2005: 10 publications 2006: 15 publications 2007: 12 publications 2008: 10 publications 2009: 19 publications 2010: 10 publications 2011: 14 publications 2012: 13 publications 2013: 36 publications 2014: 19 publications 2015: 30 publications 2016: 19 publications 2017: 23 publications 2018: 17 publications 2019: 10 publications 2020: 11 publications 2021: 2 publications 2022: 1 publication 2023: 2 publications 2024: 0 publications 2025: 1 publication
1968 2025

564 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Jeffrey S. Borer: publications per year, 1968 to 2025
Year Publications
1968 1
1969 0
1970 0
1971 0
1972 1
1973 0
1974 4
1975 5
1976 2
1977 4
1978 14
1979 13
1980 11
1981 8
1982 9
1983 13
1984 8
1985 11
1986 17
1987 16
1988 7
1989 2
1990 6
1991 9
1992 9
1993 7
1994 11
1995 17
1996 8
1997 11
1998 6
1999 8
2000 3
2001 4
2002 17
2003 11
2004 17
2005 10
2006 15
2007 12
2008 10
2009 19
2010 10
2011 14
2012 13
2013 36
2014 19
2015 30
2016 19
2017 23
2018 17
2019 10
2020 11
2021 2
2022 1
2023 2
2024 0
2025 1
Total 564
Download as CSV

Jeffrey S. Borer publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jeffrey S. Borer sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600 800
Bar chart with 86 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 101–120 to 1,796+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 922. Most scientists, 922, have 341–360 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 541–560 publications, is where this scientist sits. 101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 610 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101–120 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 546 publications — 65th percentile

65% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
101–120 5
121–140 26
141–160 73
161–180 155
181–200 230
201–220 363
221–240 487
241–260 545
261–280 722
281–300 768
301–320 834
321–340 895
341–360 922
361–380 838
381–400 861
401–420 918
421–440 806
441–460 771
461–480 751
481–500 713
501–520 617
521–540 610
541–560 537 546
561–580 504
581–600 509
601–620 396
621–640 386
641–660 371
661–680 340
681–700 336
701–720 307
721–740 259
741–760 230
761–780 228
781–800 217
801–820 204
821–840 186
841–860 177
861–880 155
881–900 139
901–920 145
921–940 116
941–960 133
961–980 91
981–1,000 96
1,001–1,020 77
1,021–1,040 70
1,041–1,060 63
1,061–1,080 77
1,081–1,100 49
1,101–1,120 54
1,121–1,140 49
1,141–1,160 51
1,161–1,180 35
1,181–1,200 39
1,201–1,220 26
1,221–1,240 37
1,241–1,260 36
1,261–1,280 27
1,281–1,300 32
1,301–1,320 28
1,321–1,340 17
1,341–1,360 30
1,361–1,380 28
1,381–1,400 17
1,401–1,420 21
1,421–1,440 15
1,441–1,460 12
1,461–1,480 12
1,481–1,500 18
1,501–1,520 14
1,521–1,540 17
1,541–1,560 15
1,561–1,580 6
1,581–1,600 2
1,601–1,620 12
1,621–1,640 11
1,641–1,660 8
1,661–1,680 5
1,681–1,700 5
1,701–1,720 10
1,721–1,740 12
1,741–1,760 14
1,761–1,780 6
1,781–1,795 5
1,796+ 100
Download as CSV

Jeffrey S. Borer D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jeffrey S. Borer sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
250 500 750 1,000
Bar chart with 75 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 70–71 to 217+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 1,027. Most scientists, 1,027, have 82–83 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 90–91 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 399 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70–71 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 91 D-Index — 43rd percentile

43% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
70–71 226
72–73 391
74–75 574
76–77 730
78–79 891
80–81 972
82–83 1,027
84–85 1,003
86–87 960
88–89 970
90–91 922 91
92–93 839
94–95 808
96–97 779
98–99 668
100–101 611
102–103 630
104–105 513
106–107 541
108–109 445
110–111 429
112–113 399
114–115 393
116–117 318
118–119 302
120–121 287
122–123 255
124–125 256
126–127 252
128–129 230
130–131 179
132–133 168
134–135 163
136–137 159
138–139 134
140–141 134
142–143 118
144–145 109
146–147 106
148–149 74
150–151 79
152–153 80
154–155 87
156–157 57
158–159 74
160–161 69
162–163 60
164–165 53
166–167 39
168–169 42
170–171 32
172–173 39
174–175 40
176–177 28
178–179 19
180–181 23
182–183 31
184–185 18
186–187 20
188–189 22
190–191 13
192–193 21
194–195 12
196–197 12
198–199 14
200–201 15
202–203 13
204–205 10
206–207 8
208–209 4
210–211 12
212–213 11
214–215 10
216 4
217+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Jeffrey S. Borer is affiliated with SUNY Downstate Medical Center in the United States. The research conducted by this scientist spans several aspects of cardiology, particularly focusing on cardiac valve diseases, cardiovascular function, heart failure treatment, and related diagnostic and therapeutic approaches.

Among the recent published papers, notable works include:

  • Relationship of Body Mass Index With Outcomes After Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement: Results From the National Cardiovascular Data-STS/ACC TVT Registry (2020, Mayo Clinic Proceedings)
  • Comparison of Outcome Adjudication by Investigators and by a Central End Point Committee in Heart Failure Trials (2020, Circulation Heart Failure)
  • Evaluation of the Relationship Between Serum Urate Levels, Clinical Manifestations of Gout, and Death From Cardiovascular Causes in Patients Receiving Febuxostat or Allopurinol in an Outcomes Trial (2022, Arthritis & Rheumatology)
  • Time to benefit of heart rate reduction with ivabradine in patients with heart failure and reduced ejection fraction (2023, European Journal of Heart Failure)
  • Efficacy of ivabradine in heart failure patients with a high-risk profile (analysis from the SHIFT trial) (2023, ESC Heart Failure)

Frequent coauthors who have collaborated with Jeffrey S. Borer include:

  • Jeffrey Schussler
  • Robert Stoler
  • Antonio Abbate
  • J Dawn
  • Abbott George

The scientist has a substantial publication record in well-recognized journals, with the most frequent venues being:

  • The American Journal of Cardiology (83 publications)
  • European Journal of Heart Failure (2 publications)
  • JACC: Cardiovascular Interventions (2 publications)
  • Mayo Clinic Proceedings (1 publication)
  • Circulation Heart Failure (1 publication)

The main fields of study associated with this researcher include cardiology and cardiovascular medicine, highlighted by 23 publications. Additional subfields cover surgery, pulmonary and respiratory medicine, radiology and nuclear medicine, as well as economics and econometrics.

Key research topics explored in their work are:

  • Cardiac Valve Diseases and Treatments
  • Cardiovascular Function and Risk Factors
  • Heart Failure Treatment and Management
  • Heart rate and cardiovascular health
  • Cardiac Imaging and Diagnostics
  • Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life
  • Statistical Methods in Clinical Trials

Best Publications

  • Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction (TIMI) Trial, Phase I: A comparison between intravenous tissue plasminogen activator and intravenous streptokinase. Clinical findings through hospital discharge.

    J H Chesebro;G Knatterud;R Roberts;J Borer

  • Ivabradine and outcomes in chronic heart failure (SHIFT): a randomised placebo-controlled study.

    Karl Swedberg;Michel Komajda;Michael Böhm;Jeffrey S Borer

  • Targeted Anticytokine Therapy in Patients with Chronic Heart Failure: Results of the Randomized Etanercept Worldwide Evaluation (RENEWAL)

    Douglas L. Mann;John J.V. McMurray;Milton Packer;Karl Swedberg

  • Resting heart rate in cardiovascular disease.

    Kim Fox;Jeffrey S. Borer;A. John Camm;Nicolas Danchin

  • Heart rate as a risk factor in chronic heart failure (SHIFT): the association between heart rate and outcomes in a randomised placebo-controlled trial

    Michael Böhm;Karl Swedberg;Michel Komajda;Jeffrey S Borer

  • Real-time radionuclide cineangiography in the noninvasive evaluation of global and regional left ventricular function at rest and during exercise in patients with coronary-artery disease.

    J S Borer;S L Bacharach;M V Green;K M Kent

  • Left ventricular hypertrophy in patients with hypertension: importance of blood pressure response to regularly recurring stress.

    R. B. Devereux;T. G. Pickering;Gregory A Harshfield;H. D. Kleinert

  • Cardiac-Resynchronization Therapy in Heart Failure with a Narrow QRS Complex

    Frank Ruschitzka;William T. Abraham;Jagmeet P. Singh;Jeroen J. Bax

  • Cardiovascular Safety of Celecoxib, Naproxen, or Ibuprofen for Arthritis

    Steven E Nissen

  • Cardiovascular Safety of Febuxostat or Allopurinol in Patients with Gout

    William B. White;Kenneth G. Saag;Michael A. Becker;Jeffrey S. Borer

  • Consensus recommendations for the management of chronic heart failure: Introduction

    Milton Packer;Jay N. Cohn;William T. Abraham;Wilson S. Colucci

  • Antianginal and antiischemic effects of ivabradine, an I(f) inhibitor, in stable angina: a randomized, double-blind, multicentered, placebo-controlled trial.

    Jeffrey S. Borer;Kim Fox;Patrice Jaillon;Guy Lerebours

  • Sensitivity, specificity and predictive accuracy of radionuclide cineangiography during exercise in patients with coronary artery disease. Comparison with exercise electrocardiography.

    J S Borer;K M Kent;S L Bacharach;M V Green

  • Observations on the optimum time for operative intervention for aortic regurgitation. I. Evaluation of the results of aortic valve replacement in symptomatic patients.

    Walter L. Henry;Robert . Bonow;Jeffrey S. Borer;James H. Ware

  • Meta-Analysis of the Relation of Body Mass Index to All-Cause and Cardiovascular Mortality and Hospitalization in Patients With Chronic Heart Failure

    Abhishek Sharma;Carl J. Lavie;Jeffrey S. Borer;Ajay Vallakati

  • Heart Rate, Life Expectancy and the Cardiovascular System: Therapeutic Considerations

    Konstantinos Dean Boudoulas;Jeffrey S. Borer;Harisios Boudoulas

  • The cardiovascular manifestations of the hypereosinophilic syndrome: Prospective study of 26 patients, with review of the literature

    Joseph E. Parrillo;Jeffrey S. Borer;Walter L. Henry;Sheldon M. Wolff

  • Limitations of the electrocardiographic response to exercise in predicting coronary-artery disease.

    Jeffrey S. Borer;John F. Brensike;David R. Redwood;Samuel B. Itscoitz

  • Effects of selective heart rate reduction with ivabradine on left ventricular remodelling and function: results from the SHIFT echocardiography substudy

    Jean-Claude Tardif;Eileen O’Meara;Michel Komajda;Michael C Böhm

  • Prediction of Indications for Valve Replacement Among Asymptomatic or Minimally Symptomatic Patients With Chronic Aortic Regurgitation and Normal Left Ventricular Performance

    Jeffrey S. Borer;Clare Hochreiter;Edmond McM. Herrold;Phyllis Supino

Frequent Co-Authors

Paul Kligfield
Paul Kligfield Cornell University
Ian Ford
Ian Ford University of Glasgow
Karl Swedberg
Karl Swedberg University of Gothenburg
Luigi Tavazzi
Luigi Tavazzi University of Ferrara
Richard B. Devereux
Richard B. Devereux Cornell University
Michael Böhm
Michael Böhm Saarland University
Mary J. Roman
Mary J. Roman Cornell University
Thomas F. Lüscher
Thomas F. Lüscher University of Zurich
Jeffrey W. Moses
Jeffrey W. Moses Columbia University Medical Center
Peter M. Okin
Peter M. Okin Cornell University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring medicine in the USA opens doors to a variety of rewarding healthcare careers, many of which can begin or advance through online education. For those interested in nutrition and wellness, an online bachelor's degree in nutrition can be an excellent first step toward working as a dietitian or health educator.

Administrative roles are also in demand, and a master’s degree can broaden your career prospects. Look for cahme accredited online mha programs to ensure your degree meets industry-recognized standards in health administration.

Registered nurses seeking further qualifications might wonder about program requirements. Understanding does rn to bsn require clinicals can help you choose a flexible program that fits your lifestyle.

Finally, those aiming for advanced practice and leadership can accelerate their studies with accelerated dnp programs online, streamlining the path to a Doctor of Nursing Practice.

Online healthcare degrees offer adaptability and access to top programs, supporting various professional pathways within the medical field.

Best Scientists Citing Jeffrey S. Borer

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles