World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Engineering and Technology 47 5004 4816 264 260 159 6279

Yongjun Peng publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Yongjun Peng between 1999 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Yongjun Peng published across 27 years, from 1999 to 2025, averaging 7.1 papers a year. Output peaked at 17 publications in 2014. 21 of the 192 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1999 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 17. Peak 17 publications in 2014. 1999: 1 publication 2000: 0 publications 2001: 0 publications 2002: 1 publication 2003: 2 publications 2004: 0 publications 2005: 2 publications 2006: 2 publications 2007: 0 publications 2008: 1 publication 2009: 1 publication 2010: 6 publications 2011: 3 publications 2012: 12 publications 2013: 10 publications 2014: 17 publications 2015: 14 publications 2016: 16 publications 2017: 11 publications 2018: 8 publications 2019: 9 publications 2020: 17 publications 2021: 17 publications 2022: 11 publications 2023: 10 publications 2024: 10 publications 2025: 11 publications
1999 2025

192 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Yongjun Peng: publications per year, 1999 to 2025
Year Publications
1999 1
2000 0
2001 0
2002 1
2003 2
2004 0
2005 2
2006 2
2007 0
2008 1
2009 1
2010 6
2011 3
2012 12
2013 10
2014 17
2015 14
2016 16
2017 11
2018 8
2019 9
2020 17
2021 17
2022 11
2023 10
2024 10
2025 11
Total 192
Download as CSV

Yongjun Peng publication distribution in Engineering and Technology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Engineering and Technology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Yongjun Peng sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300 400
Bar chart with 78 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 38–47 to 804+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 457. Most scientists, 457, have 148–157 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 804 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 158–167 publications, is where this scientist sits. 38–47 publications: 20 scientists 48–57 publications: 35 scientists 58–67 publications: 96 scientists 68–77 publications: 135 scientists 78–87 publications: 190 scientists 88–97 publications: 259 scientists 98–107 publications: 283 scientists 108–117 publications: 369 scientists 118–127 publications: 341 scientists 128–137 publications: 386 scientists 138–147 publications: 372 scientists 148–157 publications: 457 scientists 158–167 publications: 415 scientists 168–177 publications: 407 scientists 178–187 publications: 421 scientists 188–197 publications: 378 scientists 198–207 publications: 403 scientists 208–217 publications: 317 scientists 218–227 publications: 346 scientists 228–237 publications: 321 scientists 238–247 publications: 260 scientists 248–257 publications: 280 scientists 258–267 publications: 240 scientists 268–277 publications: 214 scientists 278–287 publications: 242 scientists 288–297 publications: 203 scientists 298–307 publications: 166 scientists 308–317 publications: 154 scientists 318–327 publications: 175 scientists 328–337 publications: 159 scientists 338–347 publications: 99 scientists 348–357 publications: 131 scientists 358–367 publications: 106 scientists 368–377 publications: 118 scientists 378–387 publications: 97 scientists 388–397 publications: 108 scientists 398–407 publications: 82 scientists 408–417 publications: 71 scientists 418–427 publications: 64 scientists 428–437 publications: 55 scientists 438–447 publications: 54 scientists 448–457 publications: 60 scientists 458–467 publications: 47 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 30 scientists 488–497 publications: 29 scientists 498–507 publications: 38 scientists 508–517 publications: 40 scientists 518–527 publications: 32 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 28 scientists 548–557 publications: 23 scientists 558–567 publications: 19 scientists 568–577 publications: 16 scientists 578–587 publications: 17 scientists 588–597 publications: 18 scientists 598–607 publications: 22 scientists 608–617 publications: 15 scientists 618–627 publications: 9 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 21 scientists 648–657 publications: 12 scientists 658–667 publications: 9 scientists 668–677 publications: 11 scientists 678–687 publications: 9 scientists 688–697 publications: 6 scientists 698–707 publications: 14 scientists 708–717 publications: 7 scientists 718–727 publications: 8 scientists 728–737 publications: 10 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 5 scientists 758–767 publications: 5 scientists 768–777 publications: 11 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 2 scientists 798–803 publications: 4 scientists 804+ publications: 100 scientists
38–47 publications 804+

This scientist: 159 publications — 31st percentile

31% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 804 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Engineering and Technology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,796 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
38–47 20
48–57 35
58–67 96
68–77 135
78–87 190
88–97 259
98–107 283
108–117 369
118–127 341
128–137 386
138–147 372
148–157 457
158–167 415 159
168–177 407
178–187 421
188–197 378
198–207 403
208–217 317
218–227 346
228–237 321
238–247 260
248–257 280
258–267 240
268–277 214
278–287 242
288–297 203
298–307 166
308–317 154
318–327 175
328–337 159
338–347 99
348–357 131
358–367 106
368–377 118
378–387 97
388–397 108
398–407 82
408–417 71
418–427 64
428–437 55
438–447 54
448–457 60
458–467 47
468–477 40
478–487 30
488–497 29
498–507 38
508–517 40
518–527 32
528–537 23
538–547 28
548–557 23
558–567 19
568–577 16
578–587 17
588–597 18
598–607 22
608–617 15
618–627 9
628–637 11
638–647 21
648–657 12
658–667 9
668–677 11
678–687 9
688–697 6
698–707 14
708–717 7
718–727 8
728–737 10
738–747 9
748–757 5
758–767 5
768–777 11
778–787 7
788–797 2
798–803 4
804+ 100
Download as CSV

Yongjun Peng D-index placement in Engineering and Technology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Engineering and Technology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Yongjun Peng sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300 400
Bar chart with 78 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30 to 107+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 426. Most scientists, 426, have 42 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 107 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 47 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30 D-Index: 59 scientists 31 D-Index: 114 scientists 32 D-Index: 129 scientists 33 D-Index: 189 scientists 34 D-Index: 200 scientists 35 D-Index: 262 scientists 36 D-Index: 311 scientists 37 D-Index: 312 scientists 38 D-Index: 350 scientists 39 D-Index: 385 scientists 40 D-Index: 348 scientists 41 D-Index: 362 scientists 42 D-Index: 426 scientists 43 D-Index: 380 scientists 44 D-Index: 310 scientists 45 D-Index: 341 scientists 46 D-Index: 301 scientists 47 D-Index: 306 scientists 48 D-Index: 271 scientists 49 D-Index: 246 scientists 50 D-Index: 210 scientists 51 D-Index: 253 scientists 52 D-Index: 213 scientists 53 D-Index: 221 scientists 54 D-Index: 195 scientists 55 D-Index: 186 scientists 56 D-Index: 170 scientists 57 D-Index: 167 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 144 scientists 60 D-Index: 152 scientists 61 D-Index: 141 scientists 62 D-Index: 138 scientists 63 D-Index: 131 scientists 64 D-Index: 118 scientists 65 D-Index: 114 scientists 66 D-Index: 119 scientists 67 D-Index: 95 scientists 68 D-Index: 87 scientists 69 D-Index: 77 scientists 70 D-Index: 89 scientists 71 D-Index: 69 scientists 72 D-Index: 54 scientists 73 D-Index: 46 scientists 74 D-Index: 55 scientists 75 D-Index: 54 scientists 76 D-Index: 49 scientists 77 D-Index: 53 scientists 78 D-Index: 46 scientists 79 D-Index: 28 scientists 80 D-Index: 39 scientists 81 D-Index: 36 scientists 82 D-Index: 24 scientists 83 D-Index: 26 scientists 84 D-Index: 36 scientists 85 D-Index: 18 scientists 86 D-Index: 25 scientists 87 D-Index: 19 scientists 88 D-Index: 26 scientists 89 D-Index: 27 scientists 90 D-Index: 23 scientists 91 D-Index: 15 scientists 92 D-Index: 12 scientists 93 D-Index: 9 scientists 94 D-Index: 15 scientists 95 D-Index: 10 scientists 96 D-Index: 13 scientists 97 D-Index: 13 scientists 98 D-Index: 9 scientists 99 D-Index: 7 scientists 100 D-Index: 7 scientists 101 D-Index: 8 scientists 102 D-Index: 7 scientists 103 D-Index: 7 scientists 104 D-Index: 9 scientists 105 D-Index: 6 scientists 106 D-Index: 9 scientists 107+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 107+

This scientist: 47 D-Index — 52nd percentile

52% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 107 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Engineering and Technology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,796 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30 59
31 114
32 129
33 189
34 200
35 262
36 311
37 312
38 350
39 385
40 348
41 362
42 426
43 380
44 310
45 341
46 301
47 306 47
48 271
49 246
50 210
51 253
52 213
53 221
54 195
55 186
56 170
57 167
58 166
59 144
60 152
61 141
62 138
63 131
64 118
65 114
66 119
67 95
68 87
69 77
70 89
71 69
72 54
73 46
74 55
75 54
76 49
77 53
78 46
79 28
80 39
81 36
82 24
83 26
84 36
85 18
86 25
87 19
88 26
89 27
90 23
91 15
92 12
93 9
94 15
95 10
96 13
97 13
98 9
99 7
100 7
101 8
102 7
103 7
104 9
105 6
106 9
107+ 99
Download as CSV

Overview

Yongjun Peng is affiliated with the University of Queensland in Australia and has an extensive body of work primarily in the field of Engineering and Environmental Science. Their research focuses on various subfields including Water Science and Technology, Biomedical Engineering, Mechanical Engineering, Materials Chemistry, and Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment.

The main topics of their research cover Minerals Flotation and Separation Techniques, Metal Extraction and Bioleaching, Extraction and Separation Processes, Mineral Processing and Grinding, Fluid Dynamics and Mixing, Pickering emulsions and particle stabilization, and Iron oxide chemistry and applications.

Yongjun Peng has contributed significantly to academic literature with a strong presence in the journal Minerals Engineering, where 36 of their publications have appeared. Other frequent publication venues include Powder Technology, Mineral Processing and Extractive Metallurgy Review, Applied Surface Science, and the Journal of Molecular Liquids.

Some of their recent papers include:

  • Flotation behaviour in reflux flotation cell - A critical review (2022, Minerals Engineering)
  • The effect of sodium hydrosulfide on molybdenite flotation as a depressant of copper sulfides (2020, Minerals Engineering)
  • A comparison of native starch, oxidized starch and CMC as copper-activated pyrite depressants (2020, Minerals Engineering)
  • The interaction of grinding media and collector in pyrite flotation at alkaline pH (2020, Minerals Engineering)
  • Starch chemical modification for selective flotation of copper sulphide minerals from carbonaceous material: A critical review (2020, Minerals Engineering)

Peng's frequent co-authors include:

  • Xumeng Chen
  • Wonder Chimonyo
  • Liang Cao
  • Yufan Mu
  • Jiarui Chen

Best Publications

  • A review of entrainment: Mechanisms, contributing factors and modelling in flotation

    L. Wang;Y. Peng;K. Runge;D. Bradshaw

  • The depression of pyrite in selective flotation by different reagent systems – A Literature review

    Yufan Mu;Yongjun Peng;Rolf A. Lauten

  • The effect of saline water on mineral flotation - a critical review

    Bo Wang;Yongjun Peng

  • Control of grinding conditions in the flotation of chalcopyrite and its separation from pyrite

    Yongjun Peng;Stephen Grano;Daniel Fornasiero;John Ralston

  • Control of grinding conditions in the flotation of galena and its separation from pyrite

    Yongjun Peng;Stephen Grano;Daniel Fornasiero;John Ralston

  • The behaviour of mineral matter in fine coal flotation using saline water

    Bo Wang;Yongjun Peng

  • A review of copper–arsenic mineral removal from copper concentrates

    Graham Long;Yongjun Peng;Dee J. Bradshaw

  • Diagnosis of the Surface Chemistry Effects on Fine Coal Flotation Using Saline Water

    Bo Wang;Yongjun Peng;Sue Vink

  • The adsorption behavior of surfactants on mineral surfaces in the presence of electrolytes - A critical review

    Ziyong Chang;Xumeng Chen;Yongjun Peng

  • Managing clay minerals in froth flotation—A critical review

    Xumeng Chen;Yongjun Peng

  • Cyanide chemistry and its effect on mineral flotation

    Bao Guo;Yongjun Peng;Rodolfo Espinosa-Gomez

  • Reducing the entrainment of clay minerals in flotation using tap and saline water

    Di Liu;Yongjun Peng

  • Effect of clay minerals on pulp rheology and the flotation of copper and gold minerals

    Ming Zhang;Yongjun Peng

  • The separation of chalcopyrite and chalcocite from pyrite in cleaner flotation after regrinding

    Xumeng Chen;Yongjun Peng;Dee Bradshaw

  • Exploiting the dual functions of polymer depressants in fine particle flotation

    Qi Liu;David Wannas;Yongjun Peng

  • The effect of surface oxidation of copper sulfide minerals on clay slime coating in flotation

    Yongjun Peng;Shengli Zhao

  • Interactions of clay minerals in copper–gold flotation: Part 1 – Rheological properties of clay mineral suspensions in the presence of flotation reagents

    Nestor Cruz;Yongjun Peng;Saeed Farrokhpay;Dee J. Bradshaw

  • Reducing quartz gangue entrainment in sulphide ore flotation by high molecular weight polyethylene oxide

    J. Gong;Y. Peng;A. Bouajila;M. Ourriban

  • The effect of electrochemical potential on the activation of pyrite by copper and lead ions during grinding

    Yongjun Peng;Bo Wang;Andrea Gerson

  • The role of sodium sulfide in the flotation of pyrite depressed in chalcopyrite flotation

    Zhao Cao;Xumeng Chen;Yongjun Peng

  • Effect of iron contamination from grinding media on the flotation of sulphide minerals of different particle size

    Yongjun Peng;Stephen Grano

  • The interaction of clay minerals and saline water in coarse coal flotation

    Bo Wang;Yongjun Peng

  • Understanding different roles of lignosulfonate in dispersing clay minerals in coal flotation using deionised water and saline water

    Di Liu;Yongjun Peng

  • Effect of grinding media on the activation of pyrite flotation

    Yongjun Peng;Stephen Grano

  • Entrainment in froth flotation: The degree of entrainment and its contributing factors

    L. Wang;Y. Peng;K. Runge

  • The interaction between diesel and surfactant Triton X-100 and their adsorption on coal surfaces with different degrees of oxidation

    Ziyong Chang;Xumeng Chen;Yongjun Peng

  • Electrochemistry aspects of pyrite in the presence of potassium amyl xanthate and a lignosulfonate-based biopolymer depressant

    Yufan Mu;Yongjun Peng;Rolf Andreas Lauten

  • The galvanic interaction between chalcopyrite and pyrite in the presence of lignosulfonate-based biopolymers and its effects on flotation performance

    Yufan Mu;Yongjun Peng;Rolf A. Lauten

  • The oxidation of copper sulfide minerals during grinding and their interactions with clay particles

    Shengli Zhao;Yongjun Peng

  • The flotation of slime–fine fractions of Mt. Keith pentlandite ore in de-ionised and saline water

    Y. Peng;Y. Peng;D. Seaman

Frequent Co-Authors

Dee Bradshaw
Dee Bradshaw University of Queensland
John Ralston
John Ralston Adelaide University
Ming Zhang
Ming Zhang China Jiliang University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying Engineering and Technology in the USA opens doors to diverse and complementary online degree and career options across various industries. Those interested in leveraging their technical background with strong administrative abilities might consider the office administration associate's degree. This program builds practical office management and organizational skills, making it valuable in a broad array of sectors.

For those aiming to combine technical expertise with business acumen, a bachelor of business administration online delivers foundational knowledge in management, finance, and operations, which complements engineering and technology careers.

To pursue leadership roles, the best online master's in organizational leadership can equip tech professionals with advanced skills in team management and organizational change. Meanwhile, those interested in progression within project management or operational roles can benefit from mba in operations management programs, which focus on optimizing processes and strategic decision-making.

These online degree options provide flexible learning while expanding your career pathways in today’s interconnected engineering and technology landscapes.

Best Scientists Citing Yongjun Peng

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles