World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Ecology and Evolution

D-Index
36
Citations
6431
World Ranking
7050
National Ranking
367

Niko Balkenhol publication distribution in Ecology and Evolution in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Ecology and Evolution in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Niko Balkenhol sits on this spectrum.

37–41 publications: 2 scientists 42–46 publications: 9 scientists 47–51 publications: 10 scientists 52–56 publications: 31 scientists 57–61 publications: 56 scientists 62–66 publications: 91 scientists 67–71 publications: 92 scientists 72–76 publications: 127 scientists 77–81 publications: 173 scientists 82–86 publications: 236 scientists 87–91 publications: 227 scientists 92–96 publications: 240 scientists 97–101 publications: 333 scientists 102–106 publications: 280 scientists 107–111 publications: 300 scientists 112–116 publications: 285 scientists 117–121 publications: 305 scientists 122–126 publications: 287 scientists 127–131 publications: 278 scientists 132–136 publications: 289 scientists 137–141 publications: 273 scientists 142–146 publications: 262 scientists 147–151 publications: 246 scientists 152–156 publications: 235 scientists 157–161 publications: 205 scientists 162–166 publications: 199 scientists 167–171 publications: 174 scientists 172–176 publications: 164 scientists 177–181 publications: 173 scientists 182–186 publications: 189 scientists 187–191 publications: 170 scientists 192–196 publications: 139 scientists 197–201 publications: 128 scientists 202–206 publications: 117 scientists 207–211 publications: 115 scientists 212–216 publications: 107 scientists 217–221 publications: 124 scientists 222–226 publications: 81 scientists 227–231 publications: 82 scientists 232–236 publications: 85 scientists 237–241 publications: 75 scientists 242–246 publications: 66 scientists 247–251 publications: 81 scientists 252–256 publications: 69 scientists 257–261 publications: 70 scientists 262–266 publications: 55 scientists 267–271 publications: 64 scientists 272–276 publications: 49 scientists 277–281 publications: 48 scientists 282–286 publications: 44 scientists 287–291 publications: 45 scientists 292–296 publications: 36 scientists 297–301 publications: 39 scientists 302–306 publications: 38 scientists 307–311 publications: 30 scientists 312–316 publications: 34 scientists 317–321 publications: 25 scientists 322–326 publications: 22 scientists 327–331 publications: 28 scientists 332–336 publications: 30 scientists 337–341 publications: 22 scientists 342–346 publications: 30 scientists 347–351 publications: 26 scientists 352–356 publications: 22 scientists 357–361 publications: 29 scientists 362–366 publications: 21 scientists 367–371 publications: 12 scientists 372–376 publications: 18 scientists 377–381 publications: 17 scientists 382–386 publications: 13 scientists 387–391 publications: 21 scientists 392–396 publications: 13 scientists 397–401 publications: 10 scientists 402–406 publications: 15 scientists 407–411 publications: 8 scientists 412–416 publications: 9 scientists 417–421 publications: 8 scientists 422–426 publications: 4 scientists 427–431 publications: 10 scientists 432–436 publications: 10 scientists 437–441 publications: 5 scientists 442–446 publications: 4 scientists 447–451 publications: 10 scientists 452–456 publications: 2 scientists 457–461 publications: 4 scientists 462–466 publications: 7 scientists 467–471 publications: 7 scientists 472–476 publications: 6 scientists 477–481 publications: 6 scientists 482–486 publications: 3 scientists 487–491 publications: 3 scientists 492–496 publications: 4 scientists 497–501 publications: 4 scientists 502–506 publications: 8 scientists 507–511 publications: 5 scientists 512–516 publications: 4 scientists 517–521 publications: 5 scientists 522–526 publications: 4 scientists 527–530 publications: 5 scientists 531+ publications: 100 scientists
37 publications 531+

This scientist: 147 publications — 51st percentile

51% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 531 publications or more.

Niko Balkenhol D-index placement in Ecology and Evolution in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Ecology and Evolution scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Niko Balkenhol sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 95 scientists 31 D-Index: 123 scientists 32 D-Index: 191 scientists 33 D-Index: 245 scientists 34 D-Index: 252 scientists 35 D-Index: 244 scientists 36 D-Index: 249 scientists 37 D-Index: 244 scientists 38 D-Index: 254 scientists 39 D-Index: 254 scientists 40 D-Index: 280 scientists 41 D-Index: 274 scientists 42 D-Index: 266 scientists 43 D-Index: 233 scientists 44 D-Index: 248 scientists 45 D-Index: 208 scientists 46 D-Index: 201 scientists 47 D-Index: 213 scientists 48 D-Index: 207 scientists 49 D-Index: 172 scientists 50 D-Index: 209 scientists 51 D-Index: 199 scientists 52 D-Index: 153 scientists 53 D-Index: 169 scientists 54 D-Index: 163 scientists 55 D-Index: 148 scientists 56 D-Index: 120 scientists 57 D-Index: 146 scientists 58 D-Index: 137 scientists 59 D-Index: 140 scientists 60 D-Index: 104 scientists 61 D-Index: 119 scientists 62 D-Index: 118 scientists 63 D-Index: 99 scientists 64 D-Index: 77 scientists 65 D-Index: 100 scientists 66 D-Index: 86 scientists 67 D-Index: 83 scientists 68 D-Index: 75 scientists 69 D-Index: 94 scientists 70 D-Index: 57 scientists 71 D-Index: 68 scientists 72 D-Index: 59 scientists 73 D-Index: 63 scientists 74 D-Index: 66 scientists 75 D-Index: 60 scientists 76 D-Index: 42 scientists 77 D-Index: 49 scientists 78 D-Index: 39 scientists 79 D-Index: 37 scientists 80 D-Index: 43 scientists 81 D-Index: 41 scientists 82 D-Index: 45 scientists 83 D-Index: 34 scientists 84 D-Index: 40 scientists 85 D-Index: 35 scientists 86 D-Index: 55 scientists 87 D-Index: 24 scientists 88 D-Index: 24 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 23 scientists 91 D-Index: 25 scientists 92 D-Index: 27 scientists 93 D-Index: 27 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 23 scientists 96 D-Index: 12 scientists 97 D-Index: 14 scientists 98 D-Index: 19 scientists 99 D-Index: 16 scientists 100 D-Index: 14 scientists 101 D-Index: 5 scientists 102 D-Index: 21 scientists 103 D-Index: 16 scientists 104 D-Index: 10 scientists 105 D-Index: 7 scientists 106 D-Index: 7 scientists 107 D-Index: 7 scientists 108 D-Index: 6 scientists 109 D-Index: 9 scientists 110 D-Index: 11 scientists 111 D-Index: 12 scientists 112 D-Index: 9 scientists 113 D-Index: 7 scientists 114 D-Index: 3 scientists 115 D-Index: 8 scientists 116 D-Index: 5 scientists 117 D-Index: 11 scientists 118 D-Index: 4 scientists 119 D-Index: 2 scientists 120 D-Index: 5 scientists 121+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 121+

This scientist: 36 D-Index — 17th percentile

17% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 121 D-Index or more.

Overview

Niko Balkenhol is affiliated with the University of Göttingen in Germany. Their research primarily spans the field of Environmental Science, with a notable emphasis on Ecology. Within this broad discipline, their work further focuses on several subfields including Ecology, Nature and Landscape Conservation, Genetics, Global and Planetary Change, and Ecological Modeling.

The main topics explored in their research encompass Wildlife Ecology and Conservation, Wildlife-Road Interactions and Conservation, Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies, Species Distribution and Climate Change, Animal Behavior and Welfare Studies, Land Use and Ecosystem Services, as well as Human-Animal Interaction Studies.

Balkenhol has contributed to numerous scientific articles with recent publications reflecting diverse aspects of ecological and conservation topics. Notable recent papers include:

  • "Anthropogenic resistance: accounting for human behavior in wildlife connectivity planning" (2021), published in One Earth
  • "So close and yet so different: The importance of considering temporal dynamics to understand habitat selection" (2020), published in Basic and Applied Ecology
  • "An overview of computational tools for preparing, constructing and using resistance surfaces in connectivity research" (2022), published in Landscape Ecology
  • "Target-oriented habitat and wildlife management: estimating forage quantity and quality of semi-natural grasslands with Sentinel-1 and Sentinel-2 data" (2020), published in Remote Sensing in Ecology and Conservation
  • "Integrated SDM database: Enhancing the relevance and utility of species distribution models in conservation management" (2021), published in Methods in Ecology and Evolution

Their frequent publication venues include Ecology and Evolution, Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research), Landscape Ecology, Movement Ecology, and Conservation Genetics.

In collaboration, Balkenhol has worked extensively with colleagues including Johannes Signer, Matthias Waltert, J. Isselstein, Trishna Dutta, and Friederike Riesch.

Best Publications

  • Use of resistance surfaces for landscape genetic studies: considerations for parameterization and analysis

    Stephen F. Spear;Niko Balkenhol;Marie-Josée Fortin;Brad H. Mcrae

  • Remotely sensed spectral heterogeneity as a proxy of species diversity: Recent advances and open challenges

    Duccio Rocchini;Niko Balkenhol;Gregory A. Carter;Giles M. Foody

  • Statistical approaches in landscape genetics: an evaluation of methods for linking landscape and genetic data

    Niko Balkenhol;Lisette P. Waits;Raymond J. Dezzani

  • Molecular road ecology: exploring the potential of genetics for investigating transportation impacts on wildlife

    Niko Balkenhol;Lisette P. Waits

  • Integrating movement ecology with biodiversity research - exploring new avenues to address spatiotemporal biodiversity dynamics.

    Florian Jeltsch;Dries Bonte;Guy Pe’er;Björn Reineking

  • Ecological connectivity research in urban areas

    Scott Daniel LaPoint;Scott Daniel LaPoint;Niko Balkenhol;James Hale;Jonathan Sadler

  • Landscape genetics : concepts, methods, applications

    Niko Balkenhol;Samuel A. Cushman;Andrew T. Storfer;Lisette P. Waits

  • Identifying future research needs in landscape genetics: Where to from here?

    Niko Balkenhol;Felix Gugerli;Sam A. Cushman;Lisette P. Waits

  • Path segmentation for beginners: an overview of current methods for detecting changes in animal movement patterns

    Hendrik Edelhoff;Johannes Signer;Niko Balkenhol

  • Reproducible home ranges (rhr): A new, user-friendly R package for analyses of wildlife telemetry data

    Johannes Signer;Niko Balkenhol

  • A comparative framework to infer landscape effects on population genetic structure: Are habitat suitability models effective in explaining gene flow?

    María C. Mateo-Sánchez;Niko Balkenhol;Samuel Cushman;Trinidad Pérez

  • A simulation-based evaluation of methods for inferring linear barriers to gene flow

    Christopher Blair;Christopher Blair;Dana E. Weigel;Matthew Balazik;Annika T. H. Keeley

  • Estimating effective landscape distances and movement corridors: Comparison of habitat and genetic data

    Maria C. Mateo-Sanchez;Niko Balkenhol;Samuel Cushman;Trinidad Perez

  • Conservation genetics: linking science with practice

    Rolf Holderegger;Niko Balkenhol;Janine Bolliger;Jan O. Engler

  • Livestock grazing in protected areas and its effects on large mammals in the Hyrcanian forest, Iran

    Mahmood Soofi;Arash Ghoddousi;Thorsten Zeppenfeld;Shirko Shokri

  • A plea for simultaneously considering matrix quality and local environmental conditions when analysing landscape impacts on effective dispersal.

    Femke J. Pflüger;Niko Balkenhol

  • Planning tiger recovery: Understanding intraspecific variation for effective conservation

    Andreas Wilting;Alexandre Courtiol;Per Christiansen;Jürgen Niedballa

  • Fencing solves human-wildlife conflict locally but shifts problems elsewhere: A case study using functional connectivity modelling of the African elephant

    Liudmila Osipova;Liudmila Osipova;Moses M. Okello;Steven J. Njumbi;Shadrack Ngene

  • Enhancing conservation network design with graph-theory and a measure of protected area effectiveness: Refining wildlife corridors in Belize, Central America

    Maarten P.G. Hofman;Maarten P.G. Hofman;Matthew W. Hayward;Matthew W. Hayward;Matthew W. Hayward;Marcella J. Kelly;Niko Balkenhol

  • Anthropogenic resistance: accounting for human behavior in wildlife connectivity planning

    Arash Ghoddousi;Erin K. Buchholtz;Alia M. Dietsch;Matthew A. Williamson

  • Landscape Genomics: Understanding Relationships Between Environmental Heterogeneity and Genomic Characteristics of Populations

    Niko Balkenhol;Rachael Y. Dudaniec;Konstantin V. Krutovsky;Jeremy S. Johnson

  • Integrating movement ecology with biodiversity research

    Florian Jeltsch;Dries Bonte;Guy Pe'er;Björn Reineking

Frequent Co-Authors

Matt W. Hayward
Matt W. Hayward University of Newcastle Australia
Lisette P. Waits
Lisette P. Waits University of Idaho
Samuel A. Cushman
Samuel A. Cushman University of Oxford
Erin L. Landguth
Erin L. Landguth University of Montana
Matthias Waltert
Matthias Waltert University of Göttingen
Marco Heurich
Marco Heurich University of Freiburg
Frank E. Zachos
Frank E. Zachos Natural History Museum Vienna
Christoph Leuschner
Christoph Leuschner University of Göttingen
Christian Ammer
Christian Ammer University of Göttingen
Andrea Polle
Andrea Polle University of Göttingen

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying Ecology and Evolution opens doors to a range of rewarding career avenues, many of which intersect with other disciplines such as mental health, counseling, psychology, and social work. If you are interested in broadening your career opportunities or complementing your science background, consider related online degrees.

Pursuing social work master programs online can prepare you to address social and environmental challenges at the community level. For those passionate about human behavior, accelerated psychology masters programs offer a flexible, fast-tracked route to gaining advanced psychological expertise.

Additionally, those interested in supporting community well-being may consider the accelerated online masters in counseling degree, which equips graduates to address diverse mental health needs. For a career blending science with the justice system, a forensic psychology degree may be the ideal option.

These pathways are flexible, often fully online, and can enhance your expertise in ecology, evolution, and human impact — helping you make a broader positive difference.

Best Scientists Citing Niko Balkenhol

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles