World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Neuroscience

D-Index
57
Citations
14850
World Ranking
4295
National Ranking
1944

Stephen A. Back publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Stephen A. Back sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientists 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 887+

This scientist: 106 publications — 20th percentile

20% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

Stephen A. Back D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Stephen A. Back sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 57 D-Index — 56th percentile

56% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

Overview

Stephen A. Back is affiliated with Oregon Health & Science University in the United States. Their research spans multiple disciplines, primarily focusing on medicine, biochemistry, genetics, molecular biology, and neuroscience. These main fields include specialized subfields such as pediatrics, perinatology and child health, pulmonary and respiratory medicine, neurology, molecular biology, and cancer research.

Their work addresses several key topics within these fields, notably:

  • Neonatal and fetal brain pathology
  • Neonatal respiratory health research
  • Neuroinflammation and neurodegeneration mechanisms
  • Neurological disease mechanisms and treatments
  • Neuroscience of respiration and sleep
  • Proteoglycans and glycosaminoglycans research
  • Traumatic brain injury and neurovascular disturbances

Stephen A. Back has a diverse publication record with research articles appearing in a number of scientific journals. Frequent publication venues include:

  • International Journal of Molecular Sciences
  • Developmental Neuroscience
  • Annals of Neurology
  • GeroScience
  • UNC Libraries

Highlighted recent papers authored or co-authored by Stephen A. Back include:

  • The Vannucci Model of Hypoxic-Ischemic Injury in the Neonatal Rodent: 40 years Later, 2022, Developmental Neuroscience
  • Ferroptosis of Microglia in Aging Human White Matter Injury, 2023, Annals of Neurology
  • Association of cerebral microvascular dysfunction and white matter injury in Alzheimer's disease, 2022, GeroScience
  • Translational Stroke Research: Vision and Opportunities, 2020, UNC Libraries
  • TSG-6-Mediated Extracellular Matrix Modifications Regulate Hypoxic-Ischemic Brain Injury, 2024, Journal of Neuroscience

Collaboration is an integral part of their research activities, with frequent co-authors including Larry S. Sherman, Philip A. Adeniyi, Xi Gong, Taasin Srivastava, and C. Dirk Keene. These collaborations reflect interdisciplinary approaches and contribute to the breadth of their scientific output.

Best Publications

  • Late Oligodendrocyte Progenitors Coincide with the Developmental Window of Vulnerability for Human Perinatal White Matter Injury

    Stephen A. Back;Ning Ling Luo;Natalya S. Borenstein;Joel M. Levine

  • Selective vulnerability of late oligodendrocyte progenitors to hypoxia-ischemia.

    Stephen A. Back;Byung Hee Han;Ning Ling Luo;Charlene A. Chricton

  • Maturation-Dependent Vulnerability of Oligodendrocytes to Oxidative Stress-Induced Death Caused by Glutathione Depletion

    Stephen A. Back;Xiaodong Gan;Ya Li;Paul A. Rosenberg

  • White matter injury in the preterm infant: pathology and mechanisms

    Stephen A. Back

  • Arrested preoligodendrocyte maturation contributes to myelination failure in premature infants

    Joshua R. Buser;Jennifer Maire;Art Riddle;Xi Gong

  • Maturation-Dependent Vulnerability of Perinatal White Matter in Premature Birth

    Stephen A. Back;Art Riddle;Melissa M. McClure

  • Perinatal white matter injury: The changing spectrum of pathology and emerging insights into pathogenetic mechanisms

    Stephen A. Back

  • BDNF blocks caspase-3 activation in neonatal hypoxia-ischemia.

    Byung Hee Han;Anselm D'Costa;Stephen A. Back;Maia Parsadanian

  • Brain injury in premature neonates: A primary cerebral dysmaturation disorder?

    Stephen A. Back;Steven P. Miller

  • Arrested oligodendrocyte lineage maturation in chronic perinatal white matter injury

    Kristen N. Segovia;Melissa McClure;Matthew Moravec;Ning Ling Luo

  • Quantitative analysis of perinatal rodent oligodendrocyte lineage progression and its correlation with human.

    Andrew Craig;Ning Ling Luo;Douglas J Beardsley;Nasiema Wingate-Pearse

  • Isoflurane-induced apoptosis of oligodendrocytes in the neonatal primate brain

    Ansgar M. Brambrink;Stephen A. Back;Art Riddle;Xi Gong

  • Selective vulnerability of preterm white matter to oxidative damage defined by F2-isoprostanes

    Stephen A. Back;Ning Ling Luo;Rebecca A. Mallinson;Jean P. O'Malley

  • CD44 expression identifies astrocyte-restricted precursor cells

    Ying Liu;Ying Liu;Steve S.W. Han;Yuanyuan Wu;Therese M.F. Tuohy

  • Preterm Fetal Hypoxia-Ischemia Causes Hypertonia and Motor Deficits in the Neonatal Rabbit: A Model for Human Cerebral Palsy?

    Matthew Derrick;Ning Ling Luo;Joanne C. Bregman;Tamas Jilling

  • Isoflurane-induced Apoptosis of Neurons and Oligodendrocytes in the Fetal Rhesus Macaque Brain

    Catherine E. Creeley;Krikor T. Dikranian;Gregory A. Dissen;Stephen A. Back

  • Pathophysiology of glia in perinatal white matter injury

    Stephen A. Back;Paul A. Rosenberg

  • Spatial Heterogeneity in Oligodendrocyte Lineage Maturation and Not Cerebral Blood Flow Predicts Fetal Ovine Periventricular White Matter Injury

    Art Riddle;Ning Ling Luo;Mario Manese;Douglas J. Beardsley

  • Arrested oligodendrocyte lineage progression during human cerebral white matter development: dissociation between the timing of progenitor differentiation and myelinogenesis.

    Stephen A. Back;Ning Ling Luo;Natalia S. Borenstein;Joseph J. Volpe

  • Developmental Changes in Diffusion Anisotropy Coincide with Immature Oligodendrocyte Progression and Maturation of Compound Action Potential

    Alexander Drobyshevsky;Sheng Kwei Song;Georgi Gamkrelidze;Alice M. Wyrwicz

Frequent Co-Authors

Larry S. Sherman
Larry S. Sherman Oregon National Primate Research Center
Joseph J. Volpe
Joseph J. Volpe Harvard University
Christopher D. Kroenke
Christopher D. Kroenke Oregon National Primate Research Center
Paul A. Rosenberg
Paul A. Rosenberg Boston Children's Hospital
Steven P. Miller
Steven P. Miller University of Toronto
Alistair J. Gunn
Alistair J. Gunn University of Auckland
Thomas J. Montine
Thomas J. Montine Stanford University
Hannah C. Kinney
Hannah C. Kinney Boston Children's Hospital
Charles K. Meshul
Charles K. Meshul Oregon Health & Science University
David M. Holtzman
David M. Holtzman Washington University in St. Louis

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Aspiring neuroscience students may also be interested in related online degrees and career pathways in psychology, therapy, and social work. These programs can provide key foundational skills and open doors to a range of fulfilling professions beyond direct neuroscience research.

For those interested in clinical practice, best online mft programs prepare graduates to become licensed marriage and family therapists, helping individuals and families navigate mental health challenges. Similarly, a Master’s in Psychology offers opportunities in counseling, organizational psychology, and research. If you’re wondering how much does masters in psychology cost, tuition rates are frequently more affordable online than on-campus.

Prospective students should also consider the financial investment required for these related pathways. To better understand how much is a psychology degree, prospective learners can compare programs based on tuition, fees, and potential financial aid options. Those interested in social work might look into msw online programs, which provide training for roles supporting community mental health and advocacy.

These online degrees offer flexibility, affordability, and strong career prospects, making them excellent options for students interested in the broader field of neuroscience and mental health.

Best Scientists Citing Stephen A. Back

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles