World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
104
Citations
56559
World Ranking
6919
National Ranking
3646

Joseph E. Bavaria publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Joseph E. Bavaria sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 610 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 617 publications — 73rd percentile

73% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

Joseph E. Bavaria D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Joseph E. Bavaria sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 399 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 104 D-Index — 66th percentile

66% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Overview

Joseph E. Bavaria is affiliated with the University of Pennsylvania in the United States. Their research contributions span multiple domains within medicine, with a primary focus on pulmonary and respiratory medicine, cardiology and cardiovascular medicine, epidemiology, surgery, and public health.

The main topics covered in their work include cardiac valve diseases and treatments, aortic disease and treatment approaches, aortic aneurysm repair treatments, infective endocarditis diagnosis and management, congenital heart disease studies, cardiac structural anomalies and repair, and cardiac, anesthesia and surgical outcomes.

Frequent co-authors collaborating with Joseph E. Bavaria include:

  • Nimesh D. Desai (66 publications)
  • Wilson Y. Szeto (44 publications)
  • Vinod H. Thourani (26 publications)
  • Thoralf M. Sundt (26 publications)
  • Thomas G. Gleason (21 publications)

Common publication venues where Joseph E. Bavaria has contributed extensively are:

  • The Annals of Thoracic Surgery (35 publications)
  • Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery (27 publications)
  • European Journal of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery (16 publications)
  • Journal of the American College of Cardiology (8 publications)
  • Journal of Vascular Surgery (7 publications)

Recent notable papers authored or co-authored by Joseph E. Bavaria include:

  • STS-ACC TVT Registry of Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement, 2020, Journal of the American College of Cardiology
  • Society for Vascular Surgery (SVS) and Society of Thoracic Surgeons (STS) reporting standards for type B aortic dissections, 2020, Journal of Vascular Surgery
  • EACTS/STS Guidelines for diagnosing and treating acute and chronic syndromes of the aortic organ, 2023, European Journal of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery
  • STS-ACC TVT Registry of Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement, 2020, The Annals of Thoracic Surgery
  • Society for Vascular Surgery (SVS) and Society of Thoracic Surgeons (STS) Reporting Standards for Type B Aortic Dissections, 2020, The Annals of Thoracic Surgery

Best Publications

  • Transcatheter Aortic-Valve Implantation for Aortic Stenosis in Patients Who Cannot Undergo Surgery

    Martin B. Leon;Craig R. Smith;Michael Mack;D. Craig Miller

  • Transcatheter versus Surgical Aortic-Valve Replacement in High-Risk Patients

    Craig R. Smith;Martin B. Leon;Michael J. Mack;D. Craig Miller

  • 5-year outcomes of transcatheter aortic valve replacement or surgical aortic valve replacement for high surgical risk patients with aortic stenosis (PARTNER 1): a randomised controlled trial

    Michael J Mack;Martin B Leon;Craig R Smith;D Craig Miller

  • Transcatheter Aortic-Valve Replacement for Inoperable Severe Aortic Stenosis

    Raj R Makkar;Gregory P Fontana;Hasan Jilaihawi;Samir Kapadia

  • Expert consensus document on the treatment of descending thoracic aortic disease using endovascular stent-grafts.

    Lars G. Svensson;Nicholas T. Kouchoukos;D. Craig Miller;Joseph E. Bavaria

  • STS-ACC TVT Registry of Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement.

    John D. Carroll;Michael J. Mack;Sreekanth Vemulapalli;Howard C. Herrmann

  • Transcatheter Versus Surgical Aortic-Valve Replacement in High-Risk Patients

    Craig R. Smith;Martin B. Leon;Michael J. Mack;D. Craig Miller

  • Endovascular treatment of thoracic aortic aneurysms: results of the phase II multicenter trial of the GORE TAG thoracic endoprosthesis.

    Michel S. Makaroun;Ellen D. Dillavou;Stephen T. Kee;Gregorio Sicard

  • Society for Vascular Surgery (SVS) and Society of Thoracic Surgeons (STS) reporting standards for type B aortic dissections

    Joseph V. Lombardi;G. Chad Hughes;Jehangir J. Appoo;Joseph E. Bavaria

  • Endovascular stent grafting versus open surgical repair of descending thoracic aortic aneurysms in low-risk patients: A multicenter comparative trial

    Joseph E. Bavaria;Jehangir J. Appoo;Michel S. Makaroun;Joel Verter

  • 2016 Annual Report of The Society of Thoracic Surgeons/American College of Cardiology Transcatheter Valve Therapy Registry.

    Frederick L Grover;Sreekanth Vemulapalli;John D Carroll;Fred H Edwards

  • Vascular Complications After Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement: Insights From the PARTNER (Placement of AoRTic TraNscathetER Valve) Trial

    Philippe Généreux;John G. Webb;Lars G. Svensson;Susheel K. Kodali

  • Bicuspid Aortic Valves Are Associated With Aortic Dilatation Out of Proportion to Coexistent Valvular Lesions

    Martin G. Keane;Susan E. Wiegers;Ted Plappert;Alberto Pochettino

  • Primary Graft Failure Following Lung Transplantation

    Jason D. Christie;Joseph E. Bavaria;Harold I. Palevsky;Leslie Litzky

  • Predictors of Mortality and Outcomes of Therapy in Low-Flow Severe Aortic Stenosis A Placement of Aortic Transcatheter Valves (PARTNER) Trial Analysis

    Howard C. Herrmann;Philippe Pibarot;Irene Hueter;Zachary M. Gertz

  • Deep hypothermic circulatory arrest: I. Effects of cooling on electroencephalogram and evoked potentials

    Mark M Stecker;Albert T Cheung;Alberto Pochettino;Glenn P Kent

  • Significance of malperfusion syndromes prior to contemporary surgical repair for acute type A dissection: outcomes and need for additional revascularizations

    Arnar Geirsson;Wilson Y. Szeto;Alberto Pochettino;Michael L. McGarvey

  • Contemporary real-world outcomes of surgical aortic valve replacement in 141,905 low-risk, intermediate-risk, and high-risk patients

    Vinod H. Thourani;Rakesh M. Suri;Rebecca L. Gunter;Shubin Sheng

  • Cost-Effectiveness of Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement Compared With Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement in High-Risk Patients With Severe Aortic Stenosis : Results of the PARTNER (Placement of Aortic Transcatheter Valves) Trial (Cohort A)

    Matthew R. Reynolds;Elizabeth A. Magnuson;Yang Lei;Kaijun Wang

  • Procedural Volume and Outcomes for Transcatheter Aortic-Valve Replacement.

    Sreekanth Vemulapalli;John D. Carroll;Michael J. Mack;Zhuokai Li

Frequent Co-Authors

Wilson Y. Szeto
Wilson Y. Szeto University of Pennsylvania
Howard C. Herrmann
Howard C. Herrmann University of Pennsylvania
Robert C. Gorman
Robert C. Gorman University of Pennsylvania
Joseph H. Gorman
Joseph H. Gorman University of Pennsylvania
D. Craig Miller
D. Craig Miller Stanford University
Larry R. Kaiser
Larry R. Kaiser Temple University
Michael J. Mack
Michael J. Mack Scott & White Memorial Hospital
Thoralf M. Sundt
Thoralf M. Sundt Harvard University
Lars G. Svensson
Lars G. Svensson Cleveland Clinic
Vinod H. Thourani
Vinod H. Thourani Georgetown University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring a career in medicine offers diverse educational routes that extend beyond the traditional MD. Many students consider starting with nursing degrees, which can be completed online. For those seeking cost-effective options, there are cheapest online bsn programs that provide flexibility for aspiring registered nurses to earn their bachelor’s and enter the workforce quickly.

Licensed RNs can further advance by enrolling in rn to bsn online cost programs, making the pathway to career growth and meeting hospital requirements more affordable. Aspiring nurse practitioners have access to cheapest fnp programs, helping them achieve advanced degrees, specialize in family medicine, and increase earning potential without overwhelming student debt.

For professionals interested in research, leadership, or academic roles, pursuing an online phd nursing can open doors to high-level positions. Overall, these flexible online pathways create multiple entry points into the medical field, making advanced education accessible and affordable for many students.

Best Scientists Citing Joseph E. Bavaria

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles