World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Medicine 82 16151 15195 8127 7517 481 23899

Scott A. LeMaire publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Scott A. LeMaire between 1993 and 2026, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Scott A. LeMaire published across 34 years, from 1993 to 2026, averaging 14.9 papers a year. Output peaked at 34 publications in 2009. 15 of the 506 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
10 20 30
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1993 to 2026. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 34. Peak 34 publications in 2009. 1993: 1 publication 1994: 0 publications 1995: 4 publications 1996: 1 publication 1997: 5 publications 1998: 3 publications 1999: 7 publications 2000: 15 publications 2001: 5 publications 2002: 13 publications 2003: 5 publications 2004: 7 publications 2005: 9 publications 2006: 17 publications 2007: 14 publications 2008: 16 publications 2009: 34 publications 2010: 23 publications 2011: 27 publications 2012: 29 publications 2013: 26 publications 2014: 19 publications 2015: 10 publications 2016: 24 publications 2017: 24 publications 2018: 19 publications 2019: 15 publications 2020: 32 publications 2021: 34 publications 2022: 21 publications 2023: 23 publications 2024: 9 publications 2025: 14 publications 2026: 1 publication
1993 2026

506 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Scott A. LeMaire: publications per year, 1993 to 2026
Year Publications
1993 1
1994 0
1995 4
1996 1
1997 5
1998 3
1999 7
2000 15
2001 5
2002 13
2003 5
2004 7
2005 9
2006 17
2007 14
2008 16
2009 34
2010 23
2011 27
2012 29
2013 26
2014 19
2015 10
2016 24
2017 24
2018 19
2019 15
2020 32
2021 34
2022 21
2023 23
2024 9
2025 14
2026 1
Total 506
Download as CSV

Scott A. LeMaire publications per year - data summary

  • Scott A. LeMaire, a Medicine scholar from Baylor College of Medicine, has 506 publications recorded across 34 years, from 1993 to 2026.
  • The oldest publication on record dates to 1993 and the most recent to 2026.
  • The most productive years are 2009 and 2021, with 34 publications each.
  • The least productive years with any output are 1993, 1996 and 2026, with 1 publication each.
  • 1 of the 34 years in the span carries no publications at all (1994).
  • The rate of publication averages 14.9 papers per year over the whole span, or 15.3 per year counting only the 33 years with at least one publication.
  • The last 5 years on the chart (2022-2026) hold 68 publications, 13% of the career total.
  • Split into equal eras - 1993-2004: 66 publications (5.5 per year); 2005-2016: 248 publications (20.7 per year); 2017-2026: 192 publications (19.2 per year).
  • Comparing the opening and closing eras, the overall trend of publication is rising.

Scott A. LeMaire publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Scott A. LeMaire sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600 800
Bar chart with 86 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 101–120 to 1,796+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 922. Most scientists, 922, have 341–360 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 481–500 publications, is where this scientist sits. 101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 610 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101–120 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 481 publications — 55th percentile

55% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
101–120 5
121–140 26
141–160 73
161–180 155
181–200 230
201–220 363
221–240 487
241–260 545
261–280 722
281–300 768
301–320 834
321–340 895
341–360 922
361–380 838
381–400 861
401–420 918
421–440 806
441–460 771
461–480 751
481–500 713 481
501–520 617
521–540 610
541–560 537
561–580 504
581–600 509
601–620 396
621–640 386
641–660 371
661–680 340
681–700 336
701–720 307
721–740 259
741–760 230
761–780 228
781–800 217
801–820 204
821–840 186
841–860 177
861–880 155
881–900 139
901–920 145
921–940 116
941–960 133
961–980 91
981–1,000 96
1,001–1,020 77
1,021–1,040 70
1,041–1,060 63
1,061–1,080 77
1,081–1,100 49
1,101–1,120 54
1,121–1,140 49
1,141–1,160 51
1,161–1,180 35
1,181–1,200 39
1,201–1,220 26
1,221–1,240 37
1,241–1,260 36
1,261–1,280 27
1,281–1,300 32
1,301–1,320 28
1,321–1,340 17
1,341–1,360 30
1,361–1,380 28
1,381–1,400 17
1,401–1,420 21
1,421–1,440 15
1,441–1,460 12
1,461–1,480 12
1,481–1,500 18
1,501–1,520 14
1,521–1,540 17
1,541–1,560 15
1,561–1,580 6
1,581–1,600 2
1,601–1,620 12
1,621–1,640 11
1,641–1,660 8
1,661–1,680 5
1,681–1,700 5
1,701–1,720 10
1,721–1,740 12
1,741–1,760 14
1,761–1,780 6
1,781–1,795 5
1,796+ 100
Download as CSV

Scott A. LeMaire publication distribution in Medicine in 2026 - data summary

  • The chart plots the publication count of all 20,134 Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026, grouped into 86 ranges running from 101–120 to 1,796+ publications.
  • Scott A. LeMaire, a Medicine scholar from Baylor College of Medicine, records 481 publications - the 55th percentile of the discipline.
  • 55% of ranked Medicine scientists score the same or lower than Scott A. LeMaire, and about 45% score higher.
  • The median of the discipline falls in the 441–460 publications range, and Scott A. LeMaire ranks above the median.
  • The most crowded range is 341–360 publications, holding 922 scientists (5% of the field).
  • 64% of the field sits in the lowest quarter of the value range (up to 521–540 publications), so the distribution is heavily right-skewed and high scores are rare.
  • The final bar has no upper bound: it groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more, 100 scientists in all (<1% of the field).

Scott A. LeMaire D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Scott A. LeMaire sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
250 500 750 1,000
Bar chart with 75 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 70–71 to 217+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 1,027. Most scientists, 1,027, have 82–83 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 82–83 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 399 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70–71 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 82 D-Index — 21st percentile

21% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
70–71 226
72–73 391
74–75 574
76–77 730
78–79 891
80–81 972
82–83 1,027 82
84–85 1,003
86–87 960
88–89 970
90–91 922
92–93 839
94–95 808
96–97 779
98–99 668
100–101 611
102–103 630
104–105 513
106–107 541
108–109 445
110–111 429
112–113 399
114–115 393
116–117 318
118–119 302
120–121 287
122–123 255
124–125 256
126–127 252
128–129 230
130–131 179
132–133 168
134–135 163
136–137 159
138–139 134
140–141 134
142–143 118
144–145 109
146–147 106
148–149 74
150–151 79
152–153 80
154–155 87
156–157 57
158–159 74
160–161 69
162–163 60
164–165 53
166–167 39
168–169 42
170–171 32
172–173 39
174–175 40
176–177 28
178–179 19
180–181 23
182–183 31
184–185 18
186–187 20
188–189 22
190–191 13
192–193 21
194–195 12
196–197 12
198–199 14
200–201 15
202–203 13
204–205 10
206–207 8
208–209 4
210–211 12
212–213 11
214–215 10
216 4
217+ 98
Download as CSV

Scott A. LeMaire D-index placement in Medicine in 2026 - data summary

  • The chart plots the discipline H-index (D-index) of all 20,134 Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026, grouped into 75 ranges running from 70–71 to 217+ D-Index.
  • Scott A. LeMaire, a Medicine scholar from Baylor College of Medicine, records 82 D-Index - the 21st percentile of the discipline.
  • 21% of ranked Medicine scientists score the same or lower than Scott A. LeMaire, and about 79% score higher.
  • The median of the discipline falls in the 94–95 D-Index range, and Scott A. LeMaire ranks below the median.
  • The most crowded range is 82–83 D-Index, holding 1,027 scientists (5% of the field).
  • 70% of the field sits in the lowest quarter of the value range (up to 106–107 D-Index), so the distribution is heavily right-skewed and high scores are rare.
  • The final bar has no upper bound: it groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more, 98 scientists in all (<1% of the field).

Overview

Scott A. LeMaire is affiliated with Baylor College of Medicine in the United States and has contributed extensively to the field of medicine, with a particular focus on pulmonary and respiratory medicine, cardiology and cardiovascular medicine, surgery, molecular biology, and genetics. Their work encompasses a total of 258 publications across these areas.

Their research concentrates on several key topics that include aortic aneurysm repair treatments, aortic disease and treatment approaches, cardiac, anesthesia and surgical outcomes, infectious aortic and vascular conditions, cardiac valve diseases and treatments, connective tissue disorders research, and congenital heart disease studies.

LeMaire has published research in multiple high-impact venues. Frequent publication sources include Circulation, the Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Arteriosclerosis Thrombosis and Vascular Biology, The Annals of Thoracic Surgery, and the Journal of Vascular Surgery.

Key recent papers authored or coauthored by LeMaire are:

  • Single-Cell Transcriptome Analysis Reveals Dynamic Cell Populations and Differential Gene Expression Patterns in Control and Aneurysmal Human Aortic Tissue, 2020, Circulation
  • Aortic Aneurysms and Dissections Series, 2020, Arteriosclerosis Thrombosis and Vascular Biology
  • Epigenetic Induction of Smooth Muscle Cell Phenotypic Alterations in Aortic Aneurysms and Dissections, 2023, Circulation
  • Targeting the NLRP3 Inflammasome With Inhibitor MCC950 Prevents Aortic Aneurysms and Dissections in Mice, 2020, Journal of the American Heart Association
  • Cholesterol-Induced Phenotypic Modulation of Smooth Muscle Cells to Macrophage/Fibroblast-like Cells Is Driven by an Unfolded Protein Response, 2020, Arteriosclerosis Thrombosis and Vascular Biology

LeMaire has collaborated frequently with a number of coauthors, including:

  • Joseph S. Coselli, with 60 joint publications
  • Ying H. Shen, with 40 joint publications
  • Yanming Li, with 26 joint publications
  • Ourania Preventza, with 25 joint publications
  • Dianna M. Milewicz, with 24 joint publications

Their interdisciplinary research integrates clinical and molecular perspectives to investigate vascular diseases, focusing on both mechanistic insights and therapeutic approaches. This includes molecular and genetic facets that influence surgical outcomes and cardiovascular health conditions.

Best Publications

  • Cerebrospinal fluid drainage reduces paraplegia after thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysm repair: results of a randomized clinical trial.

    Joseph S. Coselli;Scott A. LeMaire;Cüneyt Köksoy;Zachary C. Schmittling

  • Open surgical repair of 2286 thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysms.

    Joseph S. Coselli;John Bozinovski;Scott A. LeMaire

  • Mutations in Smooth Muscle Alpha-Actin (ACTA2) Cause Coronary Artery Disease, Stroke, and Moyamoya Disease, Along with Thoracic Aortic Disease

    Dong Chuan Guo;Christina L. Papke;Van Tran-Fadulu;Ellen S. Regalado

  • Outcomes of 3309 thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysm repairs.

    Joseph S. Coselli;Joseph S. Coselli;Joseph S. Coselli;Scott A. LeMaire;Ourania Preventza;Ourania Preventza;Ourania Preventza;Kim I. de la Cruz;Kim I. de la Cruz;Kim I. de la Cruz

  • Enhanced Cardiomyocyte NLRP3 Inflammasome Signaling Promotes Atrial Fibrillation.

    Chunxia Yao;Tina Veleva;Larry Scott;Shuyi Cao

  • Mortality and paraplegia after thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysm repair: a risk factor analysis

    Joseph S. Coselli;Scott A. LeMaire;Charles C. Miller;Zachary C. Schmittling

  • 2016 The American Association for Thoracic Surgery (AATS) consensus guidelines: Surgical treatment of infective endocarditis: Executive summary

    Gösta B. Pettersson;Joseph S. Coselli;Joseph S. Coselli;Syed T. Hussain;Brian Griffin

  • Epidemiology of thoracic aortic dissection

    Scott A. LeMaire;Ludivine Russell

  • Morbidity and mortality after extent II thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysm repair

    Joseph S Coselli;Scott A LeMaire;Lori D Conklin;Cüneyt Köksoy

  • Free Fatty Acids Inhibit Insulin Signaling–Stimulated Endothelial Nitric Oxide Synthase Activation Through Upregulating PTEN or Inhibiting Akt Kinase

    Xing Li Wang;Lin Zhang;Keith Youker;Ming-Xiang Zhang

  • Activation of the AMPK-FOXO3 pathway reduces fatty acid-induced increase in intracellular reactive oxygen species by upregulating thioredoxin.

    Xiao-Nan Li;Jun Song;Lin Zhang;Scott A. LeMaire

  • Thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysm repair: review and update of current strategies.

    Joseph S Coselli;Lori D Conklin;Scott A LeMaire

  • Left Heart Bypass Reduces Paraplegia Rates After Thoracoabdominal Aortic Aneurysm Repair

    Joseph S Coselli;Scott A LeMaire

  • STING-IRF3 Triggers Endothelial Inflammation in Response to Free Fatty Acid-Induced Mitochondrial Damage in Diet-Induced Obesity.

    Yun Mao;Yun Mao;Yun Mao;Wei Luo;Wei Luo;Wei Luo;Lin Zhang;Lin Zhang;Weiwei Wu

  • Analysis of multigenerational families with thoracic aortic aneurysms and dissections due to TGFBR1 or TGFBR2 mutations

    V. Tran-Fadulu;H. Pannu;Dong H Kim;G. W. Vick

  • Renal perfusion during thoracoabdominal aortic operations: cold crystalloid is superior to normothermic blood.

    Cüneyt Köksoy;Scott A LeMaire;Patrick E Curling;Steven A Raskin

  • Molecular Mechanisms of Thoracic Aortic Dissection

    Darrell Wu;Ying H. Shen;Ying H. Shen;Ludivine Russell;Ludivine Russell;Joseph S. Coselli;Joseph S. Coselli

  • Matrix metalloproteinases in ascending aortic aneurysms: bicuspid versus trileaflet aortic valves.

    Scott A. LeMaire;Xinwen Wang;Jonathan A. Wilks;Stacey A. Carter

  • The elephant trunk technique for staged repair of complex aneurysms of the entire thoracic aorta.

    Scott A. LeMaire;Stacey A. Carter;Joseph S. Coselli

  • Superior nationwide outcomes of endovascular versus open repair for isolated descending thoracic aortic aneurysm in 11,669 patients.

    Raja R. Gopaldas;Raja R. Gopaldas;Joseph Huh;Joseph Huh;Tam K. Dao;Scott A. LeMaire;Scott A. LeMaire

Frequent Co-Authors

Joseph S. Coselli
Joseph S. Coselli Baylor College of Medicine
Dianna M. Milewicz
Dianna M. Milewicz The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston
Kim A. Eagle
Kim A. Eagle University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
Reed E. Pyeritz
Reed E. Pyeritz University of Pennsylvania
Richard B. Devereux
Richard B. Devereux Cornell University
Joseph E. Bavaria
Joseph E. Bavaria University of Pennsylvania
Mary J. Roman
Mary J. Roman Cornell University
Alan Daugherty
Alan Daugherty University of Kentucky
Harry C. Dietz
Harry C. Dietz Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine
John W. Belmont
John W. Belmont Baylor College of Medicine

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing a traditional medical degree in the USA is not the only path to a rewarding healthcare career. There are many online degree options and career ladders that offer flexibility and diverse roles within the health sector. For example, registered nurses looking to advance can consider an rn to np bridge program, designed to help RNs become nurse practitioners without repeating courses.

Those interested in preventive care and wellness may opt for an online degree in nutrition. This field is growing alongside increased public interest in healthy living. Leadership roles in healthcare are also more accessible than ever with flexible online mha programs, which focus on hospital management and administration.

For registered nurses aiming to complete a bachelor’s degree while maintaining their current jobs, there are now rn bsn online programs no clinicals, allowing nurses to boost their qualifications completely online. These options demonstrate the increasing flexibility and variety of medical career pathways available without needing to attend campus full-time.

Best Scientists Citing Scott A. LeMaire

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles