World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Richard P. Cambria

Richard P. Cambria

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Medicine 98 9038 8483 4655 4305 408 26529

Richard P. Cambria publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Richard P. Cambria between 1964 and 2024, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Richard P. Cambria published across 61 years, from 1964 to 2024, averaging 6.8 papers a year. Output peaked at 28 publications in 2014. 9 of the 412 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15 20 25
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1964 to 2024. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 28. Peak 28 publications in 2014. 1964: 1 publication 1965: 0 publications 1966: 0 publications 1967: 0 publications 1968: 0 publications 1969: 0 publications 1970: 0 publications 1971: 0 publications 1972: 0 publications 1973: 0 publications 1974: 0 publications 1975: 0 publications 1976: 0 publications 1977: 0 publications 1978: 0 publications 1979: 0 publications 1980: 0 publications 1981: 0 publications 1982: 1 publication 1983: 2 publications 1984: 2 publications 1985: 2 publications 1986: 3 publications 1987: 7 publications 1988: 2 publications 1989: 6 publications 1990: 4 publications 1991: 8 publications 1992: 9 publications 1993: 12 publications 1994: 9 publications 1995: 7 publications 1996: 9 publications 1997: 7 publications 1998: 6 publications 1999: 5 publications 2000: 9 publications 2001: 2 publications 2002: 5 publications 2003: 4 publications 2004: 14 publications 2005: 15 publications 2006: 10 publications 2007: 9 publications 2008: 13 publications 2009: 16 publications 2010: 22 publications 2011: 18 publications 2012: 25 publications 2013: 17 publications 2014: 28 publications 2015: 17 publications 2016: 21 publications 2017: 17 publications 2018: 12 publications 2019: 9 publications 2020: 3 publications 2021: 7 publications 2022: 8 publications 2023: 4 publications 2024: 5 publications
1964 2024

412 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Richard P. Cambria: publications per year, 1964 to 2024
Year Publications
1964 1
1965 0
1966 0
1967 0
1968 0
1969 0
1970 0
1971 0
1972 0
1973 0
1974 0
1975 0
1976 0
1977 0
1978 0
1979 0
1980 0
1981 0
1982 1
1983 2
1984 2
1985 2
1986 3
1987 7
1988 2
1989 6
1990 4
1991 8
1992 9
1993 12
1994 9
1995 7
1996 9
1997 7
1998 6
1999 5
2000 9
2001 2
2002 5
2003 4
2004 14
2005 15
2006 10
2007 9
2008 13
2009 16
2010 22
2011 18
2012 25
2013 17
2014 28
2015 17
2016 21
2017 17
2018 12
2019 9
2020 3
2021 7
2022 8
2023 4
2024 5
Total 412
Download as CSV

Richard P. Cambria publications per year - data summary

  • Richard P. Cambria, a Medicine scholar from Harvard University, has 412 publications recorded across 61 years, from 1964 to 2024.
  • The oldest publication on record dates to 1964 and the most recent to 2024.
  • The most productive year is 2014, with 28 publications.
  • The least productive years with any output are 1964 and 1982, with 1 publication each.
  • 17 of the 61 years in the span carry no publications at all (1965, 1966, 1967, 1968 and others).
  • The rate of publication averages 6.8 papers per year over the whole span, or 9.4 per year counting only the 44 years with at least one publication.
  • The last 5 years on the chart (2020-2024) hold 27 publications, 7% of the career total.
  • Split into equal eras - 1964-1984: 6 publications (0.3 per year); 1985-2005: 145 publications (6.9 per year); 2006-2024: 261 publications (13.7 per year).
  • Comparing the opening and closing eras, the overall trend of publication is rising.

Richard P. Cambria publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Richard P. Cambria sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600 800
Bar chart with 86 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 101–120 to 1,796+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 922. Most scientists, 922, have 341–360 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 401–420 publications, is where this scientist sits. 101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 610 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101–120 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 408 publications — 40th percentile

40% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
101–120 5
121–140 26
141–160 73
161–180 155
181–200 230
201–220 363
221–240 487
241–260 545
261–280 722
281–300 768
301–320 834
321–340 895
341–360 922
361–380 838
381–400 861
401–420 918 408
421–440 806
441–460 771
461–480 751
481–500 713
501–520 617
521–540 610
541–560 537
561–580 504
581–600 509
601–620 396
621–640 386
641–660 371
661–680 340
681–700 336
701–720 307
721–740 259
741–760 230
761–780 228
781–800 217
801–820 204
821–840 186
841–860 177
861–880 155
881–900 139
901–920 145
921–940 116
941–960 133
961–980 91
981–1,000 96
1,001–1,020 77
1,021–1,040 70
1,041–1,060 63
1,061–1,080 77
1,081–1,100 49
1,101–1,120 54
1,121–1,140 49
1,141–1,160 51
1,161–1,180 35
1,181–1,200 39
1,201–1,220 26
1,221–1,240 37
1,241–1,260 36
1,261–1,280 27
1,281–1,300 32
1,301–1,320 28
1,321–1,340 17
1,341–1,360 30
1,361–1,380 28
1,381–1,400 17
1,401–1,420 21
1,421–1,440 15
1,441–1,460 12
1,461–1,480 12
1,481–1,500 18
1,501–1,520 14
1,521–1,540 17
1,541–1,560 15
1,561–1,580 6
1,581–1,600 2
1,601–1,620 12
1,621–1,640 11
1,641–1,660 8
1,661–1,680 5
1,681–1,700 5
1,701–1,720 10
1,721–1,740 12
1,741–1,760 14
1,761–1,780 6
1,781–1,795 5
1,796+ 100
Download as CSV

Richard P. Cambria publication distribution in Medicine in 2026 - data summary

  • The chart plots the publication count of all 20,134 Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026, grouped into 86 ranges running from 101–120 to 1,796+ publications.
  • Richard P. Cambria, a Medicine scholar from Harvard University, records 408 publications - the 40th percentile of the discipline.
  • 40% of ranked Medicine scientists score the same or lower than Richard P. Cambria, and about 60% score higher.
  • The median of the discipline falls in the 441–460 publications range, and Richard P. Cambria ranks below the median.
  • The most crowded range is 341–360 publications, holding 922 scientists (5% of the field).
  • 64% of the field sits in the lowest quarter of the value range (up to 521–540 publications), so the distribution is heavily right-skewed and high scores are rare.
  • The final bar has no upper bound: it groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more, 100 scientists in all (<1% of the field).

Richard P. Cambria D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Richard P. Cambria sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
250 500 750 1,000
Bar chart with 75 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 70–71 to 217+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 1,027. Most scientists, 1,027, have 82–83 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 98–99 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 399 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70–71 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 98 D-Index — 57th percentile

57% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
70–71 226
72–73 391
74–75 574
76–77 730
78–79 891
80–81 972
82–83 1,027
84–85 1,003
86–87 960
88–89 970
90–91 922
92–93 839
94–95 808
96–97 779
98–99 668 98
100–101 611
102–103 630
104–105 513
106–107 541
108–109 445
110–111 429
112–113 399
114–115 393
116–117 318
118–119 302
120–121 287
122–123 255
124–125 256
126–127 252
128–129 230
130–131 179
132–133 168
134–135 163
136–137 159
138–139 134
140–141 134
142–143 118
144–145 109
146–147 106
148–149 74
150–151 79
152–153 80
154–155 87
156–157 57
158–159 74
160–161 69
162–163 60
164–165 53
166–167 39
168–169 42
170–171 32
172–173 39
174–175 40
176–177 28
178–179 19
180–181 23
182–183 31
184–185 18
186–187 20
188–189 22
190–191 13
192–193 21
194–195 12
196–197 12
198–199 14
200–201 15
202–203 13
204–205 10
206–207 8
208–209 4
210–211 12
212–213 11
214–215 10
216 4
217+ 98
Download as CSV

Richard P. Cambria D-index placement in Medicine in 2026 - data summary

  • The chart plots the discipline H-index (D-index) of all 20,134 Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026, grouped into 75 ranges running from 70–71 to 217+ D-Index.
  • Richard P. Cambria, a Medicine scholar from Harvard University, records 98 D-Index - the 57th percentile of the discipline.
  • 57% of ranked Medicine scientists score the same or lower than Richard P. Cambria, and about 43% score higher.
  • The median of the discipline falls in the 94–95 D-Index range, and Richard P. Cambria ranks above the median.
  • The most crowded range is 82–83 D-Index, holding 1,027 scientists (5% of the field).
  • 70% of the field sits in the lowest quarter of the value range (up to 106–107 D-Index), so the distribution is heavily right-skewed and high scores are rare.
  • The final bar has no upper bound: it groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more, 98 scientists in all (<1% of the field).

Overview

Richard P. Cambria is affiliated with Harvard University in the United States and has contributed extensively to the field of medicine, focusing primarily on pulmonary and respiratory medicine, cardiology and cardiovascular medicine, epidemiology, neurology, and surgery.

Their research encompasses several main topics, including:

  • Aortic Disease and Treatment Approaches
  • Cerebrovascular and Carotid Artery Diseases
  • Aortic Aneurysm Repair Treatments
  • Acute Ischemic Stroke Management
  • Cardiovascular Health and Disease Prevention
  • Cardiac, Anesthesia and Surgical Outcomes
  • Cardiac Valve Diseases and Treatments

Richard P. Cambria's work has appeared predominantly in the Journal of Vascular Surgery, with 17 publications, as well as in other venues such as Angiology, European Journal of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, The Annals of Thoracic Surgery, and Journal of Stroke and Cerebrovascular Diseases.

Notable recent papers include:

  • "Society for Vascular Surgery (SVS) and Society of Thoracic Surgeons (STS) reporting standards for type B aortic dissections," 2020, Journal of Vascular Surgery
  • "Society for Vascular Surgery (SVS) and Society of Thoracic Surgeons (STS) Reporting Standards for Type B Aortic Dissections," 2020, The Annals of Thoracic Surgery
  • "Optimal Management of Asymptomatic Carotid Stenosis in 2021: The Jury is Still Out. An International, Multispecialty, Expert Review and Position Statement," 2021, Journal of Stroke and Cerebrovascular Diseases
  • "Retrograde type A dissection in the Vascular Quality Initiative thoracic endovascular aortic repair for dissection postapproval project," 2022, Journal of Vascular Surgery
  • "Learning curve and proficiency metrics for transcarotid artery revascularization," 2022, Journal of Vascular Surgery

The scientist frequently collaborates with a core group of co-authors who have appeared alongside them in multiple publications. These include Joseph V. Lombardi, Adam W. Beck, Rodney A. White, Jack L. Cronenwett, and Ali Azizzadeh.

Richard P. Cambria's research output is primarily concentrated within the field of Medicine, with a strong emphasis on cardiopulmonary and cerebrovascular conditions. Their work contributes to clinical and surgical understanding concerning vascular diseases, ischemic stroke management, and treatment approaches for aortic and carotid artery disorders.

Best Publications

  • Endovascular treatment of thoracic aortic aneurysms: results of the phase II multicenter trial of the GORE TAG thoracic endoprosthesis.

    Michel S. Makaroun;Ellen D. Dillavou;Stephen T. Kee;Gregorio Sicard

  • Vascular complications associated with spontaneous aortic dissection

    Richard P. Cambria;David C. Brewster;Jonathan Gertler;Ashby C. Moncure

  • Five-year results of endovascular treatment with the Gore TAG device compared with open repair of thoracic aortic aneurysms

    Michel S. Makaroun;Ellen D. Dillavou;Grayson H. Wheatley;Richard P. Cambria

  • Persistent type 2 endoleak after endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysm is associated with adverse late outcomes

    John E. Jones;Marvin D. Atkins;David C. Brewster;Thomas K. Chung

  • International controlled clinical trial of thoracic endovascular aneurysm repair with the Zenith TX2 endovascular graft: 1-year results.

    Jon S. Matsumura;Richard P. Cambria;Michael D. Dake;Randy D. Moore

  • The Society for Vascular Surgery Vascular Quality Initiative

    Jack L. Cronenwett;Larry W. Kraiss;Richard P. Cambria

  • Thoracoabdominal Aneurysm Repair: Results With 337 Operations Performed Over a 15-Year Interval

    Richard P. Cambria;W. Darrin Clouse;J. Kenneth Davison;Peter F. Dunn

  • Thoracoabdominal Aneurysm Repair: A 20-Year Perspective

    Mark F. Conrad;Robert S. Crawford;J. Kenneth Davison;Richard P. Cambria

  • Distal aortic perfusion and cerebrospinal fluid drainage for thoracoabdominal and descending thoracic aortic repair: ten years of organ protection.

    Hazim J. Safi;Charles C. Miller;Tam T.T. Huynh;Anthony L. Estrera

  • Initial experience with endovascular aneurysm repair: comparison of early results with outcome of conventional open repair.

    David C. Brewster;Stuart C. Geller;John A. Kaufman;Richard P. Cambria

  • Results of the ROADSTER multicenter trial of transcarotid stenting with dynamic flow reversal

    Christopher J. Kwolek;Michael R. Jaff;J. Ignacio Leal;L. Nelson Hopkins

  • Stent-graft versus open-surgical repair of the thoracic aorta: mid-term results.

    David H. Stone;David C. Brewster;Christopher J. Kwolek;Glenn M. LaMuraglia

  • Long-term outcomes after endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair: the first decade.

    David C. Brewster;John E. Jones;Thomas K. Chung;Glenn M. Lamuraglia

  • Outcomes following endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair (EVAR): An anatomic and device-specific analysis

    Thomas A. Abbruzzese;Christopher J. Kwolek;David C. Brewster;Thomas K. Chung

  • Clinical experience with epidural cooling for spinal cord protection during thoracic and thoracoabdominal aneurysm repair

    Richard P. Cambria;J.Kenneth Davison;Simona Zannetti;Gilbert L'Italien

  • Transperitoneal versus retroperitoneal approach for aortic reconstruction: a randomized prospective study.

    Richard P. Cambria;David C. Brewster;William M. Abbott;Marion Freehan

  • Surgical revascularization versus endovascular therapy for chronic mesenteric ischemia: a comparative experience.

    Marvin D. Atkins;Christopher J. Kwolek;Glenn M. LaMuraglia;David C. Brewster

  • Prospective multicenter clinical trial (STABLE) on the endovascular treatment of complicated type B aortic dissection using a composite device design.

    Joseph V. Lombardi;Richard P. Cambria;Christoph A. Nienaber;Roberto Chiesa

  • Endovascular Treatment of Thoracic Aortic Aneurysms: Results of the Phase II Multicenter Trial of the GORE TAG Thoracic Endoprosthesis

    M.S. Makaroun;E.D. Dillavou;S.T. Kee

Frequent Co-Authors

David C. Brewster
David C. Brewster Harvard University
William M. Abbott
William M. Abbott Harvard University
Arthur C. Waltman
Arthur C. Waltman Harvard University
Michael R. Jaff
Michael R. Jaff Boston Scientific (United States)
Peter Gloviczki
Peter Gloviczki Mayo Clinic
Peter Sandercock
Peter Sandercock University of Edinburgh
Michael D. Dake
Michael D. Dake University of Arizona
Eric M. Isselbacher
Eric M. Isselbacher Harvard University
Dimitri P. Mikhailidis
Dimitri P. Mikhailidis University College London
James W. Prichard
James W. Prichard Yale University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Considering a career in medicine doesn’t always mean following a traditional M.D. path. There are numerous related online degrees and career pathways that align with the healthcare field and offer flexibility for working professionals or those seeking alternative routes.

For those aiming for advanced practice, pursuing dnp online programs cheap can provide a cost-effective way to earn a Doctor of Nursing Practice. This pathway focuses on clinical leadership and improving patient outcomes.

If pharmacy is of interest, consider online pharm d programs. These programs equip you for high-level pharmacy roles without requiring you to attend on-campus classes.

Not all careers require direct patient care. Studying for a health information technology online degree opens the door to managing medical records, data systems, and ensuring regulatory compliance for healthcare organizations.

Lastly, for those looking for roles you can do remotely or on a flexible schedule, medical billing and coding classes online could be the perfect fit. This pathway supports vital healthcare administration functions and offers strong job prospects.

Best Scientists Citing Richard P. Cambria

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles