World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Medicine 103 7254 6814 274 268 800 47094

Frans L. Moll publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Frans L. Moll between 1981 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Frans L. Moll published across 45 years, from 1981 to 2025, averaging 18 papers a year. Output peaked at 85 publications in 2010. 4 of the 810 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
20 40 60 80
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1981 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 85. Peak 85 publications in 2010. 1981: 1 publication 1982: 1 publication 1983: 1 publication 1984: 1 publication 1985: 0 publications 1986: 1 publication 1987: 2 publications 1988: 0 publications 1989: 0 publications 1990: 0 publications 1991: 1 publication 1992: 0 publications 1993: 4 publications 1994: 7 publications 1995: 7 publications 1996: 11 publications 1997: 2 publications 1998: 13 publications 1999: 8 publications 2000: 7 publications 2001: 6 publications 2002: 11 publications 2003: 6 publications 2004: 12 publications 2005: 17 publications 2006: 25 publications 2007: 36 publications 2008: 38 publications 2009: 53 publications 2010: 85 publications 2011: 80 publications 2012: 59 publications 2013: 55 publications 2014: 59 publications 2015: 55 publications 2016: 41 publications 2017: 28 publications 2018: 23 publications 2019: 16 publications 2020: 11 publications 2021: 12 publications 2022: 6 publications 2023: 5 publications 2024: 1 publication 2025: 3 publications
1981 2025

810 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Frans L. Moll: publications per year, 1981 to 2025
Year Publications
1981 1
1982 1
1983 1
1984 1
1985 0
1986 1
1987 2
1988 0
1989 0
1990 0
1991 1
1992 0
1993 4
1994 7
1995 7
1996 11
1997 2
1998 13
1999 8
2000 7
2001 6
2002 11
2003 6
2004 12
2005 17
2006 25
2007 36
2008 38
2009 53
2010 85
2011 80
2012 59
2013 55
2014 59
2015 55
2016 41
2017 28
2018 23
2019 16
2020 11
2021 12
2022 6
2023 5
2024 1
2025 3
Total 810
Download as CSV

Frans L. Moll publications per year - data summary

  • Frans L. Moll, a Medicine scholar from Utrecht University, has 810 publications recorded across 45 years, from 1981 to 2025.
  • The oldest publication on record dates to 1981 and the most recent to 2025.
  • The most productive year is 2010, with 85 publications.
  • The least productive years with any output are 1981, 1982, 1983, 1984 and others, with 1 publication each.
  • 5 of the 45 years in the span carry no publications at all (1985, 1988, 1989, 1990 and others).
  • The rate of publication averages 18.0 papers per year over the whole span, or 20.3 per year counting only the 40 years with at least one publication.
  • The last 5 years on the chart (2021-2025) hold 27 publications, 3% of the career total.
  • Split into equal eras - 1981-1995: 26 publications (1.7 per year); 1996-2010: 330 publications (22.0 per year); 2011-2025: 454 publications (30.3 per year).
  • Comparing the opening and closing eras, the overall trend of publication is rising.

Frans L. Moll publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Frans L. Moll sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600 800
Bar chart with 86 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 101–120 to 1,796+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 922. Most scientists, 922, have 341–360 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 781–800 publications, is where this scientist sits. 101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 610 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101–120 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 800 publications — 87th percentile

87% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
101–120 5
121–140 26
141–160 73
161–180 155
181–200 230
201–220 363
221–240 487
241–260 545
261–280 722
281–300 768
301–320 834
321–340 895
341–360 922
361–380 838
381–400 861
401–420 918
421–440 806
441–460 771
461–480 751
481–500 713
501–520 617
521–540 610
541–560 537
561–580 504
581–600 509
601–620 396
621–640 386
641–660 371
661–680 340
681–700 336
701–720 307
721–740 259
741–760 230
761–780 228
781–800 217 800
801–820 204
821–840 186
841–860 177
861–880 155
881–900 139
901–920 145
921–940 116
941–960 133
961–980 91
981–1,000 96
1,001–1,020 77
1,021–1,040 70
1,041–1,060 63
1,061–1,080 77
1,081–1,100 49
1,101–1,120 54
1,121–1,140 49
1,141–1,160 51
1,161–1,180 35
1,181–1,200 39
1,201–1,220 26
1,221–1,240 37
1,241–1,260 36
1,261–1,280 27
1,281–1,300 32
1,301–1,320 28
1,321–1,340 17
1,341–1,360 30
1,361–1,380 28
1,381–1,400 17
1,401–1,420 21
1,421–1,440 15
1,441–1,460 12
1,461–1,480 12
1,481–1,500 18
1,501–1,520 14
1,521–1,540 17
1,541–1,560 15
1,561–1,580 6
1,581–1,600 2
1,601–1,620 12
1,621–1,640 11
1,641–1,660 8
1,661–1,680 5
1,681–1,700 5
1,701–1,720 10
1,721–1,740 12
1,741–1,760 14
1,761–1,780 6
1,781–1,795 5
1,796+ 100
Download as CSV

Frans L. Moll publication distribution in Medicine in 2026 - data summary

  • The chart plots the publication count of all 20,134 Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026, grouped into 86 ranges running from 101–120 to 1,796+ publications.
  • Frans L. Moll, a Medicine scholar from Utrecht University, records 800 publications - the 87th percentile of the discipline.
  • 87% of ranked Medicine scientists score the same or lower than Frans L. Moll, and about 13% score higher.
  • The median of the discipline falls in the 441–460 publications range, and Frans L. Moll ranks above the median.
  • The most crowded range is 341–360 publications, holding 922 scientists (5% of the field).
  • 64% of the field sits in the lowest quarter of the value range (up to 521–540 publications), so the distribution is heavily right-skewed and high scores are rare.
  • The final bar has no upper bound: it groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more, 100 scientists in all (<1% of the field).

Frans L. Moll D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Frans L. Moll sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
250 500 750 1,000
Bar chart with 75 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 70–71 to 217+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 1,027. Most scientists, 1,027, have 82–83 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 102–103 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 399 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70–71 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 103 D-Index — 65th percentile

65% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
70–71 226
72–73 391
74–75 574
76–77 730
78–79 891
80–81 972
82–83 1,027
84–85 1,003
86–87 960
88–89 970
90–91 922
92–93 839
94–95 808
96–97 779
98–99 668
100–101 611
102–103 630 103
104–105 513
106–107 541
108–109 445
110–111 429
112–113 399
114–115 393
116–117 318
118–119 302
120–121 287
122–123 255
124–125 256
126–127 252
128–129 230
130–131 179
132–133 168
134–135 163
136–137 159
138–139 134
140–141 134
142–143 118
144–145 109
146–147 106
148–149 74
150–151 79
152–153 80
154–155 87
156–157 57
158–159 74
160–161 69
162–163 60
164–165 53
166–167 39
168–169 42
170–171 32
172–173 39
174–175 40
176–177 28
178–179 19
180–181 23
182–183 31
184–185 18
186–187 20
188–189 22
190–191 13
192–193 21
194–195 12
196–197 12
198–199 14
200–201 15
202–203 13
204–205 10
206–207 8
208–209 4
210–211 12
212–213 11
214–215 10
216 4
217+ 98
Download as CSV

Frans L. Moll D-index placement in Medicine in 2026 - data summary

  • The chart plots the discipline H-index (D-index) of all 20,134 Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026, grouped into 75 ranges running from 70–71 to 217+ D-Index.
  • Frans L. Moll, a Medicine scholar from Utrecht University, records 103 D-Index - the 65th percentile of the discipline.
  • 65% of ranked Medicine scientists score the same or lower than Frans L. Moll, and about 35% score higher.
  • The median of the discipline falls in the 94–95 D-Index range, and Frans L. Moll ranks above the median.
  • The most crowded range is 82–83 D-Index, holding 1,027 scientists (5% of the field).
  • 70% of the field sits in the lowest quarter of the value range (up to 106–107 D-Index), so the distribution is heavily right-skewed and high scores are rare.
  • The final bar has no upper bound: it groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more, 98 scientists in all (<1% of the field).

Overview

Frans L. Moll is affiliated with Utrecht University in the Netherlands and has a substantive publication record primarily within the field of Medicine. Their research encompasses a variety of subfields, particularly Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, Surgery, Neurology, and Emergency Medical Services.

Their research topics focus extensively on vascular and cardiac conditions, including but not limited to:

  • Aortic Disease and Treatment Approaches
  • Aortic aneurysm repair treatments
  • Vascular Procedures and Complications
  • Infectious Aortic and Vascular Conditions
  • Cardiac Valve Diseases and Treatments
  • Cerebrovascular and Carotid Artery Diseases
  • Cardiovascular Health and Disease Prevention

The scientist has contributed multiple papers, some of the recent ones being:

  • "Endovascular ascending aortic repair in type A dissection: A systematic review" (2020), published in Journal of Cardiac Surgery
  • "Carotid endarterectomy with patch angioplasty versus primary closure in patients with symptomatic and significant stenosis: a systematic review with meta-analyses and trial sequential analysis of randomized clinical trials" (2021), published in Systematic Reviews
  • "A systematic review of the current status of interventions for type II endoleak after EVAR for abdominal aortic aneurysms" (2021), published in International Journal of Surgery
  • "Impact of Aortic Tortuosity on Displacement Forces in Descending Thoracic Aortic Aneurysms" (2020), published in European Journal of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery
  • "Rivaroxaban in patients with symptomatic peripheral artery disease after lower extremity bypass surgery with venous and prosthetic conduits" (2022), published in Journal of Vascular Surgery

Frans L. Moll has collaborated frequently with several co-authors, including:

  • Joost A. van Herwaarden
  • Himanshu J. Patel
  • Nicholas S. Burris
  • Ignas B. Houben
  • C. Alberto Figueroa

The scientist's work has been published in multiple venues, notably:

  • European Journal of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery
  • Journal of Cardiac Surgery
  • The Journal of Vascular Access
  • European Journal of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery
  • Annals of Vascular Surgery

Best Publications

  • Defining the role of common variation in the genomic and biological architecture of adult human height

    Andrew R. Wood;Tonu Esko;Jian Yang;Sailaja Vedantam

  • Genetic studies of body mass index yield new insights for obesity biology

    Adam E. Locke;Bratati Kahali;Sonja I. Berndt;Anne E. Justice

  • Carotid artery stenting compared with endarterectomy in patients with symptomatic carotid stenosis (International Carotid Stenting Study): an interim analysis of a randomised controlled trial

    Jörg Ederle;Joanna Dobson;Joanna Dobson;Roland L. Featherstone;Leo H. Bonati;Leo H. Bonati

  • Editor's Choice - Management of Descending Thoracic Aorta Diseases: Clinical Practice Guidelines of the European Society for Vascular Surgery (ESVS)

    V. Riambau;D. Böckler;J. Brunkwall

  • The Influence of Age and Sex on Genetic Associations with Adult Body Size and Shape: A Large-Scale Genome-Wide Interaction Study

    Thomas W. Winkler;Anne E. Justice;Mariaelisa Graff;Llilda Barata

  • Composition of Carotid Atherosclerotic Plaque Is Associated With Cardiovascular Outcome A Prognostic Study

    Willem E. Hellings;Wouter Peeters;Frans L. Moll;Sebastiaan R.D. Piers

  • Hemodialysis Arteriovenous Fistula Patency Revisited: Results of a Prospective, Multicenter Initiative

    Henricus J.T. Huijbregts;Michiel L. Bots;Cees H.A. Wittens;Yvonne C. Schrama

  • High Neutrophil Numbers in Human Carotid Atherosclerotic Plaques Are Associated With Characteristics of Rupture-Prone Lesions

    Mihaela G. Ionita;Pleunie van den Borne;Louise M. Catanzariti;Frans L. Moll

  • Influence of smoking on incidence and prevalence of peripheral arterial disease

    Edith M. Willigendael;Joep A.W. Teijink;Marie-Louise Bartelink;Barthold W. Kuiken

  • The AneuRx stent graft: four-year results and worldwide experience 2000.

    Christopher K. Zarins;Rodney A. White;Frans L. Moll;Tami Crabtree

  • Chapter V: Diabetic foot.

    M Lepäntalo;M Lepäntalo;J Apelqvist;C Setacci;J-B Ricco

  • Association of Intraoperative Transcranial Doppler Monitoring Variables With Stroke From Carotid Endarterectomy

    R. G. A. Ackerstaff;K. G. M. Moons;C. J. W. van de Vlasakker;F. L. Moll

  • Critical Limb Ischemia: Current Trends and Future Directions

    Martin Teraa;Michael S. Conte;Frans L. Moll;Marianne C. Verhaar

  • Matrix Metalloproteinase 2 Is Associated With Stable and Matrix Metalloproteinases 8 and 9 With Vulnerable Carotid Atherosclerotic Lesions: A Study in Human Endarterectomy Specimen Pointing to a Role for Different Extracellular Matrix Metalloproteinase Inducer Glycosylation Forms

    Joost P.G. Sluijter;Wilco P.C. Pulskens;Arjan H. Schoneveld;Evelyn Velema

  • Endovascular Treatment of Mycotic Aortic Aneurysms A European Multicenter Study

    Karl Sörelius;Kevin Mani;Martin Björck;Petr Sedivy

  • Aneurysm rupture after EVAR: can the ultimate failure be predicted?

    Felix Schlösser;Richard Jefferson Gusberg;A. Dardik;Peter Lin

  • Carotid artery plaque composition : Relationship to clinical presentation and ultrasound B-mode imaging

    H. Sillesen;T. Nielsen;H. Laursen;T.V. Schroeder

  • Durability of percutaneous transluminal angioplasty for obstructive lesions of proximal subclavian artery: Long-term results

    Jean-Paul P.M. de Vries;L. Cara Jager;Jos C. van den Berg;Tim Th.C. Overtoom

  • Transcranial Doppler Monitoring During Carotid Endarterectomy Helps to Identify Patients at Risk of Postoperative Hyperperfusion

    J. E. Dalman;I. C. M. Beenakkers;F. L. Moll;J. A. Leusink

  • Carotid Atherosclerotic Plaques Stabilize After Stroke. Insights Into the Natural Process of Atherosclerotic Plaque Stabilization

    W. Peeters;W.E. Hellings;D.P.V. de Kleijn;J.P.P.M. de Vries

Frequent Co-Authors

Gerard Pasterkamp
Gerard Pasterkamp Utrecht University
Michiel L. Bots
Michiel L. Bots Utrecht University
Yolanda van der Graaf
Yolanda van der Graaf Utrecht University
Kim A. Eagle
Kim A. Eagle University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
Ferdinando Auricchio
Ferdinando Auricchio University of Pavia
Mathias Prokop
Mathias Prokop Radboud University
Willem P.Th.M. Mali
Willem P.Th.M. Mali Utrecht University
M. G. Myriam Hunink
M. G. Myriam Hunink Erasmus University Rotterdam
Bauer E. Sumpio
Bauer E. Sumpio Yale University
Ale Algra
Ale Algra Leiden University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing a medical degree in the USA opens doors to a wide range of related online programs and diverse career opportunities in healthcare. Whether you’re considering alternative roles in healthcare leadership, pharmacy, or information management, there are affordable pathways that can be completed flexibly online.

For those interested in administration and leadership, the cheapest online mha programs offer a cost-effective route to advance in healthcare management. Individuals aiming to specialize in advanced nursing practice may explore dnp online programs cheap, which prepare nurses for the highest levels of clinical practice.

Pharmacy is another essential healthcare field—flexible pharmd online programs can help working professionals achieve their doctorate without disrupting their careers. Additionally, with the increasing importance of technology in healthcare, a health information management bachelor degree online prepares graduates for vital roles ensuring the accuracy and security of patient data.

Exploring these related online degrees can help you find the best fit for your career goals—often at a fraction of the cost and with greater flexibility than traditional on-campus programs.

Best Scientists Citing Frans L. Moll

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles