World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
96
Citations
41989
World Ranking
9541
National Ranking
370

Mathias Prokop publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Mathias Prokop sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 611 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 610 publications — 73rd percentile

73% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

Mathias Prokop D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Mathias Prokop sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 400 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 96 D-Index — 53rd percentile

53% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Overview

Mathias Prokop is affiliated with Radboud University in the Netherlands, specializing in medical research with a focus on radiology and imaging. Their work spans multiple fields and subfields within medicine, particularly concentrating on radiology, pulmonary and respiratory medicine, and oncology.

The primary areas of study include:

  • Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging
  • Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine
  • Oncology
  • Biomedical Engineering
  • Surgery

Prokop's research covers a range of topics related to medical imaging and lung diseases, including:

  • Radiomics and Machine Learning in Medical Imaging
  • Lung Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment
  • Medical Imaging Techniques and Applications
  • Advanced X-ray and CT Imaging
  • Radiation Dose and Imaging
  • Lung Cancer Treatments and Mutations
  • COVID-19 diagnosis using AI

They have contributed to a number of prominent recent papers:

  • "Reduced Lung-Cancer Mortality with Volume CT Screening in a Randomized Trial" (2020), published in New England Journal of Medicine
  • "The Role of Chest Imaging in Patient Management During the COVID-19 Pandemic" (2020), published in CHEST Journal
  • "The Role of Chest Imaging in Patient Management during the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Multinational Consensus Statement from the Fleischner Society" (2020), published in Radiology
  • "CO-RADS: A Categorical CT Assessment Scheme for Patients Suspected of Having COVID-19-Definition and Evaluation" (2020), published in Radiology
  • "Comprehensive Health Assessment 3 Months After Recovery From Acute Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19)" (2020), published in Clinical Infectious Diseases

Frequent coauthors collaborating with Prokop include:

  • Bram van Ginneken
  • Colin Jacobs
  • Ernst T. Scholten
  • Cornelia Schaefer-Prokop
  • Rozemarijn Vliegenthart

Publication venues where Prokop has frequently published work include:

  • European Radiology
  • Radiology
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
  • Insights into Imaging
  • Cancers

Their contributions to the field of medicine are primarily within the domain of imaging techniques and diagnostics, particularly using CT scans and AI-assisted methods to improve detection and management of lung diseases and COVID-19 complications.

Best Publications

  • Reduced Lung-Cancer Mortality with Volume CT Screening in a Randomized Trial

    Harry J. de Koning;Carlijn M. van der Aalst;Pim A. de Jong;Ernst T. Scholten

  • Guidelines for Management of Incidental Pulmonary Nodules Detected on CT Images: From the Fleischner Society 2017

    Heber MacMahon;David P. Naidich;Jin Mo Goo;Kyung Soo Lee

  • The Role of Chest Imaging in Patient Management during the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Multinational Consensus Statement from the Fleischner Society

    Geoffrey D. Rubin;Christopher J. Ryerson;Linda B. Haramati;Nicola Sverzellati

  • Diagnostic accuracy of 64-slice computed tomography coronary angiography: a prospective, multicenter, multivendor study.

    W. Bob Meijboom;Matthijs F.L. Meijs;Joanne D. Schuijf;Maarten J. Cramer

  • Validation, comparison, and combination of algorithms for automatic detection of pulmonary nodules in computed tomography images: The LUNA16 challenge.

    Arnaud Arindra Adiyoso Setio;Alberto Traverso;Thomas de Bel;Moira S.N. Berens

  • Management of lung nodules detected by volume CT scanning

    Rob J van Klaveren;Matthijs Oudkerk;Mathias Prokop;Ernst T Scholten

  • CO-RADS: A Categorical CT Assessment Scheme for Patients Suspected of Having COVID-19-Definition and Evaluation.

    Mathias Prokop;Wouter van Everdingen;Tjalco van Rees Vellinga;Henriëtte Quarles van Ufford

  • British Thoracic Society guidelines for the investigation and management of pulmonary nodules: accredited by NICE

    M E J Callister;D R Baldwin;A R Akram;S Barnard

  • Computer analysis of computed tomography scans of the lung: a survey

    I. Sluimer;A. Schilham;M. Prokop;B. van Ginneken

  • The IASLC Lung Cancer Staging Project: Proposals for Coding T Categories for Subsolid Nodules and Assessment of Tumor Size in Part-Solid Tumors in the Forthcoming Eighth Edition of the TNM Classification of Lung Cancer

    William D. Travis;Hisao Asamura;Alexander A. Bankier;Mary Beth Beasley

  • Spiral and Multislice Computed Tomography of the Body

    Mathias Prokop;Michael Galanski;Aart J. van der Molen;Cornelia Schaefer-Prokop

  • Multi-Atlas-Based Segmentation With Local Decision Fusion—Application to Cardiac and Aortic Segmentation in CT Scans

    I. Isgum;M. Staring;A. Rutten;M. Prokop

  • Risk‐based selection from the general population in a screening trial: Selection criteria, recruitment and power for the Dutch‐Belgian randomised lung cancer multi‐slice CT screening trial (NELSON)

    Carola A. van Iersel;Harry J. de Koning;Gerrit Draisma;Willem P. T. M. Mali

  • Comprehensive Health Assessment 3 Months After Recovery From Acute Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19).

    Bram van den Borst;Jeannette B Peters;Monique Brink;Yvonne Schoon

  • Nodule management protocol of the NELSON randomised lung cancer screening trial

    Dong Ming Xu;Hester Gietema;Harry de Koning;René Vernhout

  • A large-scale evaluation of automatic pulmonary nodule detection in chest CT using local image features and k-nearest-neighbour classification.

    K. Murphy;B. van Ginneken;A.M.R. Schilham;B.J. de Hoop

  • Toward automated segmentation of the pathological lung in CT

    I. Sluimer;M. Prokop;B. van Ginneken

  • Multislice CT angiography.

    Mathias Prokop

  • Benign Liver Tumors: Differential Diagnosis and Indications for Surgery

    Arved Weimann;Burckhardt Ringe;Jürgen Klempnauer;Peter Lamesch

  • Renal arterial stenoses: spiral CT angiography.

    M. Galanski;M. Prokop;Ajay Chavan;C. M. Schaefer

Frequent Co-Authors

Bram van Ginneken
Bram van Ginneken Radboud University
Matthijs Oudkerk
Matthijs Oudkerk University of Groningen
Ivana Išgum
Ivana Išgum University of Amsterdam
Willem P.Th.M. Mali
Willem P.Th.M. Mali Utrecht University
Harry J. de Koning
Harry J. de Koning Erasmus University Rotterdam
Max A. Viergever
Max A. Viergever Utrecht University
Pieter A. Doevendans
Pieter A. Doevendans Utrecht University
Frans L. Moll
Frans L. Moll Utrecht University
Francesco Ciompi
Francesco Ciompi Radboud University
Ugo Pastorino
Ugo Pastorino University of Milan

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring medicine in the USA doesn't just mean becoming a doctor. There are diverse online degrees and career pathways that support healthcare delivery. For students looking to enter the field quickly, lpn program options can allow you to become a licensed practical nurse in less time, with flexible online study.

If you’re interested in mental health, there are accredited psychiatric np programs that train you to become a Psychiatric Nurse Practitioner, letting you specialize in mental health care through advanced online coursework.

For those drawn to the business side of healthcare, management roles are in high demand. The best online mha programs provide leadership skills and in-depth healthcare systems knowledge, preparing graduates for executive and administrative roles.

Affordability is also important when choosing a degree. You can explore the cheapest mha programs to gain a competitive credential for less, making career advancement in healthcare more accessible.

Best Scientists Citing Mathias Prokop

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles