World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Medicine 96 9540 8953 370 358 610 41989

Mathias Prokop publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Mathias Prokop between 1988 and 2026, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Mathias Prokop published across 39 years, from 1988 to 2026, averaging 17.8 papers a year. Output peaked at 89 publications in 2003. 30 of the 693 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
20 40 60 80
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1988 to 2026. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 89. Peak 89 publications in 2003. 1988: 3 publications 1989: 6 publications 1990: 9 publications 1991: 11 publications 1992: 7 publications 1993: 8 publications 1994: 11 publications 1995: 3 publications 1996: 7 publications 1997: 7 publications 1998: 13 publications 1999: 5 publications 2000: 8 publications 2001: 6 publications 2002: 16 publications 2003: 89 publications 2004: 7 publications 2005: 24 publications 2006: 22 publications 2007: 32 publications 2008: 29 publications 2009: 40 publications 2010: 30 publications 2011: 28 publications 2012: 23 publications 2013: 15 publications 2014: 17 publications 2015: 19 publications 2016: 12 publications 2017: 20 publications 2018: 19 publications 2019: 14 publications 2020: 29 publications 2021: 24 publications 2022: 10 publications 2023: 20 publications 2024: 20 publications 2025: 28 publications 2026: 2 publications
1988 2026

693 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Mathias Prokop: publications per year, 1988 to 2026
Year Publications
1988 3
1989 6
1990 9
1991 11
1992 7
1993 8
1994 11
1995 3
1996 7
1997 7
1998 13
1999 5
2000 8
2001 6
2002 16
2003 89
2004 7
2005 24
2006 22
2007 32
2008 29
2009 40
2010 30
2011 28
2012 23
2013 15
2014 17
2015 19
2016 12
2017 20
2018 19
2019 14
2020 29
2021 24
2022 10
2023 20
2024 20
2025 28
2026 2
Total 693
Download as CSV

Mathias Prokop publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Mathias Prokop sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600 800
Bar chart with 86 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 101–120 to 1,796+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 922. Most scientists, 922, have 341–360 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 601–620 publications, is where this scientist sits. 101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 610 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101–120 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 610 publications — 73rd percentile

73% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
101–120 5
121–140 26
141–160 73
161–180 155
181–200 230
201–220 363
221–240 487
241–260 545
261–280 722
281–300 768
301–320 834
321–340 895
341–360 922
361–380 838
381–400 861
401–420 918
421–440 806
441–460 771
461–480 751
481–500 713
501–520 617
521–540 610
541–560 537
561–580 504
581–600 509
601–620 396 610
621–640 386
641–660 371
661–680 340
681–700 336
701–720 307
721–740 259
741–760 230
761–780 228
781–800 217
801–820 204
821–840 186
841–860 177
861–880 155
881–900 139
901–920 145
921–940 116
941–960 133
961–980 91
981–1,000 96
1,001–1,020 77
1,021–1,040 70
1,041–1,060 63
1,061–1,080 77
1,081–1,100 49
1,101–1,120 54
1,121–1,140 49
1,141–1,160 51
1,161–1,180 35
1,181–1,200 39
1,201–1,220 26
1,221–1,240 37
1,241–1,260 36
1,261–1,280 27
1,281–1,300 32
1,301–1,320 28
1,321–1,340 17
1,341–1,360 30
1,361–1,380 28
1,381–1,400 17
1,401–1,420 21
1,421–1,440 15
1,441–1,460 12
1,461–1,480 12
1,481–1,500 18
1,501–1,520 14
1,521–1,540 17
1,541–1,560 15
1,561–1,580 6
1,581–1,600 2
1,601–1,620 12
1,621–1,640 11
1,641–1,660 8
1,661–1,680 5
1,681–1,700 5
1,701–1,720 10
1,721–1,740 12
1,741–1,760 14
1,761–1,780 6
1,781–1,795 5
1,796+ 100
Download as CSV

Mathias Prokop D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Mathias Prokop sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
250 500 750 1,000
Bar chart with 75 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 70–71 to 217+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 1,027. Most scientists, 1,027, have 82–83 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 96–97 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 399 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70–71 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 96 D-Index — 53rd percentile

53% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
70–71 226
72–73 391
74–75 574
76–77 730
78–79 891
80–81 972
82–83 1,027
84–85 1,003
86–87 960
88–89 970
90–91 922
92–93 839
94–95 808
96–97 779 96
98–99 668
100–101 611
102–103 630
104–105 513
106–107 541
108–109 445
110–111 429
112–113 399
114–115 393
116–117 318
118–119 302
120–121 287
122–123 255
124–125 256
126–127 252
128–129 230
130–131 179
132–133 168
134–135 163
136–137 159
138–139 134
140–141 134
142–143 118
144–145 109
146–147 106
148–149 74
150–151 79
152–153 80
154–155 87
156–157 57
158–159 74
160–161 69
162–163 60
164–165 53
166–167 39
168–169 42
170–171 32
172–173 39
174–175 40
176–177 28
178–179 19
180–181 23
182–183 31
184–185 18
186–187 20
188–189 22
190–191 13
192–193 21
194–195 12
196–197 12
198–199 14
200–201 15
202–203 13
204–205 10
206–207 8
208–209 4
210–211 12
212–213 11
214–215 10
216 4
217+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Mathias Prokop is affiliated with Radboud University in the Netherlands, specializing in medical research with a focus on radiology and imaging. Their work spans multiple fields and subfields within medicine, particularly concentrating on radiology, pulmonary and respiratory medicine, and oncology.

The primary areas of study include:

  • Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging
  • Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine
  • Oncology
  • Biomedical Engineering
  • Surgery

Prokop's research covers a range of topics related to medical imaging and lung diseases, including:

  • Radiomics and Machine Learning in Medical Imaging
  • Lung Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment
  • Medical Imaging Techniques and Applications
  • Advanced X-ray and CT Imaging
  • Radiation Dose and Imaging
  • Lung Cancer Treatments and Mutations
  • COVID-19 diagnosis using AI

They have contributed to a number of prominent recent papers:

  • "Reduced Lung-Cancer Mortality with Volume CT Screening in a Randomized Trial" (2020), published in New England Journal of Medicine
  • "The Role of Chest Imaging in Patient Management During the COVID-19 Pandemic" (2020), published in CHEST Journal
  • "The Role of Chest Imaging in Patient Management during the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Multinational Consensus Statement from the Fleischner Society" (2020), published in Radiology
  • "CO-RADS: A Categorical CT Assessment Scheme for Patients Suspected of Having COVID-19-Definition and Evaluation" (2020), published in Radiology
  • "Comprehensive Health Assessment 3 Months After Recovery From Acute Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19)" (2020), published in Clinical Infectious Diseases

Frequent coauthors collaborating with Prokop include:

  • Bram van Ginneken
  • Colin Jacobs
  • Ernst T. Scholten
  • Cornelia Schaefer-Prokop
  • Rozemarijn Vliegenthart

Publication venues where Prokop has frequently published work include:

  • European Radiology
  • Radiology
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
  • Insights into Imaging
  • Cancers

Their contributions to the field of medicine are primarily within the domain of imaging techniques and diagnostics, particularly using CT scans and AI-assisted methods to improve detection and management of lung diseases and COVID-19 complications.

Best Publications

  • Reduced Lung-Cancer Mortality with Volume CT Screening in a Randomized Trial

    Harry J. de Koning;Carlijn M. van der Aalst;Pim A. de Jong;Ernst T. Scholten

  • Guidelines for Management of Incidental Pulmonary Nodules Detected on CT Images: From the Fleischner Society 2017

    Heber MacMahon;David P. Naidich;Jin Mo Goo;Kyung Soo Lee

  • Diagnostic accuracy of 64-slice computed tomography coronary angiography: a prospective, multicenter, multivendor study.

    W. Bob Meijboom;Matthijs F.L. Meijs;Joanne D. Schuijf;Maarten J. Cramer

  • Validation, comparison, and combination of algorithms for automatic detection of pulmonary nodules in computed tomography images: The LUNA16 challenge.

    Arnaud Arindra Adiyoso Setio;Alberto Traverso;Thomas de Bel;Moira S.N. Berens

  • Management of lung nodules detected by volume CT scanning

    Rob J van Klaveren;Matthijs Oudkerk;Mathias Prokop;Ernst T Scholten

  • CO-RADS: A Categorical CT Assessment Scheme for Patients Suspected of Having COVID-19-Definition and Evaluation.

    Mathias Prokop;Wouter van Everdingen;Tjalco van Rees Vellinga;Henriëtte Quarles van Ufford

  • British Thoracic Society guidelines for the investigation and management of pulmonary nodules: accredited by NICE

    M E J Callister;D R Baldwin;A R Akram;S Barnard

  • Computer analysis of computed tomography scans of the lung: a survey

    I. Sluimer;A. Schilham;M. Prokop;B. van Ginneken

  • The IASLC Lung Cancer Staging Project: Proposals for Coding T Categories for Subsolid Nodules and Assessment of Tumor Size in Part-Solid Tumors in the Forthcoming Eighth Edition of the TNM Classification of Lung Cancer

    William D. Travis;Hisao Asamura;Alexander A. Bankier;Mary Beth Beasley

  • Spiral and Multislice Computed Tomography of the Body

    Mathias Prokop;Michael Galanski;Aart J. van der Molen;Cornelia Schaefer-Prokop

  • Multi-Atlas-Based Segmentation With Local Decision Fusion—Application to Cardiac and Aortic Segmentation in CT Scans

    I. Isgum;M. Staring;A. Rutten;M. Prokop

  • Risk‐based selection from the general population in a screening trial: Selection criteria, recruitment and power for the Dutch‐Belgian randomised lung cancer multi‐slice CT screening trial (NELSON)

    Carola A. van Iersel;Harry J. de Koning;Gerrit Draisma;Willem P. T. M. Mali

  • Comprehensive Health Assessment 3 Months After Recovery From Acute Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19).

    Bram van den Borst;Jeannette B Peters;Monique Brink;Yvonne Schoon

  • Nodule management protocol of the NELSON randomised lung cancer screening trial

    Dong Ming Xu;Hester Gietema;Harry de Koning;René Vernhout

  • A large-scale evaluation of automatic pulmonary nodule detection in chest CT using local image features and k-nearest-neighbour classification.

    K. Murphy;B. van Ginneken;A.M.R. Schilham;B.J. de Hoop

  • Toward automated segmentation of the pathological lung in CT

    I. Sluimer;M. Prokop;B. van Ginneken

  • Multislice CT angiography.

    Mathias Prokop

  • Benign Liver Tumors: Differential Diagnosis and Indications for Surgery

    Arved Weimann;Burckhardt Ringe;Jürgen Klempnauer;Peter Lamesch

  • Renal arterial stenoses: spiral CT angiography.

    M. Galanski;M. Prokop;Ajay Chavan;C. M. Schaefer

Frequent Co-Authors

Bram van Ginneken
Bram van Ginneken Radboud University
Matthijs Oudkerk
Matthijs Oudkerk University of Groningen
Ivana Išgum
Ivana Išgum University of Amsterdam
Willem P.Th.M. Mali
Willem P.Th.M. Mali Utrecht University
Harry J. de Koning
Harry J. de Koning Erasmus University Rotterdam
Max A. Viergever
Max A. Viergever Utrecht University
Pieter A. Doevendans
Pieter A. Doevendans Utrecht University
Frans L. Moll
Frans L. Moll Utrecht University
Francesco Ciompi
Francesco Ciompi Radboud University
Ugo Pastorino
Ugo Pastorino University of Milan

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring medicine in the USA doesn't just mean becoming a doctor. There are diverse online degrees and career pathways that support healthcare delivery. For students looking to enter the field quickly, lpn program options can allow you to become a licensed practical nurse in less time, with flexible online study.

If you’re interested in mental health, there are accredited psychiatric np programs that train you to become a Psychiatric Nurse Practitioner, letting you specialize in mental health care through advanced online coursework.

For those drawn to the business side of healthcare, management roles are in high demand. The best online mha programs provide leadership skills and in-depth healthcare systems knowledge, preparing graduates for executive and administrative roles.

Affordability is also important when choosing a degree. You can explore the cheapest mha programs to gain a competitive credential for less, making career advancement in healthcare more accessible.

Best Scientists Citing Mathias Prokop

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles