World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Business and Management

D-Index
30
Citations
23809
World Ranking
2864
National Ranking
1099

Psychology

D-Index
33
Citations
24661
World Ranking
10322
National Ranking
5411

Christina E. Shalley publication distribution in Business and Management in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Business and Management in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Christina E. Shalley sits on this spectrum.

35–39 publications: 2 scientists 40–44 publications: 2 scientists 45–49 publications: 5 scientists 50–54 publications: 20 scientists 55–59 publications: 39 scientists 60–64 publications: 66 scientists 65–69 publications: 52 scientists 70–74 publications: 80 scientists 75–79 publications: 83 scientists 80–84 publications: 115 scientists 85–89 publications: 94 scientists 90–94 publications: 111 scientists 95–99 publications: 122 scientists 100–104 publications: 104 scientists 105–109 publications: 113 scientists 110–114 publications: 96 scientists 115–119 publications: 97 scientists 120–124 publications: 112 scientists 125–129 publications: 93 scientists 130–134 publications: 79 scientists 135–139 publications: 69 scientists 140–144 publications: 80 scientists 145–149 publications: 81 scientists 150–154 publications: 85 scientists 155–159 publications: 50 scientists 160–164 publications: 74 scientists 165–169 publications: 61 scientists 170–174 publications: 40 scientists 175–179 publications: 44 scientists 180–184 publications: 47 scientists 185–189 publications: 59 scientists 190–194 publications: 35 scientists 195–199 publications: 37 scientists 200–204 publications: 49 scientists 205–209 publications: 48 scientists 210–214 publications: 34 scientists 215–219 publications: 31 scientists 220–224 publications: 37 scientists 225–229 publications: 34 scientists 230–234 publications: 25 scientists 235–239 publications: 28 scientists 240–244 publications: 34 scientists 245–249 publications: 28 scientists 250–254 publications: 23 scientists 255–259 publications: 22 scientists 260–264 publications: 11 scientists 265–269 publications: 16 scientists 270–274 publications: 23 scientists 275–279 publications: 12 scientists 280–284 publications: 16 scientists 285–289 publications: 10 scientists 290–294 publications: 12 scientists 295–299 publications: 12 scientists 300–304 publications: 8 scientists 305–309 publications: 13 scientists 310–314 publications: 13 scientists 315–319 publications: 6 scientists 320–324 publications: 10 scientists 325–329 publications: 9 scientists 330–334 publications: 7 scientists 335–339 publications: 10 scientists 340–344 publications: 10 scientists 345–349 publications: 7 scientists 350–354 publications: 4 scientists 355–359 publications: 10 scientists 360–364 publications: 3 scientists 365–369 publications: 7 scientists 370–374 publications: 2 scientists 375–379 publications: 8 scientists 380–384 publications: 4 scientists 385–389 publications: 5 scientists 390–394 publications: 5 scientists 395–399 publications: 2 scientists 400–404 publications: 2 scientists 405–409 publications: 4 scientists 410–414 publications: 3 scientists 415–419 publications: 2 scientists 420–424 publications: 5 scientists 425–429 publications: 3 scientists 430–434 publications: 1 scientists 435 publications: 1 scientists 436+ publications: 100 scientists
35 publications 436+

This scientist: 88 publications — 18th percentile

18% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 436 publications or more.

Christina E. Shalley D-index placement in Business and Management in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Business and Management scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Christina E. Shalley sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 156 scientists 31 D-Index: 159 scientists 32 D-Index: 171 scientists 33 D-Index: 161 scientists 34 D-Index: 135 scientists 35 D-Index: 124 scientists 36 D-Index: 114 scientists 37 D-Index: 111 scientists 38 D-Index: 103 scientists 39 D-Index: 89 scientists 40 D-Index: 81 scientists 41 D-Index: 97 scientists 42 D-Index: 80 scientists 43 D-Index: 69 scientists 44 D-Index: 67 scientists 45 D-Index: 63 scientists 46 D-Index: 54 scientists 47 D-Index: 69 scientists 48 D-Index: 50 scientists 49 D-Index: 58 scientists 50 D-Index: 54 scientists 51 D-Index: 62 scientists 52 D-Index: 54 scientists 53 D-Index: 43 scientists 54 D-Index: 49 scientists 55 D-Index: 35 scientists 56 D-Index: 40 scientists 57 D-Index: 44 scientists 58 D-Index: 34 scientists 59 D-Index: 29 scientists 60 D-Index: 48 scientists 61 D-Index: 32 scientists 62 D-Index: 30 scientists 63 D-Index: 22 scientists 64 D-Index: 22 scientists 65 D-Index: 19 scientists 66 D-Index: 20 scientists 67 D-Index: 18 scientists 68 D-Index: 17 scientists 69 D-Index: 21 scientists 70 D-Index: 20 scientists 71 D-Index: 19 scientists 72 D-Index: 14 scientists 73 D-Index: 10 scientists 74 D-Index: 16 scientists 75 D-Index: 24 scientists 76 D-Index: 13 scientists 77 D-Index: 19 scientists 78 D-Index: 8 scientists 79 D-Index: 6 scientists 80 D-Index: 4 scientists 81 D-Index: 12 scientists 82 D-Index: 7 scientists 83 D-Index: 7 scientists 84 D-Index: 6 scientists 85 D-Index: 10 scientists 86 D-Index: 4 scientists 87 D-Index: 11 scientists 88 D-Index: 6 scientists 89+ D-Index: 96 scientists
30 D-Index 89+

This scientist: 30 D-Index — 5th percentile

5% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 89 D-Index or more.

Overview

Christina E. Shalley is affiliated with the Georgia Institute of Technology in the United States. Their research primarily focuses on psychology, social sciences, and business, management, and accounting, with a significant emphasis on experimental and cognitive psychology, social psychology, strategy and management, organizational behavior and human resource management, and communication.

Their scholarly contributions span several topics, notably creativity in education and neuroscience, team dynamics and performance, innovation and knowledge management, job satisfaction and organizational behavior, gender diversity and inequality, knowledge management and sharing, and workplace spirituality and leadership.

Shalley has contributed extensively through journal articles, conference proceedings, and edited volumes. Frequent publication venues include:

  • Journal of Organizational Behavior
  • Academy of Management Proceedings
  • Personnel Psychology
  • Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes
  • Group & Organization Management

Among their recent papers are:

  • Multilevel outcomes of creativity in organizations: An integrative review and agenda for future research, 2023, Journal of Organizational Behavior
  • Building blocks of idea generation and implementation in teams: A meta-analysis of team design and team creativity and innovation, 2022, Personnel Psychology
  • Unlocking and closing the gender gap in creative performance: A multilevel model, 2021, Journal of Organizational Behavior
  • Embracing multicultural tensions: How team members' multicultural paradox mindsets foster team information elaboration and creativity, 2022, Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes
  • How Does Ethical Leadership Relate to Team Creativity? The Role of Collective Team Identification and Need for Cognitive Closure, 2022, Group & Organization Management

Frequent co-authors collaborating with Shalley include Sejin Keem, Gamze Koseoglu, Jing Zhou, Egan Lua, and Kris Byron.

In addition to articles, Christina E. Shalley has contributed to book publications, including the "Handbook of Organizational Creativity" published by Psychology Press eBooks in 2024.

Best Publications

  • The interplay between exploration and exploitation

    Anil K. Gupta;Ken G. Smith;Christina E. Shalley

  • The Effects of Personal and Contextual Characteristics on Creativity: Where Should We Go from Here?

    Christina E. Shalley;Jing Zhou;Greg R. Oldham

  • WHAT LEADERS NEED TO KNOW: A REVIEW OF SOCIAL AND CONTEXTUAL FACTORS THAT CAN FOSTER OR HINDER CREATIVITY

    Christina E Shalley;Lucy L Gilson

  • The Social Side of Creativity: A Static and Dynamic Social Network Perspective

    Jill E. Perry-Smith;Christina E. Shalley

  • Matching Creativity Requirements and the Work Environment: Effects on Satisfaction and Intentions to Leave

    Christina E. Shalley;Lucy L. Gilson;Terry C. Blum

  • RESEARCH ON EMPLOYEE CREATIVITY: A CRITICAL REVIEW AND DIRECTIONS FOR FUTURE RESEARCH

    Jing Zhou;Christina E Shalley

  • Effects of coaction, expected evaluation, and goal setting on creativity and productivity

    Christina E. Shalley

  • A Little Creativity Goes a Long Way: An Examination of Teams’ Engagement in Creative Processes

    Lucy L. Gilson;Christina E. Shalley

  • Effects of Productivity Goals, Creativity Goals, and Personal Discretion on Individual Creativity

    Christina E. Shalley

  • INTERACTIVE EFFECTS OF GROWTH NEED STRENGTH, WORK CONTEXT, AND JOB COMPLEXITY ON SELF-REPORTED CREATIVE PERFORMANCE

    Christina E. Shalley;Lucy L. Gilson;Terry C. Blum

  • Effects of social-psychological factors on creative performance: The role of informational and controlling expected evaluation and modeling experience.

    Christina E. Shalley;Jill E. Perry-Smith

  • CREATIVITY AND STANDARDIZATION: COMPLEMENTARY OR CONFLICTING DRIVERS OF TEAM EFFECTIVENESS?

    Lucy L. Gilson;John E. Mathieu;Christina E. Shalley;Thomas M. Ruddy

  • The Social Side of Creativity: A Static and Dynamic Social Network Perspective

    Unknown

  • Motivational mechanisms of employee creativity: A meta-analytic examination and theoretical extension of the creativity literature

    Dong Liu;Kaifeng Jiang;Christina E. Shalley;Sejin Keem

  • Handbook of Organizational Creativity

    Jing Zhou;Christina E. Shalley

  • The Oxford Handbook of Creativity, Innovation, and Entrepreneurship

    Christina E. Shalley;Michael A. Hitt;Jing Zhou

  • Deepening our understanding of creativity in the workplace: A review of different approaches to creativity research.

    Jing Zhou;Christina E. Shalley

  • The emergence of team creative cognition: the role of diverse outside ties, sociocognitive network centrality, and team evolution

    Christina E. Shalley;Jill E. Perry-Smith

  • Competition and Creative Performance: Effects of Competitor Presence and Visibility

    Christina E. Shalley;Greg R. Oldham

  • Multiple Tasks' and Multiple Goals' Effect on Creativity: Forced Incubation or Just a Distraction?

    Nora Madjar;Christina E. Shalley

  • A Social Composition View of Team Creativity: The Role of Member Nationality-Heterogeneous Ties Outside of the Team

    Jill E. Perry-Smith;Christina E. Shalley

  • Effects of Coaction, Expected Evaluation, and Goal Setting on Creativity and Productivity

    Unknown

Frequent Co-Authors

Greg R. Oldham
Greg R. Oldham Tulane University
Thomas W. H. Ng
Thomas W. H. Ng University of Hong Kong
Aaron Cohen
Aaron Cohen University of Haifa
Cheri Ostroff
Cheri Ostroff University of South Australia
Ronald J. Burke
Ronald J. Burke York University
Karin Sanders
Karin Sanders University of New South Wales
Juan I. Sanchez
Juan I. Sanchez Florida International University
Dov Zohar
Dov Zohar Technion – Israel Institute of Technology
Talya N. Bauer
Talya N. Bauer Portland State University
Dean Tjosvold
Dean Tjosvold Lingnan University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

If you’re interested in Psychology, there are a variety of related online degrees and career pathways you may want to explore. Social work, in particular, offers many opportunities for those passionate about helping individuals, families, and communities cope with mental health challenges or life changes.

Flexible online learning has made it easier and more affordable to pursue credentials in this field. For example, those based in Texas may want to research affordable online social work master's programs in Texas, which provide specialized training for clinical and direct service roles.

Nationwide, finding the cheapest online msw degrees in USA can help reduce student debt and make career advancement more accessible for diverse learners.

Many state-specific options exist too, such as affordable online social work degrees in Ohio and most affordable online social work degree programs in Tennessee. These local offerings often blend online coursework with in-state internship placements, making them ideal for those looking to serve their communities.

Exploring these online programs can expand your professional pathways—whether you’re focused on counseling, advocacy, or clinical practice alongside your psychology studies.

Best Scientists Citing Christina E. Shalley

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles