World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Business and Management 30 2865 2713 1100 1019 88 23809
Psychology 33 10319 9659 5412 4941 96 24661

Christina E. Shalley publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Christina E. Shalley between 1985 and 2024, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Christina E. Shalley published across 40 years, from 1985 to 2024, averaging 2.9 papers a year. Output peaked at 27 publications in 2015. 9 of the 117 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15 20 25
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1985 to 2024. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 27. Peak 27 publications in 2015. 1985: 1 publication 1986: 0 publications 1987: 1 publication 1988: 0 publications 1989: 1 publication 1990: 0 publications 1991: 2 publications 1992: 3 publications 1993: 0 publications 1994: 0 publications 1995: 2 publications 1996: 3 publications 1997: 1 publication 1998: 0 publications 1999: 0 publications 2000: 1 publication 2001: 2 publications 2002: 1 publication 2003: 3 publications 2004: 3 publications 2005: 2 publications 2006: 4 publications 2007: 3 publications 2008: 3 publications 2009: 2 publications 2010: 2 publications 2011: 3 publications 2012: 4 publications 2013: 5 publications 2014: 3 publications 2015: 27 publications 2016: 1 publication 2017: 9 publications 2018: 3 publications 2019: 1 publication 2020: 4 publications 2021: 3 publications 2022: 5 publications 2023: 6 publications 2024: 3 publications
1985 2024

117 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Christina E. Shalley: publications per year, 1985 to 2024
Year Publications
1985 1
1986 0
1987 1
1988 0
1989 1
1990 0
1991 2
1992 3
1993 0
1994 0
1995 2
1996 3
1997 1
1998 0
1999 0
2000 1
2001 2
2002 1
2003 3
2004 3
2005 2
2006 4
2007 3
2008 3
2009 2
2010 2
2011 3
2012 4
2013 5
2014 3
2015 27
2016 1
2017 9
2018 3
2019 1
2020 4
2021 3
2022 5
2023 6
2024 3
Total 117
Download as CSV

Christina E. Shalley publications per year - data summary

  • Christina E. Shalley, a Business and Management scholar from Georgia Institute of Technology, has 117 publications recorded across 40 years, from 1985 to 2024.
  • The oldest publication on record dates to 1985 and the most recent to 2024.
  • The most productive year is 2015, with 27 publications.
  • The least productive years with any output are 1985, 1987, 1989, 1997 and others, with 1 publication each.
  • 7 of the 40 years in the span carry no publications at all (1986, 1988, 1990, 1993 and others).
  • The rate of publication averages 2.9 papers per year over the whole span, or 3.5 per year counting only the 33 years with at least one publication.
  • The last 5 years on the chart (2020-2024) hold 21 publications, 18% of the career total.
  • Split into equal eras - 1985-1998: 14 publications (1.0 per year); 1999-2012: 33 publications (2.4 per year); 2013-2024: 70 publications (5.8 per year).
  • Comparing the opening and closing eras, the overall trend of publication is rising.

Christina E. Shalley publication distribution in Business and Management in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Business and Management in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Christina E. Shalley sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
25 50 75 100
Bar chart with 82 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 35–39 to 436+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 122. Most scientists, 122, have 95–99 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 436 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 85–89 publications, is where this scientist sits. 35–39 publications: 2 scientists 40–44 publications: 2 scientists 45–49 publications: 5 scientists 50–54 publications: 20 scientists 55–59 publications: 39 scientists 60–64 publications: 66 scientists 65–69 publications: 52 scientists 70–74 publications: 80 scientists 75–79 publications: 83 scientists 80–84 publications: 116 scientists 85–89 publications: 94 scientists 90–94 publications: 111 scientists 95–99 publications: 122 scientists 100–104 publications: 104 scientists 105–109 publications: 113 scientists 110–114 publications: 96 scientists 115–119 publications: 97 scientists 120–124 publications: 112 scientists 125–129 publications: 93 scientists 130–134 publications: 79 scientists 135–139 publications: 69 scientists 140–144 publications: 80 scientists 145–149 publications: 81 scientists 150–154 publications: 85 scientists 155–159 publications: 50 scientists 160–164 publications: 74 scientists 165–169 publications: 61 scientists 170–174 publications: 40 scientists 175–179 publications: 44 scientists 180–184 publications: 47 scientists 185–189 publications: 59 scientists 190–194 publications: 35 scientists 195–199 publications: 37 scientists 200–204 publications: 49 scientists 205–209 publications: 48 scientists 210–214 publications: 34 scientists 215–219 publications: 31 scientists 220–224 publications: 37 scientists 225–229 publications: 34 scientists 230–234 publications: 25 scientists 235–239 publications: 28 scientists 240–244 publications: 34 scientists 245–249 publications: 28 scientists 250–254 publications: 23 scientists 255–259 publications: 22 scientists 260–264 publications: 11 scientists 265–269 publications: 16 scientists 270–274 publications: 23 scientists 275–279 publications: 12 scientists 280–284 publications: 16 scientists 285–289 publications: 10 scientists 290–294 publications: 12 scientists 295–299 publications: 12 scientists 300–304 publications: 8 scientists 305–309 publications: 13 scientists 310–314 publications: 13 scientists 315–319 publications: 6 scientists 320–324 publications: 10 scientists 325–329 publications: 9 scientists 330–334 publications: 7 scientists 335–339 publications: 10 scientists 340–344 publications: 10 scientists 345–349 publications: 7 scientists 350–354 publications: 4 scientists 355–359 publications: 10 scientists 360–364 publications: 3 scientists 365–369 publications: 7 scientists 370–374 publications: 2 scientists 375–379 publications: 8 scientists 380–384 publications: 4 scientists 385–389 publications: 5 scientists 390–394 publications: 5 scientists 395–399 publications: 2 scientists 400–404 publications: 2 scientists 405–409 publications: 4 scientists 410–414 publications: 3 scientists 415–419 publications: 2 scientists 420–424 publications: 5 scientists 425–429 publications: 3 scientists 430–434 publications: 1 scientist 435 publications: 1 scientist 436+ publications: 100 scientists
35–39 publications 436+

This scientist: 88 publications — 18th percentile

18% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 436 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Business and Management scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 3,017 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
35–39 2
40–44 2
45–49 5
50–54 20
55–59 39
60–64 66
65–69 52
70–74 80
75–79 83
80–84 116
85–89 94 88
90–94 111
95–99 122
100–104 104
105–109 113
110–114 96
115–119 97
120–124 112
125–129 93
130–134 79
135–139 69
140–144 80
145–149 81
150–154 85
155–159 50
160–164 74
165–169 61
170–174 40
175–179 44
180–184 47
185–189 59
190–194 35
195–199 37
200–204 49
205–209 48
210–214 34
215–219 31
220–224 37
225–229 34
230–234 25
235–239 28
240–244 34
245–249 28
250–254 23
255–259 22
260–264 11
265–269 16
270–274 23
275–279 12
280–284 16
285–289 10
290–294 12
295–299 12
300–304 8
305–309 13
310–314 13
315–319 6
320–324 10
325–329 9
330–334 7
335–339 10
340–344 10
345–349 7
350–354 4
355–359 10
360–364 3
365–369 7
370–374 2
375–379 8
380–384 4
385–389 5
390–394 5
395–399 2
400–404 2
405–409 4
410–414 3
415–419 2
420–424 5
425–429 3
430–434 1
435 1
436+ 100
Download as CSV

Christina E. Shalley publication distribution in Business and Management in 2026 - data summary

  • The chart plots the publication count of all 3,017 Business and Management scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026, grouped into 82 ranges running from 35–39 to 436+ publications.
  • Christina E. Shalley, a Business and Management scholar from Georgia Institute of Technology, records 88 publications - the 18th percentile of the discipline.
  • 18% of ranked Business and Management scientists score the same or lower than Christina E. Shalley, and about 82% score higher.
  • The median of the discipline falls in the 135–139 publications range, and Christina E. Shalley ranks below the median.
  • The most crowded range is 95–99 publications, holding 122 scientists (4% of the field).
  • 52% of the field sits in the lowest quarter of the value range (up to 135–139 publications), so the distribution is heavily right-skewed and high scores are rare.
  • The final bar has no upper bound: it groups every scientist with 436 publications or more, 100 scientists in all (3% of the field).

Christina E. Shalley D-index placement in Business and Management in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Business and Management scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Christina E. Shalley sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
50 100 150
Bar chart with 60 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30 to 89+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 171. Most scientists, 171, have 32 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 89 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 30 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30 D-Index: 156 scientists 31 D-Index: 159 scientists 32 D-Index: 171 scientists 33 D-Index: 161 scientists 34 D-Index: 135 scientists 35 D-Index: 124 scientists 36 D-Index: 114 scientists 37 D-Index: 111 scientists 38 D-Index: 103 scientists 39 D-Index: 89 scientists 40 D-Index: 81 scientists 41 D-Index: 97 scientists 42 D-Index: 80 scientists 43 D-Index: 69 scientists 44 D-Index: 68 scientists 45 D-Index: 63 scientists 46 D-Index: 54 scientists 47 D-Index: 69 scientists 48 D-Index: 50 scientists 49 D-Index: 58 scientists 50 D-Index: 54 scientists 51 D-Index: 62 scientists 52 D-Index: 54 scientists 53 D-Index: 43 scientists 54 D-Index: 49 scientists 55 D-Index: 35 scientists 56 D-Index: 40 scientists 57 D-Index: 44 scientists 58 D-Index: 34 scientists 59 D-Index: 29 scientists 60 D-Index: 48 scientists 61 D-Index: 32 scientists 62 D-Index: 30 scientists 63 D-Index: 22 scientists 64 D-Index: 22 scientists 65 D-Index: 19 scientists 66 D-Index: 20 scientists 67 D-Index: 18 scientists 68 D-Index: 17 scientists 69 D-Index: 21 scientists 70 D-Index: 20 scientists 71 D-Index: 19 scientists 72 D-Index: 14 scientists 73 D-Index: 10 scientists 74 D-Index: 16 scientists 75 D-Index: 24 scientists 76 D-Index: 13 scientists 77 D-Index: 19 scientists 78 D-Index: 8 scientists 79 D-Index: 6 scientists 80 D-Index: 4 scientists 81 D-Index: 12 scientists 82 D-Index: 7 scientists 83 D-Index: 7 scientists 84 D-Index: 6 scientists 85 D-Index: 10 scientists 86 D-Index: 4 scientists 87 D-Index: 11 scientists 88 D-Index: 6 scientists 89+ D-Index: 96 scientists
30 D-Index 89+

This scientist: 30 D-Index — 5th percentile

5% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 89 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Business and Management scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 3,017 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30 156 30
31 159
32 171
33 161
34 135
35 124
36 114
37 111
38 103
39 89
40 81
41 97
42 80
43 69
44 68
45 63
46 54
47 69
48 50
49 58
50 54
51 62
52 54
53 43
54 49
55 35
56 40
57 44
58 34
59 29
60 48
61 32
62 30
63 22
64 22
65 19
66 20
67 18
68 17
69 21
70 20
71 19
72 14
73 10
74 16
75 24
76 13
77 19
78 8
79 6
80 4
81 12
82 7
83 7
84 6
85 10
86 4
87 11
88 6
89+ 96
Download as CSV

Christina E. Shalley D-index placement in Business and Management in 2026 - data summary

  • The chart plots the discipline H-index (D-index) of all 3,017 Business and Management scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026, grouped into 60 ranges running from 30 to 89+ D-Index.
  • Christina E. Shalley, a Business and Management scholar from Georgia Institute of Technology, records 30 D-Index - the 5th percentile of the discipline.
  • 5% of ranked Business and Management scientists score the same or lower than Christina E. Shalley, and about 95% score higher.
  • The median of the discipline falls in the 42 D-Index range, and Christina E. Shalley ranks below the median.
  • The most crowded range is 32 D-Index, holding 171 scientists (6% of the field).
  • 57% of the field sits in the lowest quarter of the value range (up to 44 D-Index), so the distribution is heavily right-skewed and high scores are rare.
  • The final bar has no upper bound: it groups every scientist with 89 D-Index or more, 96 scientists in all (3% of the field).

Overview

Christina E. Shalley is affiliated with the Georgia Institute of Technology in the United States. Their research primarily focuses on psychology, social sciences, and business, management, and accounting, with a significant emphasis on experimental and cognitive psychology, social psychology, strategy and management, organizational behavior and human resource management, and communication.

Their scholarly contributions span several topics, notably creativity in education and neuroscience, team dynamics and performance, innovation and knowledge management, job satisfaction and organizational behavior, gender diversity and inequality, knowledge management and sharing, and workplace spirituality and leadership.

Shalley has contributed extensively through journal articles, conference proceedings, and edited volumes. Frequent publication venues include:

  • Journal of Organizational Behavior
  • Academy of Management Proceedings
  • Personnel Psychology
  • Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes
  • Group & Organization Management

Among their recent papers are:

  • Multilevel outcomes of creativity in organizations: An integrative review and agenda for future research, 2023, Journal of Organizational Behavior
  • Building blocks of idea generation and implementation in teams: A meta-analysis of team design and team creativity and innovation, 2022, Personnel Psychology
  • Unlocking and closing the gender gap in creative performance: A multilevel model, 2021, Journal of Organizational Behavior
  • Embracing multicultural tensions: How team members' multicultural paradox mindsets foster team information elaboration and creativity, 2022, Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes
  • How Does Ethical Leadership Relate to Team Creativity? The Role of Collective Team Identification and Need for Cognitive Closure, 2022, Group & Organization Management

Frequent co-authors collaborating with Shalley include Sejin Keem, Gamze Koseoglu, Jing Zhou, Egan Lua, and Kris Byron.

In addition to articles, Christina E. Shalley has contributed to book publications, including the "Handbook of Organizational Creativity" published by Psychology Press eBooks in 2024.

Best Publications

  • The interplay between exploration and exploitation

    Anil K. Gupta;Ken G. Smith;Christina E. Shalley

  • The Effects of Personal and Contextual Characteristics on Creativity: Where Should We Go from Here?

    Christina E. Shalley;Jing Zhou;Greg R. Oldham

  • WHAT LEADERS NEED TO KNOW: A REVIEW OF SOCIAL AND CONTEXTUAL FACTORS THAT CAN FOSTER OR HINDER CREATIVITY

    Christina E Shalley;Lucy L Gilson

  • The Social Side of Creativity: A Static and Dynamic Social Network Perspective

    Jill E. Perry-Smith;Christina E. Shalley

  • Matching Creativity Requirements and the Work Environment: Effects on Satisfaction and Intentions to Leave

    Christina E. Shalley;Lucy L. Gilson;Terry C. Blum

  • RESEARCH ON EMPLOYEE CREATIVITY: A CRITICAL REVIEW AND DIRECTIONS FOR FUTURE RESEARCH

    Jing Zhou;Christina E Shalley

  • Effects of coaction, expected evaluation, and goal setting on creativity and productivity

    Christina E. Shalley

  • A Little Creativity Goes a Long Way: An Examination of Teams’ Engagement in Creative Processes

    Lucy L. Gilson;Christina E. Shalley

  • Effects of Productivity Goals, Creativity Goals, and Personal Discretion on Individual Creativity

    Christina E. Shalley

  • INTERACTIVE EFFECTS OF GROWTH NEED STRENGTH, WORK CONTEXT, AND JOB COMPLEXITY ON SELF-REPORTED CREATIVE PERFORMANCE

    Christina E. Shalley;Lucy L. Gilson;Terry C. Blum

  • Effects of social-psychological factors on creative performance: The role of informational and controlling expected evaluation and modeling experience.

    Christina E. Shalley;Jill E. Perry-Smith

  • CREATIVITY AND STANDARDIZATION: COMPLEMENTARY OR CONFLICTING DRIVERS OF TEAM EFFECTIVENESS?

    Lucy L. Gilson;John E. Mathieu;Christina E. Shalley;Thomas M. Ruddy

  • The Social Side of Creativity: A Static and Dynamic Social Network Perspective

    Unknown

  • Motivational mechanisms of employee creativity: A meta-analytic examination and theoretical extension of the creativity literature

    Dong Liu;Kaifeng Jiang;Christina E. Shalley;Sejin Keem

  • Handbook of Organizational Creativity

    Jing Zhou;Christina E. Shalley

  • The Oxford Handbook of Creativity, Innovation, and Entrepreneurship

    Christina E. Shalley;Michael A. Hitt;Jing Zhou

  • Deepening our understanding of creativity in the workplace: A review of different approaches to creativity research.

    Jing Zhou;Christina E. Shalley

  • The emergence of team creative cognition: the role of diverse outside ties, sociocognitive network centrality, and team evolution

    Christina E. Shalley;Jill E. Perry-Smith

  • Competition and Creative Performance: Effects of Competitor Presence and Visibility

    Christina E. Shalley;Greg R. Oldham

  • Multiple Tasks' and Multiple Goals' Effect on Creativity: Forced Incubation or Just a Distraction?

    Nora Madjar;Christina E. Shalley

  • A Social Composition View of Team Creativity: The Role of Member Nationality-Heterogeneous Ties Outside of the Team

    Jill E. Perry-Smith;Christina E. Shalley

  • Effects of Coaction, Expected Evaluation, and Goal Setting on Creativity and Productivity

    Unknown

Frequent Co-Authors

Lucy Gilson
Lucy Gilson University of Cape Town
Greg R. Oldham
Greg R. Oldham Tulane University
Michael A. Hitt
Michael A. Hitt Texas A&M University
Cheri Ostroff
Cheri Ostroff University of South Australia
Ronald J. Burke
Ronald J. Burke York University
Karin Sanders
Karin Sanders University of New South Wales
Juan I. Sanchez
Juan I. Sanchez Florida International University
Dov Zohar
Dov Zohar Technion – Israel Institute of Technology
Talya N. Bauer
Talya N. Bauer Portland State University
Dean Tjosvold
Dean Tjosvold Lingnan University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

If you’re interested in Psychology, there are a variety of related online degrees and career pathways you may want to explore. Social work, in particular, offers many opportunities for those passionate about helping individuals, families, and communities cope with mental health challenges or life changes.

Flexible online learning has made it easier and more affordable to pursue credentials in this field. For example, those based in Texas may want to research affordable online social work master's programs in Texas, which provide specialized training for clinical and direct service roles.

Nationwide, finding the cheapest online msw degrees in USA can help reduce student debt and make career advancement more accessible for diverse learners.

Many state-specific options exist too, such as affordable online social work degrees in Ohio and most affordable online social work degree programs in Tennessee. These local offerings often blend online coursework with in-state internship placements, making them ideal for those looking to serve their communities.

Exploring these online programs can expand your professional pathways—whether you’re focused on counseling, advocacy, or clinical practice alongside your psychology studies.

Best Scientists Citing Christina E. Shalley

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles