World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
39
Citations
20817
World Ranking
8356
National Ranking
85

Dov Zohar publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Dov Zohar sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 59 publications — 2nd percentile

2% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Dov Zohar D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Dov Zohar sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 39 D-Index — 27th percentile

27% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

Dov Zohar is affiliated with the Technion - Israel Institute of Technology in Israel. Their research primarily intersects the disciplines of Health Professions, Decision Sciences, and Business, Management and Accounting. Within these broad fields, their work extends into specialized subfields such as Radiological and Ultrasound Technology, Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty, and Strategy and Management.

Their recent scholarly output includes the paper titled Safety climate strength: The negative effects of cliques and negative relationships in teams, published in 2021 in the journal Safety Science. This publication contributes to understanding aspects of team dynamics and safety climate in occupational settings and has been cited multiple times.

The main topics addressed in their research center on Occupational Health and Safety Research, Risk and Safety Analysis, and Supply Chain Resilience and Risk Management. These themes suggest an emphasis on understanding organizational and systemic risk factors that affect workplace safety and operational continuity.

Dov Zohar frequently collaborates with several co-authors, including Renana Arizon Peretz, Gil Luria, and Yuval Kalish. These collaborations indicate an interdisciplinary approach that may span different aspects of safety science, decision-making, and management.

Their publications are primarily featured in the journal Safety Science, reflecting a focus on research that informs safety management practices and risk evaluation in professional environments.

Best Publications

  • Safety climate in industrial organizations: theoretical and applied implications.

    Dov Zohar

  • A group-level model of safety climate: testing the effect of group climate on microaccidents in manufacturing jobs.

    Dov Zohar

  • A multilevel model of safety climate: cross-level relationships between organization and group-level climates.

    Dov Zohar;Gil Luria

  • Thirty years of safety climate research: Reflections and future directions

    Dov Zohar

  • The effects of leadership dimensions, safety climate, and assigned priorities on minor injuries in work groups

    Dov Zohar

  • Modifying supervisory practices to improve subunit safety: a leadership-based intervention model.

    Dov Zohar

  • Climate as a social-cognitive construction of supervisory safety practices: scripts as proxy of behavior patterns.

    Dov Zohar;Gil Luria

  • Safety climate: Conceptual and measurement issues.

    Dov Zohar

  • Transformational leadership and group interaction as climate antecedents: a social network analysis.

    Dov Zohar;Orly Tenne-Gazit

  • The use of supervisory practices as leverage to improve safety behavior: A cross-level intervention model ☆

    Dov Zohar;Gil Luria

  • The effects of sleep loss on medical residents' emotional reactions to work events : a cognitive-energy model

    Dov Zohar;Orna Tzischinsky;Rachel Epstein;Peretz Lavie

  • Improving construction site safety through leader-based verbal safety communication

    Pete Kines;Lars P.S. Andersen;Soren Spangenberg;Kim L. Mikkelsen

  • 100 years of occupational safety research: From basic protections and work analysis to a multilevel view of workplace safety and risk.

    David A. Hofmann;Michael J. Burke;Dov Zohar

  • Discourse-based intervention for modifying supervisory communication as leverage for safety climate and performance improvement: : A randomized field study.

    Dov Zohar;Tal Polachek

  • Beyond safety outcomes: An investigation of the impact of safety climate on job satisfaction, employee engagement and turnover using social exchange theory as the theoretical framework.

    Yueng Hsiang Huang;Jin Lee;Anna C. McFadden;Lauren A. Murphy

  • Effects of energy availability on immediate and delayed emotional reactions to work events.

    Dov Zohar;O. Tzischinski;R. Epstein

  • Organizational Culture and Climate

    Dov M. Zohar;David A. Hofmann

  • Healthcare climate: a framework for measuring and improving patient safety.

    Dov Zohar;Yael Livne;Orly Tenne-Gazit;Hanna Admi

  • When things go wrong: The effect of daily work hassles on effort, exertion and negative mood

    Dov Zohar

  • Predicting burnout with a hassle-based measure of role demands

    Dov Zohar

  • The Effects of Sleep Loss on Medical Residents' Emotional Reactions to Work Events: a Cognitive-Energy Model SLEEP, SLEEP DEPRIVATION AND PERFORMANCE

    Dov Zohar;Orna Tzischinsky;Rachel Epstein;Peretz Lavie

Frequent Co-Authors

Yueng-Hsiang Huang
Yueng-Hsiang Huang Oregon Health & Science University
Ido Erev
Ido Erev Technion – Israel Institute of Technology
Thomas W. H. Ng
Thomas W. H. Ng University of Hong Kong
Aaron Cohen
Aaron Cohen University of Haifa
Cheri Ostroff
Cheri Ostroff University of South Australia
Ronald J. Burke
Ronald J. Burke York University
Karin Sanders
Karin Sanders University of New South Wales
Juan I. Sanchez
Juan I. Sanchez Florida International University
Talya N. Bauer
Talya N. Bauer Portland State University
Dean Tjosvold
Dean Tjosvold Lingnan University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Choosing to study psychology online provides flexibility and access to numerous respected programs across the USA. Prospective students can compare programs based on quality, rankings, and regional focus. For example, the best online psychology program rankings in Alabama highlight leading options in the Southeast, while those interested in the Midwest can review the best online psychology bachelor's degree rankings in Illinois.

Urban learners may prefer regionally tailored programs. Those seeking opportunities in Ohio can consult the best online psychology bachelor's program rankings in Cincinnati to find schools that suit their career goals. Similarly, New York-based students can explore online psychology bachelor's programs in New York for localized coursework and networks.

Graduates of these programs gain core knowledge in human behavior, social psychology, and mental health. Online degrees support diverse career pathways, including counseling, research, social services, and organizational roles. Many programs offer concentrations that help students prepare for graduate study or specific career tracks in psychology.

Best Scientists Citing Dov Zohar

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles