World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Neuroscience

D-Index
74
Citations
17931
World Ranking
2129
National Ranking
190

Helmuth Steinmetz publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Helmuth Steinmetz sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientists 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 887+

This scientist: 261 publications — 76th percentile

76% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

Helmuth Steinmetz D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Helmuth Steinmetz sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 74 D-Index — 79th percentile

79% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

Overview

Helmuth Steinmetz is affiliated with Goethe University Frankfurt in Germany. Their research primarily spans the field of Medicine with a focus on several specialized subfields including Neurology, Epidemiology, Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, Rehabilitation, and Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health.

Their work extensively covers key topics related to neurological conditions and treatments, including:

  • Acute Ischemic Stroke Management
  • Traumatic Brain Injury and Neurovascular Disturbances
  • Stroke Rehabilitation and Recovery
  • Neurosurgical Procedures and Complications
  • Advanced Neuroimaging Techniques and Applications
  • Intracerebral and Subarachnoid Hemorrhage Research
  • Intracranial Aneurysms: Treatment and Complications

Steinmetz has contributed to multiple recent publications, among which are:

  • "COVID -19 Vaccine-Associated Cerebral Venous Thrombosis in Germany" (2021) published in Annals of Neurology
  • "National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) on admission predicts acute symptomatic seizure risk in ischemic stroke: a population-based study involving 135,117 cases" (2020) published in Scientific Reports
  • "Multiparametric Quantitative MRI in Neurological Diseases" (2021) published in Frontiers in Neurology
  • "Unruptured Intracranial Aneurysms" (2020) published in Deutsches Ärzteblatt international
  • "Simulation-based training improves process times in acute stroke care (STREAM)" (2021) published in European Journal of Neurology

The frequent publication venues for their work include Frontiers in Neurology, DGNeurologie, Der Nervenarzt, European Journal of Neurology, and Neurological Research and Practice.

Steinmetz collaborates regularly with several coauthors, including Elke Hattingen, Christian Foerch, Waltraud Pfeilschifter, Felix Rosenow, and Ferdinand O. Bohmann, each contributing to multiple joint publications.

Best Publications

  • Carotid Intima-Media Thickening Indicates a Higher Vascular Risk Across a Wide Age Range Prospective Data From the Carotid Atherosclerosis Progression Study (CAPS)

    Matthias W. Lorenz;Stefan von Kegler;Helmuth Steinmetz;Hugh S. Markus

  • Plaque Ulceration and Lumen Thrombus Are the Main Sources of Cerebral Microemboli in High-grade Internal Carotid Artery Stenosis

    M. Sitzer;W. Müller;M. Siebler;W. Hort

  • Interhemispheric asymmetry of the human motor cortex related to handedness and gender

    Katrin Amunts;Lutz Jäncke;Hartmut Mohlberg;Helmuth Steinmetz

  • Human Motor Corpus Callosum: Topography, Somatotopy, and Link between Microstructure and Function

    Mathias Wahl;Birgit Lauterbach-Soon;Elke Hattingen;Patrick Jung

  • NADPH Oxidase Plays a Central Role in Blood-Brain Barrier Damage in Experimental Stroke

    Timo Kahles;Peter Luedike;Matthias Endres;Hans-Joachim Galla

  • The unruptured intracranial aneurysm treatment score: A multidisciplinary consensus

    Nima Etminan;Robert D. Brown;Kerim Beseoglu;Seppo Juvela

  • Genome-wide association study of intracranial aneurysm identifies three new risk loci

    Katsuhito Yasuno;Kaya Bilguvar;Philippe Bijlenga;Siew Kee Low

  • Gender differences in cortical complexity

    Eileen Luders;Katherine L Narr;Paul M Thompson;David E Rex

  • Serum GFAP is a diagnostic marker for glioblastoma multiforme

    C S Jung;C Foerch;A Schänzer;A Heck

  • Brain size and grey matter volume in the healthy human brain.

    Eileen Lüders;Helmuth Steinmetz;Lutz Jäncke

  • Resting state fMRI reveals increased subthalamic nucleus-motor cortex connectivity in Parkinson's disease.

    Simon Baudrexel;Torsten Witte;Carola Seifried;Frederic von Wegner

  • Evaluation of serum S100B as a surrogate marker for long-term outcome and infarct volume in acute middle cerebral artery infarction.

    Christian Foerch;Oliver C. Singer;Tobias Neumann-Haefelin;Richard du Mesnil de Rochemont

  • Serum S100B Predicts a Malignant Course of Infarction in Patients With Acute Middle Cerebral Artery Occlusion

    Christian Foerch;Bettina Otto;Oliver C. Singer;Tobias Neumann-Haefelin

  • Serum glial fibrillary acidic protein as a biomarker for intracerebral haemorrhage in patients with acute stroke

    Christian Foerch;Ingo Curdt;Bernard Yan;Florian Dvorak

  • Phosphorus and proton magnetic resonance spectroscopy demonstrates mitochondrial dysfunction in early and advanced Parkinson's disease

    Elke Hattingen;Jörg Magerkurth;Ulrich Pilatus;Anne Mozer

  • fMRI study of bimanual coordination.

    L Jäncke;M Peters;M Himmelbach;T Nösselt

  • Difference in recognition of right and left hemispheric stroke.

    Christian Foerch;Bjoern Misselwitz;Matthias Sitzer;Klaus Berger

  • Asymmetry of the planum parietale.

    Lutz Jäncke;Gottfried Schlaug;Yanxiong Huang;Helmuth Steinmetz

  • The perfect crime? CCSVI not leaving a trace in MS

    Christoph Mayer;Waltraud Pfeilschifter;Matthias Lorenz;Max Nedelmann

  • Mapping cortical gray matter in the young adult brain: effects of gender.

    Eileen Luders;Katherine Narr;Paul M. Thompson;Roger P. Woods

Frequent Co-Authors

Rüdiger Hilker
Rüdiger Hilker Goethe University Frankfurt
Andreas Raabe
Andreas Raabe University of Bern
Lutz Jäncke
Lutz Jäncke University of Zurich
Felix Rosenow
Felix Rosenow Goethe University Frankfurt
Adam Strzelczyk
Adam Strzelczyk Goethe University Frankfurt
Georg Auburger
Georg Auburger Goethe University Frankfurt
Ulf Ziemann
Ulf Ziemann University of Tübingen
Peter Vajkoczy
Peter Vajkoczy Charité - University Medicine Berlin
Albert Hofman
Albert Hofman Harvard University
Giuseppe Danilo Norata
Giuseppe Danilo Norata University of Milan

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying Neuroscience in the USA opens doors to a range of related academic and career opportunities. Many students interested in brain science also explore fields like counseling, psychology, or therapy. Online programs have made these pathways more accessible and affordable than ever.

If you're considering a counseling career, you might look for cacrep accredited degrees. These programs ensure you get high-quality education aligned with professional standards. For those mindful of budget, there are also many cheapest online lpc programs that can pave your way to becoming a licensed professional counselor (LPC).

Another in-demand field is family therapy. You can find affordable online mft programs that prepare you for careers as a licensed marriage and family therapist (MFT).

For a broad foundation in the behavioral sciences, a master’s in psychology is a versatile option. If cost is a concern, it’s wise to research how much does masters in psychology cost so you can plan your educational investment wisely.

Best Scientists Citing Helmuth Steinmetz

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles