World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Neuroscience

D-Index
77
Citations
21105
World Ranking
1842
National Ranking
35

Andreas Raabe publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Andreas Raabe sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientists 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 887+

This scientist: 491 publications — 94th percentile

94% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

Andreas Raabe D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Andreas Raabe sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 77 D-Index — 81st percentile

81% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

Best Publications

  • Near-infrared indocyanine green video angiography: a new method for intraoperative assessment of vascular flow.

    Andreas Raabe;Jürgen Beck;Rüdiger Gerlach;Michael Zimmermann

  • Clazosentan, an endothelin receptor antagonist, in patients with aneurysmal subarachnoid haemorrhage undergoing surgical clipping: a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase 3 trial (CONSCIOUS-2)

    R Loch Macdonald;Randall T Higashida;Emanuela Keller;Stephan A Mayer

  • Prospective evaluation of surgical microscope—integrated intraoperative near-infrared indocyanine green videoangiography during aneurysm surgery

    Andreas Raabe;Peter Nakaji;Jürgen Beck;Louis J. Kim

  • GFAP versus S100B in serum after traumatic brain injury: relationship to brain damage and outcome.

    Linda E. Pelinka;Alfred Kroepfl;Martin Leixnering;Walter Buchinger

  • Serum S-100 and Neuron-Specific Enolase for Prediction of Regaining Consciousness After Global Cerebral Ischemia

    Patrick Martens;Andreas Raabe;Per Johnsson

  • The unruptured intracranial aneurysm treatment score: A multidisciplinary consensus

    Nima Etminan;Robert D. Brown;Kerim Beseoglu;Seppo Juvela

  • Clazosentan (AXV-034343), a selective endothelin A receptor antagonist, in the prevention of cerebral vasospasm following severe aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage: results of a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicenter phase IIa study.

    Peter Vajkoczy;Bernhard Meyer;Stefan Weidauer;Andreas Raabe

  • Directional deep brain stimulation: an intraoperative double-blind pilot study.

    Claudio Pollo;Alain Kaelin-Lang;Markus F. Oertel;Lennart Stieglitz

  • Serum S-100B protein in severe head injury.

    Andreas Raabe;Cornelia Grolms;Oliver Sorge;Michael Zimmermann

  • Randomized Trial of Clazosentan in Patients With Aneurysmal Subarachnoid Hemorrhage Undergoing Endovascular Coiling

    R. Loch Macdonald;Randall T. Higashida;Emanuela Keller;Stephan A. Mayer

  • Genome-wide association study of intracranial aneurysm identifies three new risk loci

    Katsuhito Yasuno;Kaya Bilguvar;Philippe Bijlenga;Siew Kee Low

  • Serum GFAP is a diagnostic marker for glioblastoma multiforme

    C S Jung;C Foerch;A Schänzer;A Heck

  • Glial fibrillary acidic protein in serum after traumatic brain injury and multiple trauma.

    Linda E. Pelinka;Alfred Kroepfl;R Schmidhammer;Manfred Krenn

  • Serum glial fibrillary acidic protein as a biomarker for intracerebral haemorrhage in patients with acute stroke

    Christian Foerch;Ingo Curdt;Bernard Yan;Florian Dvorak

  • Laser surface scanning for patient registration in intracranial image-guided surgery.

    Andreas Raabe;René Krishnan;Robert Wolff;Elvis Hermann

  • Assessing Spinal Cerebrospinal Fluid Leaks in Spontaneous Intracranial Hypotension With a Scoring System Based on Brain Magnetic Resonance Imaging Findings.

    Tomas Dobrocky;Lorenz Grunder;Philipe S. Breiding;Mattia Branca

  • Increased Risk for Postoperative Hemorrhage After Intracranial Surgery in Patients With Decreased Factor XIII Activity Implications of a Prospective Study

    Rüdiger Gerlach;Fabian Tölle;Andreas Raabe;Michael Zimmermann

  • Assessment of Flow in Perforating Arteries During Intracranial Aneurysm Surgery Using Intraoperative Near-Infrared Indocyanine Green Videoangiography

    Jean G. de Oliveira;Jean G. de Oliveira;Jürgen Beck;Volker Seifert;Manoel J. Teixeira

  • Correlation of computed tomography findings and serum brain damage markers following severe head injury.

    A. Raabe;C. Grolms;M. Keller;J. Döhnert

  • Serum markers of brain damage and outcome prediction in patients after severe head injury.

    A. Raabe;C. Grolms;V. Seifert

  • Impairment of cerebral perfusion and infarct patterns attributable to vasospasm after aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage: a prospective MRI and DSA study.

    Stefan Weidauer;Heinrich Lanfermann;Andreas Raabe;Friedhelm Zanella

Frequent Co-Authors

Volker Seifert
Volker Seifert Goethe University Frankfurt
Peter Vajkoczy
Peter Vajkoczy Charité - University Medicine Berlin
Helmuth Steinmetz
Helmuth Steinmetz Goethe University Frankfurt
Luigi Mariani
Luigi Mariani University Hospital of Basel
Marcel Arnold
Marcel Arnold University of Bern
Gary K. Steinberg
Gary K. Steinberg Stanford University
Theo Wallimann
Theo Wallimann ETH Zurich
Urs Fischer
Urs Fischer University of Basel
Heinrich Mattle
Heinrich Mattle University of Bern
R. Loch Macdonald
R. Loch Macdonald University of Toronto

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

If you’re considering a career in neuroscience, there are several flexible online degree options to help you reach your goals faster and more efficiently. For those interested in advanced clinical roles, an online psyd program can equip you with practical skills in psychology, which pairs well with neuroscience foundations.

Individuals seeking to work with mental health families and couples might explore a mft online program. These programs provide specialized training and are often structured for working professionals in related fields.

If you're eager to enter the workforce quickly, consider one of the many accelerated bachelors options. These allow you to earn your degree in less time, making it easier to begin your neuroscience career or continue to graduate studies.

Career planning is also crucial—reviewing high paying degrees in the field helps you make informed decisions about your education and future salary potential. Exploring these related pathways ensures your educational journey in neuroscience aligns with both your interests and career ambitions.

Best Scientists Citing Andreas Raabe

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles