World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Environmental Sciences

D-Index
44
Citations
8741
World Ranking
6673
National Ranking
2382

Mary A. Voytek publication distribution in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Environmental Sciences in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Mary A. Voytek sits on this spectrum.

41–50 publications: 21 scientists 51–60 publications: 62 scientists 61–70 publications: 133 scientists 71–80 publications: 257 scientists 81–90 publications: 361 scientists 91–100 publications: 440 scientists 101–110 publications: 492 scientists 111–120 publications: 541 scientists 121–130 publications: 617 scientists 131–140 publications: 544 scientists 141–150 publications: 541 scientists 151–160 publications: 539 scientists 161–170 publications: 444 scientists 171–180 publications: 444 scientists 181–190 publications: 400 scientists 191–200 publications: 377 scientists 201–210 publications: 318 scientists 211–220 publications: 282 scientists 221–230 publications: 263 scientists 231–240 publications: 220 scientists 241–250 publications: 217 scientists 251–260 publications: 180 scientists 261–270 publications: 181 scientists 271–280 publications: 155 scientists 281–290 publications: 130 scientists 291–300 publications: 127 scientists 301–310 publications: 130 scientists 311–320 publications: 85 scientists 321–330 publications: 106 scientists 331–340 publications: 80 scientists 341–350 publications: 83 scientists 351–360 publications: 75 scientists 361–370 publications: 69 scientists 371–380 publications: 52 scientists 381–390 publications: 54 scientists 391–400 publications: 56 scientists 401–410 publications: 44 scientists 411–420 publications: 40 scientists 421–430 publications: 36 scientists 431–440 publications: 25 scientists 441–450 publications: 25 scientists 451–460 publications: 32 scientists 461–470 publications: 29 scientists 471–480 publications: 21 scientists 481–490 publications: 26 scientists 491–500 publications: 26 scientists 501–510 publications: 17 scientists 511–520 publications: 19 scientists 521–530 publications: 15 scientists 531–540 publications: 22 scientists 541–550 publications: 12 scientists 551–560 publications: 15 scientists 561–570 publications: 11 scientists 571–580 publications: 19 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 9 scientists 601–610 publications: 7 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 5 scientists 631–640 publications: 5 scientists 641–650 publications: 6 scientists 651–660 publications: 3 scientists 661–670 publications: 3 scientists 671–680 publications: 4 scientists 681–689 publications: 4 scientists 690+ publications: 100 scientists
41 publications 690+

This scientist: 136 publications — 34th percentile

34% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 690 publications or more.

Mary A. Voytek D-index placement in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Environmental Sciences scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Mary A. Voytek sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 12 scientists 31 D-Index: 26 scientists 32 D-Index: 51 scientists 33 D-Index: 88 scientists 34 D-Index: 123 scientists 35 D-Index: 163 scientists 36 D-Index: 206 scientists 37 D-Index: 267 scientists 38 D-Index: 265 scientists 39 D-Index: 275 scientists 40 D-Index: 321 scientists 41 D-Index: 343 scientists 42 D-Index: 305 scientists 43 D-Index: 336 scientists 44 D-Index: 330 scientists 45 D-Index: 348 scientists 46 D-Index: 291 scientists 47 D-Index: 275 scientists 48 D-Index: 272 scientists 49 D-Index: 273 scientists 50 D-Index: 263 scientists 51 D-Index: 232 scientists 52 D-Index: 266 scientists 53 D-Index: 217 scientists 54 D-Index: 198 scientists 55 D-Index: 177 scientists 56 D-Index: 202 scientists 57 D-Index: 204 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 177 scientists 60 D-Index: 166 scientists 61 D-Index: 152 scientists 62 D-Index: 143 scientists 63 D-Index: 150 scientists 64 D-Index: 124 scientists 65 D-Index: 119 scientists 66 D-Index: 120 scientists 67 D-Index: 118 scientists 68 D-Index: 82 scientists 69 D-Index: 98 scientists 70 D-Index: 94 scientists 71 D-Index: 105 scientists 72 D-Index: 74 scientists 73 D-Index: 84 scientists 74 D-Index: 70 scientists 75 D-Index: 67 scientists 76 D-Index: 78 scientists 77 D-Index: 60 scientists 78 D-Index: 59 scientists 79 D-Index: 52 scientists 80 D-Index: 47 scientists 81 D-Index: 38 scientists 82 D-Index: 48 scientists 83 D-Index: 42 scientists 84 D-Index: 42 scientists 85 D-Index: 43 scientists 86 D-Index: 29 scientists 87 D-Index: 37 scientists 88 D-Index: 29 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 34 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 22 scientists 93 D-Index: 17 scientists 94 D-Index: 19 scientists 95 D-Index: 24 scientists 96 D-Index: 21 scientists 97 D-Index: 20 scientists 98 D-Index: 24 scientists 99 D-Index: 17 scientists 100 D-Index: 17 scientists 101 D-Index: 21 scientists 102 D-Index: 25 scientists 103 D-Index: 18 scientists 104 D-Index: 26 scientists 105 D-Index: 20 scientists 106 D-Index: 15 scientists 107 D-Index: 10 scientists 108 D-Index: 13 scientists 109 D-Index: 15 scientists 110 D-Index: 12 scientists 111 D-Index: 8 scientists 112 D-Index: 7 scientists 113 D-Index: 9 scientists 114 D-Index: 6 scientists 115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116 D-Index: 7 scientists 117 D-Index: 8 scientists 118 D-Index: 3 scientists 119 D-Index: 5 scientists 120 D-Index: 7 scientists 121 D-Index: 2 scientists 122 D-Index: 4 scientists 123 D-Index: 8 scientists 124 D-Index: 7 scientists 125 D-Index: 9 scientists 126+ D-Index: 92 scientists
30 D-Index 126+

This scientist: 44 D-Index — 32nd percentile

32% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 126 D-Index or more.

Overview

Mary A. Voytek is affiliated with the National Aeronautics and Space Administration in the United States. Their research encompasses a range of interdisciplinary fields and topics focusing on social sciences, technology, health, education, and space science.

The scientific contributions of Mary A. Voytek are evident in recent publications covering various topics such as space exploration, occupational therapy, and astrobiology. Key papers include:

  • Moving toward a framework for communicating the confidence of life detection (2023) published in Nature Astronomy
  • The Role of OT in Meeting the Needs of Older Adults With Varying Acuity Levels Transitioning to Life-Plan Communities (LPCs) (2020) published in American Journal of Occupational Therapy
  • Communicating Discoveries in the Search for Life in the Universe Workshop Report (2025) published in Astrobiology

Mary A. Voytek's frequently collaborating co-authors include:

  • Charles W. Gunnels
  • Mary I. Abercrombie
  • B. D. Bovard
  • Dean A. Croshaw
  • Jessica Drummond

Their work appears regularly in publication venues such as:

  • Nature Astronomy
  • American Journal of Occupational Therapy
  • Astrobiology

Their main fields of study are concentrated in social sciences, with subfields deeply connected to health, education, technology management, astronomy, and demography. Specific subfields include:

  • Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis
  • Education
  • Management of Technology and Innovation
  • Astronomy and Astrophysics
  • Demography

The primary research topics that Mary A. Voytek addresses involve:

  • Urban Green Space and Health
  • Educational Environments and Student Outcomes
  • Innovative Approaches in Technology and Social Development
  • Space Science and Extraterrestrial Life
  • Migration, Aging, and Tourism Studies

Best Publications

  • METHODS FOR MEASURING DENITRIFICATION: DIVERSE APPROACHES TO A DIFFICULT PROBLEM

    Peter M. Groffman;Mark A. Altabet;John K. Bohlke;Klaus Butterbach-Bahl

  • ENVIRONMENTAL CONTROLS ON DENITRIFYING COMMUNITIES AND DENITRIFICATION RATES: INSIGHTS FROM MOLECULAR METHODS

    Matthew D. Wallenstein;David D. Myrold;Mary Firestone;Mary Voytek

  • Geomicrobiology of Subglacial Ice Above Lake Vostok, Antarctica

    John C. Priscu;Edward E. Adams;W. Berry Lyons;Mary A. Voytek

  • Volatile and organic compositions of sedimentary rocks in Yellowknife Bay, Gale crater, Mars.

    Douglas W. Ming;P. D. Archer;D. P. Glavin;J. L. Eigenbrode

  • Hyporheic zone denitrification: Controls on effective reaction depth and contribution to whole-stream mass balance

    Judson W. Harvey;John Karl Böhlke;Mary A. Voytek;Durelle Scott

  • Is there a common water-activity limit for the three domains of life?

    Andrew Stevenson;Jonathan A. Cray;Jim P. Williams;Ricardo Santos

  • Stimulation of methane generation from nonproductive coal by addition of nutrients or a microbial consortium.

    Elizabeth J. P. Jones;Mary A. Voytek;Margo D. Corum;William H. Orem

  • A ubiquitous thermoacidophilic archaeon from deep-sea hydrothermal vents

    Anna-Louise Reysenbach;Yitai Liu;Amy B. Banta;Terry J. Beveridge

  • The Ladder of Life Detection.

    Marc Neveu;Marc Neveu;Lindsay E. Hays;Lindsay E. Hays;Mary A. Voytek;Michael H. New

  • Detection of ammonium-oxidizing bacteria of the beta-subclass of the class Proteobacteria in aquatic samples with the PCR.

    M A Voytek;B B Ward

  • Microbial community structure of hydrothermal deposits from geochemically different vent fields along the Mid-Atlantic Ridge

    Gilberto E. Flores;James H. Campbell;Julie D. Kirshtein;Jennifer Meneghin

  • Multiplication of microbes below 0.690 water activity: implications for terrestrial and extraterrestrial life

    Andrew Stevenson;Juergen Burkhardt;Charles S. Cockell;Jonathan A. Cray

  • Bioassay for estimating the biogenic methane-generating potential of coal samples

    Elizabeth J.P. Jones;Mary A. Voytek;Peter D. Warwick;Margo D. Corum

  • Quantitative PCR detection of Batrachochytrium dendrobatidis DNA from sediments and water.

    Julie D. Kirshtein;Chauncey W. Anderson;John S. Wood;Joyce E. Longcore

  • Multi-scale measurements and modeling of denitrification in streams with varying flow and nitrate concentration in the upper Mississippi River basin, USA

    John Karl Böhlke;Ronald C. Antweiler;Judson W. Harvey;Andrew E. Laursen

  • Reach‐scale isotope tracer experiment to quantify denitrification and related processes in a nitrate‐rich stream, midcontinent United States

    John Karl Böhlke;Judson W. Harvey;Mary A. Voytek

  • Organic intermediates in the anaerobic biodegradation of coal to methane under laboratory conditions

    William H. Orem;Mary A. Voytek;Elizabeth J. Jones;Harry E. Lerch

  • Aspergillus penicillioides differentiation and cell division at 0.585 water activity.

    Andrew Stevenson;Philip G Hamill;Callum J O'Kane;Gerhard Kminek

  • Findings of the Mars Special Regions Science Analysis Group

    K. Buxbaum;M. Meyer;N. Barlow

  • Evidence for iron-mediated anaerobic methane oxidation in a crude oil-contaminated aquifer.

    R. T. Amos;B. A. Bekins;I. M. Cozzarelli;M. A. Voytek

Frequent Co-Authors

Charles S. Cockell
Charles S. Cockell University of Edinburgh
John Karl Böhlke
John Karl Böhlke United States Geological Survey
Andrew Steele
Andrew Steele Carnegie Institution for Science
Ward E. Sanford
Ward E. Sanford United States Geological Survey
Christopher P. McKay
Christopher P. McKay Ames Research Center
William H. Orem
William H. Orem United States Geological Survey
Peter T. Doran
Peter T. Doran Louisiana State University
John E. Hallsworth
John E. Hallsworth Queen's University Belfast
Frances Westall
Frances Westall Centre national de la recherche scientifique, CNRS
Kenneth G. Miller
Kenneth G. Miller Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying Environmental Sciences opens the door to various interdisciplinary careers, often requiring complementary skills and specialized knowledge. Many students explore online geology degrees to gain a deeper understanding of Earth's physical structure and processes, which plays a crucial role in environmental assessment and conservation.

Another increasingly important area is Geographic Information Systems (GIS). GIS professionals use spatial data to address environmental challenges, making a gis degree an excellent option for those interested in data analysis and mapping technologies.

For those who aspire to leadership roles in environmental policy or public administration, pursuing one of the best online mpa programs can provide essential skills in management and governance, enabling graduates to influence environmental regulation and sustainable development strategies.

Complementing scientific study with social science perspectives is also valuable. An accredited online bachelors in sociology equips students to understand human behavior and societal impacts on the environment, essential for holistic environmental problem-solving.

Exploring these related online degrees can greatly enhance career prospects and prepare students for diverse roles in addressing today’s critical environmental issues.

Best Scientists Citing Mary A. Voytek

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles