What is he best known for?
The fields of study he is best known for:
- Ecology
- Bacteria
- Microorganism
His scientific interests lie mostly in Ecology, Environmental chemistry, Hydrology, TRACER and Nitrate.
His study in the field of Community composition is also linked to topics like Accretion.
His study in Environmental chemistry is interdisciplinary in nature, drawing from both Microbial consortium, Methane, Coal, Seawater and Heterotroph.
His Methane study incorporates themes from Microcosm, Mineralogy and Bituminous coal.
His Hyporheic zone, Sink and Groundwater study in the realm of Hydrology connects with subjects such as Flux.
His Nitrate study integrates concerns from other disciplines, such as Human impact on the nitrogen cycle, Aquatic ecosystem, Ecosystem and Water quality.
His most cited work include:
- METHODS FOR MEASURING DENITRIFICATION: DIVERSE APPROACHES TO A DIFFICULT PROBLEM (656 citations)
- ENVIRONMENTAL CONTROLS ON DENITRIFYING COMMUNITIES AND DENITRIFICATION RATES: INSIGHTS FROM MOLECULAR METHODS (365 citations)
- Geomicrobiology of Subglacial Ice Above Lake Vostok, Antarctica (345 citations)
What are the main themes of his work throughout his whole career to date?
His primary scientific interests are in Environmental chemistry, Ecology, Astrobiology, Sediment and Mars Exploration Program.
Mary A. Voytek has researched Environmental chemistry in several fields, including Bioremediation, Bioaugmentation, Biodegradation, Microbial consortium and Coal.
Mary A. Voytek has included themes like Mineralogy, Methane and Natural gas in his Coal study.
His Ecology study which covers Archaea that intersects with Extreme environment.
His work carried out in the field of Astrobiology brings together such families of science as Space exploration and Habitability.
His Drainage basin, Water quality and Groundwater study, which is part of a larger body of work in Hydrology, is frequently linked to TRACER and Geography, bridging the gap between disciplines.
He most often published in these fields:
- Environmental chemistry (25.29%)
- Ecology (22.99%)
- Astrobiology (10.34%)
What were the highlights of his more recent work (between 2013-2020)?
- Astrobiology (10.34%)
- Mars Exploration Program (9.20%)
- Life detection (4.60%)
In recent papers he was focusing on the following fields of study:
Mary A. Voytek mainly investigates Astrobiology, Mars Exploration Program, Life detection, Ecology and Extraterrestrial life.
His studies in Astrobiology integrate themes in fields like Exoplanetology, Exoplanet and Habitability.
His work on Planetary protection and Martian as part of his general Mars Exploration Program study is frequently connected to Technology readiness and Rocknest, thereby bridging the divide between different branches of science.
His studies deal with areas such as Sedimentary rock, Pyrolysis and Mineralogy as well as Martian.
His Ecology study frequently involves adjacent topics like Xerophile.
As a part of the same scientific family, Mary A. Voytek mostly works in the field of Extraterrestrial life, focusing on Biosphere and, on occasion, Archaea, Earth, Extraterrestrial Environment, Extreme environment and Data science.
Between 2013 and 2020, his most popular works were:
- Volatile and organic compositions of sedimentary rocks in Yellowknife Bay, Gale crater, Mars. (250 citations)
- Is there a common water-activity limit for the three domains of life? (148 citations)
- Multiplication of microbes below 0.690 water activity: implications for terrestrial and extraterrestrial life (95 citations)
In his most recent research, the most cited papers focused on:
- Ecology
- Bacteria
- Microorganism
Mary A. Voytek spends much of his time researching Circumstellar habitable zone, Astrobiology, Habitability, Space weather and Heliophysics.
His Circumstellar habitable zone research integrates issues from Exoplanetology, Space exploration and Extraterrestrial life.
His Extraterrestrial life research incorporates themes from Water activity and Ecology.
This overview was generated by a machine learning system which analysed the scientist’s
body of work. If you have any feedback, you can
contact us
here.
