World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Biology and Biochemistry

D-Index
79
Citations
23798
World Ranking
4284
National Ranking
322

Charles S. Cockell publication distribution in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Biology and Biochemistry in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Charles S. Cockell sits on this spectrum.

47–56 publications: 8 scientists 57–66 publications: 35 scientists 67–76 publications: 106 scientists 77–86 publications: 231 scientists 87–96 publications: 414 scientists 97–106 publications: 546 scientists 107–116 publications: 704 scientists 117–126 publications: 849 scientists 127–136 publications: 980 scientists 137–146 publications: 942 scientists 147–156 publications: 969 scientists 157–166 publications: 950 scientists 167–176 publications: 951 scientists 177–186 publications: 915 scientists 187–196 publications: 787 scientists 197–206 publications: 841 scientists 207–216 publications: 735 scientists 217–226 publications: 709 scientists 227–236 publications: 651 scientists 237–246 publications: 605 scientists 247–256 publications: 510 scientists 257–266 publications: 524 scientists 267–276 publications: 434 scientists 277–286 publications: 418 scientists 287–296 publications: 350 scientists 297–306 publications: 363 scientists 307–316 publications: 315 scientists 317–326 publications: 296 scientists 327–336 publications: 261 scientists 337–346 publications: 240 scientists 347–356 publications: 219 scientists 357–366 publications: 197 scientists 367–376 publications: 154 scientists 377–386 publications: 161 scientists 387–396 publications: 155 scientists 397–406 publications: 145 scientists 407–416 publications: 124 scientists 417–426 publications: 112 scientists 427–436 publications: 132 scientists 437–446 publications: 116 scientists 447–456 publications: 99 scientists 457–466 publications: 81 scientists 467–476 publications: 91 scientists 477–486 publications: 80 scientists 487–496 publications: 80 scientists 497–506 publications: 60 scientists 507–516 publications: 36 scientists 517–526 publications: 46 scientists 527–536 publications: 54 scientists 537–546 publications: 44 scientists 547–556 publications: 43 scientists 557–566 publications: 43 scientists 567–576 publications: 42 scientists 577–586 publications: 25 scientists 587–596 publications: 34 scientists 597–606 publications: 23 scientists 607–616 publications: 33 scientists 617–626 publications: 31 scientists 627–636 publications: 27 scientists 637–646 publications: 25 scientists 647–656 publications: 28 scientists 657–666 publications: 34 scientists 667–676 publications: 18 scientists 677–686 publications: 16 scientists 687–696 publications: 10 scientists 697–706 publications: 12 scientists 707–716 publications: 21 scientists 717–726 publications: 12 scientists 727–736 publications: 12 scientists 737–746 publications: 10 scientists 747–756 publications: 7 scientists 757–766 publications: 13 scientists 767–776 publications: 15 scientists 777–786 publications: 13 scientists 787–796 publications: 9 scientists 797–806 publications: 9 scientists 807–816 publications: 7 scientists 817–826 publications: 4 scientists 827–836 publications: 9 scientists 837–846 publications: 7 scientists 847–856 publications: 3 scientists 857–866 publications: 5 scientists 867–876 publications: 5 scientists 877–886 publications: 11 scientists 887–896 publications: 3 scientists 897–906 publications: 4 scientists 907–916 publications: 7 scientists 917–926 publications: 5 scientists 927–936 publications: 6 scientists 937–946 publications: 6 scientists 947–956 publications: 3 scientists 957–966 publications: 7 scientists 967–976 publications: 2 scientists 977–986 publications: 2 scientists 987–996 publications: 1 scientists 997–1,006 publications: 5 scientists 1,007–1,016 publications: 2 scientists 1,017–1,026 publications: 2 scientists 1,027 publications: 1 scientists 1,028+ publications: 100 scientists
47 publications 1,028+

This scientist: 629 publications — 98th percentile

98% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,028 publications or more.

Charles S. Cockell D-index placement in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Biology and Biochemistry scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Charles S. Cockell sits on this spectrum.

40–41 D-Index: 80 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 183 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 317 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 504 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 718 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 900 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 1,026 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 1,150 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 1,236 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 1,253 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 1,163 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 1,131 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 1,032 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 897 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 814 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 715 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 709 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 596 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 512 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 473 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 412 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 373 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 358 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 285 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 273 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 227 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 208 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 193 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 153 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 157 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 148 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 120 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 113 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 100 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 86 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 67 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 72 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 73 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 64 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 53 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 60 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 54 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 43 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 38 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 49 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 26 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 18 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 23 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 32 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 32 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 27 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 19 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 22 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 12 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 16 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 14 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 10 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 13 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 10 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 7 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 9 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 13 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 4 scientists 166 D-Index: 4 scientists 167+ D-Index: 98 scientists
40 D-Index 167+

This scientist: 79 D-Index — 79th percentile

79% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 167 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2015 - Fellow of the Royal Society of Edinburgh

Overview

Charles S. Cockell is affiliated with the University of Edinburgh in the United Kingdom. Their research primarily focuses on various fields including physics and astronomy as well as environmental science, with a significant number of publications in these areas.

The scientist's subfields of study include:

  • Astronomy and Astrophysics
  • Ecology
  • Physiology
  • Environmental Chemistry
  • Aerospace Engineering

The main research topics covered by Charles S. Cockell encompass:

  • Planetary Science and Exploration
  • Astro and Planetary Science
  • Space Science and Extraterrestrial Life
  • Spaceflight effects on biology
  • Microbial Community Ecology and Physiology
  • Methane Hydrates and Related Phenomena
  • Space Exploration and Technology

Frequent publication venues for their work include:

  • Astrobiology
  • Frontiers in Microbiology
  • Scientific Reports
  • Nature Astronomy
  • International Journal of Astrobiology

Charles S. Cockell has coauthored frequently with several researchers, including:

  • Stewart Gault
  • Peter M. Higgins
  • Marco J. L. Coolen
  • D. A. Kring
  • S. P. S. Gulick

Some recent papers showcasing their work are:

  • The Role of Meteorite Impacts in the Origin of Life, 2020, Astrobiology
  • Space station biomining experiment demonstrates rare earth element extraction in microgravity and Mars gravity, 2020, Nature Communications
  • Probing the hydrothermal system of the Chicxulub impact crater, 2020, Science Advances
  • Toward sustainable space exploration: a roadmap for harnessing the power of microorganisms, 2023, Nature Communications
  • A steeply-inclined trajectory for the Chicxulub impact, 2020, Nature Communications

In addition to journal articles, Charles S. Cockell has contributed to book publications. Both known titles were published by Harvard University Press:

  • Taxi from Another Planet (2022)
  • Taxi from Another Planet (2022)

Among awards received, Charles S. Cockell was named a Fellow of the Royal Society of Edinburgh in 2015.

Best Publications

  • The Chicxulub Asteroid Impact and Mass Extinction at the Cretaceous-Paleogene Boundary

    Peter Schulte;Laia Alegret;Ignacio Arenillas;José A. Arz

  • Ultraviolet radiation screening compounds

    Charles S. Cockell;John Knowland

  • Exoplanet Biosignatures: A Review of Remotely Detectable Signs of Life.

    Edward W. Schwieterman;Nancy Y. Kiang;Mary N. Parenteau;Mary N. Parenteau;Chester E. Harman;Chester E. Harman;Chester E. Harman

  • What makes a planet habitable

    H. Lammer;J. H. Bredehöft;A. Coustenis;M. L. Khodachenko

  • Emergence of a habitable planet

    Kevin Zahnle;Nick Arndt;Charles Cockell;Alex Halliday

  • Transient liquid water and water activity at Gale crater on Mars

    F. Javier Martín-Torres;F. Javier Martín-Torres;María Paz Zorzano;Patricia Valentín-Serrano;Ari Matti Harri

  • The evolution of inorganic carbon concentrating mechanisms in photosynthesis

    John A Raven;Charles S Cockell;Christina L De La Rocha

  • The ultraviolet environment of Mars: biological implications past, present, and future.

    Charles S. Cockell;David C. Catling;Wanda L. Davis;Kelly Snook

  • Habitability: a review

    C S Cockell;T Bush;C Bryce;S Direito

  • Impact-generated hydrothermal systems on Earth and Mars

    Gordon R. Osinski;Livio L. Tornabene;Neil R. Banerjee;Charles S. Cockell

  • Biosignatures on Mars: What, Where, and How? Implications for the Search for Martian Life

    Frances Westall;Frédéric Foucher;Nicolas Bost;Marylène Bertrand

  • Biological Effects of High Ultraviolet Radiation on Early Earth—a Theoretical Evaluation

    Charles S. Cockell

  • Cyanobacterial bacteriohopanepolyol signatures from cultures and natural environmental settings

    Helen M. Talbot;Roger E. Summons;Linda L. Jahnke;Charles S. Cockell

  • The formation of peak rings in large impact craters

    Joanna V. Morgan;Sean P.S. Gulick;Timothy Bralower;Elise Chenot

  • The limits for life under multiple extremes

    Jesse Patrick Harrison;Nicolas Gheeraert;Dmitry Tsigelnitskiy;Charles S. Cockell

  • Effects of a Simulated Martian UV Flux on the Cyanobacterium, Chroococcidiopsis sp. 029

    Charles S. Cockell;Andrew C. Schuerger;Daniela Billi;E. Imre Friedmann

  • Implications of a 3.472-3.333 Gyr-old subaerial microbial mat from the Barberton greenstone belt, South Africa for the UV environmental conditions on the early Earth.

    Frances Westall;Cornel E. J. de Ronde;Gordon Southam;Nathalie Grassineau

  • Searching for life on Mars: selection of molecular targets for ESA's aurora ExoMars mission

    John Parnell;David Cullen;Mark R. Sims;Stephen Alan Bowden

  • Life in (and on) the rocks.

    Chakkiath Paul Antony;Charles S Cockell;Yogesh S Shouche

  • Microbial Rock Inhabitants Survive Hypervelocity Impacts on Mars-Like Host Planets: First Phase of Lithopanspermia Experimentally Tested

    Gerda Horneck;Dieter Stöffler;Sieglinde Ott;Ulrich Hornemann

Frequent Co-Authors

Frances Westall
Frances Westall Centre national de la recherche scientifique, CNRS
John Parnell
John Parnell University of Aberdeen
Ricardo Amils
Ricardo Amils Spanish National Research Council
John A. Raven
John A. Raven University of Dundee
Howell G. M. Edwards
Howell G. M. Edwards University of Bradford
Marco J. L. Coolen
Marco J. L. Coolen Curtin University
Helmut Lammer
Helmut Lammer Austrian Academy of Sciences
David A. Kring
David A. Kring Lunar and Planetary Institute
Joanna Morgan
Joanna Morgan Imperial College London
Sean P.S. Gulick
Sean P.S. Gulick The University of Texas at Austin

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring online degrees in biology and biochemistry can open doors to various career pathways in healthcare, research, and management. For those interested in direct patient care, an asn program online provides foundational nursing skills and a quicker route to start working in healthcare settings.

Students passionate about health and wellness may consider online nutrition degrees. These programs offer a flexible way to build expertise in dietetics, public health, or food science, leading to roles in hospitals, research labs, or community outreach.

For those aiming for leadership positions in healthcare, cahme-accredited online mha programs equip graduates with the skills needed for healthcare administration or management roles. These programs are recognized for their rigorous standards and leadership training.

Lastly, those seeking to advance in nursing without traditional practicum requirements may explore a dnp program without clinical hours. These degrees are valuable for aspiring nurse leaders or educators who already possess clinical experience.

Best Scientists Citing Charles S. Cockell

Trending Scientists