World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Environmental Sciences 44 6876 6606 532 514 130 5837

Helen M. Talbot publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Helen M. Talbot between 1995 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Helen M. Talbot published across 31 years, from 1995 to 2025, averaging 4.9 papers a year. Output peaked at 16 publications in 2014. 11 of the 151 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1995 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 16. Peak 16 publications in 2014. 1995: 1 publication 1996: 0 publications 1997: 0 publications 1998: 1 publication 1999: 2 publications 2000: 1 publication 2001: 2 publications 2002: 1 publication 2003: 3 publications 2004: 1 publication 2005: 5 publications 2006: 3 publications 2007: 6 publications 2008: 9 publications 2009: 7 publications 2010: 10 publications 2011: 10 publications 2012: 7 publications 2013: 6 publications 2014: 16 publications 2015: 7 publications 2016: 15 publications 2017: 3 publications 2018: 1 publication 2019: 5 publications 2020: 6 publications 2021: 2 publications 2022: 2 publications 2023: 8 publications 2024: 7 publications 2025: 4 publications
1995 2025

151 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Helen M. Talbot: publications per year, 1995 to 2025
Year Publications
1995 1
1996 0
1997 0
1998 1
1999 2
2000 1
2001 2
2002 1
2003 3
2004 1
2005 5
2006 3
2007 6
2008 9
2009 7
2010 10
2011 10
2012 7
2013 6
2014 16
2015 7
2016 15
2017 3
2018 1
2019 5
2020 6
2021 2
2022 2
2023 8
2024 7
2025 4
Total 151
Download as CSV

Helen M. Talbot publication distribution in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Environmental Sciences in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Helen M. Talbot sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 66 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 41–50 to 690+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 617. Most scientists, 617, have 121–130 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 690 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 121–130 publications, is where this scientist sits. 41–50 publications: 21 scientists 51–60 publications: 62 scientists 61–70 publications: 133 scientists 71–80 publications: 257 scientists 81–90 publications: 361 scientists 91–100 publications: 440 scientists 101–110 publications: 492 scientists 111–120 publications: 541 scientists 121–130 publications: 617 scientists 131–140 publications: 544 scientists 141–150 publications: 541 scientists 151–160 publications: 539 scientists 161–170 publications: 444 scientists 171–180 publications: 444 scientists 181–190 publications: 400 scientists 191–200 publications: 377 scientists 201–210 publications: 318 scientists 211–220 publications: 282 scientists 221–230 publications: 263 scientists 231–240 publications: 220 scientists 241–250 publications: 217 scientists 251–260 publications: 180 scientists 261–270 publications: 181 scientists 271–280 publications: 155 scientists 281–290 publications: 130 scientists 291–300 publications: 127 scientists 301–310 publications: 130 scientists 311–320 publications: 85 scientists 321–330 publications: 106 scientists 331–340 publications: 80 scientists 341–350 publications: 83 scientists 351–360 publications: 75 scientists 361–370 publications: 69 scientists 371–380 publications: 52 scientists 381–390 publications: 54 scientists 391–400 publications: 56 scientists 401–410 publications: 44 scientists 411–420 publications: 40 scientists 421–430 publications: 36 scientists 431–440 publications: 25 scientists 441–450 publications: 25 scientists 451–460 publications: 32 scientists 461–470 publications: 29 scientists 471–480 publications: 21 scientists 481–490 publications: 26 scientists 491–500 publications: 26 scientists 501–510 publications: 17 scientists 511–520 publications: 19 scientists 521–530 publications: 15 scientists 531–540 publications: 22 scientists 541–550 publications: 12 scientists 551–560 publications: 15 scientists 561–570 publications: 11 scientists 571–580 publications: 19 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 9 scientists 601–610 publications: 7 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 5 scientists 631–640 publications: 5 scientists 641–650 publications: 6 scientists 651–660 publications: 3 scientists 661–670 publications: 3 scientists 671–680 publications: 4 scientists 681–689 publications: 4 scientists 690+ publications: 100 scientists
41–50 publications 690+

This scientist: 130 publications — 30th percentile

30% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 690 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Environmental Sciences scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,676 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
41–50 21
51–60 62
61–70 133
71–80 257
81–90 361
91–100 440
101–110 492
111–120 541
121–130 617 130
131–140 544
141–150 541
151–160 539
161–170 444
171–180 444
181–190 400
191–200 377
201–210 318
211–220 282
221–230 263
231–240 220
241–250 217
251–260 180
261–270 181
271–280 155
281–290 130
291–300 127
301–310 130
311–320 85
321–330 106
331–340 80
341–350 83
351–360 75
361–370 69
371–380 52
381–390 54
391–400 56
401–410 44
411–420 40
421–430 36
431–440 25
441–450 25
451–460 32
461–470 29
471–480 21
481–490 26
491–500 26
501–510 17
511–520 19
521–530 15
531–540 22
541–550 12
551–560 15
561–570 11
571–580 19
581–590 9
591–600 9
601–610 7
611–620 11
621–630 5
631–640 5
641–650 6
651–660 3
661–670 3
671–680 4
681–689 4
690+ 100
Download as CSV

Helen M. Talbot D-index placement in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Environmental Sciences scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Helen M. Talbot sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300
Bar chart with 97 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30 to 126+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 348. Most scientists, 348, have 45 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 126 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 44 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30 D-Index: 12 scientists 31 D-Index: 26 scientists 32 D-Index: 51 scientists 33 D-Index: 88 scientists 34 D-Index: 123 scientists 35 D-Index: 163 scientists 36 D-Index: 206 scientists 37 D-Index: 267 scientists 38 D-Index: 265 scientists 39 D-Index: 275 scientists 40 D-Index: 321 scientists 41 D-Index: 343 scientists 42 D-Index: 305 scientists 43 D-Index: 336 scientists 44 D-Index: 330 scientists 45 D-Index: 348 scientists 46 D-Index: 291 scientists 47 D-Index: 275 scientists 48 D-Index: 272 scientists 49 D-Index: 273 scientists 50 D-Index: 263 scientists 51 D-Index: 232 scientists 52 D-Index: 266 scientists 53 D-Index: 217 scientists 54 D-Index: 198 scientists 55 D-Index: 177 scientists 56 D-Index: 202 scientists 57 D-Index: 204 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 177 scientists 60 D-Index: 166 scientists 61 D-Index: 152 scientists 62 D-Index: 143 scientists 63 D-Index: 150 scientists 64 D-Index: 124 scientists 65 D-Index: 119 scientists 66 D-Index: 120 scientists 67 D-Index: 118 scientists 68 D-Index: 82 scientists 69 D-Index: 98 scientists 70 D-Index: 94 scientists 71 D-Index: 105 scientists 72 D-Index: 74 scientists 73 D-Index: 84 scientists 74 D-Index: 70 scientists 75 D-Index: 67 scientists 76 D-Index: 78 scientists 77 D-Index: 60 scientists 78 D-Index: 59 scientists 79 D-Index: 52 scientists 80 D-Index: 47 scientists 81 D-Index: 38 scientists 82 D-Index: 48 scientists 83 D-Index: 42 scientists 84 D-Index: 42 scientists 85 D-Index: 43 scientists 86 D-Index: 29 scientists 87 D-Index: 37 scientists 88 D-Index: 29 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 34 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 22 scientists 93 D-Index: 17 scientists 94 D-Index: 19 scientists 95 D-Index: 24 scientists 96 D-Index: 21 scientists 97 D-Index: 20 scientists 98 D-Index: 24 scientists 99 D-Index: 17 scientists 100 D-Index: 17 scientists 101 D-Index: 21 scientists 102 D-Index: 25 scientists 103 D-Index: 18 scientists 104 D-Index: 26 scientists 105 D-Index: 20 scientists 106 D-Index: 15 scientists 107 D-Index: 10 scientists 108 D-Index: 13 scientists 109 D-Index: 15 scientists 110 D-Index: 12 scientists 111 D-Index: 8 scientists 112 D-Index: 7 scientists 113 D-Index: 9 scientists 114 D-Index: 6 scientists 115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116 D-Index: 7 scientists 117 D-Index: 8 scientists 118 D-Index: 3 scientists 119 D-Index: 5 scientists 120 D-Index: 7 scientists 121 D-Index: 2 scientists 122 D-Index: 4 scientists 123 D-Index: 8 scientists 124 D-Index: 7 scientists 125 D-Index: 9 scientists 126+ D-Index: 92 scientists
30 D-Index 126+

This scientist: 44 D-Index — 32nd percentile

32% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 126 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Environmental Sciences scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,676 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30 12
31 26
32 51
33 88
34 123
35 163
36 206
37 267
38 265
39 275
40 321
41 343
42 305
43 336
44 330 44
45 348
46 291
47 275
48 272
49 273
50 263
51 232
52 266
53 217
54 198
55 177
56 202
57 204
58 166
59 177
60 166
61 152
62 143
63 150
64 124
65 119
66 120
67 118
68 82
69 98
70 94
71 105
72 74
73 84
74 70
75 67
76 78
77 60
78 59
79 52
80 47
81 38
82 48
83 42
84 42
85 43
86 29
87 37
88 29
89 30
90 34
91 20
92 22
93 17
94 19
95 24
96 21
97 20
98 24
99 17
100 17
101 21
102 25
103 18
104 26
105 20
106 15
107 10
108 13
109 15
110 12
111 8
112 7
113 9
114 6
115 12
116 7
117 8
118 3
119 5
120 7
121 2
122 4
123 8
124 7
125 9
126+ 92
Download as CSV

Overview

Helen M. Talbot is affiliated with the University of York in the United Kingdom. Their research primarily spans fields such as Earth and Planetary Sciences, Environmental Science, and Social Sciences, with a strong focus on Paleontology, Ecology, Geography, Planning and Development, Archeology, and Anthropology.

The main areas of study include Archaeology and ancient environmental studies, Isotope Analysis in Ecology, Pacific and Southeast Asian Studies, Geology and Paleoclimatology Research, Forensic Anthropology and Bioarchaeology Studies, Amazonian Archaeology and Ethnohistory, and Paleopathology and ancient diseases.

Talbot has authored multiple papers published in notable scientific journals. Some recent examples include:

  • Organic residue analysis shows sub-regional patterns in the use of pottery by Northern European hunter-gatherers (2020), published in Royal Society Open Science
  • High-resolution dietary reconstruction of victims of the 79 CE Vesuvius eruption at Herculaneum by compound-specific isotope analysis (2021), published in Science Advances
  • The transmission of pottery technology among prehistoric European hunter-gatherers (2022), published in Nature Human Behaviour
  • A unique bacteriohopanetetrol stereoisomer of marine anammox (2020), published in Organic Geochemistry
  • Reconstructing oxygen deficiency in the glacial Gulf of Alaska: Combining biomarkers and trace metals as paleo-redox proxies (2020), published in Chemical Geology

Frequent co-authors of Talbot include Oliver E. Craig, Alexandre Lucquin, André Carlo Colonese, Harry K. Robson, and Jasmine Lundy.

Talbot's research outputs have appeared multiple times in several publication venues such as:

  • Royal Society Open Science (4 publications)
  • Science Advances (2 publications)
  • Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (2 publications)
  • Journal of Archaeological Science (2 publications)
  • Archaeometry (2 publications)

Best Publications

  • A lacustrine GDGT-temperature calibration from the Scandinavian Arctic to Antarctic : Renewed potential for the application of GDGT-paleothermometry in lakes

    Emma J. Pearson;Steve Juggins;Helen M. Talbot;Jan Weckström

  • Microbial ecology of the stratified water column of the Black Sea as revealed by a comprehensive biomarker study

    Stuart G. Wakeham;Rudi Amann;Katherine H. Freeman;Ellen C. Hopmans

  • Cyanobacterial bacteriohopanepolyol signatures from cultures and natural environmental settings

    Helen M. Talbot;Roger E. Summons;Linda L. Jahnke;Charles S. Cockell

  • Analysis of intact bacteriohopanepolyols from methanotrophic bacteria by reversed-phase high-performance liquid chromatography-atmospheric pressure chemical ionisation mass spectrometry.

    H M Talbot;D F Watson;J C Murrell;J F Carter

  • Biosynthesis of hopanoids by sulfate-reducing bacteria (genus Desulfovibrio).

    Martin Blumenberg;Martin Krüger;Katja Nauhaus;Helen M. Talbot

  • Bacterial populations recorded in diverse sedimentary biohopanoid distributions

    Helen M. Talbot;Paul Farrimond

  • Well preserved Palaeogene and Cretaceous biomarkers from the Kilwa area, Tanzania

    Bart E. van Dongen;Helen M. Talbot;Stefan Schouten;Paul Nicholas Pearson

  • Atlantic cooling associated with a marine biotic crisis during the mid-Cretaceous period

    A. McAnena;A. McAnena;Sascha Flögel;Peter Hofmann;Jens O. Herrle

  • Methylhopanoids: Molecular indicators of ancient bacteria and a petroleum correlation tool

    P. Farrimond;H.M. Talbot;D.F. Watson;L.K. Schulz

  • Low biodegradability of fluoxetine HCl, diazepam and their human metabolites in sewage sludge-amended soil

    Clare H. Redshaw;Martin P. Cooke;Helen M. Talbot;Steve McGrath

  • Rapid structural elucidation of composite bacterial hopanoids by atmospheric pressure chemical ionisation liquid chromatography/ion trap mass spectrometry.

    Helen M. Talbot;Michel Rohmer;Paul Farrimond

  • Diverse biohopanoid compositions of non-marine sediments

    Helen M. Talbot;Diane F. Watson;Emma J. Pearson;Paul Farrimond

  • Sources for sedimentary bacteriohopanepolyols as revealed by 16S rDNA stratigraphy

    Marco J. L. Coolen;Helen M. Talbot;Ben A. Abbas;Christopher Ward

  • Atmospheric pressure chemical ionisation reversed‐phase liquid chromatography/ion trap mass spectrometry of intact bacteriohopanepolyols

    Helen M. Talbot;Angela H. Squier;Brendan J. Keely;Paul Farrimond

  • An interlaboratory study of TEX86 and BIT analysis of sediments, extracts, and standard mixtures

    Stefan Schouten;Ellen C Hopmans;Antoni Rosell-Melé;Ann Pearson

  • Bacterial populations recorded in bacteriohopanepolyol distributions in soils from Northern England

    Martin P. Cooke;Helen M. Talbot;Paul Farrimond

  • Sea‐surface temperature records of Termination 1 in the Gulf of California: Challenges for seasonal and interannual analogues of tropical Pacific climate change

    Erin L. McClymont;Erin L. McClymont;Raja S. Ganeshram;Laetitia E. Pichevin;Helen M. Talbot

  • Characteristic fragmentation of bacteriohopanepolyols during atmospheric pressure chemical ionisation liquid chromatography/ion trap mass spectrometry

    Helen M. Talbot;Roger Summons;Linda Jahnke;Paul Farrimond

  • Bacteriohopanepolyol signatures as markers for methanotrophic bacteria in peat moss

    Julia F. van Winden;Helen M. Talbot;Nardy Kip;Gert-Jan Reichart

  • Hydrologic control of carbon cycling and aged carbon discharge in the Congo River basin

    Enno Schefuß;Enno Schefuß;Timothy I Eglinton;Timothy I Eglinton;Charlotte L Spencer-Jones;Charlotte L Spencer-Jones;Jürgen Rullkötter

  • Structural characterisation of unsaturated bacterial hopanoids by atmospheric pressure chemical ionisation liquid chromatography/ion trap mass spectrometry.

    Helen M. Talbot;Michel Rohmer;Paul Farrimond

Frequent Co-Authors

Thomas Wagner
Thomas Wagner Heriot-Watt University
Jaap S. Sinninghe Damsté
Jaap S. Sinninghe Damsté Royal Netherlands Institute for Sea Research
Paul Farrimond
Paul Farrimond University of Newcastle Australia
Richard D. Pancost
Richard D. Pancost University of Bristol
Igor Semiletov
Igor Semiletov Russian Academy of Sciences
Stefan Schouten
Stefan Schouten Utrecht University
Bart E. van Dongen
Bart E. van Dongen University of Manchester
Enno Schefuß
Enno Schefuß University of Bremen
Erin L. McClymont
Erin L. McClymont Durham University
Mike S. M. Jetten
Mike S. M. Jetten Radboud University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Environmental Sciences in the USA opens doors to various online degree options that complement and enhance career prospects. For those seeking a manageable academic load, the what is the easiest bachelor's degree to get resource offers insights on programs that balance rigor with accessibility, helping students make informed decisions about their education paths.

Specializations in earth and environmental studies are also popular, with geoscience online degree programs providing a strong foundation in understanding the planet’s physical processes. These degrees are ideal for aspiring environmental consultants, researchers, or field scientists.

Geographic Information Systems (GIS) expertise is increasingly valued in environmental work. The best gis programs guide highlights top online options for mastering GIS technology, crucial for mapping, data analysis, and resource management careers.

For those interested in leadership and policy roles, public administration programs can be a great fit. The best online mpa listings showcase accelerated paths to develop skills in environmental policy, management, and government affairs, which are vital for driving sustainable initiatives.

Best Scientists Citing Helen M. Talbot

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles