World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Manajit Hayer-Hartl

Manajit Hayer-Hartl

D-Index & Metrics

Biology and Biochemistry

D-Index
61
Citations
27735
World Ranking
11093
National Ranking
795

Manajit Hayer-Hartl publication distribution in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Biology and Biochemistry in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Manajit Hayer-Hartl sits on this spectrum.

47–56 publications: 8 scientists 57–66 publications: 35 scientists 67–76 publications: 106 scientists 77–86 publications: 231 scientists 87–96 publications: 414 scientists 97–106 publications: 546 scientists 107–116 publications: 704 scientists 117–126 publications: 849 scientists 127–136 publications: 980 scientists 137–146 publications: 942 scientists 147–156 publications: 969 scientists 157–166 publications: 950 scientists 167–176 publications: 951 scientists 177–186 publications: 915 scientists 187–196 publications: 787 scientists 197–206 publications: 841 scientists 207–216 publications: 735 scientists 217–226 publications: 709 scientists 227–236 publications: 651 scientists 237–246 publications: 605 scientists 247–256 publications: 510 scientists 257–266 publications: 524 scientists 267–276 publications: 434 scientists 277–286 publications: 418 scientists 287–296 publications: 350 scientists 297–306 publications: 363 scientists 307–316 publications: 315 scientists 317–326 publications: 296 scientists 327–336 publications: 261 scientists 337–346 publications: 240 scientists 347–356 publications: 219 scientists 357–366 publications: 197 scientists 367–376 publications: 154 scientists 377–386 publications: 161 scientists 387–396 publications: 155 scientists 397–406 publications: 145 scientists 407–416 publications: 124 scientists 417–426 publications: 112 scientists 427–436 publications: 132 scientists 437–446 publications: 116 scientists 447–456 publications: 99 scientists 457–466 publications: 81 scientists 467–476 publications: 91 scientists 477–486 publications: 80 scientists 487–496 publications: 80 scientists 497–506 publications: 60 scientists 507–516 publications: 36 scientists 517–526 publications: 46 scientists 527–536 publications: 54 scientists 537–546 publications: 44 scientists 547–556 publications: 43 scientists 557–566 publications: 43 scientists 567–576 publications: 42 scientists 577–586 publications: 25 scientists 587–596 publications: 34 scientists 597–606 publications: 23 scientists 607–616 publications: 33 scientists 617–626 publications: 31 scientists 627–636 publications: 27 scientists 637–646 publications: 25 scientists 647–656 publications: 28 scientists 657–666 publications: 34 scientists 667–676 publications: 18 scientists 677–686 publications: 16 scientists 687–696 publications: 10 scientists 697–706 publications: 12 scientists 707–716 publications: 21 scientists 717–726 publications: 12 scientists 727–736 publications: 12 scientists 737–746 publications: 10 scientists 747–756 publications: 7 scientists 757–766 publications: 13 scientists 767–776 publications: 15 scientists 777–786 publications: 13 scientists 787–796 publications: 9 scientists 797–806 publications: 9 scientists 807–816 publications: 7 scientists 817–826 publications: 4 scientists 827–836 publications: 9 scientists 837–846 publications: 7 scientists 847–856 publications: 3 scientists 857–866 publications: 5 scientists 867–876 publications: 5 scientists 877–886 publications: 11 scientists 887–896 publications: 3 scientists 897–906 publications: 4 scientists 907–916 publications: 7 scientists 917–926 publications: 5 scientists 927–936 publications: 6 scientists 937–946 publications: 6 scientists 947–956 publications: 3 scientists 957–966 publications: 7 scientists 967–976 publications: 2 scientists 977–986 publications: 2 scientists 987–996 publications: 1 scientists 997–1,006 publications: 5 scientists 1,007–1,016 publications: 2 scientists 1,017–1,026 publications: 2 scientists 1,027 publications: 1 scientists 1,028+ publications: 100 scientists
47 publications 1,028+

This scientist: 155 publications — 29th percentile

29% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,028 publications or more.

Manajit Hayer-Hartl D-index placement in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Biology and Biochemistry scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Manajit Hayer-Hartl sits on this spectrum.

40–41 D-Index: 80 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 183 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 317 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 504 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 718 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 900 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 1,026 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 1,150 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 1,236 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 1,253 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 1,163 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 1,131 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 1,032 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 897 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 814 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 715 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 709 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 596 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 512 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 473 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 412 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 373 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 358 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 285 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 273 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 227 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 208 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 193 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 153 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 157 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 148 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 120 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 113 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 100 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 86 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 67 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 72 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 73 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 64 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 53 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 60 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 54 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 43 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 38 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 49 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 26 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 18 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 23 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 32 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 32 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 27 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 19 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 22 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 12 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 16 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 14 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 10 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 13 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 10 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 7 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 9 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 13 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 4 scientists 166 D-Index: 4 scientists 167+ D-Index: 98 scientists
40 D-Index 167+

This scientist: 61 D-Index — 44th percentile

44% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 167 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2018 - German National Academy of Sciences Leopoldina - Deutsche Akademie der Naturforscher Leopoldina – Nationale Akademie der Wissenschaften Biochemistry and Biophysics
  • Member of the European Molecular Biology Organization (EMBO)
  • Member of the European Molecular Biology Organization (EMBO)
  • Member of the European Molecular Biology Organization (EMBO)

Overview

Manajit Hayer-Hartl is affiliated with the Max Planck Society in Germany. Their research primarily focuses on biochemistry, genetics, and molecular biology with a significant emphasis on molecular biology as a subfield. The scientist's work covers key topics such as photosynthetic processes and mechanisms, heat shock proteins research, enzyme structure and function, ATP synthase and ATPases research, protein structure and dynamics, mitochondrial function and pathology, and RNA and protein synthesis mechanisms.

Their frequent publication venues include:

  • Trends in Biochemical Sciences
  • FEBS Letters
  • Cell
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • SSRN Electronic Journal

Among recent papers authored or co-authored by Manajit Hayer-Hartl are:

  • "Recent advances in understanding catalysis of protein folding by molecular chaperones," 2020, FEBS Letters
  • "Bacterial Hsp70 resolves misfolded states and accelerates productive folding of a multi-domain protein," 2020, Nature Communications
  • "Chaperone Machineries of Rubisco - The Most Abundant Enzyme," 2020, Trends in Biochemical Sciences
  • "Dual Functions of a Rubisco Activase in Metabolic Repair and Recruitment to Carboxysomes," 2020, Cell
  • "Scaffolding protein CcmM directs multiprotein phase separation in β-carboxysome biogenesis," 2021, Nature Structural & Molecular Biology

Frequent co-authors of Manajit Hayer-Hartl include:

  • F. Ulrich Hartl
  • Huping Wang
  • Andreas Bracher
  • David Balchin
  • Mirkko Flecken

In recognition of their contributions to the field, Manajit Hayer-Hartl has received awards such as election to the German National Academy of Sciences Leopoldina in 2018 for achievements in biochemistry and biophysics. They are also a member of the European Molecular Biology Organization (EMBO).

Best Publications

  • Molecular Chaperones in the Cytosol: from Nascent Chain to Folded Protein

    F. Ulrich Hartl;Manajit Hayer-Hartl

  • Molecular chaperones in protein folding and proteostasis

    F. Ulrich Hartl;Andreas Bracher;Manajit Hayer-Hartl

  • Molecular Chaperone Functions in Protein Folding and Proteostasis

    Yujin E. Kim;Mark S. Hipp;Andreas Bracher;Manajit Hayer-Hartl

  • Converging concepts of protein folding in vitro and in vivo

    F Ulrich Hartl;Manajit Hayer-Hartl

  • In vivo aspects of protein folding and quality control

    David Balchin;Manajit Hayer-Hartl;F. Ulrich Hartl

  • Hsp70 and Hsp40 chaperones can inhibit self-assembly of polyglutamine proteins into amyloid-like fibrils

    Paul J. Muchowski;Gregor Schaffar;Annie Sittler;Erich E. Wanker

  • Amyloid-like Aggregates Sequester Numerous Metastable Proteins with Essential Cellular Functions

    Heidi Olzscha;Sonya M. Schermann;Andreas C. Woerner;Stefan Pinkert

  • Proteome-wide Analysis of Chaperonin-Dependent Protein Folding in Escherichia coli

    Michael J. Kerner;Dean J. Naylor;Yasushi Ishihama;Tobias Maier

  • Crystal Structure of the Nucleotide Exchange Factor GrpE Bound to the ATPase Domain of the Molecular Chaperone DnaK

    Celia J. Harrison;Celia J. Harrison;Manajit Hayer-Hartl;Manajit Hayer-Hartl;Maurizio Di Liberto;Maurizio Di Liberto;F.-Ulrich Hartl;F.-Ulrich Hartl

  • Geldanamycin activates a heat shock response and inhibits huntingtin aggregation in a cell culture model of Huntington’s disease

    Annie Sittler;Rudi Lurz;Gerhild Lueder;Josef Priller

  • Cellular toxicity of polyglutamine expansion proteins: Mechanism of transcription factor deactivation

    Gregor Schaffar;Peter Breuer;Raina Boteva;Christian Behrends

  • Protein Folding in the Cytoplasm and the Heat Shock Response

    R. M. Vabulas;S. Raychaudhuri;M. Hayer-Hartl;F. U. Hartl

  • PolyQ proteins interfere with nuclear degradation of cytosolic proteins by sequestering the Sis1p chaperone.

    Sae-Hun Park;Yury Kukushkin;Rajat Gupta;Taotao Chen

  • DnaK functions as a central hub in the E. coli chaperone network

    Giulia Calloni;Taotao Chen;Sonya M. Schermann;Hung-chun Chang

  • The GroEL–GroES Chaperonin Machine: A Nano-Cage for Protein Folding

    Manajit Hayer-Hartl;Andreas Bracher;F. Ulrich Hartl

  • Dual Function of Protein Confinement in Chaperonin-Assisted Protein Folding

    A. Brinker;G. Pfeifer;M.J. Kerner;D.J. Naylor

  • Structural Features of the GroEL-GroES Nano-Cage Required for Rapid Folding of Encapsulated Protein

    Yun-Chi Tang;Hung-Chun Chang;Annette Roeben;Dirk Wischnewski

  • Molecular chaperones as modulators of polyglutamine protein aggregation and toxicity

    H. Sakahira;P. Breuer;M. K. Hayer-Hartl;F. U. Hartl

  • Function of Trigger Factor and DnaK in Multidomain Protein Folding: Increase in Yield at the Expense of Folding Speed

    Vishwas R. Agashe;Suranjana Guha;Hung Chun Chang;Pierre Genevaux

  • Failure of RQC machinery causes protein aggregation and proteotoxic stress

    Young-Jun Choe;Sae-Hun Park;Timm Hassemer;Roman Körner

Frequent Co-Authors

Andreas Bracher
Andreas Bracher Max Planck Society
F. Ulrich Hartl
F. Ulrich Hartl Max Planck Society
Costa Georgopoulos
Costa Georgopoulos University of Utah
Don C. Lamb
Don C. Lamb Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München
Frank Weber
Frank Weber HEMAP AG
Matthias Mann
Matthias Mann Max Planck Institute of Biochemistry
John R. Engen
John R. Engen Northeastern University
Erich E. Wanker
Erich E. Wanker Max Delbrück Center for Molecular Medicine
Gian Gaetano Tartaglia
Gian Gaetano Tartaglia Italian Institute of Technology
Hans Lehrach
Hans Lehrach Max Planck Society

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying Biology and Biochemistry in the USA opens the door to a wide range of impactful healthcare and science careers. Many students explore online programs to gain practical skills and start working sooner. For example, online ultrasound tech programs offer a flexible route to work in diagnostic imaging, a fast-growing field in healthcare.

Similarly, those interested in imaging technology might consider online associate radiology tech programs, which can prepare you for essential roles in hospitals and clinics. For students seeking to focus on nutrition and wellness, dietitian masters programs provide advanced knowledge for careers in dietetics, public health, and nutrition counseling.

If you're interested in clinical roles with patient interaction, online medical assisting classes can help you launch your career quickly—even with financial aid options available. Each of these pathways leverages your foundation in Biology or Biochemistry and offers diverse, flexible career opportunities.

Best Scientists Citing Manajit Hayer-Hartl

Trending Scientists