World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Michael Thomas Ewing

Michael Thomas Ewing

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Business and Management 54 782 725 43 43 185 12110

Michael Thomas Ewing publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Michael Thomas Ewing between 1995 and 2023, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Michael Thomas Ewing published across 29 years, from 1995 to 2023, averaging 7.2 papers a year. Output peaked at 21 publications in 2015. 10 of the 209 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15 20
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1995 to 2023. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 21. Peak 21 publications in 2015. 1995: 1 publication 1996: 0 publications 1997: 2 publications 1998: 5 publications 1999: 8 publications 2000: 14 publications 2001: 13 publications 2002: 11 publications 2003: 9 publications 2004: 6 publications 2005: 7 publications 2006: 6 publications 2007: 12 publications 2008: 8 publications 2009: 8 publications 2010: 6 publications 2011: 11 publications 2012: 6 publications 2013: 9 publications 2014: 9 publications 2015: 21 publications 2016: 7 publications 2017: 2 publications 2018: 2 publications 2019: 3 publications 2020: 6 publications 2021: 7 publications 2022: 2 publications 2023: 8 publications
1995 2023

209 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Michael Thomas Ewing: publications per year, 1995 to 2023
Year Publications
1995 1
1996 0
1997 2
1998 5
1999 8
2000 14
2001 13
2002 11
2003 9
2004 6
2005 7
2006 6
2007 12
2008 8
2009 8
2010 6
2011 11
2012 6
2013 9
2014 9
2015 21
2016 7
2017 2
2018 2
2019 3
2020 6
2021 7
2022 2
2023 8
Total 209
Download as CSV

Michael Thomas Ewing publications per year - data summary

  • Michael Thomas Ewing, a Business and Management scholar from Southern Cross University, has 209 publications recorded across 29 years, from 1995 to 2023.
  • The oldest publication on record dates to 1995 and the most recent to 2023.
  • The most productive year is 2015, with 21 publications.
  • The least productive year with any output is 1995, with 1 publication.
  • 1 of the 29 years in the span carries no publications at all (1996).
  • The rate of publication averages 7.2 papers per year over the whole span, or 7.5 per year counting only the 28 years with at least one publication.
  • The last 5 years on the chart (2019-2023) hold 26 publications, 12% of the career total.
  • Split into equal eras - 1995-2004: 69 publications (6.9 per year); 2005-2014: 82 publications (8.2 per year); 2015-2023: 58 publications (6.4 per year).
  • Comparing the opening and closing eras, the overall trend of publication is broadly steady.

Michael Thomas Ewing publication distribution in Business and Management in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Business and Management in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Michael Thomas Ewing sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
25 50 75 100
Bar chart with 82 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 35–39 to 436+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 122. Most scientists, 122, have 95–99 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 436 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 185–189 publications, is where this scientist sits. 35–39 publications: 2 scientists 40–44 publications: 2 scientists 45–49 publications: 5 scientists 50–54 publications: 20 scientists 55–59 publications: 39 scientists 60–64 publications: 66 scientists 65–69 publications: 52 scientists 70–74 publications: 80 scientists 75–79 publications: 83 scientists 80–84 publications: 116 scientists 85–89 publications: 94 scientists 90–94 publications: 111 scientists 95–99 publications: 122 scientists 100–104 publications: 104 scientists 105–109 publications: 113 scientists 110–114 publications: 96 scientists 115–119 publications: 97 scientists 120–124 publications: 112 scientists 125–129 publications: 93 scientists 130–134 publications: 79 scientists 135–139 publications: 69 scientists 140–144 publications: 80 scientists 145–149 publications: 81 scientists 150–154 publications: 85 scientists 155–159 publications: 50 scientists 160–164 publications: 74 scientists 165–169 publications: 61 scientists 170–174 publications: 40 scientists 175–179 publications: 44 scientists 180–184 publications: 47 scientists 185–189 publications: 59 scientists 190–194 publications: 35 scientists 195–199 publications: 37 scientists 200–204 publications: 49 scientists 205–209 publications: 48 scientists 210–214 publications: 34 scientists 215–219 publications: 31 scientists 220–224 publications: 37 scientists 225–229 publications: 34 scientists 230–234 publications: 25 scientists 235–239 publications: 28 scientists 240–244 publications: 34 scientists 245–249 publications: 28 scientists 250–254 publications: 23 scientists 255–259 publications: 22 scientists 260–264 publications: 11 scientists 265–269 publications: 16 scientists 270–274 publications: 23 scientists 275–279 publications: 12 scientists 280–284 publications: 16 scientists 285–289 publications: 10 scientists 290–294 publications: 12 scientists 295–299 publications: 12 scientists 300–304 publications: 8 scientists 305–309 publications: 13 scientists 310–314 publications: 13 scientists 315–319 publications: 6 scientists 320–324 publications: 10 scientists 325–329 publications: 9 scientists 330–334 publications: 7 scientists 335–339 publications: 10 scientists 340–344 publications: 10 scientists 345–349 publications: 7 scientists 350–354 publications: 4 scientists 355–359 publications: 10 scientists 360–364 publications: 3 scientists 365–369 publications: 7 scientists 370–374 publications: 2 scientists 375–379 publications: 8 scientists 380–384 publications: 4 scientists 385–389 publications: 5 scientists 390–394 publications: 5 scientists 395–399 publications: 2 scientists 400–404 publications: 2 scientists 405–409 publications: 4 scientists 410–414 publications: 3 scientists 415–419 publications: 2 scientists 420–424 publications: 5 scientists 425–429 publications: 3 scientists 430–434 publications: 1 scientist 435 publications: 1 scientist 436+ publications: 100 scientists
35–39 publications 436+

This scientist: 185 publications — 70th percentile

70% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 436 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Business and Management scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 3,017 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
35–39 2
40–44 2
45–49 5
50–54 20
55–59 39
60–64 66
65–69 52
70–74 80
75–79 83
80–84 116
85–89 94
90–94 111
95–99 122
100–104 104
105–109 113
110–114 96
115–119 97
120–124 112
125–129 93
130–134 79
135–139 69
140–144 80
145–149 81
150–154 85
155–159 50
160–164 74
165–169 61
170–174 40
175–179 44
180–184 47
185–189 59 185
190–194 35
195–199 37
200–204 49
205–209 48
210–214 34
215–219 31
220–224 37
225–229 34
230–234 25
235–239 28
240–244 34
245–249 28
250–254 23
255–259 22
260–264 11
265–269 16
270–274 23
275–279 12
280–284 16
285–289 10
290–294 12
295–299 12
300–304 8
305–309 13
310–314 13
315–319 6
320–324 10
325–329 9
330–334 7
335–339 10
340–344 10
345–349 7
350–354 4
355–359 10
360–364 3
365–369 7
370–374 2
375–379 8
380–384 4
385–389 5
390–394 5
395–399 2
400–404 2
405–409 4
410–414 3
415–419 2
420–424 5
425–429 3
430–434 1
435 1
436+ 100
Download as CSV

Michael Thomas Ewing publication distribution in Business and Management in 2026 - data summary

  • The chart plots the publication count of all 3,017 Business and Management scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026, grouped into 82 ranges running from 35–39 to 436+ publications.
  • Michael Thomas Ewing, a Business and Management scholar from Southern Cross University, records 185 publications - the 70th percentile of the discipline.
  • 70% of ranked Business and Management scientists score the same or lower than Michael Thomas Ewing, and about 30% score higher.
  • The median of the discipline falls in the 135–139 publications range, and Michael Thomas Ewing ranks above the median.
  • The most crowded range is 95–99 publications, holding 122 scientists (4% of the field).
  • 52% of the field sits in the lowest quarter of the value range (up to 135–139 publications), so the distribution is heavily right-skewed and high scores are rare.
  • The final bar has no upper bound: it groups every scientist with 436 publications or more, 100 scientists in all (3% of the field).

Michael Thomas Ewing D-index placement in Business and Management in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Business and Management scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Michael Thomas Ewing sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
50 100 150
Bar chart with 60 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30 to 89+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 171. Most scientists, 171, have 32 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 89 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 54 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30 D-Index: 156 scientists 31 D-Index: 159 scientists 32 D-Index: 171 scientists 33 D-Index: 161 scientists 34 D-Index: 135 scientists 35 D-Index: 124 scientists 36 D-Index: 114 scientists 37 D-Index: 111 scientists 38 D-Index: 103 scientists 39 D-Index: 89 scientists 40 D-Index: 81 scientists 41 D-Index: 97 scientists 42 D-Index: 80 scientists 43 D-Index: 69 scientists 44 D-Index: 68 scientists 45 D-Index: 63 scientists 46 D-Index: 54 scientists 47 D-Index: 69 scientists 48 D-Index: 50 scientists 49 D-Index: 58 scientists 50 D-Index: 54 scientists 51 D-Index: 62 scientists 52 D-Index: 54 scientists 53 D-Index: 43 scientists 54 D-Index: 49 scientists 55 D-Index: 35 scientists 56 D-Index: 40 scientists 57 D-Index: 44 scientists 58 D-Index: 34 scientists 59 D-Index: 29 scientists 60 D-Index: 48 scientists 61 D-Index: 32 scientists 62 D-Index: 30 scientists 63 D-Index: 22 scientists 64 D-Index: 22 scientists 65 D-Index: 19 scientists 66 D-Index: 20 scientists 67 D-Index: 18 scientists 68 D-Index: 17 scientists 69 D-Index: 21 scientists 70 D-Index: 20 scientists 71 D-Index: 19 scientists 72 D-Index: 14 scientists 73 D-Index: 10 scientists 74 D-Index: 16 scientists 75 D-Index: 24 scientists 76 D-Index: 13 scientists 77 D-Index: 19 scientists 78 D-Index: 8 scientists 79 D-Index: 6 scientists 80 D-Index: 4 scientists 81 D-Index: 12 scientists 82 D-Index: 7 scientists 83 D-Index: 7 scientists 84 D-Index: 6 scientists 85 D-Index: 10 scientists 86 D-Index: 4 scientists 87 D-Index: 11 scientists 88 D-Index: 6 scientists 89+ D-Index: 96 scientists
30 D-Index 89+

This scientist: 54 D-Index — 75th percentile

75% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 89 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Business and Management scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 3,017 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30 156
31 159
32 171
33 161
34 135
35 124
36 114
37 111
38 103
39 89
40 81
41 97
42 80
43 69
44 68
45 63
46 54
47 69
48 50
49 58
50 54
51 62
52 54
53 43
54 49 54
55 35
56 40
57 44
58 34
59 29
60 48
61 32
62 30
63 22
64 22
65 19
66 20
67 18
68 17
69 21
70 20
71 19
72 14
73 10
74 16
75 24
76 13
77 19
78 8
79 6
80 4
81 12
82 7
83 7
84 6
85 10
86 4
87 11
88 6
89+ 96
Download as CSV

Michael Thomas Ewing D-index placement in Business and Management in 2026 - data summary

  • The chart plots the discipline H-index (D-index) of all 3,017 Business and Management scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026, grouped into 60 ranges running from 30 to 89+ D-Index.
  • Michael Thomas Ewing, a Business and Management scholar from Southern Cross University, records 54 D-Index - the 75th percentile of the discipline.
  • 75% of ranked Business and Management scientists score the same or lower than Michael Thomas Ewing, and about 25% score higher.
  • The median of the discipline falls in the 42 D-Index range, and Michael Thomas Ewing ranks above the median.
  • The most crowded range is 32 D-Index, holding 171 scientists (6% of the field).
  • 57% of the field sits in the lowest quarter of the value range (up to 44 D-Index), so the distribution is heavily right-skewed and high scores are rare.
  • The final bar has no upper bound: it groups every scientist with 89 D-Index or more, 96 scientists in all (3% of the field).

Overview

What is he best known for?

The fields of study he is best known for:

  • Marketing
  • Social psychology
  • Social science

His scientific interests lie mostly in Marketing, Advertising, Scale, Value and Context. His Accounting research extends to the thematically linked field of Marketing. His research on Advertising frequently links to adjacent areas such as Internal marketing.

Michael Thomas Ewing has included themes like Reliability, Multimedia, Applied psychology and Measure in his Scale study. His Value research is multidisciplinary, incorporating perspectives in Intermediary, Speculation and The Internet. The concepts of his Brand management study are interwoven with issues in Brand equity and Report card.

His most cited work include:

  • Captivating company: dimensions of attractiveness in employer branding (526 citations)
  • The Effects of the Social Structure of Digital Networks on Viral Marketing Performance (235 citations)
  • How corporate reputation, quality, and value influence online loyalty (193 citations)

What are the main themes of his work throughout his whole career to date?

Marketing, Advertising, Public relations, Social psychology and Brand management are his primary areas of study. His research combines Public sector and Marketing. His study in the field of Advertising research is also linked to topics like Recall.

He undertakes multidisciplinary investigations into Social psychology and Salient in his work. As a part of the same scientific family, Michael Thomas Ewing mostly works in the field of Brand management, focusing on Brand equity and, on occasion, Brand awareness. His work in Marketing research is not limited to one particular discipline; it also encompasses Digital marketing.

He most often published in these fields:

  • Marketing (51.85%)
  • Advertising (24.87%)
  • Public relations (14.81%)

What were the highlights of his more recent work (between 2012-2021)?

  • Marketing (51.85%)
  • Advertising (24.87%)
  • Social psychology (12.17%)

In recent papers he was focusing on the following fields of study:

The scientist’s investigation covers issues in Marketing, Advertising, Social psychology, Customer retention and Applied psychology. His research in Marketing intersects with topics in Construct, Perspective and Key. His Advertising research incorporates elements of Empirical research, Agency and Organizational citizenship behavior.

Michael Thomas Ewing has researched Social psychology in several fields, including Value and Clinical psychology. His Customer retention research integrates issues from Incentive, Profitability index and Customer advocacy. His Brand management study which covers Presentation that intersects with Public relations.

Between 2012 and 2021, his most popular works were:

  • Brand rivalry and community conflict (56 citations)
  • Knowledge about sports-related concussion: is the message getting through to coaches and trainers? (54 citations)
  • Concussion guidelines need to move from only expert content to also include implementation and dissemination strategies (45 citations)

In his most recent research, the most cited papers focused on:

  • Marketing
  • Social psychology
  • Social science

Michael Thomas Ewing spends much of his time researching Marketing, Social psychology, Social marketing, Customer retention and Physical therapy. Michael Thomas Ewing performs integrative study on Marketing and Competitive disadvantage. The Social psychology study combines topics in areas such as Item bias, Rasch model and Compromise.

His work in the fields of Customer retention, such as Customer intelligence, overlaps with other areas such as Context and Potential impact. In his research on the topic of Advertising, Originality is strongly related with Organizational citizenship behavior. The study incorporates disciplines such as Marketing research, Brand extension and Target audience in addition to Survey data collection.

Best Publications

  • Captivating company: dimensions of attractiveness in employer branding

    Pierre R Berthon;Michael Thomas Ewing;Li Lian Hah

  • Employment branding in the knowledge economy

    Michael Thomas Ewing;Leyland F Pitt;Nigel M de Bussy;Pierre R Berthon

  • How corporate reputation, quality, and value influence online loyalty

    Albert Caruana;Michael Thomas Ewing

  • Brand management in small to medium-sized enterprises

    Pierre R Berthon;Michael Thomas Ewing;Julie Napoli

  • Developing and validating a multidimensional nonprofit brand orientation scale

    Michael Thomas Ewing;Julie Napoli

  • The Effects of the Social Structure of Digital Networks on Viral Marketing Performance

    Mauro Bampo;Michael Thomas Ewing;Dineli R Mather;David Brunton Stewart

  • Assessment of the three-column format SERVQUAL : an experimental approach

    Albert Caruana;Michael T. Ewing;Balasubramanian Ramaseshan

  • Potential Research Space in MIS: A Framework for Envisioning and Evaluating Research Replication, Extension, and Generation

    Pierre Berthon;Leyland Pitt;Michael Ewing;Christopher L. Carr

  • Aesthetic theory and logo design: examining consumer response to proportion across cultures

    Narelle Pittard;Michael Thomas Ewing;Colin Peter Jevons

  • An internal marketing approach to public sector management: The marketing and human resources interface

    Michael T. Ewing;Albert Caruana

  • Effects of some Environmental Challenges and Centralization on the Entrepreneurial Orientation and Performance of Public Sector Entities

    Albert Caruana;Michael T. Ewing;B. Ramaseshan

  • The effect of product placement in computer games on brand attitude and recall

    Thomas Mackay;Michael Thomas Ewing;Fiona Joy Newton;Lydia Elisabeth Windisch

  • Developing a scale to measure the enjoyment of Web experiences

    Aleck Lin;Shirley Gregor;Michael Thomas Ewing

  • The impact of the Internet on the distribution value chain: The case of the South African tourism industry

    Clive Wynne;Pierre Berthon;Leyland Pitt;Michael Ewing

  • Children's understanding of the selling versus persuasive intent of junk food advertising: Implications for regulation

    Owen B.J. Carter;Lisa J. Patterson;Robert J. Donovan;Michael T. Ewing

  • Do universities that are more market orientated perform better

    Albert Caruana;Balasubramanian Ramaseshan;Michael T. Ewing

  • Integrated marketing communications measurement and evaluation

    Michael Thomas Ewing

  • The Effect of Anomie on Academic Dishonesty among University Students.

    Albert Caruana;Balasubramanian Ramaseshan;Michael T. Ewing

  • Corollaries of the Collective: The Influence of Organizational Culture and Memory Development on Perceived Decision-Making Context

    Pierre Berthon;Leyland F Pitt;Michael Thomas Ewing

  • Managing B2B customer churn, retention and profitability

    Ali Tamaddoni Jahromi;Stanislav Stakhovych;Michael Thomas Ewing

  • Stakeholder theory and internal marketing communications: a framework for analysing the influence of new media

    Nigel M de Bussy;Michael Thomas Ewing;Leyland F Pitt

Frequent Co-Authors

Leyland Pitt
Leyland Pitt Simon Fraser University
Albert Caruana
Albert Caruana University of Malta
Pierre Berthon
Pierre Berthon Bentley University
Robert J. Donovan
Robert J. Donovan University of Western Australia
Caroline F. Finch
Caroline F. Finch Edith Cowan University
Richard T. Watson
Richard T. Watson University of Georgia
Ajay Mahal
Ajay Mahal University of Melbourne
Paul McCrory
Paul McCrory Florey Institute of Neuroscience and Mental Health
Shirley Gregor
Shirley Gregor Australian National University
Adrian Bauman
Adrian Bauman University of Sydney

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

If you're interested in expanding your expertise beyond core Business and Management studies, there are a variety of related online degrees that can help advance your career. Many students today are choosing fast-paced, flexible study options―for example, fast track college programs allow you to finish your degree and start your career sooner.

Specialized fields are also available online, such as construction management colleges and online healthcare degrees. These programs prepare graduates for in-demand roles in growing sectors.

For those mindful of tuition costs, finding the cheapest online business management degree can lead to a strong education with less financial strain. Whether you want to specialize in healthcare, construction, or streamline your business studies, exploring these diverse online options can open doors to rewarding and dynamic career pathways.

Best Scientists Citing Michael Thomas Ewing

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles