D-Index & Metrics Best Publications

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-index D-index (Discipline H-index) only includes papers and citation values for an examined discipline in contrast to General H-index which accounts for publications across all disciplines. Citations Publications World Ranking National Ranking
Psychology D-index 32 Citations 6,972 87 World Ranking 6909 National Ranking 96

Overview

What is he best known for?

The fields of study he is best known for:

  • Social psychology
  • Social science
  • The Internet

Karolien Poels spends much of his time researching Social psychology, Multimedia, Usability, Human–computer interaction and Game mechanics. The Social psychology study combines topics in areas such as Developmental psychology and Library science. His Multimedia study incorporates themes from Factor structure and Internet privacy.

His work deals with themes such as User experience design and Immersion, which intersect with Usability. His study in Game mechanics is interdisciplinary in nature, drawing from both Game design, Game Developer and Game design document. His Game art design study in the realm of Game Developer connects with subjects such as Perspective and Interface.

His most cited work include:

  • Digital game design for elderly users (379 citations)
  • How to Capture the Heart? Reviewing 20 Years of Emotion Measurement in Advertising (264 citations)
  • Patterns and Universals of Adult Romantic Attachment Across 62 Cultural Regions Are Models of Self and of Other Pancultural Constructs (227 citations)

What are the main themes of his work throughout his whole career to date?

Karolien Poels mainly focuses on Advertising, Social psychology, Internet privacy, Perception and Bystander effect. His work on Targeted advertising and Brand awareness is typically connected to Context and Regulatory focus theory as part of general Advertising study, connecting several disciplines of science. His Social psychology research incorporates themes from Developmental psychology and Focus group.

His Focus group study frequently draws connections to adjacent fields such as Applied psychology. His Perception study frequently links to related topics such as Point. His study in Theory of planned behavior extends to Bystander effect with its themes.

He most often published in these fields:

  • Advertising (34.25%)
  • Social psychology (31.49%)
  • Internet privacy (8.29%)

What were the highlights of his more recent work (between 2016-2021)?

  • Advertising (34.25%)
  • Internet privacy (8.29%)
  • Persuasion (4.42%)

In recent papers he was focusing on the following fields of study:

Advertising, Internet privacy, Persuasion, Social psychology and Targeted advertising are his primary areas of study. His work on Point as part of general Advertising research is often related to Focus, thus linking different fields of science. His Persuasion study integrates concerns from other disciplines, such as Social support and News media.

The study of Social psychology is intertwined with the study of Skepticism in a number of ways. The various areas that Karolien Poels examines in his Targeted advertising study include Perceived control, Advertising campaign and Salience. His studies deal with areas such as Factorial survey, Brand engagement and Social network as well as Personalization.

Between 2016 and 2021, his most popular works were:

  • Like or dislike? Adolescents’ responses to personalized social network site advertising (34 citations)
  • Predicting Consumer Responses to a Chatbot on Facebook. (33 citations)
  • Do you like cookies? Adolescents' skeptical processing of retargeted Facebook-ads and the moderating role of privacy concern and a textual debriefing (31 citations)

In his most recent research, the most cited papers focused on:

  • Social psychology
  • Social science
  • The Internet

Karolien Poels focuses on Advertising, Internet privacy, Point, Chatbot and Native advertising. Karolien Poels is studying Marketing communication, which is a component of Advertising. Karolien Poels has included themes like Social network, Brand engagement and Personalization in his Internet privacy study.

Karolien Poels combines subjects such as Perception and Literacy with his study of Point. His work deals with themes such as Helpfulness, Affect and Intrusiveness, which intersect with Chatbot. His biological study spans a wide range of topics, including Transparency, Credibility, News media and Deception.

This overview was generated by a machine learning system which analysed the scientist’s body of work. If you have any feedback, you can contact us here.

Best Publications

The Geographic Distribution of Big Five Personality Traits Patterns and Profiles of Human Self-Description Across 56 Nations

David P. Schmitt;Jüri Allik;Robert R. McCrae;Verónica Benet-Martínez.
Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology (2007)

1343 Citations

Digital game design for elderly users

Wijnand Ijsselsteijn;Henk Herman Nap;Yvonne de Kort;Karolien Poels.
conference on future play (2007)

642 Citations

The Game Experience Questionnaire

WA Wijnand IJsselsteijn;de Yaw Yvonne Kort;K Karolien Poels.
(2013)

482 Citations

How to Capture the Heart? Reviewing 20 Years of Emotion Measurement in Advertising

Karolien Poels;Siegfried Dewitte.
Journal of Advertising Research (2006)

478 Citations

Patterns and Universals of Adult Romantic Attachment Across 62 Cultural Regions Are Models of Self and of Other Pancultural Constructs

David P. Schmitt;Lidia Alcalay;Melissa Allensworth;Jüri Allik.
Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology (2004)

445 Citations

Characterising and measuring user experiences in digital games

WA Wijnand IJsselsteijn;de Yaw Yvonne Kort;K Karolien Poels;A Jurgelionis.
conference; ACE 2007; 2007-06-13; 2007-06-15 (2007)

383 Citations

D3.3 : Game Experience Questionnaire:development of a self-report measure to assess the psychological impact of digital games

K Karolien Poels;de Yaw Yvonne Kort;WA Wijnand IJsselsteijn.
(2007)

327 Citations

"It is always a lot of fun!": exploring dimensions of digital game experience using focus group methodology

Karolien Poels;Yvonne de Kort;Wijnand Ijsselsteijn.
conference on future play (2007)

319 Citations

Cyberbullying on social network sites. An experimental study into bystanders' behavioural intentions to help the victim or reinforce the bully

Sara Bastiaensens;Heidi Vandebosch;Karolien Poels;Katrien Van Cleemput.
Computers in Human Behavior (2014)

308 Citations

A meta-analysis of serious digital games for healthy lifestyle promotion.

Ann DeSmet;Dimitri Van Ryckeghem;Sofie Compernolle;Tom Baranowski.
Preventive Medicine (2014)

276 Citations

Best Scientists Citing Karolien Poels

Lennart E. Nacke

Lennart E. Nacke

University of Waterloo

Publications: 28

Niklas Ravaja

Niklas Ravaja

University of Helsinki

Publications: 20

Fons J. R. van de Vijver

Fons J. R. van de Vijver

Tilburg University

Publications: 20

David P. Schmitt

David P. Schmitt

Brunel University London

Publications: 19

Anu Realo

Anu Realo

University of Warwick

Publications: 18

Samuel D. Gosling

Samuel D. Gosling

The University of Texas at Austin

Publications: 16

Jüri Allik

Jüri Allik

University of Tartu

Publications: 15

Paul Cairns

Paul Cairns

University of York

Publications: 14

David W. Kaufman

David W. Kaufman

Simon Fraser University

Publications: 14

WA Wijnand IJsselsteijn

WA Wijnand IJsselsteijn

Eindhoven University of Technology

Publications: 13

Robert R. McCrae

Robert R. McCrae

Independent Scientist / Consultant, US

Publications: 12

Panos Markopoulos

Panos Markopoulos

Eindhoven University of Technology

Publications: 12

Mike J. Dixon

Mike J. Dixon

University of Waterloo

Publications: 12

Tom Baranowski

Tom Baranowski

Baylor College of Medicine

Publications: 12

Christian Montag

Christian Montag

University of Ulm

Publications: 12

Peter J. Rentfrow

Peter J. Rentfrow

University of Cambridge

Publications: 10

Profile was last updated on December 6th, 2021.
Research.com Ranking is based on data retrieved from the Microsoft Academic Graph (MAG).
The ranking d-index is inferred from publications deemed to belong to the considered discipline.

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Contact us
Something went wrong. Please try again later.