What is he best known for?
The fields of study he is best known for:
- Artificial intelligence
- Cognition
- Statistics
Mike J. Dixon mainly investigates Social psychology, Cognitive psychology, Developmental psychology, Slot machine and Cognition.
His Social psychology research is multidisciplinary, relying on both Game play and Sight.
His research brings together the fields of Grapheme-color synesthesia and Cognitive psychology.
He has researched Grapheme-color synesthesia in several fields, including Color vision and Communication.
His Developmental psychology research incorporates themes from External validity and Cognitive disorder.
His work carried out in the field of Cognition brings together such families of science as Vigilance and Audiology.
His most cited work include:
- Google Earth Engine: Planetary-scale geospatial analysis for everyone (2202 citations)
- Not all synaesthetes are created equal: projector versus associator synaesthetes. (257 citations)
- Five plus two equals yellow (200 citations)
What are the main themes of his work throughout his whole career to date?
Cognitive psychology, Artificial intelligence, Social psychology, Computer vision and Communication are his primary areas of study.
His work in Cognitive psychology addresses subjects such as Cognition, which are connected to disciplines such as Developmental psychology.
His Developmental psychology research integrates issues from Cognitive disorder and Audiology.
In his study, Visual agnosia is inextricably linked to Pattern recognition, which falls within the broad field of Artificial intelligence.
His Social psychology study frequently intersects with other fields, such as Outcome.
His work on Motion as part of his general Computer vision study is frequently connected to Process, thereby bridging the divide between different branches of science.
He most often published in these fields:
- Cognitive psychology (25.98%)
- Artificial intelligence (19.61%)
- Social psychology (14.71%)
What were the highlights of his more recent work (between 2016-2021)?
- Social psychology (14.71%)
- Scratch (4.41%)
- Cognitive psychology (25.98%)
In recent papers he was focusing on the following fields of study:
The scientist’s investigation covers issues in Social psychology, Scratch, Cognitive psychology, Affect and Preference.
His study in Social psychology is interdisciplinary in nature, drawing from both Context and Outcome.
His research is interdisciplinary, bridging the disciplines of Automaticity and Cognitive psychology.
He interconnects Persistence, Finance, Multilevel model and Boredom in the investigation of issues within Affect.
His Preference research is multidisciplinary, incorporating perspectives in Presentation, Depiction, Debiasing, Information retrieval and Selection.
His World Wide Web research includes elements of Remote sensing, Remote sensing, Geospatial analysis and Big data.
Between 2016 and 2021, his most popular works were:
- Google Earth Engine: Planetary-scale geospatial analysis for everyone (2202 citations)
- Near-Misses and Stop Buttons in Slot Machine Play: An Investigation of How They Affect Players, and May Foster Erroneous Cognitions. (44 citations)
- Dark Flow, Depression and Multiline Slot Machine Play (38 citations)
In his most recent research, the most cited papers focused on:
- Artificial intelligence
- Cognition
- Statistics
Mike J. Dixon spends much of his time researching Social psychology, Affect, Dark flow, Outcome and Slot machine.
His Social psychology studies intersect with other disciplines such as Near miss, Skin conductance and Scratch.
His Affect research is multidisciplinary, incorporating elements of Persistence and Finance.
He works mostly in the field of Outcome, limiting it down to topics relating to Arousal and, in certain cases, Frustration.
Mike J. Dixon integrates several fields in his works, including Slot machine and Cognitive psychology.
The concepts of his Cognitive psychology study are interwoven with issues in Illusion of control, Cognition, Cognitive bias and Perception.
This overview was generated by a machine learning system which analysed the scientist’s
body of work. If you have any feedback, you can
contact us
here.
