World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
37
Citations
5872
World Ranking
9187
National Ranking
106

Beat Meier publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Beat Meier sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 216 publications — 73rd percentile

73% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Beat Meier D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Beat Meier sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 37 D-Index — 21st percentile

21% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

Beat Meier is affiliated with the University of Bern in Switzerland. Their research contributions span multiple fields, primarily focusing on neuroscience and psychology. The scientist has a strong background in cognitive neuroscience and experimental and cognitive psychology, with additional work in plant science, materials chemistry, and neurology.

Meier's research encompasses several key topics including:

  • Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
  • Cognitive Functions and Memory
  • Memory Processes and Influences
  • Cognitive Abilities and Testing
  • Multisensory Perception and Integration
  • Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Studies
  • Olfactory and Sensory Function Studies

Among their recent papers are:

  • The hypnagogic state: A brief update, 2022, Journal of Sleep Research
  • The left prefrontal cortex determines relevance at encoding and governs episodic memory formation, 2022, Cerebral Cortex
  • Different temporal dynamics after conflicts and errors in children and adults, 2020, PLoS ONE
  • Stimulating the parietal cortex by transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS): no effects on attention and memory, 2020, AIMS neuroscience
  • Fostering cognitive performance in older adults with a process- and a strategy-based cognitive training, 2022, Aging Neuropsychology and Cognition

The scientist frequently publishes in various venues including the Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, The Cambridge Structural Database, Zeitschrift für Phytotherapie, Journal of Sleep Research, and Cerebral Cortex.

Meier has collaborated regularly with several coauthors such as Mirela Dubravac, Michèle C. Muhmenthaler, Romain Ghibellini, Stefan Klöppel, and Katharina Henke. The collaboration counts range up to seven joint works with Mirela Dubravac.

Best Publications

  • The concurrent validity of the N-back task as a working memory measure

    Susanne M Jaeggi;Martin Buschkuehl;Walter J Perrig;Beat Meier

  • Stress effects on working memory, explicit memory, and implicit memory for neutral and emotional stimuli in healthy men

    Mathias Luethi;Beat Meier;Carmen Sandi

  • Enhanced memory ability: Insights from synaesthesia

    Nicolas Rothen;Beat Meier;Jamie Ward

  • The rise and decline of prospective memory performance across the lifespan

    Thomas D. Zimmermann;Beat Meier

  • How important is importance for prospective memory? A review

    Stefan Walter;Beat Meier

  • Dimensional structure of the Yale-Brown Obsessive-Compulsive Scale (Y-BOCS).

    Steffen Moritz;Beat Meier;Martin Kloss;Dirk Jacobsen

  • Transfer appropriate processing for prospective memory tests

    Beat Meier;Peter Graf

  • The Effect of Implementation Intentions on Prospective Memory Performance across the Lifespan

    Thomas D. Zimmermann;Beat Meier

  • Higher Prevalence of Synaesthesia in Art Students

    Nicolas Rothen;Beat Meier

  • Grapheme-color synaesthesia is associated with a distinct cognitive style

    Beat Meier;Nicolas Rothen

  • Swimming-style synesthesia.

    Danko Nikolić;Uta M. Jürgens;Uta M. Jürgens;Nicolas Rothen;Beat Meier

  • Do synesthetes have a general advantage in visual search and episodic memory? A case for group studies.

    Nicolas Rothen;Beat Meier

  • Training grapheme-colour associations produces a synaesthetic Stroop effect, but not a conditioned synaesthetic response.

    Beat Meier;Nicolas Rothen

  • Grapheme–colour synaesthesia yields an ordinary rather than extraordinary memory advantage: Evidence from a group study

    Nicolas Rothen;Beat Meier

  • Retrieval experience in prospective memory: strategic monitoring and spontaneous retrieval.

    Beat Meier;Thomas D. Zimmermann;Walter J. Perrig

  • Sex Differences in Semantic Processing: Event-Related Brain Potentials Distinguish between Lower and Higher Order Semantic Analysis during Word Reading

    M Wirth;H Horn;T Koenig;M Stein

  • Bivalency is Costly: Bivalent Stimuli Elicit Cautious Responding

    Todd S. Woodward;Beat Meier;Christine Tipper;Peter Graf

  • Low reliability of perceptual priming: consequences for the interpretation of functional dissociations between explicit and implicit memory.

    Beat Meier;Walter J. Perrig

  • Offline consolidation in implicit sequence learning

    Beat Meier;Josephine Cock

  • Personality and Memory in Old Age

    Beat Meier;Pasqualina Perrig-Chiello;Walter Perrig

  • How important is importance for prospective memory

    Stefan Markus Walter;Beat Meier

Frequent Co-Authors

René M. Müri
René M. Müri University of Bern
Claudia M. Roebers
Claudia M. Roebers University of Bern
Todd S. Woodward
Todd S. Woodward University of British Columbia
Thomas Koenig
Thomas Koenig University of Bern
Walter J. Perrig
Walter J. Perrig University of Bern
Jamie Ward
Jamie Ward University of Sussex
Peter Graf
Peter Graf University of British Columbia
Fred W. Mast
Fred W. Mast University of Bern
Steffen Moritz
Steffen Moritz University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf
Susanne M. Jaeggi
Susanne M. Jaeggi University of California, Irvine

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring psychology in the USA often leads students to consider related online degrees and specialized career pathways. Many choose interdisciplinary fields such as social work or applied behavior analysis (ABA), where a strong psychology foundation is highly valued. For those interested in social work, it’s helpful to research the most valuable online social work degree programs in Texas to find flexible and reputable options.

Applied behavior analysis is another popular option for psychology graduates. Students aiming to become Board Certified Behavior Analysts (BCBA) should understand specific requirements in their state. Researching the steps for becoming a bcba in Vermont, becoming a bcba in Virginia, and the bcba certification requirements in Washington can help you plan your path based on location and licensing regulations.

Whether you’re considering social work or behavior analysis, online programs can provide flexibility and open doors to diverse, meaningful careers closely tied to psychology.

Best Scientists Citing Beat Meier

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles