World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Clay B. Holroyd

Clay B. Holroyd

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
63
Citations
22766
World Ranking
3060
National Ranking
190

Clay B. Holroyd publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Clay B. Holroyd sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 135 publications — 41st percentile

41% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Clay B. Holroyd D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Clay B. Holroyd sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 63 D-Index — 73rd percentile

73% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

Clay B. Holroyd is affiliated with the University of Victoria in Canada and works primarily in the field of neuroscience. Their research spans multiple subfields including cognitive neuroscience, social psychology, general decision sciences, psychiatry and mental health, and cellular and molecular neuroscience.

Holroyd's research topics cover a range of areas related to brain function and behavior. These topics include neural dynamics and brain function, neural and behavioral psychology studies, functional brain connectivity studies, EEG and brain-computer interfaces, motor control and adaptation, memory and neural mechanisms, and action observation and synchronization.

Among recent publications, notable papers authored by Holroyd include:

  • Interbrain synchrony: on wavy ground (2022, Trends in Neurosciences)
  • The Best Laid Plans: Computational Principles of Anterior Cingulate Cortex (2021, Trends in Cognitive Sciences)

Frequent coauthors working alongside Holroyd include Daniel H. Mathalon, Ricardo J. Alejandro, Brian J. Roach, Judith M. Ford, and Susanna L. Fryer.

The main venues where Holroyd has published work are varied but show a concentration in certain journals. These include bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory), NeuroImage, Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, Psychophysiology, and Scientific Reports.

Holroyd's body of work demonstrates a consistent focus on understanding the neural mechanisms underlying cognition, behavior, and brain connectivity using various methodologies. Their contributions span experimental and computational neuroscience, with particular attention to brain dynamics and decision-making processes.

Best Publications

  • The neural basis of human error processing: Reinforcement learning, dopamine, and the error-related negativity.

    Clay B. Holroyd;Michael G. H. Coles

  • The feedback-related negativity reflects the binary evaluation of good versus bad outcomes

    Greg Hajcak;Jason S. Moser;Clay B. Holroyd;Robert F. Simons

  • Motivation of extended behaviors by anterior cingulate cortex

    Clay B. Holroyd;Nick Yeung

  • Reinforcement-related brain potentials from medial frontal cortex: origins and functional significance

    Sander Nieuwenhuis;Clay B Holroyd;Nisan Mol;Michael G.H Coles

  • The feedback correct-related positivity: sensitivity of the event-related brain potential to unexpected positive feedback.

    Clay B. Holroyd;Kaivon L. Pakzad-Vaezi;Olave E. Krigolson

  • Dorsal anterior cingulate cortex shows fMRI response to internal and external error signals

    Clay B Holroyd;Sander Nieuwenhuis;Sander Nieuwenhuis;Nick Yeung;Leigh Nystrom

  • ERP Correlates of Feedback and Reward Processing in the Presence and Absence of Response Choice

    Nick Yeung;Clay B. Holroyd;Jonathan D. Cohen

  • Brain potentials associated with expected and unexpected good and bad outcomes.

    Greg Hajcak;Clay B. Holroyd;Jason S. Moser;Robert F. Simons

  • It's worse than you thought: The feedback negativity and violations of reward prediction in gambling tasks

    Greg Hajcak;Jason S. Moser;Clay B. Holroyd;Robert F. Simons

  • Why is there an ERN/Ne on correct trials? Response representations, stimulus-related components, and the theory of error-processing

    Michael G.H Coles;Marten K Scheffers;Clay B Holroyd

  • Errors in reward prediction are reflected in the event-related brain potential.

    Clay B. Holroyd;Sander Nieuwenhuis;Nick Yeung;Jonathan D. Cohen

  • Context dependence of the event-related brain potential associated with reward and punishment.

    Clay B. Holroyd;Jeff T. Larsen;Jonathan D. Cohen

  • Error-related scalp potentials elicited by hand and foot movements: evidence for an output-independent error-processing system in humans

    Clay B Holroyd;Joseph Dien;Michael G.H Coles

  • The good, the bad and the neutral: electrophysiological responses to feedback stimuli.

    Clay B. Holroyd;Greg Hajcak;Jeff T. Larsen

  • A computational account of altered error processing in older age: dopamine and the error-related negativity.

    Sander Nieuwenhuis;K. Richard Ridderinkhof;Durk Talsma;Michael G. H. Coles;Michael G. H. Coles

  • Sensitivity of Electrophysiological Activity from Medial Frontal Cortex to Utilitarian and Performance Feedback

    Sander Nieuwenhuis;Nick Yeung;Clay B. Holroyd;Aaron Schurger

  • Reward prediction error signals associated with a modified time estimation task.

    Clay B. Holroyd;Olave E. Krigolson

  • Knowing good from bad: differential activation of human cortical areas by positive and negative outcomes

    Sander Nieuwenhuis;Heleen A. Slagter;Niels J. Alting von Geusau;Dirk J. Heslenfeld

  • Activity in human reward-sensitive brain areas is strongly context dependent.

    Sander Nieuwenhuis;Dirk J. Heslenfeld;Niels J. Alting von Geusau;Rogier B. Mars;Rogier B. Mars

  • Detection of synchronized oscillations in the electroencephalogram: An evaluation of methods

    Nick Yeung;Rafal Bogacz;Clay B. Holroyd;Jonathan D. Cohen;Jonathan D. Cohen

Frequent Co-Authors

Michael G. H. Coles
Michael G. H. Coles University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
Nick Yeung
Nick Yeung University of Oxford
Jonathan D. Cohen
Jonathan D. Cohen Princeton University
Rogier B. Mars
Rogier B. Mars University of Oxford
Johannes Hewig
Johannes Hewig University of Würzburg
Wolfgang H. R. Miltner
Wolfgang H. R. Miltner Friedrich Schiller University Jena
James W. Tanaka
James W. Tanaka University of Victoria
Jeremy K. Seamans
Jeremy K. Seamans University of British Columbia
Greg Hajcak
Greg Hajcak Santa Clara University
Tim Stockwell
Tim Stockwell University of Victoria

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing a psychology degree in the USA opens a wide range of career opportunities, including in-demand roles such as Marriage and Family Therapist (MFT). Online programs make it easier than ever to earn credentials and begin working toward licensure. However, requirements for certification and practice can vary significantly by location.

For instance, the North Las Vegas mft certification requirements highlight the necessity of graduate-level education, supervised clinical experience, and state-specific exams. If you’re interested in California, check the steps on how to become an mft in Oakland for more detailed guidelines.

Each state sets its own criteria. The Oklahoma City mft certification requirements discuss clinical supervision hour requirements, while the Omaha mft certification requirements outline Nebraska-specific licensing regulations.

Exploring online psychology degrees is a key first step. Be sure to research your state’s licensing requirements to ensure your education aligns with your desired career pathway.

Best Scientists Citing Clay B. Holroyd

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles