World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Clay B. Holroyd

Clay B. Holroyd

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 63 3060 2817 190 176 135 22766

Clay B. Holroyd publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Clay B. Holroyd between 1995 and 2026, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Clay B. Holroyd published across 32 years, from 1995 to 2026, averaging 5.1 papers a year. Output peaked at 12 publications in 2024. 11 of the 162 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1995 to 2026. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 12. Peak 12 publications in 2024. 1995: 1 publication 1996: 0 publications 1997: 0 publications 1998: 1 publication 1999: 0 publications 2000: 0 publications 2001: 1 publication 2002: 4 publications 2003: 3 publications 2004: 8 publications 2005: 6 publications 2006: 3 publications 2007: 8 publications 2008: 10 publications 2009: 6 publications 2010: 5 publications 2011: 9 publications 2012: 6 publications 2013: 8 publications 2014: 3 publications 2015: 8 publications 2016: 6 publications 2017: 9 publications 2018: 9 publications 2019: 7 publications 2020: 4 publications 2021: 6 publications 2022: 3 publications 2023: 5 publications 2024: 12 publications 2025: 10 publications 2026: 1 publication
1995 2026

162 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Clay B. Holroyd: publications per year, 1995 to 2026
Year Publications
1995 1
1996 0
1997 0
1998 1
1999 0
2000 0
2001 1
2002 4
2003 3
2004 8
2005 6
2006 3
2007 8
2008 10
2009 6
2010 5
2011 9
2012 6
2013 8
2014 3
2015 8
2016 6
2017 9
2018 9
2019 7
2020 4
2021 6
2022 3
2023 5
2024 12
2025 10
2026 1
Total 162
Download as CSV

Clay B. Holroyd publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Clay B. Holroyd sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 131–140 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 135 publications — 41st percentile

41% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605
91–100 713
101–110 736
111–120 686
121–130 670
131–140 644 135
141–150 597
151–160 576
161–170 477
171–180 450
181–190 397
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

Clay B. Holroyd D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Clay B. Holroyd sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 62–63 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 63 D-Index — 73rd percentile

73% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671
36–37 659
38–39 641
40–41 671
42–43 617
44–45 558
46–47 495
48–49 487
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248 63
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Clay B. Holroyd is affiliated with the University of Victoria in Canada and works primarily in the field of neuroscience. Their research spans multiple subfields including cognitive neuroscience, social psychology, general decision sciences, psychiatry and mental health, and cellular and molecular neuroscience.

Holroyd's research topics cover a range of areas related to brain function and behavior. These topics include neural dynamics and brain function, neural and behavioral psychology studies, functional brain connectivity studies, EEG and brain-computer interfaces, motor control and adaptation, memory and neural mechanisms, and action observation and synchronization.

Among recent publications, notable papers authored by Holroyd include:

  • Interbrain synchrony: on wavy ground (2022, Trends in Neurosciences)
  • The Best Laid Plans: Computational Principles of Anterior Cingulate Cortex (2021, Trends in Cognitive Sciences)

Frequent coauthors working alongside Holroyd include Daniel H. Mathalon, Ricardo J. Alejandro, Brian J. Roach, Judith M. Ford, and Susanna L. Fryer.

The main venues where Holroyd has published work are varied but show a concentration in certain journals. These include bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory), NeuroImage, Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, Psychophysiology, and Scientific Reports.

Holroyd's body of work demonstrates a consistent focus on understanding the neural mechanisms underlying cognition, behavior, and brain connectivity using various methodologies. Their contributions span experimental and computational neuroscience, with particular attention to brain dynamics and decision-making processes.

Best Publications

  • The neural basis of human error processing: Reinforcement learning, dopamine, and the error-related negativity.

    Clay B. Holroyd;Michael G. H. Coles

  • The feedback-related negativity reflects the binary evaluation of good versus bad outcomes

    Greg Hajcak;Jason S. Moser;Clay B. Holroyd;Robert F. Simons

  • Motivation of extended behaviors by anterior cingulate cortex

    Clay B. Holroyd;Nick Yeung

  • Reinforcement-related brain potentials from medial frontal cortex: origins and functional significance

    Sander Nieuwenhuis;Clay B Holroyd;Nisan Mol;Michael G.H Coles

  • The feedback correct-related positivity: sensitivity of the event-related brain potential to unexpected positive feedback.

    Clay B. Holroyd;Kaivon L. Pakzad-Vaezi;Olave E. Krigolson

  • Dorsal anterior cingulate cortex shows fMRI response to internal and external error signals

    Clay B Holroyd;Sander Nieuwenhuis;Sander Nieuwenhuis;Nick Yeung;Leigh Nystrom

  • ERP Correlates of Feedback and Reward Processing in the Presence and Absence of Response Choice

    Nick Yeung;Clay B. Holroyd;Jonathan D. Cohen

  • Brain potentials associated with expected and unexpected good and bad outcomes.

    Greg Hajcak;Clay B. Holroyd;Jason S. Moser;Robert F. Simons

  • It's worse than you thought: The feedback negativity and violations of reward prediction in gambling tasks

    Greg Hajcak;Jason S. Moser;Clay B. Holroyd;Robert F. Simons

  • Why is there an ERN/Ne on correct trials? Response representations, stimulus-related components, and the theory of error-processing

    Michael G.H Coles;Marten K Scheffers;Clay B Holroyd

  • Errors in reward prediction are reflected in the event-related brain potential.

    Clay B. Holroyd;Sander Nieuwenhuis;Nick Yeung;Jonathan D. Cohen

  • Context dependence of the event-related brain potential associated with reward and punishment.

    Clay B. Holroyd;Jeff T. Larsen;Jonathan D. Cohen

  • Error-related scalp potentials elicited by hand and foot movements: evidence for an output-independent error-processing system in humans

    Clay B Holroyd;Joseph Dien;Michael G.H Coles

  • The good, the bad and the neutral: electrophysiological responses to feedback stimuli.

    Clay B. Holroyd;Greg Hajcak;Jeff T. Larsen

  • A computational account of altered error processing in older age: dopamine and the error-related negativity.

    Sander Nieuwenhuis;K. Richard Ridderinkhof;Durk Talsma;Michael G. H. Coles;Michael G. H. Coles

  • Sensitivity of Electrophysiological Activity from Medial Frontal Cortex to Utilitarian and Performance Feedback

    Sander Nieuwenhuis;Nick Yeung;Clay B. Holroyd;Aaron Schurger

  • Reward prediction error signals associated with a modified time estimation task.

    Clay B. Holroyd;Olave E. Krigolson

  • Knowing good from bad: differential activation of human cortical areas by positive and negative outcomes

    Sander Nieuwenhuis;Heleen A. Slagter;Niels J. Alting von Geusau;Dirk J. Heslenfeld

  • Activity in human reward-sensitive brain areas is strongly context dependent.

    Sander Nieuwenhuis;Dirk J. Heslenfeld;Niels J. Alting von Geusau;Rogier B. Mars;Rogier B. Mars

  • Detection of synchronized oscillations in the electroencephalogram: An evaluation of methods

    Nick Yeung;Rafal Bogacz;Clay B. Holroyd;Jonathan D. Cohen;Jonathan D. Cohen

Frequent Co-Authors

Michael G. H. Coles
Michael G. H. Coles University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
Nick Yeung
Nick Yeung University of Oxford
Jonathan D. Cohen
Jonathan D. Cohen Princeton University
Rogier B. Mars
Rogier B. Mars University of Oxford
Johannes Hewig
Johannes Hewig University of Würzburg
Wolfgang H. R. Miltner
Wolfgang H. R. Miltner Friedrich Schiller University Jena
James W. Tanaka
James W. Tanaka University of Victoria
Jeremy K. Seamans
Jeremy K. Seamans University of British Columbia
Greg Hajcak
Greg Hajcak Santa Clara University
Tim Stockwell
Tim Stockwell University of Victoria

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing a psychology degree in the USA opens a wide range of career opportunities, including in-demand roles such as Marriage and Family Therapist (MFT). Online programs make it easier than ever to earn credentials and begin working toward licensure. However, requirements for certification and practice can vary significantly by location.

For instance, the North Las Vegas mft certification requirements highlight the necessity of graduate-level education, supervised clinical experience, and state-specific exams. If you’re interested in California, check the steps on how to become an mft in Oakland for more detailed guidelines.

Each state sets its own criteria. The Oklahoma City mft certification requirements discuss clinical supervision hour requirements, while the Omaha mft certification requirements outline Nebraska-specific licensing regulations.

Exploring online psychology degrees is a key first step. Be sure to research your state’s licensing requirements to ensure your education aligns with your desired career pathway.

Best Scientists Citing Clay B. Holroyd

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles