World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Michael Inzlicht

Michael Inzlicht

Last Updated:

D-Index & Metrics

?
Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 79 1493 1335 78 68 195 29341

Michael Inzlicht publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Michael Inzlicht between 2000 and 2026, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Michael Inzlicht published across 27 years, from 2000 to 2026, averaging 11.1 papers a year. Output peaked at 47 publications in 2025. 48 of the 300 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
10 20 30 40
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 2000 to 2026. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 47. Peak 47 publications in 2025. 2000: 1 publication 2001: 0 publications 2002: 1 publication 2003: 2 publications 2004: 1 publication 2005: 1 publication 2006: 3 publications 2007: 2 publications 2008: 5 publications 2009: 3 publications 2010: 8 publications 2011: 11 publications 2012: 14 publications 2013: 11 publications 2014: 11 publications 2015: 20 publications 2016: 18 publications 2017: 19 publications 2018: 10 publications 2019: 12 publications 2020: 17 publications 2021: 21 publications 2022: 20 publications 2023: 19 publications 2024: 22 publications 2025: 47 publications 2026: 1 publication
2000 2026

300 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Michael Inzlicht: publications per year, 2000 to 2026
Year Publications
2000 1
2001 0
2002 1
2003 2
2004 1
2005 1
2006 3
2007 2
2008 5
2009 3
2010 8
2011 11
2012 14
2013 11
2014 11
2015 20
2016 18
2017 19
2018 10
2019 12
2020 17
2021 21
2022 20
2023 19
2024 22
2025 47
2026 1
Total 300
Download as CSV

Michael Inzlicht publications per year - data summary

  • Michael Inzlicht, a Psychology scholar from University of Toronto, has 300 publications recorded across 27 years, from 2000 to 2026.
  • The oldest publication on record dates to 2000 and the most recent to 2026.
  • The most productive year is 2025, with 47 publications.
  • The least productive years with any output are 2000, 2002, 2004, 2005 and others, with 1 publication each.
  • 1 of the 27 years in the span carries no publications at all (2001).
  • The rate of publication averages 11.1 papers per year over the whole span, or 11.5 per year counting only the 26 years with at least one publication.
  • The last 5 years on the chart (2022-2026) hold 109 publications, 36% of the career total.
  • Split into equal eras - 2000-2008: 16 publications (1.8 per year); 2009-2017: 115 publications (12.8 per year); 2018-2026: 169 publications (18.8 per year).
  • Comparing the opening and closing eras, the overall trend of publication is rising.

Michael Inzlicht publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Michael Inzlicht sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 191–200 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 195 publications — 67th percentile

67% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605
91–100 713
101–110 736
111–120 686
121–130 670
131–140 644
141–150 597
151–160 576
161–170 477
171–180 450
181–190 397
191–200 343 195
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

Michael Inzlicht publication distribution in Psychology in 2026 - data summary

  • The chart plots the publication count of all 11,416 Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026, grouped into 69 ranges running from 31–40 to 705+ publications.
  • Michael Inzlicht, a Psychology scholar from University of Toronto, records 195 publications - the 67th percentile of the discipline.
  • 67% of ranked Psychology scientists score the same or lower than Michael Inzlicht, and about 33% score higher.
  • The median of the discipline falls in the 151–160 publications range, and Michael Inzlicht ranks above the median.
  • The most crowded range is 101–110 publications, holding 736 scientists (6% of the field).
  • 72% of the field sits in the lowest quarter of the value range (up to 201–210 publications), so the distribution is heavily right-skewed and high scores are rare.
  • The final bar has no upper bound: it groups every scientist with 705 publications or more, 100 scientists in all (<1% of the field).

Michael Inzlicht D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Michael Inzlicht sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 78–79 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 79 D-Index — 87th percentile

87% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671
36–37 659
38–39 641
40–41 671
42–43 617
44–45 558
46–47 495
48–49 487
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137 79
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Michael Inzlicht D-index placement in Psychology in 2026 - data summary

  • The chart plots the discipline H-index (D-index) of all 11,416 Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026, grouped into 58 ranges running from 30–31 to 144+ D-Index.
  • Michael Inzlicht, a Psychology scholar from University of Toronto, records 79 D-Index - the 87th percentile of the discipline.
  • 87% of ranked Psychology scientists score the same or lower than Michael Inzlicht, and about 13% score higher.
  • The median of the discipline falls in the 48–49 D-Index range, and Michael Inzlicht ranks above the median.
  • The most crowded range is 32–33 D-Index, holding 702 scientists (6% of the field).
  • 68% of the field sits in the lowest quarter of the value range (up to 58–59 D-Index), so the distribution is heavily right-skewed and high scores are rare.
  • The final bar has no upper bound: it groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more, 98 scientists in all (<1% of the field).

Overview

Michael Inzlicht is affiliated with the University of Toronto in Canada and has contributed significantly to the fields of psychology and neuroscience. Their scholarly work spans several subfields, including cognitive neuroscience, applied psychology, social psychology, experimental and cognitive psychology, as well as sociology and political science.

Their research primarily covers topics such as behavioral health and interventions, mental health research, decision-making and behavioral economics, psychology of moral and emotional judgment, neural and behavioral psychology studies, psychological well-being and life satisfaction, and social and intergroup psychology.

Among recent papers, notable publications include:

  • Why Are Self-Report and Behavioral Measures Weakly Correlated? (2020, Trends in Cognitive Sciences)
  • Integrating Models of Self-Regulation (2020, Annual Review of Psychology)
  • Expectations of reward and efficacy guide cognitive control allocation (2021, Nature Communications)
  • A Multisite Preregistered Paradigmatic Test of the Ego-Depletion Effect (2021, Psychological Science)
  • The Experience of Empathy in Everyday Life (2021, Psychological Science)

Michael Inzlicht frequently collaborates with several coauthors, including Hause Lin, Blair Saunders, Gregory John Depow, Malte Friese, and C. Daryl Cameron.

Their work has appeared repeatedly in a range of academic journals. The most frequent publication venues include:

  • Trends in Cognitive Sciences
  • Communications Psychology
  • Psychological Science
  • Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science
  • Journal of Experimental Psychology General

Overall, the scope of Michael Inzlicht's research represents a multidisciplinary approach to understanding psychological and neuroscientific phenomena related to behavior regulation, mental health, and social processes.

Best Publications

  • Improving adolescents' standardized test performance: An intervention to reduce the effects of stereotype threat

    Catherine Good;Joshua Aronson;Michael Inzlicht

  • What Is Ego Depletion? Toward a Mechanistic Revision of the Resource Model of Self-Control

    Michael Inzlicht;Brandon J. Schmeichel

  • A Multilab Preregistered Replication of the Ego-Depletion Effect

    Martin S. Hagger;Nikos L. D. Chatzisarantis

  • A threatening intellectual environment: why females are susceptible to experiencing problem-solving deficits in the presence of males.

    Michael Inzlicht;Talia Ben-Zeev

  • Why self-control seems (but may not be) limited.

    Michael Inzlicht;Brandon J. Schmeichel;C. Neil Macrae

  • The Effort Paradox: Effort Is Both Costly and Valued.

    Michael Inzlicht;Amitai Shenhav;Christopher Y. Olivola

  • Inside the Mindful Mind How Mindfulness Enhances Emotion Regulation Through Improvements in Executive Control

    Rimma Teper;Zindel V. Segal;Michael Inzlicht

  • Stigma as ego depletion: how being the target of prejudice affects self-control.

    Michael Inzlicht;Linda McKay;Joshua Aronson

  • Stereotype Threat and Executive Resource Depletion: Examining the Influence of Emotion Regulation

    Michael Johns;Michael Inzlicht;Toni Schmader

  • Emotional foundations of cognitive control

    Michael Inzlicht;Bruce D. Bartholow;Jacob B. Hirsh

  • Why Are Self-Report and Behavioral Measures Weakly Correlated?

    Junhua Dang;Kevin M. King;Michael Inzlicht

  • Stereotype Threat Spillover: How Coping With Threats to Social Identity Affects Aggression, Eating, Decision Making, and Attention

    Michael Inzlicht;Sonia K. Kang

  • Meditation, mindfulness, and executive control: The importance of emotional acceptance and brain-based performance monitoring

    Rimma Teper;Michael Inzlicht

  • Understanding all inconsistency compensation as a palliative response to violated expectations.

    Travis Proulx;Michael Inzlicht;Eddie Harmon-Jones

  • Arousal and stereotype threat

    Talia Ben-Zeev;Steven Fein;Michael Inzlicht

  • Running on Empty Neural Signals for Self-Control Failure

    Michael Inzlicht;Jennifer N. Gutsell

  • Empathy constrained: Prejudice predicts reduced mental simulation of actions during observation of outgroups.

    Jennifer N. Gutsell;Michael Inzlicht

  • Integrating Models of Self-Regulation

    Michael Inzlicht;Kaitlyn M. Werner;Julia L. Briskin;Brent W. Roberts

  • The five “A”s of meaning maintenance: Finding meaning in the theories of sense-making.

    Travis Proulx;Michael Inzlicht

  • Neural Markers of Religious Conviction

    Michael Inzlicht;Ian McGregor;Jacob B. Hirsh;Kyle Nash

  • Stereotype Threat: Theory, Process, and Application

    Michael Inzlicht;Toni Schmader

  • Stereotype ThreatTheory, Process, and Application

    Michael Inzlicht;Toni Schmader

Frequent Co-Authors

Marina Milyavskaya
Marina Milyavskaya Carleton University
Eddie Harmon-Jones
Eddie Harmon-Jones University of New South Wales
Brandon J. Schmeichel
Brandon J. Schmeichel Texas A&M University
Ian McGregor
Ian McGregor University of Waterloo
Joshua Aronson
Joshua Aronson New York University
Amitai Shenhav
Amitai Shenhav Brown University
Michael I. Norton
Michael I. Norton Harvard University
Malte Friese
Malte Friese Saarland University
Jacob B. Hirsh
Jacob B. Hirsh University of Toronto
Jordan B. Peterson
Jordan B. Peterson University of Toronto

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Psychology in the USA opens the door to a variety of online degree options and specialized career paths. Many undergraduate and graduate programs provide a foundation for becoming a professional counselor, therapist, or mental health specialist.

For those interested in working in educational settings, becoming a school counselor is a rewarding career choice. However, requirements to enter this field vary from state to state. For example, Iowa school counselor education requirements include a master's degree in school counseling and completion of a state-approved program. Similarly, Kansas school counselor education requirements specify completion of advanced coursework and supervised experience.

Aspiring counselors should also be aware of certification procedures. In Kentucky, Kentucky school counselor certification requirements include both educational credentials and relevant teaching experience. In Louisiana, the requirements to be a school counselor in Louisiana highlight the demand for specialized training and passing standardized examinations.

No matter your location, researching your state’s specific pathway is crucial. Many institutions now offer online degrees that can support these requirements and provide the flexibility to balance your studies with professional or personal commitments.

Best Scientists Citing Michael Inzlicht

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles