World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 54 4500 4164 297 276 112 19350

Toni Schmader publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Toni Schmader between 1998 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Toni Schmader published across 28 years, from 1998 to 2025, averaging 5.3 papers a year. Output peaked at 18 publications in 2025. 24 of the 148 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1998 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 18. Peak 18 publications in 2025. 1998: 2 publications 1999: 1 publication 2000: 1 publication 2001: 2 publications 2002: 3 publications 2003: 3 publications 2004: 2 publications 2005: 3 publications 2006: 3 publications 2007: 3 publications 2008: 4 publications 2009: 3 publications 2010: 5 publications 2011: 8 publications 2012: 3 publications 2013: 5 publications 2014: 8 publications 2015: 9 publications 2016: 1 publication 2017: 3 publications 2018: 13 publications 2019: 7 publications 2020: 8 publications 2021: 9 publications 2022: 10 publications 2023: 5 publications 2024: 6 publications 2025: 18 publications
1998 2025

148 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Toni Schmader: publications per year, 1998 to 2025
Year Publications
1998 2
1999 1
2000 1
2001 2
2002 3
2003 3
2004 2
2005 3
2006 3
2007 3
2008 4
2009 3
2010 5
2011 8
2012 3
2013 5
2014 8
2015 9
2016 1
2017 3
2018 13
2019 7
2020 8
2021 9
2022 10
2023 5
2024 6
2025 18
Total 148
Download as CSV

Toni Schmader publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Toni Schmader sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 111–120 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 112 publications — 28th percentile

28% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605
91–100 713
101–110 736
111–120 686 112
121–130 670
131–140 644
141–150 597
151–160 576
161–170 477
171–180 450
181–190 397
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

Toni Schmader D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Toni Schmader sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 54–55 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 54 D-Index — 61st percentile

61% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671
36–37 659
38–39 641
40–41 671
42–43 617
44–45 558
46–47 495
48–49 487
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408 54
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Toni Schmader is affiliated with the University of British Columbia in Canada and specializes in social sciences, with a focus on psychology. Their research portfolio spans multiple studies on gender diversity, social and intergroup psychology, and career development within diverse contexts.

The main fields of study for Toni Schmader include:

  • Social Sciences
  • Psychology

Subfields of particular interest encompass:

  • Gender Studies
  • Sociology and Political Science
  • Social Psychology
  • Safety Research
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology

Toni Schmader's work addresses a variety of topics, including:

  • Gender Diversity and Inequality
  • Social and Intergroup Psychology
  • Career Development and Diversity
  • Cultural Differences and Values
  • Behavioral Health and Interventions
  • Work-Family Balance Challenges
  • Gender Roles and Identity Studies

Recent publications authored or co-authored by Toni Schmader include:

  • Gender Inclusion and Fit in STEM, 2022, Annual Review of Psychology
  • Why Antibias Interventions (Need Not) Fail, 2022, Perspectives on Psychological Science

Other notable papers in which Toni Schmader is involved or related include:

  • The Future of Women in Psychological Science, 2020, Perspectives on Psychological Science
  • The misjudgment of men: Does pluralistic ignorance inhibit allyship?, 2021, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology
  • When People Do Allyship: A Typology of Allyship Action, 2024, Personality and Social Psychology Review

Frequent co-authors appearing with Toni Schmader across publications consist of:

  • Katharina Block
  • Hilary B. Bergsieker
  • Lucy De Souza
  • William M. Hall
  • Andrew Scott Baron

Toni Schmader frequently publishes in venues such as:

  • Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin
  • Academy of Management Proceedings
  • Perspectives on Psychological Science
  • Journal of Personality and Social Psychology
  • PLoS ONE

Best Publications

  • An Integrated Process Model of Stereotype Threat Effects on Performance

    Toni Schmader;Michael Johns;Chad E. Forbes

  • Converging evidence that stereotype threat reduces working memory capacity.

    Toni Schmader;Michael Johns

  • Gender Identification Moderates Stereotype Threat Effects on Women's Math Performance ☆ ☆☆ ★

    Toni Schmader

  • Knowing Is Half the Battle Teaching Stereotype Threat as a Means of Improving Women's Math Performance

    Michael Johns;Toni Schmader;Andy Martens

  • Coping with Negative Stereotypes about Intellectual Performance: The Role of Psychological Disengagement

    Brenda Major;Steven Spencer;Toni Schmader;Connie Wolfe

  • Stereotype Threat and Executive Resource Depletion: Examining the Influence of Emotion Regulation

    Michael Johns;Michael Inzlicht;Toni Schmader

  • The Costs of Accepting Gender Differences: The Role of Stereotype Endorsement in Women's Experience in the Math Domain

    Toni Schmader;Michael Johns;Marchelle Barquissau

  • Perceiving Personal Discrimination: The Role of Group Status and Legitimizing Ideology

    Brenda Major;Richard H. Gramzow;Shannon K. McCoy;Shana Levin

  • Turning the knots in your stomach into bows: Reappraising arousal improves performance on the GRE

    Jeremy P. Jamieson;Wendy Berry Mendes;Erin Blackstock;Toni Schmader

  • Why Individuals Protest the Perceived Transgressions of Their Country: The Role of Anger, Shame, and Guilt

    Aarti Iyer;Toni Schmader;Brian Lickel

  • Coping With Ethnic Stereotypes in the Academic Domain: Perceived Injustice and Psychological Disengagement

    Toni Schmader;Brenda Major;Richard H. Gramzow

  • Attributions to discrimination and self-esteem: Impact of group identification and situational ambiguity

    Brenda Major;Wendy J Quinton;Toni Schmader

  • Vicarious Shame and Guilt

    Brian Lickel;Toni Schmader;Mathew Curtis;Marchelle Scarnier

  • Vicarious Retribution: The Role of Collective Blame in Intergroup Aggression

    Brian Lickel;Norman Miller;Douglas M. Stenstrom;Thomas F. Denson

  • An Underexamined Inequality: Cultural and Psychological Barriers to Men’s Engagement With Communal Roles

    Alyssa Croft;Toni Schmader;Katharina Block

  • A Linguistic Comparison of Letters of Recommendation for Male and Female Chemistry and Biochemistry Job Applicants

    Toni Schmader;Jessica Whitehead;Vicki H. Wysocki

  • Stereotype Threat: Theory, Process, and Application

    Michael Inzlicht;Toni Schmader

  • Coping with stigma through psychological disengagement.

    Brenda Major;Toni Schmader

  • The Approach and Avoidance Function of Guilt and Shame Emotions: Comparing Reactions to Self-Caused and Other-Caused Wrongdoing

    Toni Schmader;Brian Lickel

  • A Case of Collective Responsibility: Who Else Was to Blame for the Columbine High School Shootings?

    Brian Lickel;Toni Schmader;David L. Hamilton

  • Stereotype ThreatTheory, Process, and Application

    Michael Inzlicht;Toni Schmader

Frequent Co-Authors

Brian Lickel
Brian Lickel University of Massachusetts Amherst
Brenda Major
Brenda Major University of California, Santa Barbara
Mark R. Beauchamp
Mark R. Beauchamp University of British Columbia
Elizabeth A. Croft
Elizabeth A. Croft Monash University
Bruno D. Zumbo
Bruno D. Zumbo University of British Columbia
Wendy Berry Mendes
Wendy Berry Mendes University of California, San Francisco
Ryan E. Rhodes
Ryan E. Rhodes University of Victoria
Jeff Stone
Jeff Stone University of Arizona
Michael Inzlicht
Michael Inzlicht University of Toronto
Paul A. Estabrooks
Paul A. Estabrooks University of Nebraska Medical Center

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring psychology in the USA goes beyond traditional campus-based degrees. Many students are now considering online programs for their flexibility and accessibility. When searching for the right fit, it’s important to look at how different cities and universities stack up.

For those interested in pursuing psychology in Florida, the best psychology degree rankings in Orlando can help you compare top programs in that region. Similarly, if you are drawn to Arizona, you’ll want to review the best psychology degree rankings in Phoenix to make an informed decision.

North Carolina also offers strong choices; check out the best psychology degree rankings in Raleigh to see leading institutions in that area. Those considering Nevada can look at the top psychology degrees in Reno for more options.

Online psychology programs often lead to diverse career pathways, such as counseling, human resources, research, and education. Choosing the right program—whether on-campus or online—can open doors to rewarding roles in both clinical and non-clinical settings across the country.

Best Scientists Citing Toni Schmader

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles