World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Kathryn M. Neckerman

Kathryn M. Neckerman

D-Index & Metrics

Social Sciences and Humanities

D-Index
44
Citations
11451
World Ranking
4050
National Ranking
1931

Kathryn M. Neckerman publication distribution in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Kathryn M. Neckerman sits on this spectrum.

44–53 publications: 28 scientists 54–63 publications: 61 scientists 64–73 publications: 161 scientists 74–83 publications: 225 scientists 84–93 publications: 301 scientists 94–103 publications: 390 scientists 104–113 publications: 406 scientists 114–123 publications: 474 scientists 124–133 publications: 453 scientists 134–143 publications: 434 scientists 144–153 publications: 407 scientists 154–163 publications: 411 scientists 164–173 publications: 391 scientists 174–183 publications: 313 scientists 184–193 publications: 319 scientists 194–203 publications: 304 scientists 204–213 publications: 285 scientists 214–223 publications: 246 scientists 224–233 publications: 213 scientists 234–243 publications: 170 scientists 244–253 publications: 167 scientists 254–263 publications: 162 scientists 264–273 publications: 138 scientists 274–283 publications: 138 scientists 284–293 publications: 113 scientists 294–303 publications: 106 scientists 304–313 publications: 95 scientists 314–323 publications: 101 scientists 324–333 publications: 81 scientists 334–343 publications: 69 scientists 344–353 publications: 56 scientists 354–363 publications: 36 scientists 364–373 publications: 42 scientists 374–383 publications: 41 scientists 384–393 publications: 44 scientists 394–403 publications: 27 scientists 404–413 publications: 30 scientists 414–423 publications: 20 scientists 424–433 publications: 29 scientists 434–443 publications: 29 scientists 444–453 publications: 25 scientists 454–463 publications: 19 scientists 464–473 publications: 21 scientists 474–483 publications: 11 scientists 484–493 publications: 17 scientists 494–503 publications: 7 scientists 504–513 publications: 6 scientists 514–523 publications: 12 scientists 524–533 publications: 10 scientists 534–543 publications: 7 scientists 544–553 publications: 6 scientists 554–563 publications: 12 scientists 564–569 publications: 8 scientists 570+ publications: 100 scientists
44 publications 570+

This scientist: 102 publications — 14th percentile

14% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more.

Kathryn M. Neckerman D-index placement in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Kathryn M. Neckerman sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 177 scientists 31 D-Index: 210 scientists 32 D-Index: 222 scientists 33 D-Index: 188 scientists 34 D-Index: 181 scientists 35 D-Index: 243 scientists 36 D-Index: 261 scientists 37 D-Index: 272 scientists 38 D-Index: 278 scientists 39 D-Index: 300 scientists 40 D-Index: 297 scientists 41 D-Index: 308 scientists 42 D-Index: 313 scientists 43 D-Index: 300 scientists 44 D-Index: 269 scientists 45 D-Index: 260 scientists 46 D-Index: 228 scientists 47 D-Index: 251 scientists 48 D-Index: 203 scientists 49 D-Index: 186 scientists 50 D-Index: 187 scientists 51 D-Index: 166 scientists 52 D-Index: 138 scientists 53 D-Index: 141 scientists 54 D-Index: 131 scientists 55 D-Index: 137 scientists 56 D-Index: 109 scientists 57 D-Index: 129 scientists 58 D-Index: 95 scientists 59 D-Index: 105 scientists 60 D-Index: 106 scientists 61 D-Index: 86 scientists 62 D-Index: 94 scientists 63 D-Index: 77 scientists 64 D-Index: 79 scientists 65 D-Index: 59 scientists 66 D-Index: 68 scientists 67 D-Index: 51 scientists 68 D-Index: 49 scientists 69 D-Index: 40 scientists 70 D-Index: 43 scientists 71 D-Index: 40 scientists 72 D-Index: 50 scientists 73 D-Index: 46 scientists 74 D-Index: 43 scientists 75 D-Index: 45 scientists 76 D-Index: 45 scientists 77 D-Index: 30 scientists 78 D-Index: 25 scientists 79 D-Index: 31 scientists 80 D-Index: 29 scientists 81 D-Index: 18 scientists 82 D-Index: 21 scientists 83 D-Index: 26 scientists 84 D-Index: 15 scientists 85 D-Index: 15 scientists 86 D-Index: 19 scientists 87 D-Index: 19 scientists 88 D-Index: 12 scientists 89 D-Index: 7 scientists 90 D-Index: 19 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 13 scientists 93 D-Index: 9 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 8 scientists 96 D-Index: 7 scientists 97 D-Index: 6 scientists 98 D-Index: 6 scientists 99 D-Index: 6 scientists 100+ D-Index: 97 scientists
30 D-Index 100+

This scientist: 44 D-Index — 49th percentile

49% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more.

Overview

Kathryn M. Neckerman is affiliated with Columbia University in the United States. Their research primarily spans the fields of Social Sciences and Medicine, with a significant focus on topics related to urban transport, public health, and environmental factors influencing health outcomes.

Neckerman's work covers several main topics:

  • Urban Transport and Accessibility
  • Obesity, Physical Activity, Diet
  • Health disparities and outcomes
  • Air Quality and Health Impacts
  • Urban Green Space and Health
  • Traffic and Road Safety
  • Gestational Diabetes Research and Management

The scientist's subfields of study include Transportation, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis, and General Health Professions.

Several recent publications illustrate the scope of their research. These include:

  • "Neighborhood Walkability and Mortality in a Prospective Cohort of Women" (2021), published in Epidemiology
  • "Healthy food retail availability and cardiovascular mortality in the United States: a cohort study" (2021), published in BMJ Open
  • "Associations between Greenspace and Gentrification-Related Sociodemographic and Housing Cost Changes in Major Metropolitan Areas across the United States" (2021), published in International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
  • "Neighborhood walkability and poverty predict excessive gestational weight gain: A cross-sectional study in New York City" (2022), published in Obesity
  • "Long-Term Exposure to Walkable Residential Neighborhoods and Risk of Obesity-Related Cancer in the New York University Women's Health Study (NYUWHS)" (2023), published in Environmental Health Perspectives

Neckerman frequently collaborates with other researchers. Their common coauthors include Andrew Rundle, James W. Quinn, Gina S. Lovasi, Sandra India-Aldana, and Yelena Afanasyeva.

Their work is published in a variety of academic venues, with multiple publications in the ISEE Conference Abstracts and the American Journal of Epidemiology. Other venues include Epidemiology, BMJ Open, and the International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health.

Best Publications

  • “We’d Love to Hire Them, But …” : The Meaning of Race for Employers

    Joleen Kirshenman;Kathryn M. Neckerman

  • Built Environments and Obesity in Disadvantaged Populations

    Gina S. Lovasi;Malo A. Hutson;Monica Guerra;Kathryn M. Neckerman

  • Inequality: Causes and Consequences

    Kathryn M. Neckerman;Florencia Torche

  • Using Google Street View to audit neighborhood environments.

    Andrew G. Rundle;Michael D.M. Bader;Catherine A. Richards;Kathryn M. Neckerman

  • Hiring Strategies, Racial Bias, and Inner-City Workers

    Kathryn M. Neckerman;Joleen Kirschenman

  • Neighborhood Food Environment and Walkability Predict Obesity in New York City

    Andrew Rundle;Kathryn M. Neckerman;Lance Freeman;Gina S. Lovasi

  • Segmented assimilation and minority cultures of mobility

    Kathryn M. Neckerman;Prudence Carter;Jennifer Lee

  • Children living in areas with more street trees have lower prevalence of asthma

    Gina Schellenbaum Lovasi;James W Quinn;Kathryn M Neckerman;Matthew S Perzanowski

  • The urban built environment and obesity in New York City: a multilevel analysis

    Andrew Rundle;Ana V. Diez Roux;Lance M. Freeman;Douglas Miller

  • Disparities in Urban Neighborhood Conditions: Evidence from GIS Measures and Field Observation in New York City

    Kathryn M Neckerman;Gina S Lovasi;Stephen Davies;Marnie Purciel

  • Association of proximity and density of parks and objectively measured physical activity in the United States: A systematic review.

    Carolyn Bancroft;Spruha Joshi;Andrew Rundle;Malo Hutson

  • Disparities in neighborhood food environments: implications of measurement strategies.

    Michael D. M. Bader;Marnie Purciel;Paulette Yousefzadeh;Kathryn M. Neckerman

  • Streetscape features related to pedestrian activity

    Reid Ewing;Amir Hajrasouliha;Kathryn M. Neckerman;Marnie Purciel-Hill

  • Neighborhood safety and green space as predictors of obesity among preschool children from low-income families in New York City.

    Gina S. Lovasi;Ofira Schwartz-Soicher;James W. Quinn;Diana K. Berger

  • Effect of individual or neighborhood disadvantage on the association between neighborhood walkability and body mass index.

    Gina S. Lovasi;Kathryn M. Neckerman;James W. Quinn;Christopher C. Weiss

  • Reconsidering Access: Park Facilities and Neighborhood Disamenities in New York City

    Christopher C. Weiss;Marnie Purciel;Michael Bader;James W. Quinn

  • Is the Environment Near Home and School Associated with Physical Activity and Adiposity of Urban Preschool Children

    Gina S. Lovasi;Judith S. Jacobson;James W. Quinn;Kathryn M. Neckerman

  • Employment and Marriage among Inner-city Fathers

    Mark Testa;Nan Marie Astone;Marilyn Krogh;Kathryn M. Neckerman

  • Schools Betrayed: Roots of Failure in Inner-City Education

    Kathryn M. Neckerman

  • Beyond Income Poverty: Measuring Disadvantage in Terms of Material Hardship and Health.

    Kathryn M. Neckerman;Irwin Garfinkel;Julien O. Teitler;Jane Waldfogel

Frequent Co-Authors

Andrew Rundle
Andrew Rundle Columbia University
Gina S. Lovasi
Gina S. Lovasi Drexel University
Michael D. M. Bader
Michael D. M. Bader American University
Julien O. Teitler
Julien O. Teitler Columbia University
Jane Waldfogel
Jane Waldfogel Columbia University
William Julius Wilson
William Julius Wilson Harvard University
Theda Skocpol
Theda Skocpol Harvard University
Ana V. Diez Roux
Ana V. Diez Roux Drexel University
Irwin Garfinkel
Irwin Garfinkel Columbia University
Reid Ewing
Reid Ewing University of Utah

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Social Sciences and Humanities in the USA opens doors to flexible and affordable online study options. Many students seek the masters in psychology online cheap route, making advanced education accessible without financial strain. These programs often fit busy schedules and allow learners to balance work and study.

Those wanting to accelerate their careers may look for accelerated edd programs online, which condense years of coursework into a shorter time frame. This fast-tracked approach is ideal for professionals eager to boost their qualifications quickly.

If you prefer a broader selection, there’s a growing demand for flexible master degree online options. Many of these programs can be completed within a year, equipping students with specialized knowledge faster than traditional paths.

Additionally, prospective undergraduates can benefit from online bachelor degree programs designed to expedite entry into the workforce. These pathways often accept transfer credits, helping you finish your degree in less time.

Whichever route you choose, online degrees in Social Sciences and Humanities offer the flexibility and specialization modern students need to advance their careers.

Best Scientists Citing Kathryn M. Neckerman

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles