World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Hannah Badland

Hannah Badland

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Social Sciences and Humanities 61 1360 1210 100 92 246 13203

Hannah Badland publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Hannah Badland between 2002 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Hannah Badland published across 24 years, from 2002 to 2025, averaging 11 papers a year. Output peaked at 20 publications in 2017. 13 of the 264 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15 20
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 2002 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 20. Peak 20 publications in 2017. 2002: 1 publication 2003: 1 publication 2004: 5 publications 2005: 7 publications 2006: 10 publications 2007: 9 publications 2008: 13 publications 2009: 14 publications 2010: 12 publications 2011: 7 publications 2012: 12 publications 2013: 16 publications 2014: 19 publications 2015: 19 publications 2016: 15 publications 2017: 20 publications 2018: 19 publications 2019: 16 publications 2020: 9 publications 2021: 12 publications 2022: 8 publications 2023: 7 publications 2024: 7 publications 2025: 6 publications
2002 2025

264 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Hannah Badland: publications per year, 2002 to 2025
Year Publications
2002 1
2003 1
2004 5
2005 7
2006 10
2007 9
2008 13
2009 14
2010 12
2011 7
2012 12
2013 16
2014 19
2015 19
2016 15
2017 20
2018 19
2019 16
2020 9
2021 12
2022 8
2023 7
2024 7
2025 6
Total 264
Download as CSV

Hannah Badland publication distribution in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Hannah Badland sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300 400
Bar chart with 54 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 44–53 to 570+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 474. Most scientists, 474, have 114–123 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 244–253 publications, is where this scientist sits. 44–53 publications: 28 scientists 54–63 publications: 61 scientists 64–73 publications: 161 scientists 74–83 publications: 225 scientists 84–93 publications: 301 scientists 94–103 publications: 390 scientists 104–113 publications: 406 scientists 114–123 publications: 474 scientists 124–133 publications: 453 scientists 134–143 publications: 434 scientists 144–153 publications: 407 scientists 154–163 publications: 411 scientists 164–173 publications: 391 scientists 174–183 publications: 313 scientists 184–193 publications: 319 scientists 194–203 publications: 304 scientists 204–213 publications: 285 scientists 214–223 publications: 246 scientists 224–233 publications: 213 scientists 234–243 publications: 170 scientists 244–253 publications: 167 scientists 254–263 publications: 162 scientists 264–273 publications: 138 scientists 274–283 publications: 138 scientists 284–293 publications: 113 scientists 294–303 publications: 106 scientists 304–313 publications: 95 scientists 314–323 publications: 101 scientists 324–333 publications: 81 scientists 334–343 publications: 69 scientists 344–353 publications: 56 scientists 354–363 publications: 36 scientists 364–373 publications: 42 scientists 374–383 publications: 41 scientists 384–393 publications: 44 scientists 394–403 publications: 27 scientists 404–413 publications: 30 scientists 414–423 publications: 20 scientists 424–433 publications: 29 scientists 434–443 publications: 29 scientists 444–453 publications: 25 scientists 454–463 publications: 19 scientists 464–473 publications: 21 scientists 474–483 publications: 11 scientists 484–493 publications: 17 scientists 494–503 publications: 7 scientists 504–513 publications: 6 scientists 514–523 publications: 12 scientists 524–533 publications: 10 scientists 534–543 publications: 7 scientists 544–553 publications: 6 scientists 554–563 publications: 12 scientists 564–569 publications: 8 scientists 570+ publications: 100 scientists
44–53 publications 570+

This scientist: 246 publications — 78th percentile

78% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 7,777 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
44–53 28
54–63 61
64–73 161
74–83 225
84–93 301
94–103 390
104–113 406
114–123 474
124–133 453
134–143 434
144–153 407
154–163 411
164–173 391
174–183 313
184–193 319
194–203 304
204–213 285
214–223 246
224–233 213
234–243 170
244–253 167 246
254–263 162
264–273 138
274–283 138
284–293 113
294–303 106
304–313 95
314–323 101
324–333 81
334–343 69
344–353 56
354–363 36
364–373 42
374–383 41
384–393 44
394–403 27
404–413 30
414–423 20
424–433 29
434–443 29
444–453 25
454–463 19
464–473 21
474–483 11
484–493 17
494–503 7
504–513 6
514–523 12
524–533 10
534–543 7
544–553 6
554–563 12
564–569 8
570+ 100
Download as CSV

Hannah Badland D-index placement in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Hannah Badland sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300
Bar chart with 71 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30 to 100+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 313. Most scientists, 313, have 42 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 61 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30 D-Index: 177 scientists 31 D-Index: 210 scientists 32 D-Index: 222 scientists 33 D-Index: 188 scientists 34 D-Index: 181 scientists 35 D-Index: 243 scientists 36 D-Index: 261 scientists 37 D-Index: 272 scientists 38 D-Index: 278 scientists 39 D-Index: 300 scientists 40 D-Index: 297 scientists 41 D-Index: 308 scientists 42 D-Index: 313 scientists 43 D-Index: 300 scientists 44 D-Index: 269 scientists 45 D-Index: 260 scientists 46 D-Index: 228 scientists 47 D-Index: 251 scientists 48 D-Index: 203 scientists 49 D-Index: 186 scientists 50 D-Index: 187 scientists 51 D-Index: 166 scientists 52 D-Index: 138 scientists 53 D-Index: 141 scientists 54 D-Index: 131 scientists 55 D-Index: 137 scientists 56 D-Index: 109 scientists 57 D-Index: 129 scientists 58 D-Index: 95 scientists 59 D-Index: 105 scientists 60 D-Index: 106 scientists 61 D-Index: 86 scientists 62 D-Index: 94 scientists 63 D-Index: 77 scientists 64 D-Index: 79 scientists 65 D-Index: 59 scientists 66 D-Index: 68 scientists 67 D-Index: 51 scientists 68 D-Index: 49 scientists 69 D-Index: 40 scientists 70 D-Index: 43 scientists 71 D-Index: 40 scientists 72 D-Index: 50 scientists 73 D-Index: 46 scientists 74 D-Index: 43 scientists 75 D-Index: 45 scientists 76 D-Index: 45 scientists 77 D-Index: 30 scientists 78 D-Index: 25 scientists 79 D-Index: 31 scientists 80 D-Index: 29 scientists 81 D-Index: 18 scientists 82 D-Index: 21 scientists 83 D-Index: 26 scientists 84 D-Index: 15 scientists 85 D-Index: 15 scientists 86 D-Index: 19 scientists 87 D-Index: 19 scientists 88 D-Index: 12 scientists 89 D-Index: 7 scientists 90 D-Index: 19 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 13 scientists 93 D-Index: 9 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 8 scientists 96 D-Index: 7 scientists 97 D-Index: 6 scientists 98 D-Index: 6 scientists 99 D-Index: 6 scientists 100+ D-Index: 97 scientists
30 D-Index 100+

This scientist: 61 D-Index — 83rd percentile

83% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 7,777 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30 177
31 210
32 222
33 188
34 181
35 243
36 261
37 272
38 278
39 300
40 297
41 308
42 313
43 300
44 269
45 260
46 228
47 251
48 203
49 186
50 187
51 166
52 138
53 141
54 131
55 137
56 109
57 129
58 95
59 105
60 106
61 86 61
62 94
63 77
64 79
65 59
66 68
67 51
68 49
69 40
70 43
71 40
72 50
73 46
74 43
75 45
76 45
77 30
78 25
79 31
80 29
81 18
82 21
83 26
84 15
85 15
86 19
87 19
88 12
89 7
90 19
91 20
92 13
93 9
94 13
95 8
96 7
97 6
98 6
99 6
100+ 97
Download as CSV

Overview

Hannah Badland is affiliated with RMIT University in Australia and specializes primarily in the Social Sciences. Their research encompasses several interconnected subfields, including General Health Professions, Health, Transportation, Education, and Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health.

Their scholarly output focuses on various research topics such as:

  • Health disparities and outcomes
  • Urban Transport and Accessibility
  • Homelessness and Social Issues
  • Obesity, Physical Activity, Diet
  • Employment and Welfare Studies
  • Early Childhood Education and Development
  • Noise Effects and Management

Frequent co-authors in their work include:

  • Amanda Alderton (18 publications)
  • Sharon Goldfeld (11 publications)
  • Meredith O'Connor (11 publications)
  • Carl Higgs (10 publications)
  • Roger J. Stancliffe (10 publications)

Hannah Badland publishes regularly in several venues, with notable frequency in:

  • International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health (6 publications)
  • International Journal of Epidemiology (6 publications)
  • RMIT Research Repository (RMIT University Library) (4 publications)
  • Health Promotion Journal of Australia (4 publications)
  • Academic Pediatrics (3 publications)

Selected recent papers authored or co-authored by Hannah Badland include:

  • "Creating healthy and sustainable cities: what gets measured, gets done" (2022), published in The Lancet Global Health
  • "Liveable, healthy, sustainable: What are the key indicators for Melbourne neighbourhoods?" (2024), published in RMIT Research Repository (RMIT University Library)
  • "Living liveable? RESIDE's evaluation of the "Liveable Neighborhoods" planning policy on the health supportive behaviors and wellbeing of residents in Perth, Western Australia" (2020), published in SSM - Population Health
  • "The Disability and Wellbeing Monitoring Framework: data, data gaps, and policy implications" (2020), published in Australian and New Zealand Journal of Public Health
  • "Inequities in Children's Reading Skills: The Role of Home Reading and Preschool Attendance" (2021), published in Academic Pediatrics

Best Publications

  • City planning and population health: a global challenge

    Billie Giles-Corti;Anne Vernez-Moudon;Rodrigo Siqueira Reis;Rodrigo Siqueira Reis;Rodrigo Siqueira Reis;Gavin Turrell;Gavin Turrell

  • Public open space, physical activity, urban design and public health: Concepts, methods and research agenda

    Mohammad Javad Koohsari;Mohammad Javad Koohsari;Suzanne Mavoa;Karen Villanueva;Karen Villanueva;Takemi Sugiyama;Takemi Sugiyama

  • Transport, urban design, and physical activity: an evidence-based update

    Hannah Badland;Grant Schofield

  • Do low-income neighbourhoods have the least green space? A cross-sectional study of Australia's most populous cities.

    Thomas Astell-Burt;Thomas Astell-Burt;Xiaoqi Feng;Suzanne Mavoa;Hannah M Badland

  • Associations of children's independent mobility and active travel with physical activity, sedentary behaviour and weight status: A systematic review

    Stephanie Schoeppe;Mitch J. Duncan;Hannah Badland;Melody Oliver

  • Urban liveability: Emerging lessons from Australia for exploring the potential for indicators to measure the social determinants of health

    Hannah Badland;Carolyn Whitzman;Melanie Lowe;Melanie Davern

  • Perceived neighborhood environmental attributes associated with walking and cycling for transport among adult residents of 17 cities in 12 countries: the IPEN study

    Jacqueline Kerr;Jennifer A Emond;Hannah Badland;Rodrigo S. Reis

  • An ethical framework for automated, wearable cameras in health behavior research

    Paul Kelly;Simon J. Marshall;Hannah Badland;Jacqueline Kerr

  • Can virtual streetscape audits reliably replace physical streetscape audits

    Hannah M. Badland;Simon Opit;Karen Witten;Robin A. Kearns

  • International comparisons of the associations between objective measures of the built environment and transport-related walking and cycling: IPEN adult study

    Lars Breum Christiansen;Ester Cerin;Ester Cerin;Hannah Badland;Jacqueline Kerr

  • Using the SenseCam to Improve Classifications of Sedentary Behavior in Free-Living Settings

    Jacqueline Kerr;Simon J. Marshall;Suneeta Godbole;Jacqueline Chen

  • Advancing Science and Policy Through a Coordinated International Study of Physical Activity and Built Environments: IPEN Adult Methods

    Jacqueline Kerr;James F Sallis;James F Sallis;Neville Owen;Ilse De Bourdeaudhuij

  • A Longitudinal Analysis of the Influence of the Neighborhood Built Environment on Walking for Transportation The RESIDE Study

    Matthew W Knuiman;Hayley E Christian;Mark L Divitini;Sarah A Foster

  • Planning Healthy, Liveable and Sustainable Cities: How Can Indicators Inform Policy?

    Melanie Lowe;Carolyn Whitzman;Hannah Badland;Melanie Davern

  • Neighborhood Built Environment and Transport and Leisure Physical Activity: Findings Using Objective Exposure and Outcome Measures in New Zealand

    Karen Witten;Tony Blakely;Nasser Bagheri;Hannah Badland

  • Applying GPS to enhance understanding of transport-related physical activity.

    Mitch J. Duncan;Hannah M. Badland;W. Kerry Mummery

  • Developing indicators of public open space to promote health and wellbeing in communities

    Karen Villanueva;Karen Villanueva;Hannah Badland;Paula Hooper;Mohammad Javad Koohsari;Mohammad Javad Koohsari

  • Travel behavior and objectively measured urban design variables: Associations for adults traveling to work

    Hannah M. Badland;Grant M. Schofield;Nicholas Garrett

  • (Re)Designing the built environment to support physical activity: Bringing public health back into urban design and planning

    Mohammad Javad Koohsari;Mohammad Javad Koohsari;Hannah Badland;Billie Giles-Corti

  • Examining associations between urban design attributes and transport mode choice for walking, cycling, public transport and private motor vehicle trips

    Claire Boulange;Lucy Gunn;Billie Giles-Corti;Suzanne Mavoa

  • Combining GPS, GIS, and Accelerometry: Methodological Issues in the Assessment of Location and Intensity of Travel Behaviors

    Melody Oliver;Hannah M. Badland;Suzanne Mavoa;Mitch J. Duncan

Frequent Co-Authors

Billie Giles-Corti
Billie Giles-Corti RMIT University
Suzanne Mavoa
Suzanne Mavoa University of Melbourne
Mitch J. Duncan
Mitch J. Duncan University of Newcastle Australia
Karen Witten
Karen Witten Massey University
Mohammad Javad Koohsari
Mohammad Javad Koohsari Japan Advanced Institute of Science and Technology
Robin Kearns
Robin Kearns University of Auckland
Sharon Goldfeld
Sharon Goldfeld University of Melbourne
Jacqueline Kerr
Jacqueline Kerr University of California, San Diego
Takemi Sugiyama
Takemi Sugiyama Swinburne University of Technology
Aiden R. Doherty
Aiden R. Doherty University of Oxford

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring online degrees in Social Sciences and Humanities can open doors to flexible and affordable education. Many students are now choosing online programs for their convenience and ability to fast-track a career. If you’re considering advanced study, it’s important to understand how much does it cost to get a masters in psychology—tuition varies widely depending on your chosen school and delivery format.

For those interested in academia or leadership, accelerated doctoral degrees like edd programs can help you reach your professional goals faster. Similarly, some of the online masters programs now offer completion in as little as one year, making it feasible for working professionals or career changers.

Undergraduate students can benefit as well, with options such as an online accelerated bachelor's degree, which enables quicker entry into the workforce. As demand grows for flexible, accredited programs, these online pathways are becoming increasingly popular among students who value affordability, speed, and career versatility.

Best Scientists Citing Hannah Badland

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles