World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Thomas Astell-Burt

Thomas Astell-Burt

D-Index & Metrics

Social Sciences and Humanities

D-Index
57
Citations
24799
World Ranking
1715
National Ranking
128

Thomas Astell-Burt publication distribution in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Thomas Astell-Burt sits on this spectrum.

44–53 publications: 28 scientists 54–63 publications: 61 scientists 64–73 publications: 161 scientists 74–83 publications: 225 scientists 84–93 publications: 301 scientists 94–103 publications: 390 scientists 104–113 publications: 406 scientists 114–123 publications: 474 scientists 124–133 publications: 453 scientists 134–143 publications: 434 scientists 144–153 publications: 407 scientists 154–163 publications: 411 scientists 164–173 publications: 391 scientists 174–183 publications: 313 scientists 184–193 publications: 319 scientists 194–203 publications: 304 scientists 204–213 publications: 285 scientists 214–223 publications: 246 scientists 224–233 publications: 213 scientists 234–243 publications: 170 scientists 244–253 publications: 167 scientists 254–263 publications: 162 scientists 264–273 publications: 138 scientists 274–283 publications: 138 scientists 284–293 publications: 113 scientists 294–303 publications: 106 scientists 304–313 publications: 95 scientists 314–323 publications: 101 scientists 324–333 publications: 81 scientists 334–343 publications: 69 scientists 344–353 publications: 56 scientists 354–363 publications: 36 scientists 364–373 publications: 42 scientists 374–383 publications: 41 scientists 384–393 publications: 44 scientists 394–403 publications: 27 scientists 404–413 publications: 30 scientists 414–423 publications: 20 scientists 424–433 publications: 29 scientists 434–443 publications: 29 scientists 444–453 publications: 25 scientists 454–463 publications: 19 scientists 464–473 publications: 21 scientists 474–483 publications: 11 scientists 484–493 publications: 17 scientists 494–503 publications: 7 scientists 504–513 publications: 6 scientists 514–523 publications: 12 scientists 524–533 publications: 10 scientists 534–543 publications: 7 scientists 544–553 publications: 6 scientists 554–563 publications: 12 scientists 564–569 publications: 8 scientists 570+ publications: 100 scientists
44 publications 570+

This scientist: 213 publications — 69th percentile

69% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more.

Thomas Astell-Burt D-index placement in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Thomas Astell-Burt sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 177 scientists 31 D-Index: 210 scientists 32 D-Index: 222 scientists 33 D-Index: 188 scientists 34 D-Index: 181 scientists 35 D-Index: 243 scientists 36 D-Index: 261 scientists 37 D-Index: 272 scientists 38 D-Index: 278 scientists 39 D-Index: 300 scientists 40 D-Index: 297 scientists 41 D-Index: 308 scientists 42 D-Index: 313 scientists 43 D-Index: 300 scientists 44 D-Index: 269 scientists 45 D-Index: 260 scientists 46 D-Index: 228 scientists 47 D-Index: 251 scientists 48 D-Index: 203 scientists 49 D-Index: 186 scientists 50 D-Index: 187 scientists 51 D-Index: 166 scientists 52 D-Index: 138 scientists 53 D-Index: 141 scientists 54 D-Index: 131 scientists 55 D-Index: 137 scientists 56 D-Index: 109 scientists 57 D-Index: 129 scientists 58 D-Index: 95 scientists 59 D-Index: 105 scientists 60 D-Index: 106 scientists 61 D-Index: 86 scientists 62 D-Index: 94 scientists 63 D-Index: 77 scientists 64 D-Index: 79 scientists 65 D-Index: 59 scientists 66 D-Index: 68 scientists 67 D-Index: 51 scientists 68 D-Index: 49 scientists 69 D-Index: 40 scientists 70 D-Index: 43 scientists 71 D-Index: 40 scientists 72 D-Index: 50 scientists 73 D-Index: 46 scientists 74 D-Index: 43 scientists 75 D-Index: 45 scientists 76 D-Index: 45 scientists 77 D-Index: 30 scientists 78 D-Index: 25 scientists 79 D-Index: 31 scientists 80 D-Index: 29 scientists 81 D-Index: 18 scientists 82 D-Index: 21 scientists 83 D-Index: 26 scientists 84 D-Index: 15 scientists 85 D-Index: 15 scientists 86 D-Index: 19 scientists 87 D-Index: 19 scientists 88 D-Index: 12 scientists 89 D-Index: 7 scientists 90 D-Index: 19 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 13 scientists 93 D-Index: 9 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 8 scientists 96 D-Index: 7 scientists 97 D-Index: 6 scientists 98 D-Index: 6 scientists 99 D-Index: 6 scientists 100+ D-Index: 97 scientists
30 D-Index 100+

This scientist: 57 D-Index — 78th percentile

78% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more.

Overview

Thomas Astell-Burt is affiliated with the University of Wollongong in Australia and specializes primarily in Environmental Science. Their research covers a broad range of subfields including Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis, Speech and Hearing, Plant Science, Global and Planetary Change, and Environmental Engineering.

The scientist's principal research topics include Urban Green Space and Health, Noise Effects and Management, Urban Agriculture and Sustainability, Climate Change and Health Impacts, Land Use and Ecosystem Services, Urban Heat Island Mitigation, and Urban Transport and Accessibility.

Thomas Astell-Burt has contributed to multiple publications in notable academic venues such as:

  • Urban forestry & urban greening
  • International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
  • Environmental Research
  • Health & Place
  • ISEE Conference Abstracts

Key recent papers include:

  • Estimation of the global prevalence of dementia in 2019 and forecasted prevalence in 2050: an analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2019, 2022, The Lancet Public Health
  • Global, regional, and national burden of diabetes from 1990 to 2021, with projections of prevalence to 2050: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2021, 2023, The Lancet
  • Rates of Attrition and Dropout in App-Based Interventions for Chronic Disease: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis, 2020, Journal of Medical Internet Research
  • Population-level risks of alcohol consumption by amount, geography, age, sex, and year: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2020, 2022, The Lancet
  • Green Space Quality and Health: A Systematic Review, 2021, International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health

Thomas Astell-Burt often collaborates with a group of frequent coauthors including Xiaoqi Feng, Michael Navakatikyan, I Gusti Ngurah Edi Putra, Katarzyna Olcoń, and Brenda B. Lin.

Best Publications

  • Estimation of the global prevalence of dementia in 2019 and forecasted prevalence in 2050: an analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2019

    Unknown

  • Global, regional, and national burden of diabetes from 1990 to 2021, with projections of prevalence to 2050: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2021

    Unknown

  • Exploring pathways linking greenspace to health: Theoretical and methodological guidance.

    Iana Markevych;Julia Schoierer;Terry Hartig;Alexandra Chudnovsky

  • Domain-Specific Physical Activity and Mental Health: A Meta-analysis.

    Rhiannon Lee White;Mark J. Babic;Philip D. Parker;David R. Lubans

  • Rates of Attrition and Dropout in App-Based Interventions for Chronic Disease: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

    Gideon Meyerowitz-Katz;Sumathy Ravi;Leonard F Arnolda;Xiaoqi Feng

  • The impact of interventions to promote physical activity in urban green space: A systematic review and recommendations for future research

    Ruth F Hunter;Hayley Christian;Jenny Veitch;Thomas Astell-Burt

  • Environmental Risk Factors for Developing Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: A Systematic Review.

    Tashi Dendup;Xiaoqi Feng;Xiaoqi Feng;Stephanie Clingan;Thomas E Astell-Burt;Thomas E Astell-Burt

  • The association between green space and mental health varies across the lifecourse. A longitudinal study

    Thomas E Astell-Burt;Richard Mitchell;Terry Hartig

  • The nexus between air pollution, green infrastructure and human health.

    Prashant Kumar;Prashant Kumar;Angela Druckman;John Gallagher;Birgitta Gatersleben

  • Association of Urban Green Space With Mental Health and General Health Among Adults in Australia.

    Thomas E Astell-Burt;Xiaoqi Feng

  • Do low-income neighbourhoods have the least green space? A cross-sectional study of Australia's most populous cities.

    Thomas Astell-Burt;Thomas Astell-Burt;Xiaoqi Feng;Suzanne Mavoa;Hannah M Badland

  • Stunting and severe stunting among children under-5 years in Nigeria: A multilevel analysis.

    Blessing Jaka Akombi;Kingsley Emwinyore Agho;John Joseph Hall;Dafna Merom

  • Flooding and Mental Health: A Systematic Mapping Review

    Ana Cláudia Fernandez;John Black;Mairwen Jones;Leigh Wilson

  • Nature-Based Interventions for Improving Health and Wellbeing : The Purpose, the People and the Outcomes

    Danielle F. Shanahan;Thomas Astell–Burt;Elizabeth A. Barber;Eric Brymer

  • Green Space Quality and Health: A Systematic Review.

    Phi-Yen Nguyen;Thomas Astell-Burt;Hania Rahimi-Ardabili;Hania Rahimi-Ardabili;Xiaoqi Feng;Xiaoqi Feng

  • Mental health benefits of neighbourhood green space are stronger among physically active adults in middle-to-older age: evidence from 260,061 Australians.

    Thomas Astell-Burt;Xiaoqi Feng;Gregory S. Kolt

  • Is Neighborhood Green Space Associated With a Lower Risk of Type 2 Diabetes? Evidence From 267,072 Australians

    Thomas Astell-Burt;Thomas Astell-Burt;Xiaoqi Feng;Gregory S. Kolt

  • Green cities and health: a question of scale?

    Elizabeth A Richardson;Richard Mitchell;Terry Hartig;Sjerp De Vries

  • A comparison of green space indicators for epidemiological research

    Richard Mitchell;Thomas E Astell-Burt;Elizabeth A Richardson

  • Effect of nature prescriptions on cardiometabolic and mental health, and physical activity: a systematic review.

    Unknown

  • Does access to neighbourhood green space promote a healthy duration of sleep? Novel findings from a cross-sectional study of 259 319 Australians.

    Thomas Astell-Burt;Xiaoqi Feng;Gregory S Kolt

  • Green space is associated with walking and moderate-to-vigorous physical activity (MVPA) in middle-to-older-aged adults: findings from 203 883 Australians in the 45 and Up Study

    Thomas Astell-Burt;Xiaoqi Feng;Gregory S Kolt

  • Physical Activity and School Engagement in Youth: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

    Katherine B. Owen;Phillip David Parker;Brooke Van Zanden;Freya MacMillan

  • Greener neighborhoods, slimmer people? Evidence from 246,920 Australians.

    Thomas Astell-Burt;Xiaoqi Feng;Gregory Kolt

Frequent Co-Authors

Andrew Page
Andrew Page Western Sydney University
Chris Lonsdale
Chris Lonsdale Australian Catholic University
Philip D. Parker
Philip D. Parker Australian Catholic University
Luis Salvador-Carulla
Luis Salvador-Carulla Australian National University
Seeromanie Harding
Seeromanie Harding King's College London
Suzanne Mavoa
Suzanne Mavoa University of Melbourne
Terry Hartig
Terry Hartig Uppsala University
Stewart A. Vella
Stewart A. Vella University of Wollongong
Hannah Badland
Hannah Badland RMIT University
Richard Mitchell
Richard Mitchell University of Glasgow

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Graduates in the Social Sciences and Humanities have a wide range of online degree options that lead to rewarding career paths. Many programs today focus on fields such as counseling, therapy, psychology, and social work—each offering unique possibilities for those looking to make a difference.

For individuals interested in professional counseling, there are several cacrep-accredited online counseling programs that prepare students for licensure and clinical roles. Others may want to specialize in helping couples and families, where marriage and family therapy master's programs offer focused training and flexible online study options.

If you’re looking for a degree with broad applicability, a cheap psychology degree online can open doors to careers in research, counseling, marketing, or human resources. Meanwhile, students with a passion for advocacy and community service might consider msw online programs to launch or advance a career in social work.

Online degrees in these fields often provide both affordability and flexibility, allowing you to pursue your chosen pathway while balancing life’s commitments.

Best Scientists Citing Thomas Astell-Burt

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles