What is she best known for?
The fields of study she is best known for:
- Chemical engineering
- Natural gas
- Redox
Her main research concerns Waste management, Calcination, Sorbent, Chemical engineering and Carbonation.
Her study in Flue gas and Chemical looping combustion falls under the purview of Waste management.
Her biological study spans a wide range of topics, including Fluidized bed, Fluidized bed combustion and Power station.
Her study of Sorbent brings together topics like Process engineering and Carbonate.
Her Chemical engineering research incorporates themes from Mineralogy and Natural gas.
Her Carbonation research is multidisciplinary, incorporating perspectives in Thermogravimetry, Analytical chemistry, Work and Particle size.
Her most cited work include:
- Cost structure of a postcombustion CO2 capture system using CaO (206 citations)
- Application of the random pore model to the carbonation cyclic reaction (162 citations)
- Reactivity of highly cycled particles of CaO in a carbonation/calcination loop (133 citations)
What are the main themes of her work throughout her whole career to date?
Gemma Grasa mainly focuses on Chemical engineering, Sorbent, Calcination, Materials science and Waste management.
Her Sorbent research covers fields of interest such as Carbonation, Work, Calcium oxide, Chromatography and Space velocity.
Her study in the field of Carbonatation also crosses realms of Reaction rate, Carbonate and Partial pressure.
In her research, Continuous reactor is intimately related to Chemical kinetics, which falls under the overarching field of Calcination.
Her Waste management research incorporates elements of Process engineering and Power station.
Her study looks at the relationship between Flue gas and topics such as Coal, which overlap with Supercritical fluid.
She most often published in these fields:
- Chemical engineering (52.86%)
- Sorbent (51.43%)
- Calcination (38.57%)
What were the highlights of her more recent work (between 2017-2020)?
- Chemical engineering (52.86%)
- Materials science (35.71%)
- Sorbent (51.43%)
In recent papers she was focusing on the following fields of study:
Her primary areas of investigation include Chemical engineering, Materials science, Sorbent, Sorption and Calcination.
Her work on Carbonation as part of general Chemical engineering research is often related to Methane, thus linking different fields of science.
Her study in Sorbent is interdisciplinary in nature, drawing from both Syngas and Steam reforming.
In her study, Deposition precipitation is inextricably linked to Fixed bed, which falls within the broad field of Sorption.
Gemma Grasa works mostly in the field of Calcination, limiting it down to topics relating to Chemical kinetics and, in certain cases, Continuous reactor.
Her Fluidized bed research includes themes of Wood gas generator, Mixing and Char.
Between 2017 and 2020, her most popular works were:
- Evaluation of the effect of inert support on the carbonation reaction of synthetic CaO-based CO2 sorbents (18 citations)
- CO2 capture in existing power plants using second generation Ca-Looping systems firing biomass in the calciner (13 citations)
- Complete Ca/Cu cycle for H2 production via CH4 sorption enhanced reforming in a Lab-Scale fixed bed reactor (12 citations)
In her most recent research, the most cited papers focused on:
- Chemical engineering
- Redox
- Natural gas
The scientist’s investigation covers issues in Sorbent, Materials science, Chemical engineering, Steam reforming and Sorption.
Her Sorbent research focuses on Calcium looping in particular.
Her Calcium looping research incorporates Efficient energy use, Environmental science, Process engineering, Flue gas and Work.
Her work deals with themes such as Fluidized bed and Wood gas generator, which intersect with Char.
Fixed bed is closely attributed to Calcination in her work.
Other disciplines of study, such as Reaction model, Inert, Calcium oxide, Reactivity and Carbonation, are mixed together with her Particle studies.
This overview was generated by a machine learning system which analysed the scientist’s
body of work. If you have any feedback, you can
contact us
here.
