World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Günter Scheffknecht

Günter Scheffknecht

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Engineering and Technology 42 6584 6357 217 208 162 6901

Günter Scheffknecht publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Günter Scheffknecht between 2002 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Günter Scheffknecht published across 24 years, from 2002 to 2025, averaging 6.9 papers a year. Output peaked at 17 publications in 2014. 15 of the 165 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 2002 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 17. Peak 17 publications in 2014. 2002: 1 publication 2003: 0 publications 2004: 0 publications 2005: 3 publications 2006: 0 publications 2007: 4 publications 2008: 4 publications 2009: 6 publications 2010: 9 publications 2011: 10 publications 2012: 9 publications 2013: 12 publications 2014: 17 publications 2015: 12 publications 2016: 13 publications 2017: 6 publications 2018: 4 publications 2019: 4 publications 2020: 10 publications 2021: 17 publications 2022: 6 publications 2023: 3 publications 2024: 6 publications 2025: 9 publications
2002 2025

165 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Günter Scheffknecht: publications per year, 2002 to 2025
Year Publications
2002 1
2003 0
2004 0
2005 3
2006 0
2007 4
2008 4
2009 6
2010 9
2011 10
2012 9
2013 12
2014 17
2015 12
2016 13
2017 6
2018 4
2019 4
2020 10
2021 17
2022 6
2023 3
2024 6
2025 9
Total 165
Download as CSV

Günter Scheffknecht publication distribution in Engineering and Technology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Engineering and Technology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Günter Scheffknecht sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300 400
Bar chart with 78 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 38–47 to 804+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 457. Most scientists, 457, have 148–157 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 804 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 158–167 publications, is where this scientist sits. 38–47 publications: 20 scientists 48–57 publications: 35 scientists 58–67 publications: 96 scientists 68–77 publications: 135 scientists 78–87 publications: 190 scientists 88–97 publications: 259 scientists 98–107 publications: 283 scientists 108–117 publications: 369 scientists 118–127 publications: 341 scientists 128–137 publications: 386 scientists 138–147 publications: 372 scientists 148–157 publications: 457 scientists 158–167 publications: 415 scientists 168–177 publications: 407 scientists 178–187 publications: 421 scientists 188–197 publications: 378 scientists 198–207 publications: 403 scientists 208–217 publications: 317 scientists 218–227 publications: 346 scientists 228–237 publications: 321 scientists 238–247 publications: 260 scientists 248–257 publications: 280 scientists 258–267 publications: 240 scientists 268–277 publications: 214 scientists 278–287 publications: 242 scientists 288–297 publications: 203 scientists 298–307 publications: 166 scientists 308–317 publications: 154 scientists 318–327 publications: 175 scientists 328–337 publications: 159 scientists 338–347 publications: 99 scientists 348–357 publications: 131 scientists 358–367 publications: 106 scientists 368–377 publications: 118 scientists 378–387 publications: 97 scientists 388–397 publications: 108 scientists 398–407 publications: 82 scientists 408–417 publications: 71 scientists 418–427 publications: 64 scientists 428–437 publications: 55 scientists 438–447 publications: 54 scientists 448–457 publications: 60 scientists 458–467 publications: 47 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 30 scientists 488–497 publications: 29 scientists 498–507 publications: 38 scientists 508–517 publications: 40 scientists 518–527 publications: 32 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 28 scientists 548–557 publications: 23 scientists 558–567 publications: 19 scientists 568–577 publications: 16 scientists 578–587 publications: 17 scientists 588–597 publications: 18 scientists 598–607 publications: 22 scientists 608–617 publications: 15 scientists 618–627 publications: 9 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 21 scientists 648–657 publications: 12 scientists 658–667 publications: 9 scientists 668–677 publications: 11 scientists 678–687 publications: 9 scientists 688–697 publications: 6 scientists 698–707 publications: 14 scientists 708–717 publications: 7 scientists 718–727 publications: 8 scientists 728–737 publications: 10 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 5 scientists 758–767 publications: 5 scientists 768–777 publications: 11 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 2 scientists 798–803 publications: 4 scientists 804+ publications: 100 scientists
38–47 publications 804+

This scientist: 162 publications — 32nd percentile

32% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 804 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Engineering and Technology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,796 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
38–47 20
48–57 35
58–67 96
68–77 135
78–87 190
88–97 259
98–107 283
108–117 369
118–127 341
128–137 386
138–147 372
148–157 457
158–167 415 162
168–177 407
178–187 421
188–197 378
198–207 403
208–217 317
218–227 346
228–237 321
238–247 260
248–257 280
258–267 240
268–277 214
278–287 242
288–297 203
298–307 166
308–317 154
318–327 175
328–337 159
338–347 99
348–357 131
358–367 106
368–377 118
378–387 97
388–397 108
398–407 82
408–417 71
418–427 64
428–437 55
438–447 54
448–457 60
458–467 47
468–477 40
478–487 30
488–497 29
498–507 38
508–517 40
518–527 32
528–537 23
538–547 28
548–557 23
558–567 19
568–577 16
578–587 17
588–597 18
598–607 22
608–617 15
618–627 9
628–637 11
638–647 21
648–657 12
658–667 9
668–677 11
678–687 9
688–697 6
698–707 14
708–717 7
718–727 8
728–737 10
738–747 9
748–757 5
758–767 5
768–777 11
778–787 7
788–797 2
798–803 4
804+ 100
Download as CSV

Günter Scheffknecht D-index placement in Engineering and Technology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Engineering and Technology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Günter Scheffknecht sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300 400
Bar chart with 78 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30 to 107+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 426. Most scientists, 426, have 42 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 107 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 42 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30 D-Index: 59 scientists 31 D-Index: 114 scientists 32 D-Index: 129 scientists 33 D-Index: 189 scientists 34 D-Index: 200 scientists 35 D-Index: 262 scientists 36 D-Index: 311 scientists 37 D-Index: 312 scientists 38 D-Index: 350 scientists 39 D-Index: 385 scientists 40 D-Index: 348 scientists 41 D-Index: 362 scientists 42 D-Index: 426 scientists 43 D-Index: 380 scientists 44 D-Index: 310 scientists 45 D-Index: 341 scientists 46 D-Index: 301 scientists 47 D-Index: 306 scientists 48 D-Index: 271 scientists 49 D-Index: 246 scientists 50 D-Index: 210 scientists 51 D-Index: 253 scientists 52 D-Index: 213 scientists 53 D-Index: 221 scientists 54 D-Index: 195 scientists 55 D-Index: 186 scientists 56 D-Index: 170 scientists 57 D-Index: 167 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 144 scientists 60 D-Index: 152 scientists 61 D-Index: 141 scientists 62 D-Index: 138 scientists 63 D-Index: 131 scientists 64 D-Index: 118 scientists 65 D-Index: 114 scientists 66 D-Index: 119 scientists 67 D-Index: 95 scientists 68 D-Index: 87 scientists 69 D-Index: 77 scientists 70 D-Index: 89 scientists 71 D-Index: 69 scientists 72 D-Index: 54 scientists 73 D-Index: 46 scientists 74 D-Index: 55 scientists 75 D-Index: 54 scientists 76 D-Index: 49 scientists 77 D-Index: 53 scientists 78 D-Index: 46 scientists 79 D-Index: 28 scientists 80 D-Index: 39 scientists 81 D-Index: 36 scientists 82 D-Index: 24 scientists 83 D-Index: 26 scientists 84 D-Index: 36 scientists 85 D-Index: 18 scientists 86 D-Index: 25 scientists 87 D-Index: 19 scientists 88 D-Index: 26 scientists 89 D-Index: 27 scientists 90 D-Index: 23 scientists 91 D-Index: 15 scientists 92 D-Index: 12 scientists 93 D-Index: 9 scientists 94 D-Index: 15 scientists 95 D-Index: 10 scientists 96 D-Index: 13 scientists 97 D-Index: 13 scientists 98 D-Index: 9 scientists 99 D-Index: 7 scientists 100 D-Index: 7 scientists 101 D-Index: 8 scientists 102 D-Index: 7 scientists 103 D-Index: 7 scientists 104 D-Index: 9 scientists 105 D-Index: 6 scientists 106 D-Index: 9 scientists 107+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 107+

This scientist: 42 D-Index — 35th percentile

35% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 107 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Engineering and Technology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,796 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30 59
31 114
32 129
33 189
34 200
35 262
36 311
37 312
38 350
39 385
40 348
41 362
42 426 42
43 380
44 310
45 341
46 301
47 306
48 271
49 246
50 210
51 253
52 213
53 221
54 195
55 186
56 170
57 167
58 166
59 144
60 152
61 141
62 138
63 131
64 118
65 114
66 119
67 95
68 87
69 77
70 89
71 69
72 54
73 46
74 55
75 54
76 49
77 53
78 46
79 28
80 39
81 36
82 24
83 26
84 36
85 18
86 25
87 19
88 26
89 27
90 23
91 15
92 12
93 9
94 15
95 10
96 13
97 13
98 9
99 7
100 7
101 8
102 7
103 7
104 9
105 6
106 9
107+ 99
Download as CSV

Overview

Günter Scheffknecht is affiliated with the University of Stuttgart in Germany. Their primary research focus lies within the field of engineering, with a total of 89 publications across several related subfields. These subfields include biomedical engineering, mechanical engineering, materials chemistry, catalysis, and health, toxicology, and mutagenesis.

The scientist's work addresses multiple core topics mainly related to thermochemical and chemical processes. These topics include thermochemical biomass conversion processes, chemical looping and thermochemical processes, catalysts for methane reforming, iron and steelmaking processes, industrial gas emission control, carbon dioxide capture technologies, and thermal and kinetic analysis.

Their research has been published in a variety of journals. Frequent publication venues include:

  • Fuel
  • SSRN Electronic Journal
  • Energies
  • Fuel Processing Technology
  • Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews

They have collaborated extensively with several co-authors, often contributing to multidisciplinary studies. The most frequent co-authors are:

  • Max Schmid (22 joint publications)
  • Jörg Maier (13 joint publications)
  • Selina Hafner (6 joint publications)
  • Joseba Moreno (6 joint publications)
  • Nico Mader (6 joint publications)

Among their recent papers are several addressing biomass and gasification processes, flue gas treatment, and CO2 capture. Notable publications include:

  • "Sorption enhanced gasification (SEG) of biomass for tailored syngas production with in-situ CO2 capture: Current status, process scale-up experiences and outlook," 2021, Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews
  • "Influence of temperature on products from fluidized bed pyrolysis of wood and solid recovered fuel," 2020, Fuel
  • "Investigation on the behavior of mercury across the flue gas treatment of coal combustion power plants using a lab-scale firing system," 2020, Fuel Processing Technology
  • "Experimental investigation of the calcination reactor in a tail-end calcium looping configuration for CO2 capture from cement plants," 2020, Fuel
  • "Steam-oxygen gasification of sewage sludge: Reduction of tar, H2S and COS with limestone as bed additive," 2021, Biomass and Bioenergy

Best Publications

  • Oxy-fuel coal combustion—A review of the current state-of-the-art

    Günter Scheffknecht;Leema Al-Makhadmeh;Uwe Schnell;Jörg Maier

  • Oxyfuel combustion for CO2 capture in power plants

    Rohan Stanger;Terry Wall;Reinhold Spörl;Manoj Paneru

  • Experimental Validation of the Calcium Looping CO2 Capture Process with Two Circulating Fluidized Bed Carbonator Reactors

    Alexander Charitos;Nuria Rodríguez;Craig Hawthorne;Mónica Alonso

  • Parametric investigation of the calcium looping process for CO2 capture in a 10kWth dual fluidized bed

    A. Charitos;C. Hawthorne;A.R. Bidwe;S. Sivalingam

  • Wood smoke as a source of particle-phase organic compounds in residential areas

    Md. Aynul Bari;Guenter Baumbach;Bertram Kuch;Guenter Scheffknecht

  • Development of the calcium looping CO2 capture technology from lab to pilot scale at IFK, University of Stuttgart

    Heiko Dieter;Ajay R. Bidwe;Glykeria Varela-Duelli;Alexander Charitos

  • NOx-emissions from flameless coal combustion in air, Ar/O2 and CO2/O2

    Hannes Stadler;Dragisa Ristic;Malte Förster;Anja Schuster

  • Comparison of Different Global Reaction Mechanisms for MILD Combustion of Natural Gas

    Unknown

  • Experimental research on the performance of CO2-loaded solutions of MEA and DEA at regeneration conditions

    Paula Galindo;Anke Schäffer;Kevin Brechtel;Sven Unterberger

  • Ash fusibility and compositional data of solid recovered fuels

    Gregory Dunnu;Jörg Maier;Günter Scheffknecht

  • Particle-phase concentrations of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in ambient air of rural residential areas in southern Germany

    Md. Aynul Bari;Günter Baumbach;Bertram Kuch;Günter Scheffknecht

  • CO2 Capture for Fossil Fuel‐Fired Power Plants

    Ralf Notz;Inga Tönnies;Nichola Mccann;Günter Scheffknecht

  • Comparative study on differently concentrated aqueous solutions of MEA and TETA for CO2 capture from flue gases

    A. Schäffer;K. Brechtel;G. Scheffknecht

  • Steam gasification of wood pellets, sewage sludge and manure: Gasification performance and concentration of impurities

    Daniel Schweitzer;Andreas Gredinger;Max Schmid;Gebhard Waizmann

  • Oxy-fuel combustion technology for cement production – State of the art research and technology development

    Francisco Carrasco-Maldonado;Reinhold Spörl;Kristina Fleiger;Volker Hoenig

  • Simulation of the carbonate looping power cycle

    C. Hawthorne;M. Trossmann;P. Galindo Cifre;A. Schuster

  • Integration of a chemical process model in a power plant modelling tool for the simulation of an amine based CO2 scrubber

    P. Galindo Cifre;K. Brechtel;S. Hoch;H. García

  • Nickel-base superalloys for ultra-supercritical coal-fired power plants: Fireside corrosion. Laboratory studies and power plant exposures

    Gosia Stein-Brzozowska;Diana M. Flórez;Jörg Maier;Günter Scheffknecht

  • The oxycoal process with cryogenic oxygen supply

    Alfons Kather;Günter Scheffknecht

  • CO2 capture with CaO in a 200 kWth dual fluidized bed pilot plant

    C. Hawthorne;H. Dieter;A. Bidwe;A. Schuster

  • Comparison of experimental results from three dual fluidized bed test facilities capturing CO2 with CaO

    Nuria Rodríguez;Mónica Alonso;Juan Carlos Abanades;Alexander Charitos

  • Hydrodynamic analysis of a 10 kWth Calcium Looping Dual Fluidized Bed for post-combustion CO2 capture

    A. Charitos;C. Hawthorne;A.R. Bidwe;L. Korovesis

Frequent Co-Authors

Hans Hasse
Hans Hasse Technical University of Kaiserslautern
Hartmut Spliethoff
Hartmut Spliethoff Technical University of Munich
Terry Wall
Terry Wall University of Newcastle Australia
Mikko Hupa
Mikko Hupa Åbo Akademi University
Emmanuel Kakaras
Emmanuel Kakaras National Technical University of Athens
Panagiotis Grammelis
Panagiotis Grammelis Centre for Research and Technology Hellas
Gartzen Lopez
Gartzen Lopez University of the Basque Country
Juan Carlos Abanades
Juan Carlos Abanades Spanish National Research Council
Kalpit Shah
Kalpit Shah RMIT University
Nuria Rodríguez
Nuria Rodríguez Autonomous University of Madrid

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Engineering and Technology in the USA opens the door to a variety of dynamic fields—many of which can be studied through flexible online programs. For those interested in user interface and user experience, a ui/ux design bachelor's degree online provides foundational skills for designing intuitive digital products and services.

If you’re drawn to overseeing projects and leading teams, consider whether is project management a good degree for your career goals. Project management knowledge is increasingly valuable in engineering, tech, and business environments worldwide.

For those fascinated by digital currencies and the future of finance, a masters in crypto can provide expert-level insight into blockchain, cryptocurrency, and fintech innovation.

Lastly, if you have a passion for sports and analytics, an online sports degree combines management principles with the unique needs of the sports industry—opening new career pathways at the intersection of technology and athletics.

Each of these online degrees is designed to meet evolving industry needs, offering both flexibility and practical experience for today’s learners.

Best Scientists Citing Günter Scheffknecht

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles