World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
76
Citations
17568
World Ranking
18915
National Ranking
9426

Adolph V. Lombardi publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Adolph V. Lombardi sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 611 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 327 publications — 23rd percentile

23% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

Adolph V. Lombardi D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Adolph V. Lombardi sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 400 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 76 D-Index — 8th percentile

8% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Overview

Adolph V. Lombardi is affiliated with The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center in the United States. Their primary field of study is Medicine, with a specialized focus on Surgery. Additional subfields of interest include Rheumatology, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Mechanics of Materials, and Biomedical Engineering. The volume of work produced emphasizes Surgery, which accounts for the majority of their academic contributions.

The main topics in Lombardi's research encompass Total Knee Arthroplasty Outcomes, Orthopaedic Implants and Arthroplasty, Orthopedic Infections and Treatments, Knee Injuries and Reconstruction Techniques, Osteoarthritis Treatment and Mechanisms, Shoulder Injury and Treatment, and Anesthesia and Pain Management. These areas reflect a concentration on surgical interventions and outcome optimization within orthopedic medicine.

Frequent co-authors collaborating with Lombardi include:

  • Keith R. Berend
  • David A. Crawford
  • Michael J. Morris
  • Joanne B. Adams
  • Jason M. Hurst

Major venues for publication feature:

  • The Journal of Arthroplasty
  • Surgical Technology Online
  • The Bone & Joint Journal
  • Arthroplasty Today
  • The Journal of Knee Surgery

Notable recent papers include:

  • 2021 Mark Coventry Award: Use of a smartphone-based care platform after primary partial and total knee arthroplasty: a prospective randomized controlled trial (2021, The Bone & Joint Journal)
  • Early outcomes of primary total hip arthroplasty with use of a smartphone-based care platform: a prospective randomized controlled trial (2021, The Bone & Joint Journal)
  • The Viability of an Artificial Intelligence/Machine Learning Prediction Model to Determine Candidates for Knee Arthroplasty (2022, The Journal of Arthroplasty)
  • Technology in Total Knee Arthroplasty in 2023 (2024, The Journal of Arthroplasty)
  • Use of a Smartphone-Based Care Platform After Primary Partial and Total Knee Arthroplasty: 1-Year Follow-Up of a Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial (2023, The Journal of Arthroplasty)

The breadth and focus of these publications illustrate a consistent emphasis on the integration of technology in arthroplasty procedures, as well as outcome assessment following surgical interventions.

Best Publications

  • Two-stage Treatment of Hip Periprosthetic Joint Infection Is Associated With a High Rate of Infection Control but High Mortality

    Keith R. Berend;Keith R. Berend;Adolph V. Lombardi;Adolph V. Lombardi;Michael J. Morris;Adam G. Bergeson

  • Improved Accuracy of Alignment With Patient-specific Positioning Guides Compared With Manual Instrumentation in TKA

    Vincent Y. Ng;Jeffrey H. DeClaire;Keith R. Berend;Keith R. Berend;Bethany C. Gulick

  • Why Are Total Knees Failing Today? Etiology of Total Knee Revision in 2010 and 2011

    William C. Schroer;Keith R. Berend;Adolph V. Lombardi;C. Lowry Barnes

  • Is Recovery Faster for Mobile-bearing Unicompartmental than Total Knee Arthroplasty?

    Adolph V. Lombardi;Keith R. Berend;Keith R. Berend;Christopher A. Walter;Jorge Aziz-Jacobo

  • Total knee arthroplasty has higher postoperative morbidity than unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: a multicenter analysis.

    Nicholas M. Brown;Neil P. Sheth;Kenneth Davis;Mike E. Berend

  • Large versus small femoral heads in metal-on-metal total hip arthroplasty.

    John M. Cuckler;K.David Moore;Adolph V. Lombardi;Edward McPherson

  • Knee manipulation following total knee arthroplasty. Analysis of prognostic variables.

    Daniel Daluga;Adolph V. Lombardi;Thomas H. Mallory;Bradley K. Vaughn

  • Early failure of minimally invasive unicompartmental knee arthroplasty is associated with obesity.

    Keith R. Berend;Adolph V. Lombardi;Thomas H. Mallory;Joanne B. Adams

  • Enhanced early outcomes with the anterior supine intermuscular approach in primary total hip arthroplasty.

    Keith R Berend;Adolph V Lombardi;Brian E Seng;Joanne B Adams

  • High level of residual symptoms in young patients after total knee arthroplasty.

    Javad Parvizi;Ryan M. Nunley;Keith R. Berend;Adolph V. Lombardi

  • Why knee replacements fail in 2013: patient, surgeon, or implant?

    A. V. Lombardi;K. R. Berend;J. B. Adams

  • Soft tissue and intra-articular injection of bupivacaine, epinephrine, and morphine has a beneficial effect after total knee arthroplasty.

    Adolph V Lombardi;Keith R Berend;Thomas H Mallory;Kathleen L Dodds

  • The Long-term Outcome of 755 Consecutive Constrained Acetabular Components in Total Hip Arthroplasty: Examining the Successes and Failures

    Keith R. Berend;Adolph V. Lombardi;Thomas H. Mallory;Joanne B. Adams

  • Risk stratification algorithm for management of patients with metal-on-metal hip arthroplasty: consensus statement of the American Association of Hip and Knee Surgeons, the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons, and the Hip Society

    Young-Min Kwon;Adolph V Lombardi;Joshua J Jacobs;Thomas K Fehring

  • A Short Tapered Stem Reduces Intraoperative Complications in Primary Total Hip Arthroplasty

    Ryan G. Molli;Adolph V. Lombardi;Adolph V. Lombardi;Keith R. Berend;Keith R. Berend;Joanne B. Adams

  • Leukocyte Esterase Reagent Strips for the Rapid Diagnosis of Periprosthetic Joint Infection

    Nathan G. Wetters;Keith R. Berend;Adolph V. Lombardi;Michael J. Morris

  • The Efficacy of Suction Drains After Routine Total Joint Arthroplasty

    K J Beer;A V Lombardi;T H Mallory;B K Vaughn

  • Patient-specific approach in total knee arthroplasty.

    Adolph V Lombardi;Keith R Berend;Joanne B Adams

  • The Hip Society: algorithmic approach to diagnosis and management of metal-on-metal arthroplasty

    A. V. Lombardi;R. L. Barrack;K. R. Berend;J. M. Cuckler

  • Anterior-Supine Minimally Invasive Total Hip Arthroplasty: Defining the Learning Curve

    Brian E. Seng;Keith R. Berend;Keith R. Berend;Andrew F. Ajluni;Adolph V. Lombardi

Frequent Co-Authors

Craig J. Della Valle
Craig J. Della Valle Rush University Medical Center
Robert L. Barrack
Robert L. Barrack Washington University in St. Louis
Joshua J. Jacobs
Joshua J. Jacobs Rush University Medical Center
Michael A. Mont
Michael A. Mont Cleveland Clinic
Javad Parvizi
Javad Parvizi Acıbadem Mehmet Ali Aydınlar University
David W. Murray
David W. Murray University of Oxford
John C. Clohisy
John C. Clohisy Washington University in St. Louis
Stuart B. Goodman
Stuart B. Goodman Stanford University
James A. Kennedy
James A. Kennedy Princess Margaret Cancer Centre

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring medicine in the USA opens doors to a variety of flexible, career-advancing online programs. If you’re looking to move into nursing leadership, consider online dnp programs that can help you attain a top nursing degree while balancing work and study.

Those seeking accelerated entry into healthcare may want to explore an lpn fast track program. These options can quickly prepare you for critical roles in patient care, often in less time than traditional pathways.

If mental health interests you, the shortest pmhnp program can help you fast-track your credentials as a Psychiatric Mental Health Nurse Practitioner.

For those considering non-clinical roles, earning an affordable healthcare administration degree online offers pathways into management and administration careers within healthcare systems.

Each pathway offers distinct advantages—whether you’re aiming for hands-on patient care or leadership roles—and can be tailored to fit your career goals through convenient online study.

Best Scientists Citing Adolph V. Lombardi

Trending Scientists