World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Merrill A. Ritter

Merrill A. Ritter

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
88
Citations
23775
World Ranking
13330
National Ranking
6780

Merrill A. Ritter publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Merrill A. Ritter sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 611 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 365 publications — 31st percentile

31% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

Merrill A. Ritter D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Merrill A. Ritter sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 400 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 88 D-Index — 36th percentile

36% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Overview

Merrill A. Ritter is affiliated with the Foundation Center in the United States and has contributed research primarily in the fields of medicine and dentistry. Their work spans various subfields including oral surgery, pathology and forensic medicine, surgery, pharmacology, and cognitive neuroscience. The focus of their studies involves clinical and biomedical aspects related to spine and intervertebral disc pathology, scoliosis diagnosis and treatment, musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation, pain management and placebo effect, empathy and medical education, pediatric pain management techniques, as well as the application of lasers in dentistry and medicine.

Their recent publications include the following papers:

  • A Muscle-Driven Spine Model for Predictive Simulations in the Design of Spinal Implants and Lumbar Orthoses, 2025, published in Bioengineering
  • Talking placebo: a qualitative study of patients' attitudes toward open-label placebo implementation into clinical practice, 2025, published in Frontiers in Psychology
  • Feasibility of atraumatic extractions with surgical lasers: A pilot study in porcine jaws, 2025, published in Journal of Dentistry

Ritter frequently collaborates with other researchers, including:

  • Robin Remus
  • Andreas Lipphaus
  • Marc Neumann
  • Beate Bender
  • Antje Frey Nascimento

Their studies have appeared in several scientific journals, notably:

  • Bioengineering
  • Frontiers in Psychology
  • Journal of Dentistry

Best Publications

  • Predicting range of motion after total knee arthroplasty. Clustering, log-linear regression, and regression tree analysis.

    Merrill A Ritter;Leesa D Harty;Kenneth E Davis;John B Meding

  • Morbidly obese, diabetic, younger, and unilateral joint arthroplasty patients have elevated total joint arthroplasty infection rates.

    Robert A. Malinzak;Merrill A. Ritter;Michael E. Berend;John B. Meding

  • Why Are Total Knees Failing Today? Etiology of Total Knee Revision in 2010 and 2011

    William C. Schroer;Keith R. Berend;Adolph V. Lombardi;C. Lowry Barnes

  • Proximal tibial osteotomy. A survivorship analysis.

    Merrill A. Ritter;Robert A. Fechtman

  • Long-term followup of anatomic graduated components posterior cruciate-retaining total knee replacement.

    Merrill Ritter;Michael Berend;John Meding;E. Keating

  • Unwashed filtered shed blood collected after knee and hip arthroplasties. A source of autologous red blood cells.

    P M Faris;M A Ritter;E M Keating;C R Valeri

  • Impaction Bone-Grafting before Insertion of a Femoral Stem with Cement in Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty. A Minimum Two-Year Follow-up Study*

    John B. Meding;Merrill A. Ritter;E. Michael Keating;Philip M. Faris

  • Radiolucency at the Bone-Cement Interface in Total Knee Replacement. The Effects of Bone-Surface Preparation and Cement Technique.

    M A Ritter;S A Herbst;E M Keating;P M Faris

  • Comparative outcomes of total joint arthroplasty

    Merrill A. Ritter;Marjorie J. Albohm;E. Michael Keating;Philip M. Faris

  • Simultaneous Bilateral, Staged Bilateral, and Unilateral Total Knee Arthroplasty. A Survival Analysis

    Merrill A Ritter;Leesa D Harty;Kenneth E Davis;John B Meding

  • The role of flexion contracture on outcomes in primary total knee arthroplasty.

    Merrill A. Ritter;Joseph D. Lutgring;Kenneth E. Davis;Michael E. Berend

  • The effect of total hip arthroplasty surgical approach on gait

    Michael S. Madsen;Merrill A. Ritter;Harold H. Morris;John B. Meding

  • Long-term survival analysis of a posterior cruciate-retaining total condylar total knee arthroplasty.

    Ritter Ma;Herbst Sa;Keating Em;Faris Pm

  • Long-term followup of nonmodular total knee replacements.

    E. Michael Keating;John B. Meding;Philip M. Faris;Merrill A. Ritter

  • Predictors of Transfusion Risk in Elective Knee Surgery

    E. Keating;John Meding;Philip Faris;Merrill Ritter

  • Early failure of unicompartmental knee arthroplasty leading to revision.

    Thomas J. Aleto;Thomas J. Aleto;Michael E. Berend;Merrill A. Ritter;Philip M. Faris

  • Closed wound drainage in total hip or total knee replacement. A prospective, randomized study.

    M A Ritter;E M Keating;P M Faris

  • Anterior femoral notching and ipsilateral supracondylar femur fracture in total knee arthroplasty.

    Merrill A. Ritter;Philip M. Faris;E. Michael Keating

  • The clinical effect of gender on outcome of total knee arthroplasty.

    Merrill A. Ritter;Jennifer T. Wing;Michael E. Berend;Kenneth E. Davis

  • Effect of range of motion on the success of a total knee arthroplasty

    Merrill A. Ritter;Elaine D. Campbell

Frequent Co-Authors

Clifford W. Colwell
Clifford W. Colwell Scripps Health
Chitranjan S. Ranawat
Chitranjan S. Ranawat Hospital for Special Surgery
Michael A. Mont
Michael A. Mont Cleveland Clinic
Lawrence D. Dorr
Lawrence D. Dorr University of Southern California
John J. Callaghan
John J. Callaghan University of Iowa
Arlen D. Hanssen
Arlen D. Hanssen Mayo Clinic
Robert E. Booth
Robert E. Booth University of Colorado Denver
William H. Harris
William H. Harris Massachusetts General Hospital
Daniel T. Lackland
Daniel T. Lackland Medical University of South Carolina

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

As the demand for medical professionals grows, many students are exploring flexible online options to start or advance their careers. While attending medical school in the USA is a significant commitment, online programs offer alternative routes into the healthcare field or further specialization.

Entry-level roles, such as medical billing and coding, can be a great starting point. Students can quickly become certified from home thanks to the cheapest medical coding certification online programs, which provide industry-standard training at a fraction of traditional costs.

For those drawn to advanced clinical care, the most affordable online nurse practitioner programs allow registered nurses to earn a graduate degree with greater flexibility and affordability. Not surprisingly, many also ask, how much is online nursing school? Costs can vary, but online degrees are often more budget-friendly than campus-based counterparts.

Finally, for nurses who wish to move into leadership, teaching, or research, a phd nursing education online provides doctoral-level credentials and can unlock new professional pathways.

Best Scientists Citing Merrill A. Ritter

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles