World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Ecology and Evolution

D-Index
31
Citations
5016
World Ranking
8197
National Ranking
2718

Daniel Esler publication distribution in Ecology and Evolution in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Ecology and Evolution in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Daniel Esler sits on this spectrum.

37–41 publications: 2 scientists 42–46 publications: 9 scientists 47–51 publications: 10 scientists 52–56 publications: 31 scientists 57–61 publications: 56 scientists 62–66 publications: 91 scientists 67–71 publications: 92 scientists 72–76 publications: 127 scientists 77–81 publications: 173 scientists 82–86 publications: 236 scientists 87–91 publications: 227 scientists 92–96 publications: 240 scientists 97–101 publications: 333 scientists 102–106 publications: 280 scientists 107–111 publications: 300 scientists 112–116 publications: 285 scientists 117–121 publications: 305 scientists 122–126 publications: 287 scientists 127–131 publications: 278 scientists 132–136 publications: 289 scientists 137–141 publications: 273 scientists 142–146 publications: 262 scientists 147–151 publications: 246 scientists 152–156 publications: 235 scientists 157–161 publications: 205 scientists 162–166 publications: 199 scientists 167–171 publications: 174 scientists 172–176 publications: 164 scientists 177–181 publications: 173 scientists 182–186 publications: 189 scientists 187–191 publications: 170 scientists 192–196 publications: 139 scientists 197–201 publications: 128 scientists 202–206 publications: 117 scientists 207–211 publications: 115 scientists 212–216 publications: 107 scientists 217–221 publications: 124 scientists 222–226 publications: 81 scientists 227–231 publications: 82 scientists 232–236 publications: 85 scientists 237–241 publications: 75 scientists 242–246 publications: 66 scientists 247–251 publications: 81 scientists 252–256 publications: 69 scientists 257–261 publications: 70 scientists 262–266 publications: 55 scientists 267–271 publications: 64 scientists 272–276 publications: 49 scientists 277–281 publications: 48 scientists 282–286 publications: 44 scientists 287–291 publications: 45 scientists 292–296 publications: 36 scientists 297–301 publications: 39 scientists 302–306 publications: 38 scientists 307–311 publications: 30 scientists 312–316 publications: 34 scientists 317–321 publications: 25 scientists 322–326 publications: 22 scientists 327–331 publications: 28 scientists 332–336 publications: 30 scientists 337–341 publications: 22 scientists 342–346 publications: 30 scientists 347–351 publications: 26 scientists 352–356 publications: 22 scientists 357–361 publications: 29 scientists 362–366 publications: 21 scientists 367–371 publications: 12 scientists 372–376 publications: 18 scientists 377–381 publications: 17 scientists 382–386 publications: 13 scientists 387–391 publications: 21 scientists 392–396 publications: 13 scientists 397–401 publications: 10 scientists 402–406 publications: 15 scientists 407–411 publications: 8 scientists 412–416 publications: 9 scientists 417–421 publications: 8 scientists 422–426 publications: 4 scientists 427–431 publications: 10 scientists 432–436 publications: 10 scientists 437–441 publications: 5 scientists 442–446 publications: 4 scientists 447–451 publications: 10 scientists 452–456 publications: 2 scientists 457–461 publications: 4 scientists 462–466 publications: 7 scientists 467–471 publications: 7 scientists 472–476 publications: 6 scientists 477–481 publications: 6 scientists 482–486 publications: 3 scientists 487–491 publications: 3 scientists 492–496 publications: 4 scientists 497–501 publications: 4 scientists 502–506 publications: 8 scientists 507–511 publications: 5 scientists 512–516 publications: 4 scientists 517–521 publications: 5 scientists 522–526 publications: 4 scientists 527–530 publications: 5 scientists 531+ publications: 100 scientists
37 publications 531+

This scientist: 100 publications — 19th percentile

19% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 531 publications or more.

Daniel Esler D-index placement in Ecology and Evolution in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Ecology and Evolution scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Daniel Esler sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 95 scientists 31 D-Index: 123 scientists 32 D-Index: 191 scientists 33 D-Index: 245 scientists 34 D-Index: 252 scientists 35 D-Index: 244 scientists 36 D-Index: 249 scientists 37 D-Index: 244 scientists 38 D-Index: 254 scientists 39 D-Index: 254 scientists 40 D-Index: 280 scientists 41 D-Index: 274 scientists 42 D-Index: 266 scientists 43 D-Index: 233 scientists 44 D-Index: 248 scientists 45 D-Index: 208 scientists 46 D-Index: 201 scientists 47 D-Index: 213 scientists 48 D-Index: 207 scientists 49 D-Index: 172 scientists 50 D-Index: 209 scientists 51 D-Index: 199 scientists 52 D-Index: 153 scientists 53 D-Index: 169 scientists 54 D-Index: 163 scientists 55 D-Index: 148 scientists 56 D-Index: 120 scientists 57 D-Index: 146 scientists 58 D-Index: 137 scientists 59 D-Index: 140 scientists 60 D-Index: 104 scientists 61 D-Index: 119 scientists 62 D-Index: 118 scientists 63 D-Index: 99 scientists 64 D-Index: 77 scientists 65 D-Index: 100 scientists 66 D-Index: 86 scientists 67 D-Index: 83 scientists 68 D-Index: 75 scientists 69 D-Index: 94 scientists 70 D-Index: 57 scientists 71 D-Index: 68 scientists 72 D-Index: 59 scientists 73 D-Index: 63 scientists 74 D-Index: 66 scientists 75 D-Index: 60 scientists 76 D-Index: 42 scientists 77 D-Index: 49 scientists 78 D-Index: 39 scientists 79 D-Index: 37 scientists 80 D-Index: 43 scientists 81 D-Index: 41 scientists 82 D-Index: 45 scientists 83 D-Index: 34 scientists 84 D-Index: 40 scientists 85 D-Index: 35 scientists 86 D-Index: 55 scientists 87 D-Index: 24 scientists 88 D-Index: 24 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 23 scientists 91 D-Index: 25 scientists 92 D-Index: 27 scientists 93 D-Index: 27 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 23 scientists 96 D-Index: 12 scientists 97 D-Index: 14 scientists 98 D-Index: 19 scientists 99 D-Index: 16 scientists 100 D-Index: 14 scientists 101 D-Index: 5 scientists 102 D-Index: 21 scientists 103 D-Index: 16 scientists 104 D-Index: 10 scientists 105 D-Index: 7 scientists 106 D-Index: 7 scientists 107 D-Index: 7 scientists 108 D-Index: 6 scientists 109 D-Index: 9 scientists 110 D-Index: 11 scientists 111 D-Index: 12 scientists 112 D-Index: 9 scientists 113 D-Index: 7 scientists 114 D-Index: 3 scientists 115 D-Index: 8 scientists 116 D-Index: 5 scientists 117 D-Index: 11 scientists 118 D-Index: 4 scientists 119 D-Index: 2 scientists 120 D-Index: 5 scientists 121+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 121+

This scientist: 31 D-Index — 3rd percentile

3% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 121 D-Index or more.

Overview

Daniel Esler is affiliated with the United States Geological Survey in the United States. Their research primarily focuses on Environmental Science, with particular expertise in Ecology, Global and Planetary Change, Oceanography, Genetics, and Ecological Modeling.

Their work covers several main topics, including:

  • Marine animal studies overview
  • Avian ecology and behavior
  • Wildlife Ecology and Conservation
  • Genetic diversity and population structure
  • Marine and fisheries research
  • Marine Bivalve and Aquaculture Studies
  • Marine and coastal plant biology

Daniel Esler has contributed to research published in various scientific venues. These include:

  • Scientific Reports
  • Marine Ecology
  • Journal of Avian Biology
  • Journal of Animal Ecology
  • The Auk

Some recent papers authored or co-authored by Daniel Esler are:

  • Ecosystem response persists after a prolonged marine heatwave (2021, Scientific Reports)
  • Evidence of increased mussel abundance related to the Pacific marine heatwave and sea star wasting (2022, Marine Ecology)
  • High site fidelity does not equate to population genetic structure for common goldeneye and Barrow's goldeneye in North America (2020, Journal of Avian Biology)
  • Revealing the extent of sea otter impacts on bivalve prey through multi-trophic monitoring and mechanistic models (2023, Journal of Animal Ecology)
  • Pacific Barrow's Goldeneye refine migratory phenology in response to overwintering temperatures and annual snowmelt (2023, The Auk)

Frequent co-authors collaborating with Daniel Esler include:

  • Daniel H. Monson
  • Benjamin P. Weitzman
  • W. Sean Boyd
  • Heather A. Coletti
  • James L. Bodkin

Best Publications

  • Long-Term Ecosystem Response to the Exxon Valdez Oil Spill

    Charles H. Peterson;Stanley D. Rice;Jeffrey W. Short;Daniel Esler

  • Ecosystem response persists after a prolonged marine heatwave.

    Robert M. Suryan;Mayumi L. Arimitsu;Heather A. Coletti;Russell R. Hopcroft

  • Applying Metapopulation Theory to Conservation of Migratory Birds

    Daniel N. Esler

  • Evaluating the validity of using unverified indices of body condition

    Jason L. Schamber;Daniel Esler;Paul L. Flint

  • Winter survival of adult female harlequin ducks in relation to history of contamination by the Exxon Valdez oil spill

    Daniel Esler;Joel A. Schmutz;Robert L. Jarvis;Daniel M. Mulcahy

  • Harlequin duck population recovery following the 'Exxon Valdez' oil spill: progress, process and constraints

    Daniel N. Esler;Timothy D. Bowman;Kimberly A. Trust;Brenda E. Ballachey

  • Cytochrome P450 1A Induction in Sea Ducks Inhabiting Nearshore Areas of Prince William Sound, Alaska

    Kimberly A. Trust;Daniel N. Esler;Bruce R. Woodin;John J. Stegeman

  • Evaluation of bursal depth as an indicator of age class of harlequin ducks

    D.D. Mather;Daniel N. Esler

  • Surgical and immediate post-release mortality of harlequin ducks (Histrionicus histrionicus) implanted with abdominal radio transmitters with percutaneous antennae.

    Daniel M. Mulcahy;Daniel N. Esler

  • Trophic Mass-Balance Model of Alaska's Prince William Sound Ecosystem, for the Post-Spill Period 1994-1996

    T. A. Okey;D. Pauly;J. Allen;P. Anderson

  • Factors influencing depredation of artificial duck nests

    Daniel N. Esler;James B. Grand

  • The role of nutrient reserves for clutch formation by Northern Pintails in Alaska

    Daniel N. Esler;James B. Grand

  • Testing assumptions for unbiased estimation of survival of radiomarked harlequin ducks

    Daniel N. Esler;Daniel M. Mulcahy;Robert L. Jarvis

  • Cytochrome P4501A biomarker indication of oil exposure in harlequin ducks up to 20 years after the Exxon Valdez oil spill

    Daniel Esler;Kimberly A. Trust;Brenda E. Ballachey;Samuel A. Iverson

  • Morphology and density of mussels on natural and aquaculture structure habitats: implications for sea duck predators

    Molly Kirk;Daniel Esler;W. Sean Boyd

  • Site fidelity and the demographic implications of winter movements by a migratory bird, the harlequin duck Histrionicus histrionicus

    Samuel A. Iverson;Daniel Esler

  • Harlequin Duck population injury and recovery dynamics following the 1989 Exxon Valdez oil spill.

    Samuel A. Iverson;Daniel Esler

  • Effects of predation by sea ducks on clam abundance in soft-bottom intertidal habitats

    Tyler L. Lewis;Daniel Esler;W. Sean Boyd

  • Intraspecific Variation in Nutrient Reserve Use During Clutch Formation by Lesser Scaup

    Daniel N. Esler;James B. Grand;Alan D. Afton

  • Comparison of the Effects and Performance of Four Types of Radiotransmitters for Use With Scoters

    S.A. Iverson;W.S. Boyd;Daniel N. Esler;D.M. Mulcahy

  • NOCTURNAL FORAGING BEHAVIOR OF WINTERING SURF SCOTERS AND WHITE-WINGED SCOTERS

    Tyler L. Lewis;Daniel Esler;W. Sean Boyd;Ramūnas Žydelis

  • Using predator distributions, diet, and condition to evaluate seasonal foraging sites: sea ducks and herring spawn

    Eric M. Anderson;James R. Lovvorn;Daniel Esler;W. Sean Boyd

  • Movements of wintering surf scoters: predator responses to different prey landscapes.

    Molly Kirk;Daniel Esler;Samuel A. Iverson;Samuel A. Iverson;W. Sean Boyd

  • Harlequin duck ( Histrionicus histrionicus ) perspective: Harlequin duck population recovery following the Exxon Valdez oil spill: Progress, process, and constraints

    Daniel N. Esler;Timothy D. Bowman;Kimberly A. Trust;Brenda E. Ballachey

Frequent Co-Authors

Tony D. Williams
Tony D. Williams Simon Fraser University
David H. Ward
David H. Ward United States Geological Survey
James L. Bodkin
James L. Bodkin United States Geological Survey
Stephen C. Jewett
Stephen C. Jewett University of Alaska Fairbanks
John Y. Takekawa
John Y. Takekawa United States Geological Survey
Joel A. Schmutz
Joel A. Schmutz United States Geological Survey
Paul L. Flint
Paul L. Flint United States Geological Survey
Katrin Iken
Katrin Iken University of Alaska Fairbanks
Sandra L. Talbot
Sandra L. Talbot United States Geological Survey
Stanley D. Rice
Stanley D. Rice National Marine Fisheries Service

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Aspiring ecologists and evolutionary biologists are no longer limited by campus boundaries. Thanks to advancements in distance learning, students can now access top programs from accredited institutions, including some of the non profit online university options which combine flexibility with academic integrity.

These online pathways are especially valuable for active-duty personnel and veterans, with a growing number of military friendly colleges online providing supportive environments and resources tailored to their unique needs.

If you’re considering interdisciplinary connections, many environmental professionals pursue qualifications like social work master programs online to address social, ecological, and community challenges.

For those interested in the behavioral side of ecology or environmental psychology, exploring online masters in psychology can lead to dynamic roles in research, conservation, and outreach.

Today’s online degrees open up diverse career pathways—from conservation policy and education to research and counseling—enabling students to customize their expertise and impact.

Best Scientists Citing Daniel Esler

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles